Sunday, February 12, 2017
Conservative Fact-based Government vs Progressive Feel Good Opposition
First -- A very Happy Lincoln's Birthday to everyone. • Things aren't looking up for the mainstream media and Progressive Democrats. • • • LATEST POLLS SHOW ANTI-MSM ATTITUDES. An Emerson College poll found last week that 49% of US voters believe the Donald Trump administration is “truthful,” while only 39% feel that way about the news media. And, 53 % of those surveyed describe the media as “untruthful.” The nationwide poll, conducted February 5-6 and released last Tuesday, also show that 48% of registered voters approve of the job that President Trump is doing, as opposed to 47% who disapprove. But, the poll shows a deep partisan divide, noting that 89% of Republicans approve of the job President Trump's doing, while 81% of Democrats disapprove. According to the poll, Trump’s “failure to pass the 50% threshold” for approval is due to his 52% disapproval rating among independents. And, 89% of Republicans call the Trump administration truthful, while 77% of Democrats
find it untruthful. And, 69% of Democrats find the news media truthful (which is "quite low" according to the survey, considering the
news media's almost overwhelming leftward tilt), while 91% of Republicans consider them untruthful. Again, independents are split
-- 42% call the Trump administration untruthful and 45% say the news media is truthful. Conclusion?? America doesn't trust the mainstream media but the GOP - Prog-Dem divide is wide. We wonder if the MSM will try to improve its image with the "deplorables" or if it will double down on the Prog-Dem la-la land. • • • FACT VS FEELING. One thing that separates Prog-Dems from Deplorables is their approach to fact vs feeling. Deplorables, i.e., traditional Americans, are often guided by "common sense." But, since World War II, universities, and their growing influence on American education, have sold the notion that "facts" are too complicated, too technical, too sophisticated for ordinary Americans to grasp, and so the intellectual elites have taken to selling feelings -- the conclusions that they say are the "obvious" result of their ivory-tower analyses. It is no longer required or acceptable for ordinary citizens or their children to delve into the facts on any topic or issue. It is far safer, and more politically correct, according the the intellectual elites, to take their word for what the facts are and to accept their interpretationn of facts. This has led to education, from K-1 to PhD, being full of feel-good banalities that ill-prepare Americans to either think for themselves or to be the informed citizens the Founders anticipated when they drafted the Constitution. This pervasive 'Feel Good' approach to education has come home to roost -- universities are replete with students who equate Republicans with racism, who see climate change not as a scientific possibility but as a creed, and who support Black Lives Matter's professionally-led rioting and agree with its position that Israel is the demon of the Middle East. These children-students-citizens are neither prepared to discuss nor to analyze nor to vote on any of the weighty matters facing America. But, they do vote and their Feel-Good rejection of factual analysis
-- taught to them and to many of their parents by the Progressive intellectual elites -- will, if not countered by a return to fact-based
education, lead them to destory the Republic. • The most glaring example of this Good Feeling educaiton is the use by young Prog-Dems and their elders of the word "fascist." Indeed, American Prog-Dems call all their foes “fascist." It was George Orwell, in his 1946 essay, “Politics and the English Language,” who said that “the word fascism now has no meaning except in so far as it signifies ‘something not desirable.’” Google now defines "fascism" as a right-wing political belief. If today’s Left, and especially American Prog-Dems, do not like someone -- George W. Bush or Donald Trump -- or something -- the Republican Party or conservatism -- they mindlessly tar that person or thing with the epither 'fascist,' and hope others will know that the tarred individual or entity is "deplorable." It is an example of the sloppy thinking that plagues our public dialogue, just as the other F-word plagues our "culture," turning films, popular music, TV and literature into a vocabulary-poor attempt to express social thought without having the knowledge that a fact-based education provides. • Words are ideas, and like ideas, they have consequences. The great American conservative philosopher George Santayana -- who after de Tocqueville is regarded as the most insightful observer and defender of American individualism -- said that historical ignorance has serious consequences. The failure to be armed with the full range of ideas, and the words that represent them, debases civil discourse, turning it into the hurling of single-syllable epithets at the opposition. You cannot have a civil conversation, let alone a serious social or political debate – all of which are essential to republican government – with those who rely solely on Feel Good claims that reveal only their ignorance of the facts. • • • THE
TRUMP EDUCATION REVOLUTION. One of the most profound benefits of having elected President Trump is his determined effort to roll back these feeling-based socialist ideas about what the American constitutional Republic should be and replacing them with fact-based ideas for renewing the American Republic. "Make America Great Again" is not just a jingoist campaign motto; it is a call to replace all the Feel Good fuzziness that has degraded American culture and politics with ideas informed by educated Americans. Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos is seen as dangerous by the Prog-Dem Left because she has actually promised to educate American children. That is the greatest legacy Donald Trump can bequeathe to America. • TRUMP'S TERRORIST REVOLUTION. Another Trump revolution that is being fought tooth and nail by the Prog-Dem Left is islamic terrorism. Feel Good politics makes the description of terrorists as "islamic" anathema because they believe all religion
everywhere is protected by the First Amendment. That is a vastly too broad statement about the First Amendment, and what the Prog-Dem opposition to Trump's EO is trying to do is reject his fact-based assertion that terrorists are entering the US to do harm to Americans wiht their Feel Good religion argument. Trump's Department of Justice was amiss not to anwser the 9th Circuit assertion during the oral argument that the President's immigration EO was not based on facts. Presumably, when the case shifts back ot the Seattle district court, that omission will be corrected because there are facts aplenty. The 2017 terrorism forecast for the United States and the rate at which Americans are being radicalized at home is “alarming,” according to a monthly assessment by the House Homeland Security Committee. Citing an “unprecedented spike in the homegrown terror threat, primarily driven by the rise of the Islamic State (ISIS/ISIL)," the House committee’s Terror Threat Snapshot for February warns that, “at this rate, the forecast for 2017 looks alarming.” The House Committee report states : "Authorities continue to track a high number of homegrown terror plots in the United States, and the number of cases since 9/11 is nearing a historic milestone : There have been nearly 200 total homegrown jihadist cases in the United States since 9/11 (the figure currently stands at 193), a majority having
taken place in just the past few years." The monthly assessment says the alarming rise in the terror threat is caused by the pressure ISIS is facing “in its key safe havens,” noting that the jihadist organization’s “external operations plotting appears undiminished.” The report cites 39 homegrown jihadist plots or attacks across 19 US states since the beginning of 2016. In July 2016, FBI Director James Comey predicted that, as ISIS came closer to defeat in its home areas of Iraq and Syria, the number of terrorist attacks against the US and other Western countries would increase. Michael McCaul, chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee, agrees with Comey, saying in a statement : "I am very encouraged that the Trump Administration is preparing to put greater pressure on jihadists in their safe havens throughout the world. But as they do, we can expect to see militants returning to the West to build new networks and to plot more deadly operations. I look forward to working with the new Administration on shutting down terror pathways in America. We must also remain vigilant here at home, because Americans are being radicalized at an alarming rate." • The Terror Threat Snapshot report notes that the jihadist threat against Europe has also
increased dramatically : “European nations are moving forward with counterterrorism reforms designed to cope with the surging terror threat. Yet despite improvements, the continent still suffers from major security weaknesses that make European countries more vulnerable to attack and put US interests overseas at risk.” The report states that since 2014, there have been 166 reported ISIS-linked plots or attacks against Western targets, including 69 in Europe, 36 in the US, and 61 targeting Westerners outside those two regions. • There is solid fact-based reason for President Trump to issue his EO on immigration, but the dangerous Feel Good Left is hoping to repudiate Trump's EO by a deliberate attack on the facts. • • • DEAR READERS, in another fact-based action, even before the 9th Circuit refused to allow Trump's immigration EO go forward, there was a congressional move to break up the 9th Circuit. Fox News reports that Republican Senators Jeff Flake and John McCain of Arizona introduced legislation in January to carve six states out of the San Francisco-based 9th Circuit and create a brand new 12th Circuit. The Senators argue that the 9th Circuit is too big, too liberal and too slow resolving cases. If they succeed, only California, Oregon, Hawaii and two island districts would remain within the 9th Circuit’s judicial reach. Right now, Flake said, the Circuit is far too sprawling : “It
represents 20% of the population -- and 40% of the land mass is in that jurisdiction. It’s just too big. We have a bedrock principle
of swift justice and if you live in Arizona or anywhere in the 9th Circuit, you just don’t have it....The problem is the judges in the 9th
Circuit, particularly the liberal judges, don’t want to give up any of their jurisdiction.” Flake noted that it typically takes the court 15
months to hand down a decision : “It’s far too long." And, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals has a reputation as one of the most liberal in the country, in large part because of its makeup. Eighteen of the court’s 25 active judges were appointed by Democrats. Former President George W. Bush appointed six justices, while former President Barack Obama appointed seven. The Daily Caller reports : “Eight of out of 10 cases from the 9th Circuit reviewed by the Supreme Court are overruled, according to a 2010 analysis published by the American Bar Association....In just about any other field, a 20% success rate would be unacceptable." But, the out-of-step, ignore-the-law 9th Circuit decisions make its Prog-Dem forum shoppers Feel Good -- until the Supreme Court steps in with legal fact-based decisions. • Senator Ted Cruz talked to Newsmax TV last week about Senate Democrats : "I mean, they are right now filled with rage and fury -- and they're in a state of denial over the election. They're really angry at the voters. They're angry at the American people for voting for a Republican president, a Republican Senate, a Republican House -- and they're lashing out." Senator Cruz mentioned another Feel Good word used by Prog-Dems to rally their followers -- "racist." Cruz said : "Unfortunately, Democrats -- when they get desperate -- their most-often recourse is just to throw around accusations of
racism." • Fascists -- Racists -- Deplorables. A little education would go a long way to neutralizing the power these epithets exert
when hurled at Republicans and conservatives by under-educated, brainwashed Americans. It may seem too simple to suggest sorting out the political and social turmoil in today's United States by separating Fact from Feeling, but if we try to focus on issues and media reports as either "fact-based" or "feel good" -- the result will almost always be to separate the Progressive Democrat no-holds-barred attacks on the rule of law and the Constitution intended to make their followers "Feel Good" from the conservative Republican position that political and all other social dialogue and decisions must be "fact-based" and in support of the Constitution. Education is the key. Never trust your children to any education system without standing guard on its curriculum, its objectives, its motives and its political agenda. As Santayana said : " A child educated only at school is an uneducated child." It could be that education will finally save the Republic.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
ReplyDeleteWhat is conservatism? It is a derivative term: it refers to something outside itself. We cannot conserve the present or the future, and the past being full of contradiction, we cannot conserve it entire. In the past one finds heroism and villainy; justice and injustice; freedom and slavery. Things in the past are like things in the present: they must be judged. Conservative people know this if they have any sense.
What then makes them conservative? It is the additional knowledge that things that have had a good reputation for a long time are more trustworthy than new things. This is especially true of original things. The very term principle refers to something that comes first; to change the principle of a thing is to change it into something else. Without the principle, the thing is lost.
If American conservatism means anything, then, it means the things found at the beginning of America, when it became a nation. The classics teach us that forming political bonds is natural to people, written in their nature, stemming from the divine gift they have of speech and reason. This means in turn that the Declaration of Independence, where the final causes of our nation are stated, and the Constitution of the United States, where the form of government is established, are the original things. These documents were written by people who were friends and who understood the documents to pursue the same ends. Taken together they are the longest surviving things of their kind, and under their domain our country spread across a continent and became the strongest nation on earth, the bastion of freedom. These documents do not appeal to all conservatives, but I argue that they should, both for their age and for their worthiness.
It follows then that if Donald Trump helps to conserve these things, he is a conservative in the sense that matters most to the republic of the Americans. Will he?
A survey shows that today more Americans are renouncing their citizenships than at any time since the Civil War period of 1860's.
DeleteWhy, what has changed? Suddenly citizenship in the United States is not the prize once sought after. My Grandfather prized his American citizenship.
What has changed is the over regulation of our daily lives by a government that has grown far too large and much too powerful. This government today functions without much concern to the the daily lives of Main Street, USA.
Via Thomas Jefferson being an elected official was never intended to be a full time profession. Nor was it ever meant to be a full time job. Jefferson saw the job of elected officials as service to the people and the country requiring meeting perhaps every other year for a few months.
Today governments the world over dictate, they do not follow citizens wishes.
Jefferson also said on numerous occasions that an uprising of the citizens was good medicine for governments to be aware of the possibility.
ReplyDeleteToday the authority of the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence is in obvious decline for obvious reasons. In the general public they are rejected as obsolete or evil, and this opinion spreads throughout the whole of society , most everywhere in education, journalism, and entertainment. It has spread widely and deeply into the law. As a result our government has swollen beyond recognition, and it is centralized to a degree unimagined in the Constitution.
Laws are made now chiefly by regulatory agencies that combine in themselves all three powers of government. The popular or elected branches may overturn these regulations only when they unite to do so, and this is increasingly rare. So every institution in society is in principle subject to comprehensive regulation.
Every employer, every school, many clubs, and family life itself are now the subject of rules too complex for the lay person to grasp. These rules are not always enforced, nor can they be, but Americans sense that they better be looking over their shoulders, careful of what they say.
Compliance increasingly replaces law-abidingness as the public goal. Laws, the Founders held, must be simple, few, and constant. Then we may all know what they are, live under them, and help to enforce them. This makes us equal, ruler and ruled. It means that we do not quail before the forces of the law. We are the forces of the law.
All Americans alive today have grown up with the federal Leviathan. Consequently, the reduced condition of the states is invisible to most of us. Once glimpsed, the concentration of power in the federal government is obviously in clear violation of the Tenth Amendment: “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”
ReplyDeleteThe Tenth says that the federal government is a very limited government, limited to the (limited) powers granted it by the Constitution. (If the Great Tenth. We are now in a position to ask how well the Founders’ solution is holding up in our time. The question answers itself. We are very far advanced in the process of discarding their brilliant solution.
Today we are deluged with talk of rights: gay rights, transgender rights, civil rights, even constitutional rights, but unalienable rights have gone missing from our day-to-day political conversation. The readily observable fact that we no longer think politically in terms of unalienable rights is a perfect measure of how much we have abandoned the Founders’ vision.
Nothing is cast in stone and everything is changeable ... No it's not all changeable. And the Leviathan monster is alive and well, living in many countries capital cities.