Sunday, October 23, 2016

US Election Day Minus 15 : What You Need to Know

ELECTION DAY MINUS 15 : What you need to know. • • • INDICT HILLARYY ? Most voters say that Hillary Clinton should have been indicted over her mishandling of classified information when she was Secretary of State. The Rasmussen Reports poll that showed Trump leading Clinton by 43% to 41% also found that 53% of American voters think "The FBI should have sought a criminal indictment." Voters who think "The FBI made the right decision not to seek one : 39%." Half (49%) believe that Clinton’s issues with classified information are an important factor in whom they choose for President. • • • STATE SECRETS. American voters are right. Hillary used her position to violate the Espionage Act, to obstruct justice, to undermine and lie to Congress, the FBI and the Justice Department. She clearly gave secrets to the enemy. AND on Wednesday during a debat televised around the world, Hillary said this : "There's about four minutes between the order being given, and the people responsible for launching nuclear weapons to do so." THAT'S RIGHT -- Hillary revealed to the world how long it takes from the time the President orders the launching of a nuclear missile to the time it is launched." Fox News concluded that "our enemies in Russia, our enemies in China are all meeting trying to formulate potential responses to this." Is Hillary so stupid that she doesn't understand the importance of classified information or is she deliberately broadcasting it to America's enemies? Either way, she is unfit to be President, and when, during the debate, she charged that Donald Trump should not "have his finger on the nuclear button," it was laughable. During World War II, the catch phrase was "Loose lips sink ships." Hillary has the loosest lips in America. • • • ISLAMIC CONTRIBUTIONS. Hillary Clinton heads a Top 10 "Islamic Money in Politics" list of campaign contributions for 2015-16, the Middle East Forum announced last week. Clinton took in $41,165, including $19,249 from senior officials of the recent terrorist-list Moslem advocacy group, Council on American-Islamic Relations, the forum reported. Green Party nominee Jill Stein, who accepted a $250 contribution, is the only other active 2016 presidential candidate on the list. All the rest of the Top Ten recipients were Democrats. Former Democratic presidential candidate Senator Bernie Sanders accepted $9,285, the fourth most among the top 10. The report shows : Clinton, $41,165 / Rep. Keith Ellison, D-Minn., $17,370 / Rep. Andre Carson, D-Ind., $13,225 / Senator Bernie Sanders, $9,285 / Pramila Jayapal, a Democratic candidate for a House seat from Washington, $6,957 / Former Rep. Chaka Fattah, D-Pa., $3,500 / Dwight Evan, a Democratic candidate for a House seat from Pennsylvania, $3,500 / Rep. Donna Fern Edwards, D-Maryland, $2,900 / Democratic Rep. Gerald Connolly, D-Va., $2,850 / Rep. L. Tammy Duckworth, D-Ill., $2,835. • • • THE SECOND AMENDMENT. In last Wednesday's Las Vegas debate moderator Chris Wallace started it off by asking Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton about the Second Amendment. Hillary was asked about her claim: "the Supreme Court is wrong on the Second Amendment.” The 2008 Heller decision struck down a Washington, DC, complete ban on andguns. Before the Heller decision, people in the District could own a rifle or a shotgun, BUT it was a felony to load the gun. This amounted to a complete ban on guns, and the Supreme Court said that Washington went too far. But, on Wednesday night, Clinton suggested that Wallace had misunderstood her statement. She explained: "I support the Second Amendment...I disagreed with the way the court applied the Second Amendment in that case because what the District of Columbia was trying to do was to protect toddlers from guns. And so they wanted people with guns to safely store them." • • • THAT IS NOT WHAT THE SUPREME COURT SAID IN HELLER. The Supreme Court did nothing at all to stop safe-storage laws. The Heller decision couldn’t have been clearer : "Nor, correspondingly, does our analysis suggest the invalidity of laws regulating the storage of firearms to prevent accidents.” If the ruling has contributed to the problem that Clinton describes, one would think that there would have been a lot of accidental gun deaths involving toddlers. But there doesn’t appear to have been a single accidental gun death of any kind in the District, let alone for toddlers, during the eight years since the Heller decision was announced. • • • THE SUPREME COURT HAS ONLY STRUCK DOWN complete bans on guns. Pay attention : If Clinton’s judicial appointments vote to overturn Heller, governments will again be able to ban guns. And this is a real possibility. Heller can be overturned with just one more appointment to the Court. With one Hillary appointment to the Supreme Court, the District of Columbia and some cities will quickly move to ban guns. California has already banned over 12,000 models of handguns since 2001, with only a dozen that can still be sold in the state, and even those are likely banned within a few years. • • • THE NO-FLY LIST & GUN OWNERSHIP. During the last debate, Clinton also said : “If you are too dangerous to fly, you are too dangerous to buy a gun.” Such a law wouldn’t have prevented a single one of the mass public shootings that have occurred in the United States. And the ban would do nothing to stop terrorism. About 40% of the people on the “No Fly” watch list are considered to be under “reasonable suspicion” even though they have absolutely “no affiliation with known terrorist groups.” As of 2014, about 50,000 people were on the No Fly list. This is a ten-fold increase since Barack Obama became President. Between February 2004 and December 2014, over 2,000 people on the list purchased guns. Yet, not one of these people has been identified as using a gun in a crime. The debate isn’t over about whether dangerous people should be able to buy guns. What Hillary wants to do is permit the federal bureaucracy, without any oversight, to put someone’s name on a list. Clinton and other Democrats don’t believe that the Department of Justice should have to make its case to a judge. They don’t believe in requiring reasonable evidence that the person is a danger. And so far, Obama has not provided any way for an American to defend him (or her) self prior to being put on the No Fly list. Republicans, including Trump, believe that some evidence has to be provided. Hillary Clinton won’t honestly tell American’s what she intends to do if she becomes President, because she knows that most Americans support the Second Amendment and gun ownership. • • • HILLARY'S STAFF & CATHOLICS. New York City's Cardinal Timothy Dolan said that Hillary Clinton should disavow negative comments made by campaign staffers that were disclosed in emails hacked by WikiLeaks. Dolan said : "They are extraordinarily patronizing and insulting to Catholics. If it had been said about the Jewish community, the Islamic community, within 10 minutes there would have been an apology and a complete distancing from those remarks, which hasn't happened yet," Dolan told the ABC News affiliate in new York. • • • RIGGED POLLING RESULTS. The Americna Thinker says : "The "unskewed polls" fiasco of 2012 will live in infamy for many years until usurped by an even bigger failed prediction. Unfortunately for conservatives, the mainstream media didn't miss a beat in weaponizing polls in favor of Hillary Clinton during the current campaign, leaving many of us demoralized and in search of answers. The pollsters are skilled at shorting certain samples (independents), adding others (Democrats), and then creating a unique top line (title) that misrepresents the data included in the poll itself. This is done in such a bold manner that it's almost as if the polling companies are daring us to start the next polling conspiracy. Depending where you get your news, you may not have heard the term "political pendulum" this year -- because It's convenient in this year's narrative to ignore the fact that three straight incumbent party [presidential] terms are rare and haven't occurred since the GOP won three elections in the eighties....Ohio is still the barometer for success, just as it was four years ago. If Trump can carry the Buckeye State, he stands a good chance to also carry Pennsylvania and Michigan," which are full of blue-collar voters who have been sidetracked by the economic woes of the past two decades. I encourage people to understand the purpose of polling. It is to influence thought; depress turnout; or, at its worst, to justify fraud or theft. The American Thinker advises : "Don't try to generate the actual numbers, but look at your map and statistics. A right-tilting Ohio does not historically correlate with a left-tilting Florida and North Carolina in a right-swinging election against a scandal-ridden establishment candidate who lacks youth support and will never gain the same volume of minority support as the man she is seeking to replace. The media is playing us for fools." • • • THE US ECONOMY. Donald Trump WILL make our economy great again. When Barack Obama leaves office, the national debt will be $20 trillion, over 60% of Americans will have less than $1,000 in a savings account, the US will have sunk to 19th in the world when it comes to median wealth per adult, and over 46 million Americans will be on food stamps. Hillary Clinton and bureaucrats on the Progressive left believe more government intervention and more market restraints will solve the problem. Meanwhile, most of those on the right believe all will be made right economically if you just cut a few taxes, provide a subsidy here and there, and create a few jobs. Neither is right, BUT, luckily we actually have a businessman running for President. Donald Trump understands the free market better, perhaps, than any candidate who has ever run for President. Hillary Clinton isn't even in the same league, let alone the same ballpark. As a successful businessman, not a political hack, Trump knows that it is production that actually matters, and that not all jobs are created equal. It is not just about creating jobs or making a backroom deal in Congress to keep a factory open in your congressional district -- as the Democrats always do and Hillary proposes to continue as her 'economic policy.' It is about keeping government from tampering with the free market, while instead using the government to create and maintain a regulatory and tax environment in which private job-creators can prosper. It also means renegotiating our horrible trade deals. As Trump hammers home every day -- “Free Trade” must be smart trade, it most coincide with a tax system that allows American companies to have a level playing field with China, Japan and Mexico. Trump’s tax plan will allow manufacturers to compete with other countries, keep these jobs from going overseas, and keep small to medium to very large businesses from collapsing and going out of business. By significantly reducing business taxes and rewarding companies that hire in America, we will transform the US into what it once was -- the job magnet of the world. Trump will keep America from being 'ripped off.' In Contrast, Hillary’s trade deals would gut the US middle class -- continuing the pattern that her husband Bill started with NAFTA. Trump also challenges the Republican establishment's notion that we should keep blowing up our deficit by launching undeclared wars and protecting oil rich nations that make puny contributions to their own safety and survival. He will use our military as a last resort and tell wealthy countries to pay their fair share. Trump will carry out his promise to keep American taxpayers from being the world's door mat. Removing the chains from the free market will allow us to ensure that everyone who wants to work and 'get ahead' has the chance to do so. Under a President Trump, it will truly be American first. ~~~~~~ And that, dear readers, is what you need to know 15 days before the monumentally important November 8 US presidential election.

3 comments:

  1. All so very true but an important factor I believe is in knowing what you want, need, or don't want, and wish your Fereral bureaucracy would stop.

    It's your life that is in the balance. It's what you leave for your children. It's what your whole generation will be remembered for doing or not doing.

    We must as individuals exercise our vote intelligently, not as if it is a letter to Santa Clause with what toys we want.

    You hold in your hands the ability to pass on what was passed to you. Or you can pass along nothing, nothing if any value anyhow.

    The ball is in your court.

    ReplyDelete
  2. My experience in decision-making has shown that patterns are tough to break. In the military we study an opponent looking for gaps, flaws, or weaknesses that can be exploited. Successful leaders at all levels in all disciplines conduct this kind of analysis.

    It is quite clear, using that kind of analysis, that Hillary Clinton can best be described as an architect of failure when it comes to national security and international relations. The potential consequences of her flawed decision-making would be destructive to the nation if she were commander in chief.

    Time after time after time, Clinton's performance on national security has led to failure. National security and foreign affairs are not Clinton's strong suits. Using predictive analysis, the trend line is clear: she will continue to talk large, play small and fail.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Trump has suggested that perhaps NATO is no longer needed, or at least not in its present form. (If he had only stopped his thought at the halfway mark, it would have been a flawless statement.) Other heresies Trump has advanced include striking a deal with Vladimir Putin for their two nations to buddy up and eliminate ISIS together, an idea the Russians have long advocated. Overstepping the common narrative even further, Trump wondered aloud if the crisis in Ukraine wasn’t really Europe’s problem to solve, and whether Russia’s annexation-by-referendum of Crimea shouldn’t be accepted as the will of the people of Crimea.

    If the New World Order crowd is to succeed in propelling their fully paid-for agents, Hillary Clinton, into the White House come this November, it is vital that they keep any serious discussion of U.S. foreign policy out of the campaign chatter. Twenty-five years is a long time to get back to where you started, but two-and-a-half decades after the collapse of the Soviet Union, it is the United States, not the Russian Federation that has succeeded in restoring the threat of nuclear annihilation to the global conversation.

    And if Trump is successful in his quest for the U.S. presidency, I hope someone will whisper in his ear a piece of advice from that most remarkable of German chancellors, Otto von Bismarck: “The secret of politics? Make a good treaty with Russia.”

    After all, and to borrow a thought from the Donald, what have we got to lose?

    ReplyDelete