Tuesday, October 4, 2016

Facts for the War to Save America and the VP Debate Tonight

As we await the vice presidential debate this evening, here are some more facts in the War to Save America. ~~~~~~ Julian Assange's Berlin video conference left millions of people dismayed and wondering what's going on at WikiLeaks. Associated Press reported that Assange promised "significant" disclosures on subjects including the US election and Google in the coming weeks as WikiLeaks marked its 10th anniversary on Tuesday. Assange said WikiLeaks plans to start publishing new material starting this week. Speaking by video link to an anniversary news conference in Berlin, he said the leaks will include "significant material" on war, arms, oil, internet giant Google, the US election and mass surveillance. As Newsmax put it : "Despite widespread speculation he would reveal game-changing information on Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, Assange's 3 a.m. ET appearance featured no new revelations, although he did promise to publish information regarding the presidential election “every week for the next 10 weeks.” WikiLeaks, which released Democratic National Committee emails days before the party's national convention earlier this year, wouldn't say who or what campaign would be affected by the upcoming US election leaks. Assange said speculation that he or WikiLeaks intend to harm Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton is "false" -- and some analysts are asking if Assange has become a Hillary ally. Asked whether he feels any personal affinity with Clinton's Republican rival, Donald Trump, Assange replied: "I feel personal affinity really, I think, with all human beings. I certainly feel sorry for Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump.These are two people that are tormented by their ambitions in different ways." ~~~~~~ So far, Interim Democratic National Committee Chair Donna Brazile has not resorted to her September fear-mongering over what she had called "potential malware risk" for anyone downloading hacked DNC documents to personal computers. The alleged malware invasion never materialized, but the revelations about DNC favoritism toward Hillary Clinton led to the resignation of Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz during the Democrat National Convention -- Donna Brazile would love to prevent a second episode of downloads that could torpedo Hillary's candidacy. ~~~~~~ Maybe the torpedo will be fired not by Julian Assange but by Bill Clinton. Slick Willy 'gets it' that the public is fed up with the skyrocketing costs, unsupportable deductibles, and disappearing insurance providers of Obamacare, and he wants to save Hillary from going down with the Obama 'legacy' legislation. So Bill threw Obamacare under the bus on Monday during a Michigan campaign appearance. Bill Clinton called Obamacare a “crazy system [that] doesn’t make any sense. It doesn’t many any sense. The insurance model doesn’t work here.” Clinton was referring to the government-run marketplaces Obamacare created. Bill Clinton said Obamacare “works fine” for people with “modest” incomes or who are eligible for government subsidies, or Medicare : "but the people that are getting killed in this deal are small business people and individuals who make just a little too much to get any of these subsidies.” Bill Clinton, deeply distrusted by Barack Obama, has not lost his political touch, and is forcing Obama to be quiet about his Obamacare disaster or risk electing Donald Trump, who says he will "repeal and replace" it. The real Obama 'legacy' -- fair trade debacles for American workers' jobs, massive immigration and indiscriminate voter registration with no citizenship queries [the recent Washington state shooter had voted five times and he isn't even a citizen] -- has been cited by Trump, who says Obama's ruinous legacy will be pushed to greater heights by Hillary Clinton. This has made Trump a real challenge to the Democrats in Michigan. Bill Clinton, by expressing sympathy for “the people out there busting it,” and by criticizing the unpopular Obamacare, hopes to help his wife with lower-middle class Michigan voters. But Slick Willy is also courting the farthest left Progressive Democrats, who see Obamacare as a stop along the road to a system that provides “free” insurance for everyone -- the single payer system. As American Thinker's Thomas Lipson put it : "By saying loud and clear what President Obama clearly can’t say now and what Hillary must not quite say, the former President seems to be preparing the battlefield for a push by the next Clinton administration to replace Obamacare with single payer. If the insurance companies are ruined by Obamacare, that might help the push. The obvious response to the manipulations here is to ask, "Why would we trust the people who foisted a 'crazy' system on us to run health care?" ~~~~~~ AND, why oh why would we entrust the American police enforcement system to any of the Obama crew??? American Thinker's Catharine Evans described on Tuesday an episode in which "the Soros-funded, Obama-backed Black Lives Matter movement has just chalked up another white victim, this time in Alabama. Seventeen-year-old Brian Ogle is fighting for his life after he dared to post 'Blue Lives Matter' on his Facebook page. The Sylacauga High School teen was attacked by multiple suspects on Friday evening at an abandoned parking lot. He is listed in critical condition after being transported by helicopter to University of Alabama Birmingham Hospital with bleeding on the brain and three skull fractures. Ogle's mother, Brandi Allen, called it a 'hate crime' and said he was targeted for posting pro-police comments on Facebook after students at his high school wore BLM t-shirts to school last week. Local police agreed that racial tensions at the school may have contributed to the assault." It will be interesting to see how the mainsteam media handles this story -- we can be sure there will be no 24/7 CNN team outside the hospital as there would be if teenager Ogle were black and a policeman had shot him. Evans says that "Soros, BeyoncĂ©, Obama, Ayers, and any other supporters and funders of the Black Lives Matter terrorist group need to be held accountable. All of them are responsible for inciting the attempted murder of Ogle and so many other victims of these hate crimes." It is far more likely that Obama will label the terrorist acts of these far-left criminal hoodlums called BLM as "an expression of their First Amendment rights." His Department of Justice will be quiet -- because Attorney General Loretta Lynch only investigates police officers who shoot a black person with a long rap sheet. Lynch has in the past by her tone and words encouraged BLM-inspired thugs to loot, riot, and beat up white people. ~~~~~~ Concerning the Obama administration attacks on police for their alleged racism and use of excessive force, a federal judge has just dismissed a $41.5 million lawsuit that Ferguson protesters filed against police, the city and the county, alleging that police used excessive force against them during the Ferguson rioting after a white police officer shot an unarmed black teenager in August 2014. In a 74-page decision, Judge Henry Autrey ruled that plaintiffs “have completely failed to present any credible evidence” that any actions by police “were taken with malice or were committed in bad faith” during protests in the wake of the death of 18-year-old Michael Brown in Ferguson. Brown was killed by Officer Darren Wilson. A grand jury declined to indict Wilson in Brown’s death. Autrey wrote that police gave numerous orders for the protesters to disperse : “At the time of the events detailed herein, the atmosphere surrounding the arrests was extremely intense and had turned violent. Participants in what had turned from a peaceful assembly to unlawful assembly were advised to disperse. Numerous warnings had been announced to the crowds to do so.” Autrey also ruled that individual police officers who were defendants are subject to immunity in the case. The judge wrote that the plaintiffs presented scant evidence to back up their claims. Autrey recounted the stories of a number of protesters, including a woman who said she was thrown to the ground and her son arrested inside a McDonald’s. Autrey wrote that she was arrested a block away. Plaintiffs have appealed the ruling. A plaintiff attorney said many of those arrested were on the periphery of the protests and were detained for no good reason : “Bringing Missouri in line with the part of the country that believes that the rights of the individual have meaning is going to be a difficult fight.” We can read that as a call for more money from Soros to continue to fund the BLM effort to destroy US police forces. Remember that the Justice Department issued a scathing report against the Ferguson Police Department in 2015. Even if Brown’s death was not racially motivated, the report found, the department used racially discriminatory tactics and officers sent racist jokes over department email. From 2012 to 2014, the report found, African Americans made up 93% of the department’s arrests but constituted 63% of the city’s population. So, once again, a federal court judge has saved police from the clutches of BLM and Obama's desire to churn up racial hatred in the US for his Soros-funded Progressive political purposes. This is a major reason why electing Trump is so important -- a President Hillary would continue to fill federal judgeships and the Supreme Court with those who favor the Obama anti-American law enforcement agenda. ~~~~~~ In what could mirror the 2102 Lois Lerner IRS harassment of conservative tea party groups, rumors are circulating in online media about whether the IRS leaked Trump's tax returns to Hillary Clinton before last Monday's debate. Hillary focused on Trump’s failure to release his tax returns, surmising that the reason might be he hasn’t been paying any taxes, just days before the New York Times printed pages from his 1995 return showing a loss that “may have” allowed him to not pay taxes for the next 18 years. Did Hillary have prior warning that Trump’s documents would be leaked and that the story would break within days of the debate? We can only guess for now that someone at the IRS leaked the documents, but when you consider the 2012 targeting of Tea Party and other conservative groups by the IRS for the purpose of re-electing Obama, it is possible to surmise that the politicized IRS might act in a similar way for Obama’s successor. Investor’s Business Daily has noted that Hillary Clinton's missing and deleted emails from her private server are similar to the crashed hard drives of Lois Lerner, who masterminded the Tea Party targeting by the IRS in 2012 : "Clinton, under this administration, will likely not fear or face any criminal prosecution for violating the Federal Records Act and doing her official business on that personal server now deliberately wiped clean of records she knew were under subpoena and the subject of Freedom of Information Act lawsuits. But then, Lois Lerner, poster child for hard-drive crashes and missing emails, won't face charges for contempt of Congress either. After pleading her innocence at that 2013 hearing, Lerner went on to invoke her Fifth Amendment right to remain silent. Both Hillary Clinton and Lois Lerner used their political positions for their personal and political agendas. Both “lost” or destroyed the emails that would have proven their crimes. Lerner targeted the Tea Party. Hillary targets Donald Trump. Both benefit from acts that violated the laws. The New York Times says someone sent the documents to a reporter so they have no criminal liability....IRS Chief and Lois Lerner’s boss, John Koskinen, has been the target of a move to impeach him for his role in covering up Lerner’s crimes, his obstruction of Congress, and outright lying to Congress. He is the [model] for political hacks and it is not beyond the realm of possibility that on his watch employees of a politicized agency that has the power to tax and therefore the proverbial power to destroy leaked Trump’s 1995 return for the political purpose of helping Hillary Clinton. After all, a Trump Department of Justice would not hesitate to prosecute both." We have to admit that it is hard to argue with IBD's logic. ~~~~~~ What does a person do when untruthfully accused of suggesting the murder of another person? Deny it??? Absolutely!!! So, one would think that Hillary & Hacks would immediately deny the allegations made by Assange and revealed in third-party emails that Hillary actually suggested droning Assange to get rid of him. But, TheHill's Lisa Hagen reported Monday that Hillary Clinton campaign manager Robby Mook declined to comment about an alleged remark by Hillary, asking if a drone strike could go after WikiLeaks founder Assange. According to Hagen : "WTTG Fox 5 DC reporter Ronica Cleary published a video clip of her interview with Mook on Monday. In it, she asked if the report was true and if the comment was made in jest. Many reporters online have questioned TruePundit, the source of the original report and New York Magazine published a post Monday night which it said explained the 'viral rumor that Hillary Clinton wanted to drone-strike Julian Assange.' But, Hagen reported that Hillary campaign manager Mook told Cleary : "I'm reticent to comment on anything that the WikiLeaks people have said. They've made a lot of accusations in the past." WikiLeaks tweeted a Washington Examiner report about the video on Monday and on Sunday posted a screengrab from a TruePundit report that said Clinton once asked during a State Department briefing, "Can't we just drone this guy?" Mook shifted the attention to Donald Trump in his interview with Cleary, claiming the GOP presidential nominee and his allies are using Clinton’s alleged comment as a distraction : “Donald Trump and his allies are trying to do everything they can to change the debate here right now." But, we haven't heard Trump suggesting to 'drone' someone to silence them, have we. ~~~~~~ So, dear readers, here are today's facts for the War to Save America. When we watch the vice presidential debate tonight, we should listen for GOP VP candidate Mike Pence to make these and many other conservative GOP points as he fights the Progressive VP candidate Tim Kaine -- the Virginia Governor chosen by Hillary with only one end in view, to win the important state of Virginia's electoral votes for herself. (Can anyone actually imagine a President Kaine -- yet it is a likelihood if rumors about Hillary's health are even partly correct.) Indiana Governor Mike Pence has been seriously preparing for the debate showdown. Since joining Trump's ticket in July, Pence has often been tasked with calming the nerves of conservatives who worry about Trump's sometimes-fluctuating political ideology. Matt Schlapp, chairman of the American Conservative Union recently wrote : "There's Pence speak and there's Trump speak -- Mike Pence using the language of conservative orthodoxy and Donald Trump using the language of a brash businessman." Voting Trump is our first obligation. And if you feel that Trump needs help in bolstering his 'right' side, then remember that your vote is for Trump-Pence -- because Mike Pence is the conservative real deal.

2 comments:

  1. I believe clearly that Gov. Pence won the debate last evening.

    He was more precise in his answers, and he was more specific in his charges against what a Clinton administration would be like.

    The purpose of the debate was for Pence to make the conservative wing of the GOP comfortable with supporting and voting for Donald Trump. And he accomplished that.

    Mike Pence spoke of specific programs and actions that he and Donald Trump would initiate to solve some of the problems created by the Obama administration.

    The question of which VP candidate is best suited to be a heartbeat away from being President was answered last night;and answered loud and clear over the frivolous repetitive questions about Donald Trump's Tax returns.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Mike Pence had a strong debate performance against Tim Kaine last night. I think Pence clearly won the debate on style, answering questions in a calm and deliberate manner that sounded less rehearsed than Kaine’s rat-tat-tat delivery.

    It was clear almost from the outset what Kaine’s game plan was. He spent the entire debate demanding Mike Pence defend Donald Trump’s comments on topics including statements about women, immigrants, Vladmir Putin, nuclear weapons and abortion. Pence seemed to sidestep those challenges for most of the debate, choosing to stick to his own debate strategy rather than get roped in to playing defense.

    A clear Trump-Pence win.

    ReplyDelete