Hillary's Progressive Enforcers Are Trying to Destroy Donald Trump

Sorry to post Monday's blog so early, but I won't be available later today. ~~ Five weeks tomorrow is Election Day 2016. It is now clear that nobody -- nobody -- in the mainstream media (MSM) is in Trump's corner, and very few Republicans are giving him the support any GOP presidential candidate has the right to expect. We must look to Rudy Giuliani, Chris Christie, Newt Gingrich, Ben Carson and RNC Chair Reince Priebus to carry the load. The millions of Americans who are fervent Trump supporters will have to rely on this gallant band of faithful Republicans to tell them the truth. From now to November 8, we must stand firm as the entire world tries to make us believe that Trump is a racist, sexist idiot who is not worthy of our votes. But, we know that the noise is so loud for two reasons. First, American and Europe have been bought by a very well-financed Progressive elite determined to bring down constitutional democracy and replace it with extreme global one-world socialism, in which people have no rights and the state controls everything from kindergarten restrooms to university dogma passed off as education to citizens' rights to freedom of religion, speech and gun possession to who is born or not born. Any delusions we held about this being a fair and hard fought campaign are long since dead. This is war to save our democratic way of life. Second, despite the billion or so dollars thrown at us and the deafening negative drumbeat, we are holding our own against the hard-left gang of outlaws who have no morals, no sense of fair play, no love of country or Constitution, and no belief that they could be wrong about anything. That we are going toe-to-toe with them has frightened them into using more and more desperate tactics. We must be prepared for the filth that is yet to be hurled at us and at Donald Trump. Think of our opponents as the Enforcers in the gulags -- they may 'break' some of us but they cannot break all of us. That may sound exaggerated. It is not. Here are the latest pitchforks being thrown at us by these devils. ~~~~~~ Donald Trump complained to reporters after last Monday's debate : "They gave me a defective mic. Did you notice that? My mic was defective within the room. I wonder, was that on purpose? Was that on purpose?" Nobody believed him and he was laughed at for being a TV pro who couldn't use his mic properly. TV viewers had no trouble understanding him. Hillary Clinton, enjoying the moment, quipped that "anyone complaining about microphones is not having a good night." BUT, on Friday, the well-respected [I begin to have doubts about this] Commission on Presidential Debates said that in fact, Trump was right : "Regarding the first debate, there were issues regarding Donald Trump's audio that affected the sound level in the debate hall." The Commission posted the comment on its website and did not elaborate. On Friday, speaking at a rally in Michigan, Trump said that the audio problems were more of a challenge than taking on rival Hillary Clinton : “Working that microphone was a hell of a lot more difficult than working crooked Hillary Clinton, that I can tell you. They just anounced....that the microphone in the auditorium, the big room, was defective, and it was difficult. And when you have a situation like that and you know it’s bad and you think you have 100 million people watching, what do you do, stop the show? Please fix it. I wonder why it was bad? Think of it. I wonder why it was bad? It was so bad.” Enforcers at work?? ~~~~~~ American Thinker's contributor Kenneth R. Timmerman wrote after the debate : "There was a popular saying among intelligence officers during the Iran-contra affair: How do you know an Iranian is lying? Because his lips are moving. It was applied to Manucher Ghorbanifar, the mercurial intermediary; and to his boss, the so-called “moderate” Parliament speaker, Akbar Hashemi-Rafsanjani, who told Ghorbanifar he wanted to make a deal with America all the while he helped organize hostage-takings and terrorist attacks against Americans." Timmerman said : "Hillary Clinton’s debate performance reminded me of that saying, because every time she opened her mouth to lay out her opposition research on Donald Trump, she lied or misrepresented the truth to such an extent it became unrecognizable. American voters aren’t quite as stupid as Clinton...thinks, and as a slew of after-event polls showed, they weren’t falling for her lies about Trump, her phony statistics, or her breath-taking claim that life in America’s inner-cities has improved over the past twenty years. Or that her plan to raise taxes on the middle class and businesses will help the middle class and create jobs. They recognized her slick talking points for what they were : carefully crafted attacks, scripted by pollsters and political consultants, aimed at appealing to specific demographics she felt were 'must win' for her flailing and divisive campaign." Hillary played to the “women’s vote” - the "black vote” - the “union vote.” BUT, Trump had the right response : “All of the things she is talking about could have been taken care of in the last ten years when she had power. And if she comes to power, she won’t take care of them. Hillary, she’s got experience, but it’s bad experience....This country can’t afford to have another four years of this bad experience.” ~~~~~~ Because the Progressives want to keep African Americans "on the plantation" built for them by Democrats with a welfare state basket of cradle-to-grave entitlements, the MSM has refused to report accurately about what happened in Charlotte when Black Lives Matter took to the streets to trash the city. Clarice Feldman wrote an article for American Thinker titled, "The Mark of Soros: Charlotte, North Carolina." In it, Feldman says : "The media airbrush the mayhem, if not actually inciting it by biased coverage. They did it in the Trayvon Martin case....In Charlotte they have regularly referred to the thugs as “protestors” and failed to fully publicize how awful their behavior has been. Here are some examples you won’t see on your news programs : Rioters attacked an elderly homeless man and beat a helpless man in parking garage and pulled off and stole his pants to further humiliate him. Reports are in of stealing and looting on a significantly large scale, hijacking cars and trucks and terrifying their occupants, blocking streets and threatening to spread the mayhem outside the city limits. BLM would in a lawful society be subject to criminal racketeering and conspiracy charges, Instead, Attorney General Loretta Lynch defended the demonstrators as people exercising their constitutional rights to peaceful protest to create change. 'We hear your voices and we feel your pain.'....It’s not only the government behind this immiseration of our poorest communities for presumed political advantage, it is the Democratic party’s money bags, billionaire George Soros, who has contributed millions to Hillary and her party, who wants open borders and a recasting of the USA into his insane version of it....There’s a solitary man at the financial center of the Ferguson protest movement. No, it’s not victim Michael Brown or Officer Darren Wilson. It’s not even the Rev. Al Sharpton, despite his ubiquitous campaign on TV and the streets. Rather, it’s liberal billionaire George Soros, who has built a business empire that dominates across the ocean in Europe while forging a political machine powered by nonprofit foundations that impacts American politics and policy, not unlike what he did with MoveOn.org. Mr. Soros spurred the Ferguson protest movement through years of funding and mobilizing groups across the US, according to interviews with key players and financial records reviewed by The Washington Times. In all, Mr. Soros gave at least $33 million in one year to support already-established groups that emboldened the grass-roots, on-the-ground activists in Ferguson, according to the most recent tax filings of his nonprofit Open Society Foundations. The financial tether from Mr. Soros to the activist groups gave rise to a combustible protest movement that transformed a one-day criminal event in Missouri into a 24-hour-a-day national cause celebre. Organizers and protestors were bussed in there as they have been in Charlotte -- where police say 70% of the people arrested were from out of state." BUT, when Trump calls for "law and order," the MSM labels him racist and says his remarks disqualify him from being President. Why? The truth is that Trump has vowed to help African Americans get off of the 'plantation' Democrats and Progressives have built for them, so that they can become proud, self-sufficient Americans. ~~~~~~ Emails released this week under Freedom of Information Act requests that had to be turned into lawsuits to get action, show that President Obama, who had asserted he first learned of her illegal use of a private unsecured email server in the newspapers, had himself sent her mail on her illegal server using a pseudonym. Newsmax reported on September 23 that President Obama used a fake name and address while communicating with Hillary Clinton via email when she was Secretary of State, according to FBI documents. The Hill reported that the latest document dump by the FBI contains notes from the FBI's interview with longtime Clinton aide Huma Abedin. According to TheHill : "She was asked about a particular email from an address that 'is believed to be a pseudonym used by the President.' Abedin claimed she did not recognize the name in question and 'expressed her amazement' that the President used the tactic to hide who he was. 'How is this not classified?' Abedin reportedly asked the agents during the interview. Abedin also requested a copy of the email that was discussed. She noted that Clinton aides spoke with White House personnel when Clinton changed her email address because she wanted to be able to stay in touch with Obama via email." BUT, Trump several months ago said the Hillary email scandal went as far as the White House. He was right. For Obama and Clinton, national security and the rule of law are unimportant. And Obama's DOJ and FBI got the message. They granted immunity to five of Hillary’s closest aides. We have a government which is suppressing opposition by every means possible -- including misusing supposedly neutral agencies like the IRS, FBI, and DOJ. ~~~~~~ Concerning the immunity granted to top Hillary Clinton chief of staff Cheryl Mills, House Oversight Sommittee Chairman Jason Chaffetz said : "This is beyond explanation. The FBI was handing out immunity agreements like candy. I've lost confidence in this investigation and I question the genuine effort in which it was carried out.” The arrangements detailed by Chaffetz to the AP bring the total number of publicly known immunity deals in the Clinton case to five. Chaffetz said : “No wonder they couldn't prosecute a case.” He said Mills gave federal investigators access to her laptop on the condition that findings couldn't be used against her. Chaffetz said two others granted immunity were John Bentel, then-director of the State Department's Office of Information Resources Management, and Clinton aide Heather Samuelson. Two other people including former IT specialist Bryan Pagliano were previously identified as receiving immunity deals as well. Chaffetz’ Committee voted to recommend holding Pagliano in contempt of Congress after he again ignored a subpoena to appear before it. Clinton campaign spokesman Brian Fallon said Republicans are “trying to make something out of nothing by rummaging through the files of a Justice Department investigation that was closed months ago without any charges whatsoever.” But the grants of immunity have fueled GOP concerns about the nature of the FBI investigation, which determined Clinton’s actions were extremely careless but did not lead to any criminal prosecution. BUT, Donald Trump was ahead of Chaffetz. His spokesman Jason Miller said the multiple immunity deals "shows this was without a doubt a criminal scheme. At its heart, Clinton's secret server was an end-run around government transparency laws designed to hide corruption between the Clinton Foundation and her State Department, an arrangement which ultimately put our national security and sensitive diplomatic efforts at risk. No one with judgment this bad should be allowed to serve as president of the United States or hold any public office. What has become abundantly clear is that the Obama administration is protecting Hillary Clinton from accountability at all costs because she will keep the rigged system in Washington in place." Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus called the latest deals : "shocking. We now know it wasn't mere IT staffers that were given a pass, but individuals at the highest levels of this dangerous scheme that jeopardized national security. Not only was Cheryl Mills granted immunity, but she was allowed to advise Hillary Clinton during her own questioning by the FBI. Given that federal record-keeping policies were clearly violated, thousands of classified emails were exposed, and no one has been held accountable, this latest revelation raises very serious questions about the course of the FBI's investigation." ~~~~~~ Representative Trey Gowdy,a former prosecuting attorney, lashed the Justice Department for its decision to grant immunity to a Colorado tech employee who destroyed thousands of Hillary Clinton's emails. Gowdy described it as "tantamount to giving the triggerman immunity in a robbery case." Gowdy, who chairs the House Select Committee on Benghazi, told Fox News that the Justice Department's decision not to prosecute computer specialist Paul Combetta -- If Combetta was given transactional immunity, which means the Justice Department "gave immunity to the very person you would want to prosecute, the person who destroyed emails after there was a subpoena and prosecution order" -- is problematic because of the chronology of events. According to Gowdy : "The story broke about her email, then there was a preservation order, then there was a subpoena, then there was her press conference, which has been thoroughly and totally debunked. After that, Clinton aide Cheryl Mills and Platte River had a conference call, and Combetta deleted emails that had been in existence for five years 'all on his own.' This defies logic, why some techie in Colorado would, despite a subpoena and preservation order, but after a conference call with [Clinton attorney] David Kendall and Cheryl Mills decide on his own he's going to destroy public records. Then you grant immunity. We need to ask the FBI, what kinds of immunity did you give? And why did you give it to the triggerman, the guy who actually destroyed the documents?" FBI Director James Comey also said he couldn't make a case against Clinton because he "couldn't prove intent," said Gowdy, but Gowdy disagrees with that. "You never have anybody admit 'I know this is wrong and I'm going to do it anyway,' " Gowdy said. "And my response to that is you have to prove it [intent] by circumstantial evidence." He told Fox : "Part of the way you prove intent is the destruction of evidence, the consciousness of guilt, the multiple false explanations of why you did something....the work-related emails were government records and government property, and Clinton kept [them] rather than returning them to the State Department. Only after Congress started asking about it did she decide to return some of them. Now we know tens of thousands were deleted and even after Congress specifically said 'preserve' it, after a conference call with her lawyers, somebody applied a product called Bleachbit to make sure nobody can ever read them." Gowdy says : "There was a cover-up when it came to Hillary Clinton's use of a private email server, and the State Department aided and abetted that cover-up....She had this arrangement for the entire time she was Secretary of State, then she kept them for two years....The State Department, which is supposed to be apolitical, non-interested in the next presidential election, has been covering for Hillary Clinton since she left office." Gowdy also commented to Fox about the Department of Justice offering at least partial immunity, through the FBI, to Mills. Gowdy said that doesn't make sense to him : "Number one, if you think that there is evidence that is relevant to an investigation on a piece of physical property, you use a subpoena, a grand jury subpoena. You don't strike an immunity agreement with the computer, you go get the computer. Her lawyer, Beth Wilkinson, who represents Heather Samuelsson and Cheryl Mills, she's on record of saying, 'The Department of Justice assured me my clients did nothing wrong.' Well, people who have done nothing wrong typically don't ask for immunity so my question would be immunity from what? What was it you were worried about?" Gowdy said he thinks it's because Clinton "had classified information on those computers, so you offer immunity to Cheryl Mills, who has classified information on her computer. How can you possibly then prosecute Hillary Clinton for having classified information on her computer? You couldn't do it." Gowdy said he has "been underwhelmed by an agency that I once had tremendous respect for. The Department of Justice gives out any immunity. The FBI doesn't immunize anyone." He also pointed out that the DOJ is headed by Attorney General Loretta Lynch, who met on her private plane with former President Bill Clinton : "[She] met on the tarmac for half an hour to discuss golf and grandkids with a potential witness, to say nothing about the spouse of a potential target, a potential witness in an investigation, she recuses herself? Someone in the Department of Justice had to decide to pass out these immunity agreements. I have seen the get out of jail free cards. What I don't see is the jail. Usually you strike immunity to further a prosecution. There is no prosecution. It's just five get-out-of-jail-free cards." ~~~~~~ Dear readers, Trump's campaign also spoke out about the immunity report and called for a special prosecutor in the Clinton case. Spokesman Jason Miller said in a statement on Trump's website : "The revelation that a second individual was given an immunity deal in Hillary Clinton's email scandal only underscores the need for a special prosecutor to be appointed." We know this will not happen while Barack Obama is President. And, it will not happen if Hillary Clinton is elected President. BUT, if Donald Trump is elected, a special prosecutor is clearly in the cards. And that special prosecutor would be able to investigate Hillary's illegal email server use, whether that use was condoned or encouraged by White House staff or President Obama, and whether the server was part of a criminal scheme to make it easier for the Clinton Foundation to run its pay-for-play scam while Hillary was Secretary of State. It is easy to see why the George Soros Progressives and their Enforcers -- Obama, Hillary, Bill and their DOJ and FBI -- are throwing their devil's pitchforks at us. Prison and personal disgrace is not "a consummation devoutly to be desired" -- especially by a US Secretary of State and President.