Saturday, March 1, 2014

Ukraine Update : Putin 1 - Obama 0

Russian President Vladimir Putin asked for and quickly got parliamentary approval to use its military to protect Russia's interests across Ukraine. Sometimes-violent pro-Russian protests took place Saturday in a number of Russian-speaking eastern Ukraine cities - Kharkiv, Donetsk and Luhansk - and in the southern port of Odessa. In Kharkiv, 97 people were injured in clashes between pro-Russia demonstrators who routed supporters of the new Ukraine-Kiev government out of the regional government building and hoisted the Russian flag, according to the Interfax news agency. Moscow's immediate focus appears to be Crimea. Ignoring President Barack Obama's warning Friday that "there will be costs" if Russia intervenes militarily, Putin escalated the stakes concerning Ukraine's future, evoking memories of Cold War brinkmanship. What began Thursday with the early-morning takeover of the regional parliament building by mysterious troops continued Saturday afternoon as dozens of those soldiers - almost certainly Russian - moved into the streets around the parliamentary complex and seized control of regional airports. Media reports say that up to 6,000 more Russian troops and 8 Russian military transport planes entered Crimea on Saturday. Moscow has remained silent on claims that Russian troops are already in control of much of the peninsula, saying any troop movements are within agreed-upon rules governing the semi-autonomous Ukrainian region. Despite Putin's statement to his parliament that Moscow needs to protect pro-Russian Ukrainians, there has been no sign of ethnic Russians facing attacks in Crimea or elsewhere in Ukraine. US President Obama has called on Russia to respect the independence and territory of Ukraine and not try to take advantage of its neighbor's political upheaval. He said such action by Russia would represent a "profound interference" in matters that should be decided by the Ukrainian people. He has not said, however, how the US could pressure Moscow to step back from its intervention. The Russian parliament has asked Moscow to recall its ambassador in Washington in response to Obama's speech, while US Senator John McCain, former House Intelligence Committee Chairman Hoekstra and others have criticized President Obama for pursuing a weakened US foreign policy that has naively left a vacuum in responsible world leadership, saying that Vladimir Putin has taken advantage of the vacuum to solidify Russia's position in Ukraine and protect its Black Sea fleet. ~~~~~ Crimea was taken from resident Tatars by Russia under Catherine the Great in the 18th century. Tatars, the historic occupants of Crimea who make up 12% of the semi-island's population, stand strongly for Crimea remaining part of Ukraine, but they didn't offer resistance to Saturday's Russian occupation. Crimea became part of Ukraine when Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev gave the peninsula to his native land in 1954, a gift of little importance until the Soviet Union broke up in 1991 and Crimea ended up part of an independent Ukraine. Despite that, nearly 60% of its population of 2 million identify themselves as Russians. The Crimean port of Sevastopol is the home of Russia's Black Sea Fleet and its thousands of naval personnel. Russia was rattled in 2009 when the pro-Western Ukrainian President Viktor Yuschenko warned that it would have to leave the key port by 2017. But shortly after pro-Russian Viktor Yanukovych was elected president in 2010, he agreed to extend the Russian lease until 2042. Russia fears that Ukraine's new pro-Western government could evict it. ~~~~~ Despite Putin's sudden and massive move to occupy Crimea, there were possible signs Saturday that the Russian leader could soften his approach. Former Ukrainian Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko, who was freed last week after more than 2 1/2 years in prison, was reported to be heading to Moscow for a meeting with Putin on Monday. Putin has had good ties with Tymoshenko in the past, and he may look to her for a possible compromise. In a statement posted on her party's web site, Tymoshenko urged the UN Security Council to meet in Kiev and asked EU leaders to convene a meeting in Crimea. She urged the West to help protect Ukraine's territorial integrity, asked Ukrainians to remain calm and voiced hope that diplomacy will succeed. Meanwhile, Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Grigory Karasin said the Russian parliament's motion doesn't mean that Putin would immediately send additional troops to Ukraine (if he hasn't already done it). "There is no talk about it yet," he said. Putin's spokesman, Dmitry Peskov, also said in televised remarks that while the president "got the entire arsenal of means necessary for settling this situation," he hadn't yet decided whether to use the Russian military in Ukraine or recall the ambassador from Washington as lawmakers suggested. However, Putin's parliamentary motion loosely refers to the "territory of Ukraine" rather than specifically to Crimea, raising the possibility that Moscow could use military force in other Russian-speaking areas in eastern and southern Ukraine, where many detest the new authorities in Kiev. It is possible that Putin envisions separating Crimea from Ukraine, forming a separate entity integrated with Russia economically and politically and leaving a weakened Ukraine to try to build a new nation. On the economic front, Russia put additional pressure on Ukraine when a spokesman for state gas company Gazprom said that Ukraine owed $1.59 billion in overdue bills for imported gas. Sergei Kuprianov said in a statement carried by Russian news wires that the gas arrears would endanger a recent discount granted by Russia. The Russian payment demand clearly enlarges Ukraine's financial crisis. The country is almost out of funds and is seeking emergency credit from the International Monetary Fund, whose president, Christine LaGarde says she is not yet worried about Kiev's financial status. ~~~~~ As events moved swiftly on Saturday, one Crimean woman expressed her opinion on another aspect of the crisis : "Russia is not just all flowers" she said, noting that she feels safer with the Russian military presence but does not want Crimea to become part of Russia. And flights remained halted at Simferopol's airport Saturday while armed men in military uniforms without markings patrolled the area. They didn't stop or search people leaving or entering the airport, and refused to talk to journalists. AP reported that journalists coming from mainland Ukraine to Crimea were briefly stopped at a checkpoint manned by troops in unmarked camouflage uniforms, as well officers in uniforms of the Berkut, the feared riot police that cracked down on anti-Yanukovich protesters before he fled the capital a week ago. Late Saturday, Ukraine's acting president, Oleksandr Turchynov, announced that he has put the country's armed forces on high alert after the Russian parliament's vote to grant President Vladimir Putin permission to mobilize the country's military in Ukraine. Turchynov said Saturday he had also ordered increased security at nuclear power plants, airports and other strategic infrastructure, because of the threat of "potential aggression." Saturday evening, the UN Security Council met to discuss the Ukraine crisis, but because of Russia's veto, no resolution will be possible. And, finally, President Obama phoned President Putin late on Saturday to discuss the situation. ~~~~~ Dear readers, we are at a very important juncture in the Ukraine crisis. While things are fluid and moving rapidly, several things are clear. First, Russia has successfully secured Crimea and will not easily give it up in any future negotiation, so Vladimir Putin has once more out-maneuvered the West and continues to build his new "Russian Empire." Second, the vacuum created by President Obama's mismanagement of US foreign policy has created a world more unstable than it has been at any time since the end of World War II. This instability will continue to create challenges to world order until 2016, when a new American President takes over and rebuilds the Pax Americana that is desperately lacking now. In world politics, there are no zero-sum games. There is only resolve backed by power and enlightened by the belief that human liberties and freedom are worth the cost of preserving them.

7 comments:

  1. With what appears to be secured controll of Crimea solidly in hand, the security of the Back Sea deep naval/Submaribe ports are off the table. But the is a coast line at the southern end of Ukraine that presents some future shipping & military value to Russia.

    The Ukraine is the second largest land mass country on the continent. To be able to suddenly turn Ukraine into a nearly total Land-Lock country would present insurmountable problems for Ukraine to overcome - import/export ease, inbound/outbound tourist travel, higher cost of various energy necessities if Russia decided to continue supplying the Ukraine, etc.

    The situation for Ukraine is akin to setting at a Poker table with everyone out of the hand except Ukraine & Russia. Ukraine has a full house of A's and Kings and has to ask Russia for a loan in order to win the hand.

    All the power us with Russia right now. It's all about how Russia will proceed and more so what are their aim.

    But for sure the United States is not a player in this game.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hasn't Obama assured that the United States us not much of a player in any game?

      We are not a military threat, we are not an economic threat/power house, and he is not a respected player in the affairs of state.

      Delete
  2. I am not an isolationist or follow the Libertarian (Congressman Ron Paul view anyhow) views of foreign affairs/involvement. I have spent the youth and middle years of my life in various third world countries helping the "oppressed" people - to whom we were their only forth coming help.

    The last few days there has been a lot of "press" time dedicated to the subject of the similarities between Ukraine/Crimea to Syria’s of yesterday anyhow, and there are NO similarities. Syria was/is a defining point in how the free world will forever address future holocausts and exterminations of people that are living in a world that is still functioning by rules and laws that are 2000 years old. Massacre of children is an act of evil and needs to be eradicated from the face of the earth.

    Syria presents a “CLEAR AND PRESENT” danger to the world. A world with Assad still butchering his dissenting citizens is clearly unacceptable. But it seems that as the free world talks to itself the butcheries go on in Syria.

    My question is (as of today) does the Russian- Ukrainian/Crimean upheaval come to the level of “Clear & Present” danger. A few weeks ago it didn’t come close. Back then it was an internal conflict between Ukraine demonstrators and a very corrupt Ukrainian government, that is still quite capable of a atrocities like we are seeing in Syria (and various other Islamic countries).

    I guess it’s a moot question isn’t it. Because Obama just keeps announcing Red Line after Red Line in the sand waiting for the oppressors to step over it so Obama can draw another line. I just don’t understand how long we can wait for Obama to be out of office and the start of a democratic responsible administration is in its place.

    ReplyDelete
  3. A simple word of advice to all who contemplate involvement in the Ukrainian disturbance ... " Don't articulate a fight you don't intend to wage and yoy can not win".

    The situation in the Ukraine is made up of 3 separated and distinct bodies. The first is Russia. The second is Ukraine made of people that are loyal to and citizens of Ukraine. The third is people that are Ukrainian (for the most part) but very loyal to Russia to the point that Russian nor Ukrainian is their first language.

    And a possible 4th entity in the mix could be Crimea and where their loyalty lies. But they seem to be happy to be part of the Farther Land at present.

    My point - this is a mess of a potential Civil War/disturbance. And on paper the winner is - RUSSIA. Russia because of funds to fight a lengthy war, because of size of their military, military experience, stockpile of military equipment, food supplies, etc.

    ReplyDelete
  4. So our Secretary of State John Kerry is going to Kiev to lend the Ukrainians support. It's unclear yet weather he us going to see the Ukraine Ukrainians or the Russian (leading) Ukrainians.

    Now this is either the biggest PR ploy that the Obama administration has ever put on, or it's as a lot of people think that Obama is so out of his element in general as President but particularly in foreign affairs.

    Maybe the idea of sending someone at the Ambassadorial level to Kiev never came up since Hillary Clinton in gone. She was good at putting Ambassadors into these difficult positions.

    ReplyDelete
  5. If you can call the Obama’s foreign policy a policy, a very big part of the Obama administration’s “Smart Power” foreign policy was former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s infamous “Reset” with Russia. Today, some 5 years later it appears that the smart power and the reset were all about weakening the power of the United States in the rest of the world … like it or not that is what the ball game was about.

    The result of a broad review of a bunch of reporters, pundits and elected officials to see if any one of them could name even one major foreign policy success during Clinton’s tenure at State came up empty - nothing. Every respondent came up blank, with the exception of the pulling our troops out of Iraq. We have all seen how that turned out, with the al Qaeda flag flying over Falluja. Oh, and she traveled a bazillion miles building a “foreign policy resume” that would surely be bought as an expert by the “marginally informed “ voters in 2016 – all at taxpayers expense.

    In all fairness, she was carrying out the foreign policy of the man who appointed her, Barack Obama. (Not that they aren’t cut from the same cloth. If she disagreed with his foreign policy, she could have just declined the job offer.) This past weekend as Russia was sending more troops into Ukraine, Obama was at happy hour with the DNC.

    Other than retreat, he’s not the least bit serious on foreign policy. He didn’t even bother to attend when his national security team met (lately) to discuss the escalating situation in Ukraine. The Nobel Peace Prize winner delivered another lame, meaningless warning, and in his mind his work was done. Who out there truly believes the Russians aren’t feeling emboldened by this good-for-nothing foreign policy? Fifty years to win the Cold War and merely five years to undo it. It was by design after all.

    There is only one question left to ask in my mind: Is the defeat of the United States, the emasculation of its international prestige, the abandonment of our allies and the gutting of our military a solid plan that was there from day one or is it simply the point that Obama has arrived at via all his erroneous judgments along the way? That I am asking this question and honestly know the answer saddens me beyond belief. Treachery towards the citizens of the United States by their own president

    The entire world is well aware that the US has become a paper tiger. Obama’s busy getting more people signed up for food stamps, extending unemployment benefits, destroying health insurance, thinking up ways to spend even more of our tax dollars, and gutting the military. He’s purged top military leadership, and now wants to cut the military to pre-WWII levels. What does that tell you? What does that tell the rest of the world?

    So now Russia is moving to divide Ukraine and annex Crimea. Then they’ll move on to their next project, with nothing but a few lame warnings and “lines in the sand” treats from the self-alleged leader of the free world. There’s nothing the US or the UN can do to stop the Russians. Thanks to Obama’s foreign policy (or lack of a policy) there’s no deterrent to Putin doing whatever he wants. Obama won’t even agree to impose new sanctions on Iran, so why would Putin take anything he says seriously?

    All elections have consequences. Not just for us here in the US, but for the world. What happens via a so called election there eventually has impact in the United States and so on.

    ReplyDelete
  6. This entire situation is sad and frightening at the same time.

    ReplyDelete