Monday, March 3, 2014

Ukraine and the West Feel the Effects of Russia's Post-Soviet Humiliation

The UN Security Council is again meeting to discuss the Ukraine crisis, and the Ukrainian ambassador to the UN has spoken directly to the Russian people in Russian to tell them that their president's allegation that the Russian military needs to be in Crimea to protect Russian-heritage Ukrainians is simply false. Earlier today, Russia called for a national unity deal in Ukraine - from the vantage point of its operational control and military stranglehold in Crimea, in Vladimir Putin's bald combination of diplomacy and escalating military pressure. The US and European Union still scramble for solutions while former Ukraine prime minister Iulia Timoshenko told CNN that America and the EU have undertaken by treaty to protect Ukraine's territorial integrity and that a failure to do so now will put the world at the mercy of a lawless dictator. Global markets are in a semi-panic over the prospect of violent upheaval in the heart of Europe, partly caused by growing fears that the Kremlin might carry out more land grabs in pro-Russian eastern Ukraine, adding urgency to Western efforts to calm the crisis. European markets fell between 1% and 2% on Monday, while the Moscow market dropped about 12% and its currency fell to its lowest point ever against the US Dollar. Gold prices rose. Oil prices also rose on fears that Russia, a major oil exporter, might face EU sanctions. What is clear is that Russia is calling the shots and setting the agenda over Ukraine. Russian soldiers control all Crimean border posts and military facilities. Troops also control a ferry terminal in the Crimean city of Kerch, just 20 kilometers (12 miles) across the water from Russia, intensifying fears in Kiev that Moscow would send even more troops into the peninsula via that route, already begun with Russian troop trucks crossing into Kerch according to unverified reports. US President Barack Obama is sending his Secretary of State John Kerry to Kiev in an expression of support for Ukraine's sovereignty, and the EU is threatening to implement a long list of punitive measures and has called an emergency summit on Ukraine for Thursday. But Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said at a UN Human Rights Council session in Geneva that Ukraine should return to an agreement signed last month by pro-Russian President Viktor Yanukovich - but not Moscow - to hold early elections and give up some powers to Russia. Yanukovich later fled the country after massive street protests, called the Maidan, rejected his deal with Russia instead of accepting the EU economic offer. Timoshenko said Ukraine would never take back Yanukovich, an apparent Russian demand, or agree to the terms of the Yanukovich-Russia agreement. Meanwhile, Ukrainian authorities said that Russian troops had issued an ultimatum for two Ukrainian warships to surrender or be seized - prompting the country's acting president to accuse Russia of "piracy." Ukraine's corvette ship Ternopil and the command ship Slavutych were being blocked by four Russian naval vessels in Sevastopol's harbor, according to a Ukrainian military spokesman. Acting Ukraine president Oleksandr Turchynov said commanders and crew were "ready to defend their ships : "They are defending Ukraine." A Russian spokesman dismissed the report of a Russian ultimatum as nonsense, but refused to elaborate. Russia is "on the wrong side of history" in Ukraine, President Obama said, adding that continued military action would be "a costly proposition for Russia." Speaking to reporters in the Oval Office, Obama said the US was considering economic and diplomatic options that will isolate Russia and called on Congress to work on an aid package for Ukraine. Still, it was not clear what the West could do to make Russia back down. They have ruled out military action, leaving only economic sanctions that would freeze Russian assets and pull the plug on multi-billion dollar deals. Late Monday, the EU threatened to freeze visa liberalization and economic cooperation talks and boycott the G8 summit in Russia if Moscow does not back down. But the economic consequences of an EU economic thrust against Russia would be acute for Western Europe because the EU relies heavily on Russian natural gas flowing through a network of Ukrainian and other pipelines. For its part, Ukraine has "no military options on the table" to reverse Russia's military moves into Crimea, according to Prime Minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk, who, along with Iulia Timoshenko, has appealed for outside help and said Crimea remained part of his country. British Foreign Secretary William Hague agreed. He said his country was "urgently" asking for economic and political support from other countries, expressing the fear that Russia might seek to expand its control by seizing other parts of Ukraine in the pro-Russian east of the country, the country's industrial powerhouse and agricultural breadbasket. Hague said "the world cannot just allow this to happen." Faced with fears of more Russian aggression, Ukraine's new government has moved to consolidate its authority, naming new regional governors in the pro-Russia east picked among the country's wealthy businessmen. By putting influential oligarchs in control of key eastern provinces, Kiev appears to be hoping that Russian-leaning citizens will be more willing to remain within the Ukrainian fold. Putin's confidence in his Ukraine strategy is underpinned by the knowledge that Ukraine's 46 million people have divided loyalties. While much of western Ukraine wants closer ties with the 28-nation European Union, its eastern and southern regions look to Russia for support. ~~~~~ Dear readers, there is no coherence in the EU-US response to Putin's occupation of Ukraine. While sanctions and expulsion from the G8 and G20 would perhaps over time pinch Russians into rejecting their president's agenda, it is not sure. It is difficult to appreciate the nationalist underpinnings of the Russian national personality - a nationalism perfectly reflected in its leader. While Gorbachev and Yeltsin were anxious to lean toward the West, it was largely an economic decision. One had to have been in Russia after the collapse of the Soviet Union and have had Russian colleagues express their surreal mix of joy at being free of Communisn combined with their mystified anger and classic Russian "depression" at being destroyed as a world power. Putin both feels this and plays on it. His agenda - to restore the Russian hegemony, to become again the second superpower, to buffer its western and southern borders against NATO and the West - is a real reflection of the Russian post-Soviet humiliation. Westerners may say Russia deserved what it got...and may not see how Crimea is part of that history. But Putin sees it. The Russian parliament sees it as they draft an annexation decree to take back Crimea. Until the US and the EU accept these historical antecedents and address them in a way that saves face for Putin and Russia, there will exist every possibility that Ukraine will be menaced with being run over and annexed by Russia. Terrible as it is, unacceptable as it may be to democratic nations, Russia and its ambitious President Putin must be cajoled - not threatened - into joining today's world. It is possible but it will take both words and actions more at home in an 18th century king's court than in a vociferous 21st century parliamentary debate.

7 comments:

  1. A, if not THE mistake the United States has made in dealing with Putin during the Obama Administration is assuming 1. That Putin was our "friend" and wanted to work with us towards the simplistic, non-sensical view of the World that Obama has, and 2. That Putin's Russia was actually moving towards a western style democracy like the United States (but this us the same mistake we thought about Egypt, Iraq, Libya, etc was moving towards with the demonstrations.

    As Casey Pops said Russia was certainly embarrassed on the world stage and Putin was part of the KGB and a devote Russian. The world should have expected him to come streaking back as soon as the situation availed itself to do so. President Reagan told us this would happen. Gov. Mitt Romney told Obama in a 2010 debate to be prepared for such an happening.

    ReplyDelete
  2. President Obama is often expressing “deep concern.” From Ukraine to the Gaza, Iran to North Korea, unemployment to ObamaCare, President Obama’s response to almost every crisis is a personal expression of “deep concern.”

    Neville Chamberlain had similar concerns about Hitler, until they met and Hitler guaranteed “peace in our time” if he just get away with just taking over part of Czechoslovakia. Sounds familiar now. Remember Georgia a few years ago. Scared Putin then, didn’t we?

    It’s all part of his fantasy approach to foreign policy. Express deep concern, and then display shock when things go wrong.

    ReplyDelete
  3. First of all, there is little if anything that the U.S. can do in the (or any foreign crisis) situation between Russia and Ukraine because of President Obama. I guess there aren’t any chapters in the Handbook for Radicals on how to prevent tyrannical foreign heads of state from making you look like an incompetent fool.

    This entire situation reminds everyone of Obama’s leadership impotence when it comes to those areas that don’t fit his ideological Utopian playbook. Nobody likes being played for a fool or lied to (Obamacare) or to watch an incompetent “leader” force a nation down a primrose path laced with narcissism and hubris, especially when his supporters bill him as the smartest person in the room.

    Obama allowed this situation with Russia to get bad. He wrote verbal checks that he was unable or unwilling to cash. Do that a few times and it emboldens your enemies.

    Members of the Russian parliament are now openly saying that Putin can do what he wants because Obama and his friends will talk, talk, talk and nothing will come of it. Obama is losing the game of international chess, and rather badly I might add.

    In my world, you choose your battles in life, and you win the ones you choose to take on. You say very little, but mean what you say. You work hard to get along, but make it very clear that there will be a severe consequence for behaving inappropriately. And that consequence must come with 100% certainty.

    Obama is a great orator when he stays on the script others prepare for him. But by any objective measure, he isn’t a leader. He has been tested, and shown to be a paper tiger. And now there will be irreversible consequences.

    Obama’s foreign policy is quite simple, he has no policy. That’s why there are no answers to any of his crises and why there may be crisis situations in the first place.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Eventually, all things good, bad, and indifferent merge into two – good and evil, and there you will find us trying to make it all one … good.

    Even in the loneliness of parts of my life I knew there are others like me who had brothers they did not know or understand but wanted to help. We are probably those referred to as "our brother's protectors” possessed of one of the oldest and possible one of the most pointless and certainly one of the most persistent drives. Helping will not let us Americans get far away from those who need it.

    So here we are on the brink of another mission to help people who may not even want our help while we ignore those at home and other localities that would welcome our attendance.

    Why is it that cleaning up the rubbish of the actions of the evil is such a revered activity? Ukraine is a worldwide problem – but not to the scope that the west is making it at present. Emotions are ruling our minds presently

    ReplyDelete
  5. De Oppressor LiberMarch 4, 2014 at 9:17 AM

    Russia today is threatening the US with "economic upheaval" if we (the US) attempts sanctions against them over the Ukraine. At the same time Secretary of State Kerry is promising a billion dollars the Ukrainians.

    If the Ukraine problem is something that "money" is at the bases of them let all the countries throw some into the ring and problem solved - right?

    No it's not right. It's all about personal freedom to make the right and at times the wrong decisions and continue down the road as an independent sovereign nations of Ukrainian. And functioning Human Rights that are supportive equally for all.nd all the same. NO hyphens anyplace.

    WWI started over a madman infested with anger over a King. WWII came along because of another madman's will to created what he saw as a perfect world ruled by his cloned kind. Millions upon millions died because these these two situations were tried to be swept under the rug.

    let's guard against doing that here. let's not allow the disturbance in the Ukraine and Crimea get that far out of hand.

    If we settle the big problems the little problems will settle themselves.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Five years ago ( and not much has changed since then) it was very likely that Russia would take over the Crimea, as it was never going to surrender its main Black Sea naval base. The Americans admit to pouring 5 billion dollars into destabilizing Ukraine and Germany, in particular, has been funding opposition parties. But the Germans need Russian gas and the Russians need the money so, with any luck things may quieten down. I certainly hope so.

    In the meantime, Jews were advised to flee Kiev, as the Ukrainian Nazis (whose views are distinctly Third Reich) are in the growing influence. Not the Americans, the Germans or EU diplomats had any trouble in negotiating with and supporting them then.

    With our present leadership in Washington DC it is in our best interest to reach a workable settlement for all over Ukraine & Crimes (which seems to be settled via occupation)

    ReplyDelete
  7. Okay...I'm not really sure I understand this one.

    ReplyDelete