Friday, February 28, 2014

Could Partition Be Best for Ukraine, the EU and Russia?

BBC is asking the right question : "Will Russia intervene militarily in Crimea to safeguard its strategic interests?" Or, more precisely, has Russia already intervened? Who are the armed men who seized control of Simferopol airport? BBC reporters on site say their equipment, vehicles and behaviour mark this as a trained military unit, not a local group of pro-Russian loyalists. "These men look like a formed and organised body of troops. They appear to be disciplined, confident and uniformly dressed and equipped," according to Brigadier Ben Barry, a land warfare expert at the International Institute for Strategic Studies in London. "Irregular militia may obtain bits of official kit but they tend to look like a military jumble sale." So, it seems that a military unit secured the airport in the Crimean regional capital, Simferopol, on Friday morning. This is one of the reasons for the deepening tensions between Kiev and the Russians, who are making their usual threats and menaces aimed at the new interim authorities in Ukraine. Russian combat aircraft in areas bordering Ukraine are on alert. Snap military exercises have been held to demonstrate the readiness of Russian forces. Ukrainian Interior Minister Arsen Avakov said Russian soldiers had arrived in Sevastopol military airport near Russia's Black Sea Fleet Base on Friday and were patrolling outside, backed up by armoured vehicles, but Ukrainian military and border guards remained inside : "I consider what has happened to be an armed invasion and occupation in violation of all international agreements and norms," Mr Avakov said. Armed men also arrived at Simferopol airport overnight, some carrying Russian flags. A man called Vladimir told Reuters he was a volunteer helping the group there, though he said he did not know where they came from. "I'm with the People's Militia of Crimea," he said. But, the Russian military already is the major presence in Crimea, where it leases facilities from the Ukrainian authorities. The bulk of Russia's Black Sea Fleet is based in Crimea with its headquarters in Sevastopol. Russian naval personnel move freely in Sevastopol. The Russian navy dominates the town, but the Black Sea Fleet has a contingent of marines and there have been reports suggesting that Russian forces in and around Sevastopol have been bolstered in recent days. Andriy Parubiy, acting chairman of Ukraine's National Security Council, has claimed that both airports are now back under the control of Ukrainian authorities, but this has not been verified. In earlier actions -- on Thursday, a group of unidentified armed men entered Crimea's parliament building by force, and raised a Russian flag on the roof. The Crimean parliament then announced that it would hold a referendum on expanding the region's autonomy from Ukraine on 25 May, the same day elections are set in Ukraine. Russian President Vladimir Putin has urged his government to maintain relations with Kiev, but he is also giving the Crimean government humanitarian aid. Putin has called for a rapid return to normality in Ukraine. He spoke to Western leaders by phone to emphasise "the extreme importance of not allowing a further escalation of violence," the Kremlin said. However, Ukraine's foreign ministry has sent a protest note to Moscow citing a violation of airspace and provisions of the treaty regulating the Russian presence in Crimea, a treaty under which the US, UK, France and the UN undertake to support Ukraine's territorial integrity. US Secretary of State John Kerry has called on all sides to "step back and avoid any kind of provocations." And Friday, ousted Ukrainian President Victor Yanukovich held his first news conference after fleeing Kiev, vowing to fight for Ukraine. Speaking in Russia, he said he was "not overthrown" but was compelled to leave Ukraine after threats to his life. Yanukovich told the news conference in the southern Russian city of Rostov-on-Don : "What's going on now is lawlessness, lack of authority, and terror. Decisions in parliament were taken under duress." He apologized to the Ukrainian people for not having "enough strength to keep stability" and described his usurpers as "young, neo-fascists." Russia has threatened to increase customs duties at the two countries' border and warned of the threats to Russian minorities, orthodox religious shrines and so on. Although reminiscent of Russian rhetoric prior to its invasion of Georgia, many experts believe a similar full-scale Russian intervention in Ukraine is unlikely because of the size of Ukraine and the divisions within its population. Occupation would simply saddle Russia with involvement in what might rapidly become a bitter civil war. ~~~~~ However, the most urgent threat to the immediate future of Ukraine is economic. On top of its political problems, Ukraine has seriously urgent financial problems. The global banking association, the International Institute of Finance (IIF), warns that even if Ukraine slashes fuel subsidies and undertakes other reforms, it still requires $20 billion in foreign assistance over this year and next to service its debt and cover a large fiscal deficit, AFP reports. IIF economist Lubomir Mitov told AFP that the government needs "an injection of cash just to keep afloat. They need to get some money just to allow the budget to operate," he said. But getting quick bilateral support will be a challenge he says, because the EU and US in particular "are very reluctant to give a blank check to Ukraine." Here, Russian pressure serves a different purpose. Ukraine is heading towards bankruptcy. It needs outside funding and Moscow knows that Western financial institutions must play some kind of role. Its concern is to highlight as clearly as possible that any future Ukrainian government should reach out towards Moscow as much as to the EU. This also serves Russia's bottom line - Kiev should resist any temptation to move toward NATO. In other developments, Swiss and Austrian authorities have blocked the assets of Viktor Yanukovych and his associates, and launched a corruption probe. Russian MPs propose new laws that would make it easier for Russia to incorporate parts of Ukraine. And, amid growing fears of hyperinflation, Ukraine's central bank has put a 15,000 hryvnia (€1,000) limit on daily cash withdrawals. The UN Security Council is set to hold private discussions on the crisis later on Friday. ~~~~~ Dear readers, it is anyone's guess what the outcome for Ukraine will be. If Russia can be persuaded to settle for keeping Crimea as an independent enclave that guarantees the security of Russia's Black Sea Fleet - and if Kiev can be persuaded to let go of the Crimea in exchange for a financial support package to guarantee its economic future - then partition into west and east Ukraine would be a clean answer. There are two small Russian areas in the west but these people could be given the choice about their future. Russia has a natural historical role to play in deciding the future of Ukraine, and it would be advisable for the EU and the US to accommodate that role instead of threatening Russia. Crimea has a large pro-Russian population, probably the majority. Many Russian naval personnel are retired there. It is physically and politically far from Kiev. Current Russian pressure in Crimea serves Moscow's wider purpose of reminding Ukraine's new rulers that Moscow's concerns must be considered in any future economic and diplomatic arrangements. But, in all negotiations, the democratic future of the valiant people of Ukraine who courageously won their freedom from near-tyranny, must have equal weight with any Russian agenda.

8 comments:

  1. In which direction would "portioning" occure - North - South or East-West?

    To be honest I think what Russia wants from their invasion is all of Crimea, and a complete 100 mile strip inland area from the Black Sea.

    As Mitt Romney told Obama during one of the presidential debates in 2012 - Be carefull of al-Qaeda and be very, very aware of Russia. I guess he didn't listen, did he.

    President Reagan even warned us about the re-emergence of Russia sometime in the future. BINGO!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Would partitioning work. certainly would be better that what is shaping up to be the military action that Putin is up to. If you look up "nation building" in the dictionary what you'll see is a picture of Putin.

      But with partitioning the rights of someone are going to get trampled all over. Russia will get exactly what it wants out of this. The EU will secure via Russia the continuing flow of their needed inexpensive oil and natural gas. So that leaves the spot at the bottom of the Totem Pole for the Ukrainian & Crimean citizens.

      Is this a settlement or forced action.

      Delete
  2. Qui Ose Gagne (Who dares Wins)March 1, 2014 at 7:28 AM

    The news this morning is that Putin has asked the Russian Parliament for "permission" (as if he needs it or the permission is not a forgone conclusion) to use Russian troops in the Ukraine & Crimea.

    You can take the Russian out of the KGB ... but you cannot take the KGB out of the Russian.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Samantha Power, United States Ambassador to the United Nations, speaking at NU Security Council meeting: "Grave concern", "crisis escalating", "we are expressing this concern in the service of the territorial integrity of Ukraine".

      Now this is what the United States Foreign Policy has come to. Power is an example of a diplomatic that credentials are all contained in her State department passport – not in her experience because she has none. It’s all from between the covers of a book, not actual experience. Much like Susan Rice

      I doubt that any US diplomat will die in this confrontation, as they did in Benghazi. But remember … “Intelligence is a wonderful tool – but not if the enemy knows you have it”

      Delete
  3. If (and I’m not saying it won’t work) partitioning is the logical and possibly only viable solution over Ukraine and Crimea then maybe it should be considered for Syria, Iraq, Egypt, Venezuela, Cambodia, Cuba, Afghanistan, etc. Any and all counties that is suffering presently or about to enter into the precursor of armed civil strife could save time and money and divide along any lines that suit the inhabitants.

    Could this after all be Obama and Kerry’s savior? Their policy motto could be … “DIVISION FOR GUNS”. And for every gun (working or not, legal or not – no questions asked) turned in to International peace keeping forces the demarcation line would be extended say 100 yards in the direction of the gun donators wishes.

    Absurdity – certainly it is, ridiculousness – without a doubt. But in the hallways of of some State department building (ours mostly) there are diplomats right now talking about such an out. And that’s all these inexperienced diplomats want right now is a bloodless out, no matter what the map looks like when the dust clears.

    But let’s keep in mind there are people involved in whatever solution is enacted and they are the life blood of the final working elucidation. Let’s not make decisions on Ukraine or Crimea, or Venezuela, etc. based on Washington’s needs or Obama’s falling poll numbers, or who is the victor without concern for the unrepresented (by the US, EU, France, Germany, etc.) loser’s in this civil strife that seemed so far away in Syria and Iraq.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Fox News has in the past 15 minutes announced that Putin has received his request authorization to use military troops inside both the Ukraine and Crimea.

    The justification will undoubtedly be the protection of Russian civilians and Russian investments.

    So, let the games begin. And we will wait to see if the opposition to the Russian interests and/or human rights advocates show up.

    It would be important to remember that though Obama & Kerry say a lot they FAIL to back up their words with any action. I remind you about the red line in the sand in Syria. So let's not wait for them to arrive before the final decision is affirmed.

    ReplyDelete
  5. De Oppressor LiberMarch 1, 2014 at 9:21 AM

    We would all like to believe that this is all about human rights, civil rights, freedoms, etc. But what it is about is “political agendas”. Agendas of the movement of oil & natural gas into Europe, agendas of the reclaiming of some of the “fatherland” by Russia, agendas of the petroleum products and by-products needed in eastern Europe, agendas of the ports and military bases on the Black Sea, agenda of strangling local disobedient demonstrators, agenda of the fact that they (Russia) can simply do this, agenda that the Obama administration is so weak and disrespected in the world that the United States can do nothing to help, agenda about who has the bigger dog in this fight.

    I’m not against agendas at all. If Obama, Clinton, and Kerry had any foreign policy agenda maybe we wouldn’t be having this turmoil. But we are, aren’t we. And maybe the good will be in the supply of inexpensive (so to speak) oil to Europe and another nail in the coffin of the mid-term and presidential elections of these disguised Progressive Socialists like Obama here in the United States.

    “Peace, commerce, and honest friendship with all nations...entangling alliances with none”
    ― Thomas Jefferson

    ReplyDelete
  6. Come see - Come sawMarch 1, 2014 at 10:45 AM

    Ideologues who wish to control and change a populace for (in their elitist minds) its betterment are always the most intrusive and unrelenting. These types always think that they know better than the people about every aspect of life. They lust at the idea of being able to tell people how to live, what to eat, how to raise their children, what is acceptable consumption, what healthcare one should receive, what to read and watch (on TV), and most importantly what to think.

    Eventually they wish to control the development of humanity itself: Eugenics is the invention of the progressive Left.

    If you think that such despicable tyrants gain power only through such obvious means as violent revolution or military coup, think again. It is very possible that a gullible, uninformed population will elect them, and keep re-electing them. Unchecked, what begins as innocuous meddling can progress quickly into full-bore Mengele-ian insanity.

    ReplyDelete