Wednesday, March 26, 2014

Obama Bows to Saudi Anti-Semitism while Snubbing Freedom of the Press

In a world where the American President is seen as weak and often wrongheaded in his foreign policy decisions, it should not come as a great surprise that the Saudi government is taking advantage of the lackluster fading star that is Barack Obama by refusing to allow the Jerusalem Post’s Washington bureau chief to cover President Obama's trip to the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. The White House Correspondents Association called the Saudi decision not to grant Michael Wilner a visa for the President's trip "outrageous." Wilner is purportedly the only member of the Washington press corps who has been denied a visa. The correspondents association said : "It is outrageous that the Saudi government has refused to allow a White House reporter entry to the country to cover this week’s visit of President Barack Obama. The denial is an affront not only to this journalist but to the entire White House press corps and to the principle of freedom of the press that we hold so dear." The Jerusalem Post also reported that the Saudis ignored "firmly worded requests" to grant the application, which were made by US National Security Advisor Susan Rice and presidential assistant Tony Blinken to Saudi Arabia's ambassador to the United States, Adel bin Ahmed Al-Jubeir. The Jerusalem Post added : “Rice and Blinken separately expressed extreme displeasure at the delay and the prospect of a denial.’’ The White House said it has complained about the denial separately : "We are deeply disappointed that this credible journalist was denied a visa,” said Bernadette Meehan, a spokeswoman for the National Security Council. “We will continue to register our serious concerns about this unfortunate decision." Deputy National Security Advisor Ben Rhodes told reporters traveling with Obama en route to Belgium on Tuesday, however, that the Saudi Arabian trip would not be reconsidered : "Look, we have disagreements with Saudi Arabia on a number of issues. We obviously have had disagreements in the past as it relates to some issues associated with Israel, some issues associated with human rights. But we also share a significant set of interests with Saudi Arabia. They’re a very important partner of ours in the Gulf, and we believe it's better to have the type of relationship where we can cooperate but also be clear and honest with one another where we have differences," Rhodes said. In an editorial, the Jewish Press accused the Saudis of 'plain old anti-Semitism.' Wilner, a Jewish American, works for the Israeli English-language newspaper but does not hold Israeli citizenship and has never lived in the Jewish state. Saudi Arabia has no official relationship with the government of Israel,’’ the editorial said. ~~~~~ So, dear readers, we have here *an American citizen who happens to be *a journalist who is *an accredited member of the White House Press Corps *who is travelling with the President and is being *denied a visa to enter Saudi Arabia, *one of the stops on President Obama's latest trip to the Middle East. And what has the American President done about this affront? His National Securtiy Advisor and her Deputy have protested, as has the White House. BUT, the trip is not being cancelled because Saudi Arabia is "a very important partner of ours in the Gulf..." May we assume from this explanation that America's relationship with Saudi Arabia is more important than taking a stand against anti-Semitism and for freedom of the press and in support of America's most loyal ally, Israel? Or could it be that President Obama wants to reassure the Saudi leaders that - even though America could now singlehandedly pull the plug on the lavish petrodollar lifestyle the Saudis have become accustomed to - he will keep this from happening by preventing the construction of the Keystone Pipeline and deep port CNG terminals and the beginning of renewed offshore drilling programs? OR - is it simply that Barack Obama has been practicing his bowing technique and doesn't want to lose the opportunity to make one last bow as America's President to the King of Saudi Arabia? What a horror show the Obama presidency has become.

8 comments:

  1. It is nauseating. If this were not such a refined Blog there is so much more to say but the bluntness and brutality of the words would be an affront to Casey Pops.

    ReplyDelete
  2. "Make one last bow..." Too bad that bow isn't as he's exiting 1600 Pennsylvania Ave.

    ReplyDelete
  3. This is not a Zero-Sum Game that is being played here. The United States either can either win or lose so much more than the other side can lose or win. Obama does not have a dog in this fight – he only has Obama’s words and in this case his action words are proving out to be a very inanimate action.

    Obama is once again being tested by the Islamic nations as to exactly where he will come down on various questions. The compilation of Obama’s actions will be assistance to the Arabs in their decisions about Israel, the price of oil, natural gas, taken prisoners, their own radical terrorists, etc . Obama earlier on drew the line in the sand and failed to back it up, he has continually has failed in Syria, Libya has so many serious questions marks as to Obama’s actions – all of which are inactions towards the actions of the Arab world.

    Obama has failed at every challenge presented via the Arab world. He has failed so much that now the Arab World leadership, the Islamic Fundamentalist, and the radical terrorists that actually do the murky work for all the countries of the Arab World and the Arab Peninsula against Israel and western world that have chosen freedom over enslavement, prosperity over servitude.

    This simple flair up over a visa for Michael Wilmer in American - Saudi Arabia relations is another cowardly loss for Obama (aka United States) and another encouragement for the Islamic radicals.

    Be afraid America, Obama has put us into a corner where dramatic, dynamic action is our only way out

    ReplyDelete
  4. Obama wants the world to believe he takes the moral high ground. His refusal to cancel the visit to Saudi Arabia over its discriminatory policies just goes to show the political opportunist he is.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Mr.Michael Wilner was born in the USA and is an American citizen! He is more American than Hussein Obama who allegedly was born in Hawaii and fathered by a Kenyan Muslim! Obama's action to continue with his visit to Saudi Arabia is a disgrace and an insult to all American citizens! No wonder that Putin and other world leaders treat him with contempt; contempt that he richly deserves!!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Stand Up & Be CountedMarch 27, 2014 at 9:38 AM

    There is so much more in play here than one American Journalist that works for the Jerusalem Post.

    What is in the balance of the outcome is the respect for the United States presidency and therefore the United States itself. Obama claims in a press release to be “very disappointed” not at the Royal family but at the fact that Michael Wilner was held up to unexpected delay in his request for a visa into Saudi Arabia.

    Obama has failed once again to come down on the side of American respect and dignity. Michael Wilner is a pawn in this chess game between Obama and the Arab world. Considering the lack of action on behalf of Obama, one could almost think there is some “collusion” in play here. Maybe Obama could have heightened the theater here with a little live microphone indignation on his (Obama) part. Rather than his press release and his scampering away like a scolded child by his parent.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Publically, the Saudi rulers, their religious establishment and their media condemn and blame the Israelis for Arab and Muslim ills. Privately, the Saudi oligarchs are courting the Israelis to clip the wings of the Saudis’ remaining Islamist competitors, the Mullahs in Tehran and elsewhere.
    President Obama and his predecessors have shown that they share the Arab and Muslim rulers’ sentiments against a segment of the American society, the Jews.

    ReplyDelete
  8. It's no secret that the Kingdom and the US are not on the best terms at the moment. Countries such as Saudi Arabia and Israel that have an existential interest in the handling of Iran are sorely disappointed by the US's behavior. How far this schism will extend is questionable, as the Saudi princes rely on the US for kidney and liver transplants

    ReplyDelete