Friday, March 28, 2014

Abortion and the Death Penalty - Two Difficult Issues Confronting Texas and All of America

A federal appeals court on Thursday upheld Texas' tough abortion restrictions that have forced the closure of about 20 clinics around the state, ruling that the new rules don't jeopardize women's health. The New Orleans based 5th Circuit Court of Appeals overturned a lower court judge who said the rules violate the US Constitution and serve no medical purpose. After the lower court's ruling, the appeals court allowed the restrictions to go into effect while it considered the case. The rules require doctors who perform abortions must have privileges at a nearby hospital and places strict limits on doctors prescribing abortion-inducing pills. More regulations that are scheduled to begin later this year weren't a part of the case. In its opinion, the appeals court said the law "on its face does not impose an undue burden on the life and health of a woman." Planned Parenthood, which sued to block the restrictions, called the ruling "terrible" and said that "safe and legal abortion will continue to be virtually impossible for thousands of Texas women to access." Women will be forced to seek abortions later in their pregnancy, if they are able to get to a doctor at all." The Republican-controlled Legislature passed and Governor Rick Perry signed last summer some of the toughest restrictions in the US on when, where and how women may obtain an abortion. Debate of the law drew thousands of demonstrators on both sides of the issue to the Texas state Capitol and caused a 12-hour filibuster by state Senator Wendy Davis, a Fort Worth Democrat who succeeded in temporarily blocking passage. Though the restrictions later passed overwhelmingly, Davis catapulted to political stardom and is now running for governor. The office of Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott, a Republican who is also now running for governor, defended the law in court. He and Perry, who is not seeking re-election, cheered Thursday's ruling, saying the court's decision vindicates the careful effort by the Texas Legislature to craft a law to protect the health and safety of Texas women." In passing the rules, Texas lawmakers argued they were protecting the health of women. But abortion-rights supporters called the measures an attempt to effectively ban abortion through overregulation. The new rules, including a requirement that all procedures take place in a surgical facility, are set to begin in September, though they may also be challenged in court. The court rejected the argument that the burden caused by the new rules "falls on a large fraction of the cases." If the number of women who will have to travel farther increases because of the smaller number of doctors who will perform abortions, "the burden does not fall on the vast majority of Texas women seeking abortions," the appeals court found. The US Supreme Court will probably have the last word. The court's four liberal justices already have indicated they are inclined to hear an appeal. In November, the four dissented from the high court ruling upholding the 5th Circuit's decision to allow Texas to enforce the law while the lower court appeal was pending. The dissent, written by Justice Stephen Breyer and jouned by Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor, said that the four dissrnters would probably want to hear the case regardless of the 5th Circuit decision. Five votes constitute a majority on the nine-justice court, but it takes only four to grant full review of a lower court ruling. ~~~~~ Texas executed 16 people in 2013, one more person than in 2012. In 2013, 69% of the people Texas executed were people of color, eight African-Americans and three Hispanics. There were five white people executed by Texas in 2013. Since December 7, 1982, the state of Texas has executed 508 people. There have been 269 executions in Texas since Rick Perry took office in December 2000. New death sentences have declined from their high in the late 90s. In 1999, there were 48 people sentenced to death. On March 24, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to hear arguments in a Texas death penalty case concerning the ineffectiveness of counsel. In his request for federal relief from his death sentence, Robert Jennings cited three instances in which his trial lawyers failed to adequately represent him. A US District Court granted him relief on two of those claims (including failure to present evidence of his mental problems), while denying the third (his own lawyers told the jury they agreed he was eligible for the death penalty). Texas appealed the District Court's grant of relief on the first two claims to the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, which then held they could not consider Jennings' third claim of ineffective representation because his lawyers failed to file formal appeal papers on that claim. The case may be set for argument in the fall. Texas has become ground zero for capital punishment. Between 1976 (when the Supreme Court lifted its prohibition on the death penalty) and 1998 Texas executed 167 people. Next in rank was Virginia which executed 60 during the same period. pact of this procedure on the frequency. ~~~~~ Dear readers, the conflict between the strong desire of the Texas government to save unborn babies from being aborted and killed and its first place in US executions because of its death penalty law is astonishing. How can anyone who opposes abortion for whatever reason, whether to protect the unborn child or the mother's health and life, at the same time execute human beings for whatever reason, whether because of the viciousness of the crime or the color of their skin or ethnic background. Texas is at odds with itself. So is America. Some say in Texas it is a leftover from the days of lynchings. Others say it is a remnant of the frontier mindset. In the rest of America, these are sober, uncomfortable issues. If Rick Perry, or anyone else, is serious about running for President in 2016, they will have to address both issues. While white Americans - Protestant, Catholic and nonaffiliated - favor capital punishment at between 55% and 67%, Hispanic Catholics and Black Protestants do not, at between 27% and 37% favorability rating. But life in prison without parole is increasingly seen as an alternative, especially among young voters. As for abortion, Gallup has been asking the question since 1975 when 54% of Americans opposed abortion. In 2013, Gallup got the same answer : 54%. But in 2012, when abortion was an issue in the presidential campaign, only 17% said they could only vote for a candidate who agreed with their own views in abortion, while 45% said many other factors would also be considered before voting for a candidate who disagreed with their abortion views and 22% said it would be an important but not decisive factor. Most Americans polled say that the issue is complex and they disagree with the black-and-white views of both pro-life and pro-abortion activists. Perry and other Republican presidential hopefuls can hold the GOP base with a Texas-like view on abortion and the death penalty. But with Hispanic and Black voters, groups needed for either a Democrat or a Republican to win, the election will be decided by more mature discussions of these two difficult and heart-wrenching issues.

9 comments:

  1. I’m not sure that Casey Pops could have found two more explosive subjects. I believe that her overall point was that the next elected president in 2016 will need to siphon off votes (maybe few but some) from the Black, Hispanic, & Milleniums block of votes in order to win. No candidate will be able to carry the White vote 100%.

    I am so Pro Life that anything short of the mother’s life being in danger is not an issue for the child being carried full term. Here are some numbers that can be verified at usabortionclock.org:
    US abortions today – 2,234
    US this year - 264,619
    US since Roe v Wade in 1973 - 56,670,387
    World Wide today – 9,824,230
    World Wide since 1980 - 1,329,708,638
    This year in US after 16 weeks gestation – 12,701
    This year in US because of rape – 2,566
    Black babies in US since 1973 – 17,001,117

    I think this shows that ABORTIONS is not really a health or ability to raise an unintended child … it’s a convenience. It frees up BOTH parents to go out and live their lives with no interruptions.

    As for Capital Punishment let me leave you with 1 simple thought ... "Bad, evil things don't always happen to the other person.” People who commit these most sinful crimes need to be away from society forever. And life in prison without the possibility of parole sounds wonderful, but it can change by some judge’s ruling in the blink of an eye. And evil and depravity could be back on the streets in your town.

    I believe I have seen all that evil has to show me (though I’m sure that is not true). The dramatization of evil, killing, and degeneracy on TV and in the movies doesn’t come close to what it’s like in real life.

    ReplyDelete
  2. You won't like my view. So, no comment.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The exchange of our individual views is what allows us to come together on difficult matters confronting society like these two questions.

      Delete
  3. I believe that use of the death penalty should be available only for the most severe crimes, those crimes that epitomize the utmost expression of evil and rejection of human civility. The question really is who sets the standards for the use of a death penalty. Or do we just build a prison or two that houses only those convicted people of crimes that would have had a death sentence had one been on the books?

    I don’t really know. I do know though that those found guilty of such heinous crimes – punishment with 3 meals a day, air conditioning, health club equipment, private color TV with cable , internet, law library, movies, etc. is not punishment. What it is probably is a better life than what they had as a free person.

    So until someone much wiser than I comes along and uncovers the solution to Capital Punishment, I will be supportive of its use in very exact circumstances.

    ReplyDelete
  4. De Oppressor LiberMarch 29, 2014 at 8:28 AM

    These are two great questions if one would examine their stance on each individually, but what if you establish your individual viewpoint on abortion & capital punishment concurrently. Until 24 hours ago (when Casey Pops posted her article) I was one of the millions of people who thought that it was logical to have divergent beliefs. As I was yesterday I thought it to be logical to be exacting about being Pro Life nearly 100% of the time, and equally so rigorous in favor of Capital Punishment.

    But logically that is impossible. Because both predicaments come at us all from the same quarrels … one either believes it’s OK for society to take another’s life or you don’t. We may not want to (and I was one who didn’t want to) accept that, but it’s as true as true can be.

    Capital Punishment advocates say that it is right and justified for the safety of the greater society. Whereas Pro Choice promoters muddy up the ‘killing fields” with logic like – it’s my body I can do what I want, or Women’s Rights, or the real masterful excuse is the Fetus is not a living person. Well if it’s not a living organism at the time of abortion when is it? It’s not very big then, it can’t sustain its own life (without the help of it’ mother’s body) right then, can it? But it is living and growing rapidly. So I ask again if not at the instant of fertilization, when does the fetus join the lining human race?

    So let’s be honest with ourselves – Abortion & Capital Punishment is exactly the same murderous act simply justified by our own carefully carved out reasoning. We can be for one and against the other, or against one and for the other, or for both, or against both … in the silence of our minds we can justify either position. But remember who hears everything in your thoughts.

    In the light of a new day (and still examining my personal views) I am still unyielding about being Pro Life … but I’m re-thinking Capital Punishment vs. non pardonable life in some moderately comfortable, well-fortified prison far, far from the masses and with nothing more except the bare minimum of mortal coziness.

    Thank You Casey Pops

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Your exactly right. They are the same basic question (To kill or not to kill) just with different circumstances attached.

      So why do we have so many problems reaching one decision and then applying that verdict to other like questions?

      Delete
    2. The hardened criminal that ravishingly commits his evil deeds at least has a Lawyer speaking for his plight. What about the unborn child - who speaks for him/her? Someone must, they simply must.

      Delete
    3. IF we view them the same as simply killing then I favor both.

      Delete
  5. I once knew and played football (American style) alongside of a OB/GYN physician while I was in the Army (for low those many years). Tom was a very nice human, raised Catholic, good family man, and a great person to unload my thoughts on at times.

    He was “professionally” what is now Pro Life. But I just bet when he reentered the civilian life that he performed many abortions and justified everyone as needed. The quick extra monies that performing abortions put into his private practice was just too tempting.

    Long after his separation from the military (and I was still with Uncle Sam) I was in South Carolina and stopped to see him and yes he did regularly perform abortions. The money help with the alimony payments, child support payments, etc. My, oh my how our social views are developed out of our personal needs. Rather than our personal needs coming out of the labor to our social views.

    ReplyDelete