Monday, February 10, 2014

President Obama Invites Former Terrorist Sympathizers to Immigrate to America

President Obama has taken another step away from the American citizens who elected him - he has eased the rules for would-be asylum-seekers, refugees and others who want either to come to or remain in the United States, making it possible for the first time since 9/11 for those who gave given "limited" support to terrorists or terrorist groups to seek residence status. The change, carried out by executive order, is one of President Obama's first actions on immigration since he pledged during his January State of the Union address to use more executive directives - use his pen to go around Congress, as he put it. Congress passed legislation in the wake of 9//11 making it impossible for anyone considered to have provided support to terrorist groups to seek entry into the United States. The law's prohibition, known as terrorism related inadmissibility grounds, had affected anyone considered to have given such support. The provision has been applied rigidly to those trying to enter the US and to those already in the US but wanting to change their immigration status. According to the Department of Homeland Security, the rule change, which was announced last week without consulting Congress, gives the government more discretion, but won't open the country to terrorists or their sympathizers. People seeking refugee status, asylum and visas, including those already in the United States, still will be checked to be sure they don't pose a threat to national security or public safety, the department said. The new rule allows officials to consider whether the support was not only limited but potentially part of "routine commercial transactions or routine social transactions," according to Homeland Security spokesman Peter Boogaard. "Nothing in these exemptions changes the rigorous, multilayered security screening we do." The new rule is silent about members of rebel groups who have led revolts in Arab Spring uprisings, and it does not specifically address "freedom fighters" who may have fought against an established government. The rule change will help people Boogaard described as deserving refugees and asylum-seekers. Democrat Senator Pat Leahy said in a statement that the previous rule barred applicants for reasons "that no rational person would consider." Republican lawmakers, however, argue that the administration is relaxing rules designed by Congress to protect the country from terrorists. Representative Bob Goodlatte, chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, called the change naive, given today's global terrorist threats. The government should be protecting US citizens rather than taking a chance on those who are aiding and abetting terrorist activity and putting Americans at greater risk," said Goodlatte. ~~~~~ Dear readers, one is tempted to say that President Obama has taken leave of his senses. Using an executive order to taunt Congress for trying to provide protection from terrorists for Americans and, at the same time, taking lightly the to-be-expected negative reaction of both Congress and Americans seems both foolhardy and deliberately provocative. That the President chose not to explain such a sensitive action to America directly bespeaks a detachment from them and an indifference to their reasonable post-9/11 concerns. Has an American President decided to taunt not only Congress, which is after all a time-honored tradition, but also the American people? While it is true that Barack Obama is a figure now largely cast aside by a majority of the citizens who elected him, he is also for two more years the embodiment of the Office of the Presidency. If Americans do not support Mr. Obama, they nevertheless have enormous respect for the Office itself. President Obama should exercise sufficient self-restraint to prevent that respect from cracking into contempt. King George III made a similar mistake and paid dearly.

9 comments:

  1. Wasn't the Wizard in "The Wizard of Oz" All Knowing? Well, I think that's what Barack thinks he is.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This lame duck that we have and will have for another 2 years is tampering with mine, yours, our security. He make a move like this and instantaneously some "political hack" like Boogaard stands up and explains in Obamaezze that it really doesn't change anything. And our security is as safe and secure as ever.

    If that is the case - and it is far from it- then why did Obama need to execute another Executive Order.

    I do not trust Obama or anyone who works for him. they only know how to lie and deceive us.

    Do any of us really think that Obama is not going to at least try or has thought about the possibilities of and make an end run around the term limit spelled out in the Constitution and run for or simply call off the 2016
    elections?

    I have spent today just seeing how deep the deception of this Administration goes.

    ReplyDelete
  3. When will be say enough us enough Mr. Obama. You straighten up or we move towards Articles of Impeachment. Obama can not be all lowered to just continue down the road of ignoring the Constitution and circumventing the powers granted him.

    Google the "Nixon Articles of Impeachment" and see the similarities between Nixon and Obama actions.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Obama doesn't care what the American public thinks if him. He doesn't care what his poll numbers are. He is a one man destruction team that us determined to "slice & dice" the Constitution into slivers if paper.

    I am speechless over the latitude that is being afforded this individual in his lawless assumption if power and disregard for established "checks and balances".

    The topic in tomorrow's newspapers should be the IMPEACHMENT OF PRESIDENT OBAMA not the continuing lies about ObamaCare, or Benghazi, or IRS scandals, etc.

    ReplyDelete
  5. This story is so bizarre that it nearly is unbelievable, except we are talking about Obama. When is the House, Senate, or the American public, etc. going to get enough of Obama’s shenanigans and do something that is terminal to his treasonous activity?

    He is untrustworthy. His actions are all un-American. He stands with the enemies of America not our friends. He’s a charlatan, a pretender, an outright fraud. And yet to date there is NO ONE calling for his removal from office or at least “censure” if that is possible of the President.

    I question the country’s ability to last until his term expires on January 20, 2017. The enormity of the lasting damage that Obama can do between now and 1/20/2017 boggles the mind. Certainly all these “Executive Orders” can be rescinded by the new incoming president. But what and how long will it take (if all his actions are reversible) to put the system right again?

    ReplyDelete
  6. “An optimist sees an opportunity in every calamity; a pessimist sees a calamity in every opportunity. ”
    — Winston Churchill

    ReplyDelete
  7. I get up each morning with a smile on my face and the hope that I can somehow make a difference to the country or in one person’s life. I go to bed understanding that I tried my best and that some day’s success is just not in the cards. This has been my approach for many years now.

    But after reading about this action of Obama I just don’t know what difference I can make any more except to the individual that needs a helping hand in some manner or another. If this action is allowed to go uncontested by the House and Senate leadership (now there’s an oxymoron) is there any real opportunity for the continuance of this country in the form it was when Obama took office?

    ReplyDelete
  8. Yesterday Obama did two outrageous things that demand a strong, positive response from America.

    Firstly Obama again re-wrote ObamaCare -- without consent of Congress or actually changing the law.IIn a purely political decision due to the continued failure of ObamaCare, Obama waived the employer mandate for another year. He is acting as a lawless, runaway president who can ignore laws for his own political purposes.

    Secondly later in the day, Obama made an off-handed comment that further revealed his arrogance. While touring Monticello, he turned to the media and said, "The good thing about being president [is] I can do whatever I want."

    Is this the actions of a president that abides by the Constitution or doesn't worry about reprisal for not doing so?

    ReplyDelete
  9. A monumental occurrence is not a single accomplishment. The highpoint of change, the point that defines the complete process of the change is the accumulation of many small steps that are taken to disguise the abrupt altering of a process of historical acceptance.

    And this is precisely what we are witnessing to today. Obamacare was never intended to survive as it was enacted. And immigration was never to be anything other than a directive from the Oval office as to how it was going to be.

    Never did Obama plan on the House and/or Senate being involved in the “new immigration process” that Obama wanted in place.

    He governs not by the checks and balances that are part of the Constitution, not by the decisions on the Courts. He conducts governing by what he wants – PERIOD. And he gets what he wants via Executive Orders

    ReplyDelete