Thursday, February 13, 2014

Lincoln Saved the Union by Doing His Constitutional Duty - a Lesson for President Obama

Things in Washington are becoming more bizarre by the day. US Senator Ted Cruz, the lone Republican Senator to actively oppose last year's raising of the national debt ceiling, said earlier this week that it would be "irresponsible" for Congress to grant President Obama a debt ceiling increase without spending reforms. Cruz, who spoke to reporters after remarks at the Heritage Foundation, said he hoped the House would not "go down that road" of agreeing to an increase in the government's borrowing authority without demanding measures to rein in long-term deficits : "President Obama is asking Congress to give him a blank check to allow him to keep maxing out the credit card without doing anything to fix the problem. I think that's irresponsible," Cruz said. House Republicans disagreed, allowing the Democrat House members to give their President that blank check useable until March 2015. Cruz was a central figure in the government shutdown battle in the autumn of 2013, with his campaign to deny funds to Obamacare. His efforts, and those of outside conservative groups, were influential in persuading House Republicans to vote to block government funding for the new fiscal year if it included money for the law. The standoff launched a 16-day partial shutdown and rattled financial markets concerned about the debt limit, which needed an increase shortly thereafter. Since then, Congress has reached two minor budget deals and talk of brinkmanship has subsided. Cruz did not use procedural tactics to try to block or delay Senate consideration of the House bill raising the debt ceiling without attaching spending conditions. This occurred because the President would not talk to Speaker Boehner about compromise and insisted on a clean bill or a shutdown. ~~~~~ Former Florida GOP Congressman Allen West, a military career officer, says the GOP has a better chance of getting what it wants after the midterm election. West believes taking the Senate and maintaining the majority in the House will lead to "reform the right way and not have a repeat of what happened in 2012." West says the unemployment rate is higher than the official 6.6%, but President Obama wants to open the flood gates with more people, some former terrorists, being accepted as legal residents. ~~~~~ The Obama administration Monday delayed unilaterally another part of Obamacare, granting medium-size businesses a delay in paying a tax penalty until 2016 for not providing workers with health insurance coverage. Obama's pronouncement, the latest move to counter a storm of criticism from the business community about Obamacare, refueled Republican criticism that his signature healthcare law is a "train wreck" and "jobs killer." Republican Senator Ted Cruz, a staunch Obamacare critic, tweeted "If President Obama likes his health care law, why won't he keep it?" Nationally syndicated journalist Charles Krauthammer called Obama's constant changes to Obamacare "lawlessly" changing the rules, more akin to what goes on in a banana republic. "It's now reached the point where it's so endemic that nobody even notices or complains," he said. ~~~~~ Former Speaker Newt Gingrich weighed in on President Obama's blatant challenge to the GOP and Speaker Boehner, saying it hasn't helped that the President declared this month that he would bypass Congress : " 'I’ve got a pen, and … I’ve got a phone,' he said, to implement his economic agenda. The whole environment has been poisoned by Barack Obama talking about using his pen, doing things independently," Gingrich said regarding immigration reform. "I know Boehner made a point very clearly that as long as Obama is unwilling to reassure members that he actually will obey the law, it's very hard to move anything substantive on any topic, because the White House is so clearly dishonest." Gingrich also scored Obama's apparent lack of candor in his interview with Bill O'Reilly of Fox News before the Super Bowl, calling it "one of the most blatantly dishonest interviews I've ever seen an American President give." ~~~~~ Dear readers, the common thread in all of this is that President Obama has decided not to accept the role spelled out for the President in the Constitution. Instead of working with Congress and the Courts, constitutionally equal branches of the federal government, Obama has chosen to challenge and threaten the Supreme Court to construe laws as he would have it, he has chosen which duly enacted laws to enforce and which laws he prefers not to enforce, and now he has, after trying it and finding little pushback from Congress, decided to publicly state that he will use his pen, that is, write laws himself when that power is reserved for Congress in the Constitution. All this after taking an oath on the Lincoln Bible to preserve and protect the Constitution. There is a Lincoln quote that is little known : "This country, with its institutions, belongs to the people who inhabit it. Whenever they shall grow weary of the existing government, they can exercise their constitutional right of amending it, or exercise their revolutionary right to overthrow it." ___Abraham Lincoln. Every time I read that, I hear a Lincoln who was tied to Jefferson and Paine and Washington. It is a remarkable statement, coming from a President who went to war to save the Union. It makes his last plea to the South - we are brothers, we must not be enemies - that much more poignant. Reading this statement, one can understand how much Lincoln, as a great constitutionalist, must have wanted to let the South go its own way. But, as President, he also felt compelled to save the Union. He is the only President thus far who has had to make that choice between the constitutional right of Americans to revolt and withdraw from the Union and the presidential responsibility to protect the Union. Today, we can feel the ghosts of Lincoln's great constitutional struggle. But this time it is the President who wants to secede from the Union by ignoring the Constitution. And he wants to drag all of America with him. No one, and certainly not the President, has the right to ignore the Constitution. Mr. Obama must be prudent and uphold his oath to protect and preserve the Constitution, to truly follow the President he says he feels drawn to - Abraham Lincoln. Mr. Lincoln did his constitutional duty. He saved the Union.

7 comments:

  1. I think we are so headed for a serious Constitutional Crisis except I can't figure out who will make the trek down from the Capital to 1600 Pennsylvania Ave and tell president Obama that unless he stands behind his Oath of Office there are forth coming Articles of Impeachment against him. PERIOD

    There should be no wiggle room or deals, or compromise for Obama to save face or anything. He is in violation of his Oath, which could be argued he has committed TREASON ?

    One warning that's it. He doesn't get multiple threats of "time out" as many parents do with children who misbehave or defy authority. This is serious stuff - this is the well being of the Constitution and therefore our way of life.

    As a primer for Impeachment Google the 3 Article of Impeachment of President Nixon and draw the very close similarities between them and what Obama has done over and over as president.

    ReplyDelete
  2. "This country, with its institutions, belongs to the people who inhabit it. Whenever they shall grow weary of the existing government, they can exercise their constitutional right of amending it, or exercise their revolutionary right to overthrow it." – A. Lincoln

    This quote that Casey Pops referenced in her posting today shows us the essences of Lincoln. Every time I tread it I see more and more of the make-up and thinking of the man who served a most unique, challenging, soul wrenching presidency. The strength of Lincoln to put aside (maybe) some very personal beliefs in order to fulfill his sworn responsibilities as president – duty to Lincoln came right along with honor and integrity. Traits we simply do not see in this present administration.

    Lincoln’s word was his oath – period. His oath to do what was right for the nation. Not the North or South or this group over some other group. But to do what it took to preserve the Nation.

    Whereas Obama seems to be bent on doing whatever it takes to destroy the nation, leave our finical system penny less. Obama has never in his public life (which has been his entire adult life) demonstrated attributes close to Lincoln’s. Obama has never been confronted with making the decision that Lincoln had to daily. Obama is the ANTI-LINCOLN in every imaginable occurrence when compared to President Lincoln.

    Obama claims (as he does many other things) he was a Constitutional Law Professor for 10 years. Boggles the mind doesn’t it. How many Lawyer are out there practicing Constitutional Law (to some degree) with Obama's influence and great misinterpretations (like the ones he is practicing today) of the great document.

    ReplyDelete
  3. A question that I have asked many people and wondered about myself for a very long time … it has a simple yes or no answer. If one group of people prefers strong government control and management of people’s lives; while another group prefers liberty and desires to be left alone to make good and bad decisions that affect them only; should they be required to enter into conflict with one another and risk bloodshed and loss of life in order to impose their preferences on the other group? Yes or no. My answer is no; unless one wishes to obfuscate, they should be able to peaceably part company and go their separate ways.

    I believe our nation is at a point where there are enough irreconcilable differences between those Americans who want to control other Americans and those Americans who want to be left alone that separation is the only peaceable alternative. Just as in a marriage where vows are broken, our rights guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution have been grossly violated by a government instituted to protect them. The problem our nation faces is very much like a marriage in which one partner has an established pattern of ignoring and breaking the marital vows. Moreover, the offending partner has no intention to mend his ways. Of course, the marriage can remain intact while one party tries to impose his will on the other and engages in the deviousness of one-ups-man ship and retaliation. Rather than domination or submission by one party, or domestic violence, a more peaceable alternative is separation.

    There is no evidence that Americans who are responsible for and support constitutional abrogation have any intention of mending their ways … Article I, Section 8 of our Constitution lists the activities for which Congress is authorized to tax and spend. Nowhere on that list is there authority for Congress to tax and spend for: Medicare, Social Security, public education, farm subsidies, bank and business bailouts, food stamps and thousands of other activities that account for roughly two-thirds of the federal budget.

    Neither is there authority for congressional mandates to citizens about what type of health insurance they must purchase, or how states and people may use their land, or the speed at which they can drive, whether a library has wheelchair ramps, and the gallons of water used per toilet flush. The list of congressional violations of both the letter and spirit of the Constitution is virtually without end. Our derelict Supreme Court has given Congress sanction to do just about anything for which they can muster a majority vote.

    James Madison explained in Federalist Paper No. 45: “The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite. The former will be exercised principally on external objects, as war, peace, negotiation, and foreign commerce. … The powers reserved to the several States will extend to all the objects which in the ordinary course of affairs, concern the lives and liberties, and properties of the people, and the internal order, improvement and prosperity of the State.” Our founder’s constitutional vision of limited federal government has been consigned to the dustbin of history.

    Americans have several options. We can like sheep submit to those who have contempt for liberty and our Constitution. We can resist, fight and risk bloodshed and death in an attempt to force America’s tyrants to respect our liberties and Constitution. A superior alternative is to find a way to peaceably separate into states whose citizens respect liberty and the Constitution. My personal preference is a restoration of the constitutional values of limited government that made us a great nation.

    What do you think?

    ReplyDelete
  4. I'm afraid that the United States is in a position right now that is unmatched in our history - even the darkest days of the War of Independence, Civil War, the two World Wars, the Constitutional crisis of the Nixon Impeachment.

    Today we are teetering at the edge of Constitutional question that is unmatched. The darkness of the question is because of the mixture of lies and minuscule truths that are forthcoming from the Obama White House. Does anyone have a grasp on exactly what & where Obama is headed in this last couple of years as president? For that matter do we really know where he has been in his first 5 years? We have one scandal after another on the books, he has responded with lie after lie, down to the level of false weekly employment reports in order to look better than the situation is.

    If we choose the route of letting him continue unchallenged the risks are enormous. And it seems that there is no interest in pushing the threat of Impeachment at him. After all he has found playing the “race card” an ideal way of escaping clashing with the people easy.

    Ideally we need a “Whistleblower” to come forth. A high ranking, knowledgeable, senior official to put the nation above following this man lockstep into the obliteration we are headed for. Or a House and Senate that wishes to fulfill their Constitutional Oath! Not practical, is it?

    In a letter to Horace Greely on August 22, 1864, Lincoln defined duty and responsibility over egotism and arrogance:


    “I would save the Union. I would save it the shortest way under the Constitution. The sooner the national authority can be restored; the nearer the Union will be "the Union as it was." If there be those who would not save the Union, unless they could at the same time save slavery, I do not agree with them. If there be those who would not save the Union unless they could at the same time destroy slavery, I do not agree with them. My paramount object in this struggle is to save the Union, and is not either to save or to destroy slavery. If I could save the Union without freeing any slave I would do it, and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone I would also do that. What I do about slavery and the colored race, I do because I believe it helps to save the Union; and what I forbear, I forbear because I do not believe it would help to save the Union. I shall do less whenever I shall believe what I am doing hurts the cause, and I shall do more whenever I shall believe doing more will help the cause. I shall try to correct errors when shown to be errors; and I shall adopt new views as fast as they shall appear to be true views.”

    ReplyDelete
  5. It would be nearly impossible for Obama to learn a lesson from a man the likes of President Lincoln. They are apples & rotten apples or oranges & lemons.

    If it were in the ability of Obama to take any constructive advice, he would have done so already and not be in all the shameful circumstances that he has fashioned for himself over the past 5 years.

    No, Obama takes a play from The Frank Sinatra song book every day … “I’ll do it MY way”

    ReplyDelete
  6. For Lincoln it was the Union that mattered. For Obama it is Obamathat matters.

    Simple but creates a very complex problem.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Obama is egotistical and the only way you get to that ego is to knock it down a few pegs with articles of impeachment.

    ReplyDelete