How Insane Is the Democrat Party? Its Radical Left Thinks Infanticide, Legalized Prostitution, and Anti-Semitism Will Attract American Voters

THE INSANE DEMOCRATS NOW OFFICIALLY INCLUDE KAMALA HARRIS, ALEXANDRIA OCASIO-CORTEZ, AND ILHAN OMAR. All three pass far beyond the sanity line on everything they try to seize as winning issues. • • • KAMALA HARRIS's FATHER IS NOT HER BFF. Blabber Buzz lit into Senator Kamala Harris on Sunday. First on the list was an article published in the Jamaica Global Online, written by her father David J. Harris. Senator Harris, a leading contender for the 2020 Democrat presidential nomination, has been one of the main proponents of giving reparations to the descendants of slaves with taxpayer funds. But, says BlabberBuzz, "now a deep, dark secret from her family’s past could come back to haunt her platform and her campaign. And it comes at the hands of Harris’ father who has again become a thorn in the side of his own daughter’s ambitions." • David Harris wrote : “My roots go back, within my lifetime, to my paternal grandmother Miss Chrishy (née Christiana Brown, descendant of Hamilton Brown who is on record as plantation and slave owner and founder of Brown’s Town) and to my maternal grandmother Miss Iris (née Iris Finegan, farmer and educator, from Aenon Town and Inverness, ancestry unknown to me). The Harris name comes from my paternal grandfather Joseph Alexander Harris, land-owner and agricultural ‘produce’ exporter (mostly pimento or all-spice), who died in 1939 one year after I was born and is buried in the church yard of the magnificent Anglican Church which Hamilton Brown built in Brown’s Town (and where, as a child, I learned the catechism, was baptized and confirmed, and served as an acolyte). Looking back now I can say, with certainty and all due credit to Miss Iris, that it was this early intimate exposure to operation of the sugar industry at the local level of small-scale production with family labour and free wage-labour, coupled with my growing curiosity about how these things came to be, that led me, once I started reading about the history of Jamaica, to a closer study of the sugar industry. I came then to understand its origin as a system of global production and commerce, based on slave labour, with Jamaica as a key component of that system from its very start.” • BlabberBuzz gives more details : "Hamilton Brown was born in 1776 in Ireland. He became a sugar plantation owner and founder of Brown’s Town in Jamaica, according to university papers, textbooks, and historical documents. Henry Whiteley wrote a pamphlet entitled 'Three months in Jamaica in 1832, Comprising a Residence on a Sugar Plantation,' where he describes Brown’s views on his slaves : 'The same day I dined at St. Ann’s Bay, on board the vessel I arrived in, in the company with several colonists, among whom was Mr. Hamilton Brown, representative for the parish of St. Ann in the Colonial Assembly… I was rather startled to hear that gentleman swear by his Maker that that Order should never be adopted in Jamaica; nor would the planters of Jamaica, he said, permit the interference of the Home Government with their slaves in any shape. A great deal was said by him and others present about the happiness and comfort enjoyed by the slaves, and the many advantages possessed by them of which the poor in England were destitute. Among other circumstances mentioned in proof of this, Mr. Robinson, a wharfinger, stated that a slave in that town had sent out printed cards to invite a part of his negro acquaintance to a supper party. One of these cards was handed to Mr. Hamilton Brown, who said he would present it to the Governor, as a proof of the comfortable condition of the slave population. But, later that day, after he witnessed slaves being punished by Brown’s overseer, Whiteley wrote : 'The first was a man of about thirty-five years of age. He was what is called a pen-keeper or cattle herd; and his offence was having suffered a mule to go astray. At the command of the overseer he proceeded to strip off part of his clothes, and laid himself flat on his belly, his back and buttocks being uncovered. One of the drivers then commenced flogging him with the cart whip. This whip is about ten feet long, with a short stout handle, and is an instrument of terrible power. It is whirled by the operator round his head, and then brought down with a rapid motion of the arm upon the recumbent victim, causing the blood to spring at every stroke. When I saw this spectacle now for the first time exhibited before my own eyes, with all its revolting accompaniments, and saw the degraded and mangled victim writhing and groaning under the infliction, I felt horror-struck. I trembled and turned sick; but being determined to see the whole to an end, I kept my station at the window. The sufferer, writhing like a wounded worm, every time the lash cut across his body, cried out, 'Lord! Lord! Lord!' When he had received about twenty lashes, the driver stopped to pull up the poor man’s shirt (or rather smock frock), which had worked down upon his galled posteriors. The sufferer then cried, 'Think me no man? Think me no man?' By that exclamation I understood him to say, 'Think you I have not the feelings of a man?' The flogging was instantly recommenced and continued; the negro continuing to cry 'Lord! Lord! Lord!' till thirty-nine lashes had been inflicted. When the man rose up from the ground, I perceived the blood oozing out from the lacerated and [illegible] parts where he had been flogged; and he appeared greatly exhausted. But he was instantly ordered off to his usual occupation.' " • Blabber Buzz states that Whiteley’s account goes on, "describing one victim after the next, including women and young boys. It is truly sickening to read. Brown didn’t stop after the Jamaican slaves were freed. He attempted to make the Irish work on his plantation but failed when he was accused of trying to enslave more people. The historical accounts are so detailed that should Kamala Harris want to search out the families of the people her relative reportedly tortured, she would probably be able to find them." • BlabberBuzz concludes : "If Senator Harris’ wants to pay reparation to the descendants of slaves, she has a prime opportunity to put her own cash where her mouth is. She can start by writing checks to the descendants of the Jamaican slaves that her family owned and worked on their own plantations." • Of course, this is a cynical proposal, and the truth is that Kamala Harris is no more responsible for her ancestors' owning slave than today's white Americans are responsible for the slavery in America that ended in 1863 and 1865. Perhaps her father's article will persuade Senator Harris ot reconsider reparations to the descendants of slavery. • • • KAMALA HARRIS FAVORS LEGALIZING PROSTITUTION. The New York Post reports that : "Senator Kamala Harris recently shared that she is in favor of decriminalizing prostitution and sex work. According to Life Site News, the 2020 presidential hopeful said that despite her previous crack down on sex work when she was California’s Attorney General, she would like to see prostitution -- between two consenting adults -- decriminalized. In an interview with The Roots, Harris noted that when she was a District Attorney in California some fifteen years ago, she was advocating for the prostitute and against the 'johns' and 'pimps.' Harris said, 'I was advocating then that we had to stop arresting these prostitutes and instead go after the johns and the pimps.' " • According to Life Site News, Harris supported two laws -- 2017 Stop Enabling Sex Traffickers Act (SESTA) and Allow States and Victims to Fight Online Sex Trafficking Act (FOSTA) -- which tightened restrictions on those who willingly facilitate, support or assist in sex trafficking and on online sex trafficking. In the recent interview, however, when asked if she believed sex work should be 'decriminalized,' Harris responded, 'I think so. I do.' Harris clarified why she supported the above-mentioned laws noting that, to her, there are distinct differences between which types of sex work should be legal and which types of sex work should not. Harris noted that in the case of consenting adults she believes prostitution should be legal. In situations where prostitutes are being exploited by others, however, Harris believes that should be punishable. Harris said : “I think that we need to understand though that it is not as simple as that… there is an ecosystem around that that includes crimes that harm people, and for those issues, I do not believe that anybody who hurts another human being or profits off of their exploitation should be admonished or should be free of criminal prosecution. When you are talking about consenting adults, I think that, you know...yes. We should really consider that we can’t criminalize consensual behavior as long as no one is being harmed.” • Life Site News speculates that even if Harris made these comments to appease pro-prostitution activists who felt that by supporting SESTA and FOSTA, Harris was actually endangering sex workers more by pushing prostitution underground even further. • • • KAMALA HARRIS CONTINUES TO SUPPORT ABORTION UP TO BIRTH. In a recent interview, Senator Kamala Harris defended abortions up to birth. The California Senator said she supports women making the decision whether or not to terminate the life of their unborn baby even if that abortion occurs just before birth. Harris voted with Senate Democrats to block an anti-infanticide bill that would offer medical care and treatment for babies who survive abortions. Harris, a 2020 hopeful who voted against Republican Nebraska Senator Ben Sasse’s anti-infanticide bill, would not say if abortion was ever immoral. Senator Harris told the Daily Caller : “I think it’s up to a woman to make that decision, and I will always stand by that. I think she needs to make that decision with her doctor, with her priest, with her spouse. I would leave that decision up to them.” • In 2017, Senator Harris co-sponsored a radical pro-abortion bill that would have legalized abortions for basically any reason up to birth. The so-called “Women’s Health Protection Act” was introduced in 2017, with dozens of Democrat sponsors, including Harris and presidential candidates Elizabeth Warren, Cory Booker, Beto O’Rourke, Kristen Gillibrand and Bernie Sanders. Nicknamed the “Abortion Without Limits Until Birth Act” by pro-life groups, the bill would have invalidated nearly all state and federal abortion regulations, including waiting periods, informed consent requirements, bans on late-term abortions and sex-selection abortions and more. • Harris, like all radical Democrats, refuse to listen to Americans, who tell pollsters that legislation like the bill, which was similar to New York’s radical new pro-abortion law, is strongly opposed by voters. A new Susan B. Anthony List poll found that 77% of likely voters support legislation to protect infants born alive after botched abortions. It also found that 62% oppose bills to expand late-term abortions. Polls by Gallup and Marist have found similar results. • Sadly, Senator Harris has a long track record promoting abortion and recently came under fire for calling a pro-life Catholic nominee an “extremist” simply because he is a member of a Catholic group. • • • OCASIO-CORTEZ IS AN EASY TARGET FOR AMERICANS WHO DISAGREE WIT HER RADICAL PRONOUNCEMENTS. BlabberBuzz published on Sunday an article from the Federalist Papers that reported : "A new trend took Twitter by storm on Saturday and into Sunday to mock New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. The hashtag game #OcasioCortezChildrensBooks viciously mocked the 29-year-old and it does not require a ton of explanation. Sit back, relax and see if you can think of your own Ocasio-Cortez children’s books as we look at some of the best....The Very Hungry Socialist....The Lion, The Witch, and The Biodegradable Non-Gender Specific Wardrobe....The Little Engine that Couldn’t without Govt Assistance....Alexandria and the Terrible, Horrible, No Good, Very Bad Ideas....I Have Your Money in my Pocket....Little Red Robbing Hood....If You Give a Mouse a Cookie, I’ll Take 70%....Stalin And Gretel....Alexandria and the Terrible, Horrible, No Good, Very Bad Green New Deal....Charlie and the Closed Chocolate Factory....The Little Engine That Could But Was Unwilling to Work." • And, while AOC says things that we can easily poke fun at, Greenpeace Co-Founder, Dr. Patrick Moore, has been in an ongoing spat with New York Democratic Socialist Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez over the overly-ambitious Green New Deal that could quadruple the national debt. Moore, who has since split with Greenpeace, now refers to himself as the “sensible environmentalist.” The Green New Deal calls for an ultra-Progressive list of environmental goals such as the elimination of all fossil fuels, nuclear energy, air travel, 99% of cars and the retrofitting of every single building in America for “state of the art energy efficiency.” AOC’s plan even throws in government-guaranteed jobs -- and simply hands cash to anyone “unwilling to work,” along with healthy food and a free house. BUT, the AOC plan would also, as Moore notes, kill everything on Earth : "@AOC's Green New Deal calls for: "(J) removing greenhouse gases from the atmosphere."https://t.co/t9HuWwC1rITechnically (scientifically) this would mean removing all H2O vapour and all CO2 which would mean the eradication of all life on Earth. Brilliant. ?? pic.twitter.com/i91rvW0HXI" — Patrick Moore (@EcoSenseNow) February 19, 2019. After AOC suggested in late February that she was “in charge” until someone comes up with a better plan, Moore fired back, tweeting : “Pompous little twit. You don’t have a plan to grow food for 8 billion people without fossil fuels, or get the food into the cities. Horses? If fossil fuels were banned every tree in the world would be cut down for fuel for cooking and heating. You would bring about mass death.” Several hours later, Moore explained : “You are delusional if you think fossil fuels will end any time soon, maybe in 500 yrs. AOC’s attitude is unjustifiably condescending. She is a neophyte pretending to be wise. Her kind bring ruination if allowed to be 'in charge.' " Moore has continued his criticism -- The "world as it is" has the option of taking the subway rather than a taxi, option of Amtrak rather than plane, option of opening windows rather than A/C. You're just a garden-variety hypocrite like the others. And you have ZERO expertise at any of the things you pretend to know. • Experts estimate that Ocasio-Cortez's Green New Deal would cost every US household $600,000 !!! • And, the Western Journal Conservative Tribune reminded us on Sunday that after fellow Democrat freshman Representative Rashida Tlaib accused Republican Representative Mark Meadows of using one of his staffers as a “prop” during Capitol Hill hearings involving Michael Cohen, the former personal attorney for President Donald Trump and an uproar arose over Tlaib’s remarks, Ocasio-Cortez rushed to Tlaib’s defense, claiming Tlaib was simply telling the truth : “Total bravery from @RashidaTlaib as she reminds the nation that tokenism *is* racism https://t.co/z7K0idYd0F"— Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@AOC) February 28, 2019. In response to one Twitter user, who questioned how many blacks are working on her own staff, Ocasio-Cortez tweeted that she didn’t feel the need to advertise that : “We have Black staff. We don’t parade them to show the world how diverse our team is, and use that as some kind of evidence of the absence of racism. That’s what tokenism is. https://t.co/5qWMqy9522" — Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@AOC) March 2, 2019. THEN, the Tweets poured in -- Allie Beth Stuckey, a conservative commentator and comedian who has roasted Ocasio-Cortez before, summed it up : “So, if someone doesn’t have any/enough black people on their staff, that’s racist. But if someone does have black people on their staff and says that they do, that’s also racist. Thank you for making this perfectly clear.” Scott Adams, the creator of the “Dilbert” comic strip, sarcastically asked for a clarification : “I need clearer rules. Can I tweet that my staff is diverse so long as I am not parading it around? And hypothetically, if I have a black friend -- and I’m not saying I do, as I understand that would be racist tokenism -- should I keep it to myself?” • Yes, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is becoming the easiest target in the Washington Swamp. • • • ILHAN OMAR CONTINUES DOWN THE ANTI-SEMITIC PATH. Breitbart's Joel Pollak has this to say about Omar : "Representative Ilhan Omar (D-MN) was forced to apologize last month for anti-Semitic remarks accusing pro-Israel politicians of being paid off by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC). Now she is in trouble again after she accused Americans who support Israel of showing 'allegiance to a foreign country.' Both remarks have anti-Semitic connotations. And both show that Omar refuses to acknowledge the truth : that Americans genuinely support Israel. That truth persists despite the rights or wrongs of Israel’s conduct in any particular conflict, or indeed the case for Israel in general. One reason is cultural. As historian Michael Oren (who later served as Israel’s ambassador to the US) has shown, the Protestant roots of the American Republic were nourished by a common reverence for Biblical Israel, and many Founding Fathers believed in the eventual restoration of a Jewish state. That translates into deep support for Israel today. Americans also see Israel as a country with shared values : liberal democracy, religious tolerance, a free press. These are values that contrast sharply with those of Israel’s neighbors -- including the Palestinians. Moreover, Americans respect Israel because of its amazing success -- politically, militarily, economically, and especially technologically. And Americans also respect Israel as a haven for oppressed Jews worldwide : to support Israel is to support justice. These reasons for supporting Israel are very difficult to dislodge. Opponents of Israel tend to seize on immediate controversies -- most recently, Israel’s use of lethal force to stop Palestinian 'protesters' at the Gaza border fence last spring. It turned out the vast majority of the 'protesters' were members of the Hamas terrorist organization, and they were attempting to invade Israel, not protest the 'occupation,' which ended in Gaza in 2005. It is very difficult to generate sustained outrage against Israel when the conduct of Israel’s enemies is so outrageous. Last week, the Palestinian Authority rejected the tax revenues that Israel routinely collects for it because Israel had deducted, for the first time, the payments the Palestinian government gives to terrorists and their families. When you are willing to starve your own people for the sake of mass murderers, Americans tend not to have sympathy. There is a broader case that Israel’s opponents wish to make -- one that denies the legitimacy of Israel itself, arguing the Zionist enterprise is a settler-colonialist movement imposed on an indigenous people. That argument denies the Jewish connection to the land of Israel, which has continued for millennia, and which even the Qur’an accepts. It also ignores the way Israel was established -- not by conquest, nor as the agent of any foreign power, but by Jews themselves. And it ignores the fact that Israel sought peace and co-existence with its Arab neighbors from the start. Omar told her audience last week -- the one that applauded her remarks about 'allegiance to a foreign country' -- that she wanted a 'debate of what is happening with Palestine.' But the last thing she wants is a real debate. That is why she resorts to conspiracy theories that suggest the other side of the debate is using nefarious methods to win." • Pollak points out that Ilhan Omar, a first-year representative from Minnesota, is one of the first two Moslem women in Congress, and she rejects the idea either she or the other Moslem in Congress, Rashida Tlaib,could be motivated by hate : “No, we know hate looks like! We experience it every single day!” There is truth to that, says Pollak, "as a reprehensible poster by a Republican in the West Virginia state capitol, linking her to 9/11, shows. But that does not excuse Omar’s use of hateful anti-Jewish themes to evade the truth, which is, plainly, that Americans love Israel." • Jonathan Greenblatt, chief executive officer of the Anti-Defamation League, denounced discrimination of both faiths Sunday, writing on Twitter : “I am appalled by @IlhanMN’s #anti-Semitic comments, but that does not diminish my revulsion at this poster. It’s a smear, not only against her but also against the entire Moslem-American community. I call on people of all faiths to join me in condemning it.” • Representative Eliot L. Engel (D-N.Y.), chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, has demanded an apology over comments Omar made last Wednesday, less than a month after she was condemned by bipartisan leadership for suggesting that pro-Israel lobbying groups and Jewish politicians influence American politics. Omar's latest comments came during a town hall in Washington while speaking about liberal issues. “I want to talk about the political influence in this country that says it is okay for people to push for allegiance to a foreign country,” Omar said. In a statement Friday, Eliot said that he welcomed debate in Congress but that it was “unacceptable and deeply offensive to call into question the loyalty of fellow American citizens because of their political views, including support for the US-Israel relationship. Her comments were outrageous and deeply hurtful, and I ask that she retract them, apologize, and commit to making her case on policy issues without resorting to attacks that have no place in the Foreign Affairs Committee or the House of Representatives.” On Sunday, Representative Debbie Dingell (D-Mich.), when was asked about Omar’s words on Fox News, said lawmakers need to be careful not to use anti-Semitic language : “We need to make sure -- on both sides -- that everyone is being very careful. I see it on both sides. I see too much hatred, period.” Dingell also condemned the anti-Muslim poster that surfaced Friday during a Republican event in the West Virginia Capitol. The poster, which Democrats have called racist and Islamophobic, linked Omar to the September 11, 2001, attacks. • In February, more than 20 House Democrats demanded an apology from Omar after she suggested (again, on Twitter) that Israel’s allies in Congress were wealthy Jews driven by money. Trump called for Omar to resign from Congress or give up her seat on the House Foreign Affairs Committee -- which is why Representative Engel, chairman of the Committee, called her out for anti-Semitic remarks. BUT, while House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and bipartisan leadership issued a joint statement insisting on an apology for her “use of anti-Semitic tropes and prejudicial accusations about Israel’s supporters,” Pelosi has refused to remove Omar from the House Foreign Affairs Committee. • The accusation that pro-Israel Americans -- and Jews in particular -- owe “allegiance” to Israel is a common anti-Semitic theme on the extreme right and extreme left, implying conspiracy theories of Jewish control and “dual loyalty.” Representative Rashida Tlaib (D-MI) made a similar comment in January, for which she was also criticized. Omar was forced to apologize last month for anti-Semitic comments she made on Twitter alleging that a pro-Israel group, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), had bought the support of members of Congress. (AIPAC does not donate money to candidates.) But, she has received support, however, from the “Progressive” left -- and from ostracized white supremacist David Duke, who tweeted his support for Omar’s views about Israel on Thursday. • • • DEAR READERS, these holier-than-thou radical Insane Democrats need to be exposed for what they are -- power-hungry demagogues -- political leaders who seek support by appealing to the desires and prejudices of ordinary people rather than by using rational argument, that is, rabble-rousers. These rabble-rousers can't even properly assess their own political vulnerabilities, let alone the values of the American constitutional Republic and her citizens. In their dash for political power, they somehow believe that infanticide, legalized prostitution, and anti-Semitism will make America rally to them. Nothing could be farther from the truth.