Sunday, June 19, 2016

Hillary's Email Problems Got Worse in Early June

A former Secret Service agent has written in a new book about Hillary Clinton’s “Jekyll and Hyde” temper. Gary Byrne writes in the introduction of “Crisis of Character: A White House Secret Service Officer Discloses His Firsthand Experience with Hillary, Bill and How They Operate,” that Hillary was “erratic, uncontrollable and occasionally violent....she simply lacks the integrity and temperament to serve in the office....And with Hillary’s latest rise, I realize that her own leadership style – volcanic, impulsive, enabled by sycophants and disdainful of the rule set for everyone else – hasn’t changed a bit.” The book is due out June 28. ~~~~~ But, it seems, lawyers for the State Department are doing their best to keep the former Secretary on track for the presidency and off the public record, saying in a court filing in early June it would take 75 years to release the emails of Hillary Clinton's staffers. The filing noted that the records requested in two lawsuits by the Republican National Committee consist of 450,000 pages and include the former Secretary of State's aides Cheryl Mills and Jacob Sullivan as well as State Department official Patrick Kennedy : "Given the Department's current [Freedom of Information Act] (FOIA) workload and the complexity of these documents, it can process about 500 pages a month...16-and-2/3 years to complete the review of the Mills documents, 33-and-1/3 years [for] the Sullivan documents, and 25 years [for] the Kennedy documents – or 75 years in total." State Department spokeswoman Elizabeth Trudeau told CNN that FOIA requests have tripled since 2008 : "In fiscal year 2015 alone we received approximately 22,000 FOIA requests." ~~~~~ The State Department refusal to comply with FOIA law is illegal and should be an investigation in itself, but Americans and GOP congressional oversight seem to be indifferent to this massive cover-up, remaining silent in the face of the apparent arrogance of the President in allowing his State - and Justice - Departments to flout the law. ~~~~~ Also in early June, legal public interest watchdog Judicial Watch released the transcript of a three-hour deposition with a senior State Department aide about Hillary Clinton’s private email server. Stephen Mull, State Department Executive Secretary under Clinton, is the third person interviewed in the FOIA lawsuit seeking to make public the details of Clinton's controversial email setup. In his deposition recorded at the Justice Department, Mull provided few new details about Clinton’s email arrangement or State’s record-keeping practices, repeatedly insisting he could not recall various aspects of the setup. In particular, Mull testified he had no memory of what led him to write a 2011 email proposing that Hillary use a State Department email account on one of two department-issued BlackBerry devices. “I don't recall why, no....I don't recall the circumstances that led me to -- to write that.” In the 2011 email, Mull assured Clinton aides that the government email account would “mask her identity” but “would also be subject to FOIA requests." Mull said : “I can't recall the circumstances that led me to write this. But I do speculate it would have been to ensure that it was clear that Secretary Clinton's name would not appear on the State Department's directory.” At the time, longtime Clinton aide Huma Abedin told Mull a BlackBerry using a State 'dot gov' email account “doesn’t make a whole lot of sense.” ~~~~~ Dear readers, two related facts are red flags. First, IT expert Bryan Pagliano, who set up and maintained Hillary's secret email server, was scheduled to be deposed in early June, but a federal judge delayed the interview after Pagliano’s lawyers said he would assert his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. And, if that doesn't disturb and anger America, this really should. Stephen Mull is now the Obama administration’s lead coordinator of implementation for the Iran nuclear deal. Did his poor memory land Mull the new job -- or was it perhaps payment for lying under oath on behalf of Hillary.

5 comments:

  1. All of this information about Hillary polled on top of what we already know, I have one simple question ... " How stupid are those people who keep saying Hillary is trustworthy, that she is best suited to be President, that she is honest and forthright, and the ones who vote for her in all the Primaries, and lastly those that donate to her campaign and work her phone banks - just how stupid are they?

    ReplyDelete
  2. As we get closer to the discussions, the debates, and the nitty gritty of what a presidential campaign is really all about, isn’t it time (even for the most miss informed potential voters) that we take a very long, in-depth look at the entire Clinton families activities from the days in Little Rock, AK to the e-mail debacle of Hillary Clinton – Secretary of State regime?

    It’s all out there and seeing that it hasn’t been proven to be just trumped up political charges, but rather fact. This is a clam of 3 self-achieving (at any cost from wide open Insider Information Trading to treasonous handling of classified documents, to possibly murder intentional or otherwise), money hungry, power grabbing, and blackmailing want-a bee’s.

    What do they want-to-bee you ask? They want to be the family that brings down America. They want to be as rich as they were once poor. They want to be historical thought of as they see themselves to be, not as they actually are. They want to undisturbed to live as far outside the law as they wish, and never to be called on their actions. Etc.,

    And why do they expect all this? One reason and one reason only … they are the Clintons, and they are entitled as such

    Well they are not. I know that and so do you. So act on what you know, not what the press says about them.

    Ask your Representative, your Senators, your Governors to stand up and do what is right, and what the Clinton’s would do to them if push ever came to shove. NO ONE is above the law unless we the people allow them to be, and that is exactly what a very large percentage of the American public seems to be willing to do when it comes toe “The Clinton’s”

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hillary Clinton has given us – Cattle Futures-gate, Rose law Firm-gate, Missing FBI & IRS Records-gate, Vince Foster Death-gate, Travel-gate, protect Bill Clinton from charges of Rape-gate, Benghazi-gate, Illegal War in Syria-gate, Clinton Foundation-gate, Outlandish payments for speeches-gate, numerous cover up lying-gates.

    Be honest …is this really Presidential material or even what you as an individual wants as your president.

    She should be in a Courtroom running for her life, not taking huge illegal foreign donations for her campaign.

    ReplyDelete
  4. In a well-functioning democracy, elites and the people keep each other in check. To some extent, the elites keep the people from implementing dumb policies, policies the people support only because they’re badly informed. To some extent, the people keep the elites from simply running the government to their own advantage at the expense of everyone else. Many supporters of democracy decry the power of elites. They should be careful what they wish for because this fragile balance of 'checks & balances' is controlled by ELECTIONS.

    How badly would the scales tip if Hillary is actually elected President. Think of it just that way ... how far out of balance would the power sway?

    ReplyDelete
  5. For Hillary & Bill Clinton, Barrack Obama to get away with all they have (and all they will in the future) 4 questions comes to mind …

    1. Are all these big and little scandals symptoms of a federal government that is too complex for anyone to control?
    2. Is it actually the enduring staffs of the federal government that is actually running the daily operations and ultimately the elected officials simply rubber stamp their actions?
    3. Is the federal government is unmanageable, a fact verified even by the progressive experts at the National Commission on the Public Service itself?
    4. Is the most important social-science lesson of the 20th century is that social life is too complex to be understood by—much less be managed by—any central political authority?


    If the answer is yes to these questions, then all the Hillary's can get away with murder, treason, and anything else they want to.

    ReplyDelete