Saturday, October 3, 2015

Saturday Politics...Hillary and her Emails

It's Saturday politics and here's an interesting emailbag question : What's the real possibility that Hillary escapes her felonious email activity? Will a Clinton-appointed judge pigeonhole her problems with some legal maneuver?" ~~~~~ Hillary leads in polls ranking Democratic 2016 candidates, but is behind key Republican candidates. She's also seen as the least trustworthy candidate and is described as a liar. The Clintons know they must end the email scandal. So, Bill is on TV telling America how honest Hillary is and what a good President she'd be, in the "aw shucks" style he masters, adding that he's been out of politics so long he doesn't know what's going on - like the fox doesn't know where the chicken coop is. ~~~~~ How dangerous was Hillary's use of a private email server? National Security Agency chief Admiral Mike Rogers told a Senate hearing last week it would be an “opportunity” for spy agencies if the foreign minister of Russia or Iran used a private email server for official business. Senator Tom Cotton said he wanted the NSA director’s “professional opinion," asking whether Rogers considered the communications of top presidential advisors, even if unclassified, a top priority for foreign spy agencies. “Yes,” Rogers said. ~~~~~ Hillary's email spin : (1) She used a private server because : “I thought it would be easier to carry just one device for my work and for my personal emails instead of two.” But, Clinton’s team admitted she had an iPad and BlackBerry as Secretary of State, both on her private email server. (2) Hillary said she gave her emails to the State Department because it "sent a letter to former secretaries of state, not just to me, asking for some assistance in providing any work-related emails that might be on the personal email.” In truth, department spokesman John Kirby said “in the process of responding to [the Congress Benghazi investigation], State Department officials realized they had access to relatively few email records from former Secretary Clinton.” So State contacted her “during the summer of 2014 to learn more about her email use and the status of emails in that account.” The department also noted missing emails from other secretaries and contacted them in October 2014. (3) Clinton said : “I provided all my emails that could possibly be work-related.” In June, her advisor Sidney Blumenthal gave Congress his Clinton emails, including many she hadn’t given to State. Last week, the Defense Department found emails Hillary sent to General Petraeus that she hadn't provided. Her team now says there's a two-month gap at the start of her tenure at State when she used her private email address but not her personal server. All emails from that period are missing. The Clinton team doesn't know where they are. (4) Clinton said : “It was my practice to communicate with State Department and other government officials on their .gov accounts so those emails would be automatically saved in the State Department system to meet record-keeping requirements." Yet, Clinton top aides chief of staff Cheryl Mills and Huma Abedin had private email addresses Hillary routinely used. (5) Clinton said : “There is no classified material” on the private server. With the latest State Department email release, there are 400 Clinton emails containing classified information. (6) Clinton said the server “was on property guarded by the Secret Service. And there were no security breaches.” The last State email release shows her server was attacked five times by hackers linked to Russia. Her server was also stored at a private data center accessible to people with no security clearance. ~~~~~ Dear readers, Judge Andrew Napolitano said recently : “...when she certified under oath, ‘under penalty of perjury,’ to a federal judge that she had surrendered all her emails to the State Department, in fact she had not.” Napolitano believes the FBI will recommend indicting Clinton over her email use at State. Federal judges have various legal philosophies, but they are honest and don't bend to pressures, even from Clintonland.

5 comments:

  1. Let's take a quick, close look at who all is after Hillary for the misuse, mishandling, and dissemination of well over 400 classified documents on various subjects and at various classified levels ... FBI, CIA, NSA, DIA, 3 Commands of the United States Military, and at least 1 federal Judge, an investigative Senate Committee, a House Sub-Committee, and at least 5 prominent newspapers/TV news networks that have read the formidable truth about these emails that Hillary claims to have NO KNOWLEDGE of.

    Now really can all these people be wrong in their evaluation of the monumental effort that Hillary and her close personal staff went to to pass along this information to uncleared and/or no need to know email recipients?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hillary and all her Progressive Socialist associates have a very weird relationship with treason and treasonous activities.

      Maybe that is why we don’t recognize that what they do mostly is treason by any standard.

      Delete
  2. A short lesson in the handling of classified documents:
    1. Receiving individuals must have a security clearance equal to or above the documents classification
    2. Receiving recipient/addressee MUST have a “need to know” the information contained within the document

    It is not up to the secretary of State of any other grandstanding politician to make up such a list or willy- nilly decides on their own whom they will share the classified information with. Let alone as Ms. Clinton seemingly has and a network that passed the information on to foreign sources.

    No matter the content, a classified document has specific handling procedures that must be followed to the letter of the law.

    Clinton has failed to do this well over 400 times this time with her own email server that was wide open for hacking into and maintenance staff retrieving documents.

    Let’s also remember as First lady Hillary had FBI & IRS documents in the living quarters of the White House she was not cleared to had or view for over 6 months.

    There is a pattern here that would have ANYONE ELSE defending themselves in Court – not out running for president.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anyone that has any interest in the political climate of the United States – every man, women, republican, democrat, independent, liberal, conservative, middle of the road, white, black, Christian, non-believer, etc. – knows without a doubt what Hillary Clinton is all about.

    She is about herself, her husband, and their money machine The Clinton Foundation. Everything is to that end.

    No lie, no deception, no broken law is off the table for Hillary to use when it comes to her and her families money making schemes.

    She is a vicious machine with no ethics, no feelings, and no love of this country. The United States is nothing more than an orchard of fruit trees that she feels entitled to pick whatever she wants with no sense of duty to put any work into the orchard.

    ReplyDelete
  4. The only question that remains today is whether or not Hillary Clinton gets away with another cover-up (emails), like she did in the Vince Foster case, like she did with the Travelgate Scandal, lie she did with Whitewater scandal, the Clinton’s cattle Futures purchase, missing IRS files she had at the White House, Benghazi massacre, Bill Clintons affairs and forced affection, etc, etc and runs for President in 2016, or will she finally be held accountable?

    ReplyDelete