Friday, October 2, 2015

Better to Stand with Israel than Fly a Palestinian Flag

During the Crusades, 1095 to 1291, European Jews were in danger of being killed. There are documented accounts of Christians who tried to protect Jews from marauding Crusader groups attempting to kill them because some mideast Jews had fought to defend their towns, and Jerusalem, from the European armies. In the German city of Trier, the local bishop attempted to protect the Jews, but he was weak, and so as the Crusaders attacked, the bishop abandoned the Jews. He then gave them the choice of becoming Christians or being forced to leave town. Other German cities like Mainz had local burghers fight against the incoming Crusaders. Another German town, Cologne, hid all local Jews among their Christian neighbors. ~~~~~ More than 800 years later, Jews are still in danger. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu addressed the United Nations General Assembly yesterday, to plea yet again on behalf of the Jewish people, calling the nuclear deal with Iran a marriage of militant Islam and nuclear weapons. He described widespread international praise for it as a grave misjudgment : “I wish I could take comfort in the claim that this deal blocks Iran’s path to nuclear weapons. But I can’t, because it doesn’t.” Netanyahu didn't abandon his disagreement with the Obama administration now that the Iran nuclear agreement is finalized : "The vast majority of Israelis believe that this nuclear deal with Iran is a very bad deal. And what makes matters even worse is that we see a world celebrating this bad deal, rushing to embrace and do business with a regime openly committed to our destruction. Iran is setting up dozens of terror cells. Imagine what they will do after the sanctions are lifted.” Netanyahu answered his own question : “Unmuzzled,” Iran will “go on the prowl, devouring more and more prey,” he said, reminding the UN that Iran is spending billions on weapons and satellites. “Do you think Iran is doing that to advance peace?” he asked, responding to Obama’s claim that the Iran deal will ensure that their nuclear program is “peaceful.” Netanyahu rejects this argument, saying the agreement does nothing to block Iran’s path to a nuclear weapon : “When bad behavior is awarded, it only gets worse.” Netanyahu acknowledged that "well-intentioned people" believe the deal is the only way to block Iran’s path to the bomb. Yet, “the best intentions don’t prevent the worst outcomes." Netanyahu directly addressed the nations in attendance, challenging them : "If Iran’s rulers were working to destroy your countries, perhaps you’d be somewhat less enthusiastic about the deal. If Iran’s terror proxies were firing thousands of rockets at your cities, perhaps you’d be more measured in your praise. And yet the response from every one of you here, utter silence," he said. "Deafening silence.” After those remarks, Benjamin Netanyahu stood at the podium and glared at the delegates around the room for 45 seconds in silent condemnation of the UN, indeed condemnation of the world. ~~~~~ Dear readers, to emphasize the anti-Israeli character of the United Nations, the Palestinian flag was raised for the first time at UN headquarters on the same day that Netanyahu addressed the General Assembly. Palestinian president Mahmoud Abbas said it was a "proud day." Abbas warned that the PA no longer feels bound by agreements with Israel he claimed are "continually violated....we cannot continue to be bound by these agreements and Israel must assume all of its responsibilities as an occupying power." Netanyahu's office said Abbas's speech was "deceitful and encourages incitement and lawlessness in the Middle East." The General Assembly passed a motion earlier this month to raise the Palestinian and Vatican flags. Israel voted against it, with the United States and six other countries, while 45 countries abstained. In 2012, the General Assembly voted to upgrade Palestine's status to that of a "non-member observer state" - the same status the Vatican holds - only fitting since the Vatican just recognized the "state of Palestine." Far better to stand with Israel.

5 comments:

  1. Actions speak louder than words. And the actions of Barrick Obama against not primarily the “state” of Israel, but ALL JEWISH PEOPLE EVERTYWHERE are a gut wrenching, shameful act for anyone let alone the president of the United States.

    Obama says he is for Human Rights for everyone, but he demonstrates daily that that is simply another of his lies that he justifies and has the support of world organizations, countries, world leaders, and religious zealots.

    Obama is a racist radicle. He is a closet follower of the Muslim religion who has been anti-Semitic his entire life. Deep in his evil heart he truly believes that the destruction of the Jewish people and the State of Israel is somehow a justifiable position. He is as guilty of intolerance of Jews everywhere as Hitler was. He advocates (silently) by his actions or lack thereof everything possible to hasten the obliteration of Israel and it’s people.

    Barrack Obama’s Middle East policy is genocide of Israel and Jews. He sickens me to the pit of my stomach.

    ReplyDelete
  2. If it is the position (and it is) of the UN, various associations of European countries, NATO (to a degree) that the preservation of Israel, the welfare of the Jewish people is not worth the confrontation or a strongly backed stance with the State of Israel ... then maybe we should end our active association and monetary participation of bodies and countries that do not view the American citizens view that Israel & the Jewish community is the only reason for any ones involvement in the Middle East?

    If being tied down to a winless war against prehistoric ideas is not in the end for nothing more than the the existence of Israel - then what is it all for?

    You must remember that it it wasn't for the extremist, murderous crews floating around various countries killing not only Christians but other non responsive Muslims the Muslim world would be much more united and worried only about the price of a barrel of oil on the open market.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Obama is throwing up his hands and walking away from all the trouble spots that border Israel and the United States moral responsibilities to Jews everyplace.

    We get and have gotten nothing but insignificant answers to very significant questions over the past 6.75 years. But now with Iran most likely already in possession of a nuclear device (and many more on the way) and Russia entrenching itself right next door to Israel the stakes in this game has suddenly risen to major consequences – the continued existence of Israel and the welfare of all Jewish people everyplace.

    Putin on the other hand is a master at playing the “zero sum game” of diplomacy. He sharpened his skills in the Ukraine and is now playing in the big game.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I think the following fact speaks to what & who Obama really is.

    When Obama and Putin meet in New York City at the United Nations the other day it was passed off by all involved as a short meeting, not long in the planning stage of 2 world leaders.

    But did anyone notice the fact that within 3 hours after the meeting concluded a 3 Star Russian General was announcing the Russian move into Syria to start that very evening bombing runs aganist who we are still not sure.

    Is this a coincidence? NO. Was Putin that forceful that Obama was left with no alternative to oppose Russian entry into Syria? NO he wasn't.

    Did Obama find this move by Russia exactly what he needed to exit Syria except for his "secretive" coalition already secretly operating in Syria against ISIS but with no dramatic stoppage effort against ISIS at all? YES.

    Folks we are being duped once again by Obama and his lies.

    This entry into Syria by Russia was well thought out and planned

    ReplyDelete
  5. I just don't know what is in store for the Middle East, for Israel, and fir the world in the next 493 days of the Obama administration and the interface of Putin, Obama, terrorism, and the attempt to ill-legitimize the freedoms and liberties that are those of Anerica.

    I don't think it's good. I'm not sure the will to resist is there. I just don't know.

    ReplyDelete