Thursday, May 8, 2014
Now Is the Time to Take on al-Qaida in Africa
There's an old American expression : "Fish or cut bait." And horrific as the kidnapping and threatened sale of 287 teenaged Nigerian schoolgirls is - it could be, it just may be, that it is the turning point in the rarely opposed expansion of African jihadist terrorist groups trained and funded by al-Qaida - it could be the moment when the continent and the world realize that sitting back cutting bait just won't be enough, it's time to fish. That is not to say that the war is over, not by a long shot. ~~~~~ The kidnapping of 287 schoolgirls three weeks ago by Boko Haram has gradually ignited Nigerians' revulsion, bringing them together under the #bringbackourgirls tag on the internet. Angry Nigerian protesters have spilled onto the streets this week, supported by a growing worldwide internet support campaign that has seriously shaken President Goodluck Jonathan and his previously disengaged government. Jonathan had hoped to showcase the country's emergence as Africa's largest economy as host of the Africa meeting of the World Economic Forum, the continent's version of Davos. That meeting is ongoing in the Nigerian capital, Abuja, which also has been the recent scene of two bomb blasts blamed on Boko Haram. The Boko Haram terrorist group has operated for 12 years in northern Nigeria, killing thousands of people - Christians as well as Moslems - in a campaign of bombing and massacres. But, it expanded its reach in 2010 with the help of al-Qaida in the Islamic Maghreb, the al-Qaida terrorist network's affiliate in West Africa which was also involved in the Benghazi attack. AQIM took in Boko Haram fighters for training in its camps in southern Somalia, beginning in 2010, and after that, Boko Haram's attacks and executions have escalated. Funding sources for Boko Haram are unclear, but it seems to be partially funded by bank robberies and by other Islamist groups. In February 2012, arrested officials revealed that "donations from members, its links with al-Qaida in the Islamic Maghreb, AQIM, opened it up to more funding from groups in Saudi Arabia and the UK." They went on to say that other sources of funding included the Al Muntada Trust Fund and the Islamic World Society. Boko Haram also extorts local governments for so-called "protection money." ~~~~~ But, Boko Haram's mass abduction of the schoolgirls may have been the step too far. It appears to have galvanized global attention and offers of security assistance from foreign countries to help rescue the girls. The US has promised support, including personnel and equipment to assist with communications, logistics and intelligence planning, but will not provide any military operations. Britain and China said Nigeria had accepted their offers of help in the form of euipment and personnel, and France said it was sending in a "specialized team" already in French West Africa to help with search and rescue of the girls.
Nigerian President Jonathan in a phone call with David Cameron shortly after the prime minister told the Commons that the mass abduction was "an act of pure evil," said the abductions had "united people across the planet to stand with Nigeria to help find these children and return them to their parents." Cameron said that Britain was ready to provide whatever assistance it could. President Obama has said the US is doing its utmost to help bring the "terrible situation" to a swift and safe end. ~~~~~ But in a defiant act, on Tuesday Boko Haram attacked Gamboru, a town in northeastern Nigeria near the border with Cameroon. Residents who survived the Boko Haram attack criticized government security forces for failing to intervene even though they had been warned that the militants were camped in the bush nearby. At least 50 bodies have been recovered, many horribly burned, in the latest chapter of the Islamist militants' relentless campaign of terror. The number of people killed in the Gamboru attack was initially reported by a senator to be as many as 300. Some Gamboru residents said bodies were recovered from the debris of burned shops around the town's main market, which was the focus of the attack. Bodies were discovered when the market reopened on Wednesday as health workers, volunteers and traders searched for missing people. Survivors report that most of the bodies were burned beyond recognition. Some of the victims were traders from Chad and Cameroon. "They hid in shops so as not (to) be killed while fleeing," an official explained, but the attackers threw bombs into the market, killing them in the burning buildings. More than 1,500 Nigerians have been killed this year by Boko Haram, who behead, slash with machetes and burn their victims. ~~~~~ Dear readers, it would be comforting to believe that Boko Haram is the only well-trained and well-financed extremist jihadist terrorist group operating in Africa. It is not. AL Shabaab / al-Qaida in the Islamic Magreb / Boko Haram -- all connected across west, north and east Africa by joint training camps and funding. Terrorism experts estimate that about half of the $120 million paid in ransoms to terrorist groups worldwide since 2004 has gone to al-Qaida’s branches and affiliated groups in Africa, providing funds to pay fighters, buy increasingly sophisticated weaponry and underwrite al-Qaida operatives elsewhere. Elsewhere includes Mali, Libya and Algeria where separate groups are forming and training. Denmark and Burkina Faso are in a partnership to eliminate extremists - Denmark has pledged $22 million. Switzerland is helping several African countries to combat money laundering by terrorist groups. France is active in Mali and drove out AQIM last year. But, more is needed and now. Afghanistan and Pakistan and Yemen prove how difficult al-Qaida is to dislodge once it takes root. Now is the time to eliminate al-Qaida in Africa.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
The War on Freedom and the War on Terrorism (quiet possibly the same for the most part) has been gathering steam since the Munich Massacre on 9/5/1972 killing 11 members of the Israeli Summer Olympic Team. This is what I like to refer to as the most recent start of the Islamic terrorist’s assault on Western freedom and non-Islamic supportive countries.
ReplyDeleteIdentifying members of the various main and off shoot branches is somewhat easy. It's the dedication to confront them as need be to eradicate their existence that present the advantage to the terrorists. When a simply evil assailant understands the boundaries of their pronounced enemy the assailants aggression is stronger than all the military might that MIGHT be (but never will be) unleashed at them.
To defeat EVIL, evil must be confronted by unrestrained force. Force that is greater than the terrorists can imagine.
We treat these terrorist with respect and dignity. When captured we put them up in jails that are palaces to their homeland accommodations. We grant them every right that citizens of the world enjoy. Therefore the terrorists by their barbarous religion have NO RESPECT and have no fear of us.
Right after 9/11 was a time to drive home the message of our will to win this war and by the grounds that we were willing to react to their terroristic killing attack where ever and whenever they wished. We didn’t and the attacks increased in numbers and severity. We need to take back the aggression of this game. We need to dictate the ground rules.
The fight aganist the evil if the various Islamic terrorists organizations will be won not in the so called cout if public opinion, or on radio talk shows with their pundits galore, or in the cathedrals of higher learning. No it will be won in the absolute defeat of the terrorists that prey of defenseless citizens like those young girls from the Nigerian school or the defenseless simple villagers in Gamboru.
ReplyDeleteThe assaulted nations must agree to develop an aggressor attitude. We must treat each and all of these terrorists as the murderous, evil war criminals that they are. We must take their war to them on our terms
The effort against the terrorist’s pure evilness does seem to be less intense than as little as a year or so ago. But I do believe that after nearly 6 years of the Obama administration we need to understand that there are forces at work within our borders with plans and the necessary finances to carry out another massive attack akin to 9/11.
DeleteThe small insignificant strikes that have come along since 9/11 are just irritants and probing maneuvers. Testing for weak spots like train transportation, large civilian gathering events, water & electric supply disruption - we must be more ‘vigilant” and connect to our plight.
Ecclesiastes 3
“To everything there is a season, and a time to every purpose under the heaven: …”
SYMMETRY CARTEL is a term that might best define the methodology that the Free World countries need to embrace if they are to maximize their pugnacious efforts in the War on Terrorism. With symmetry the Dollars/Yen/Euros, etc. spend will be balanced between various entities. The manpower used will be multiplied – not duplicated. And results will be heightened and more significant faster.
DeleteNo one nation can defeat this evilness that grips the daily lives of nearly all of us and certainly will soon if not now. The right hand must know what the left hand is doing or about to do. Operational plans and objectives must be singular not duplicated. Defeat for al-Qaida in say Somalia is defeat for al-Qaida in Somalia – period. Move on to another country where ones expertise is best suited.
The trusted nations that make up this Symmetry Cartel might only be made up of some 6 or 7 nations (USA, Britain, France, Germany, Japan, Australia, and Israel) but the fewer the better because operations need to be secret. Like the soldiers that will fight these battles secrecy is required.
We are playing catch up and have been doing a poor job of it under Obama. Again Obama seems to not understand the possibilities of what can happen with uncontrolled terrorists "slicing & dicing" at their will.
ReplyDeleteThe enemies that have been roaming the planet since 1939 in Poland are different, yet somewhat similar.
Every day that the free world sits and waits to react to the terrorists is a day they become stronger and more impervious and resistant to our actions down the road. By our current action of ‘wait & see’ is an act of dereliction of duty, of negligence, of recklessness by our elected leaders.
ReplyDeleteThese Islamic fundamentalists will come to the peace table when they build the peace table and not a minute sooner. They have spent 4000 years getting to where they are. And where they are is due to our very own ignorance to their objectives and intentions.
For the most part the citizens of the free world are living in LaLa Land. They believe that harm such as we are witnessing in Nigeria and most of every nation on the African continent can’t possibly come in contact with their lives? What about the next car bombing, school massacre, the next unexplainable disaster/accident, the next disruption of your utilities or cable TV? No, they are coming. And they are coming for us faster than we are going for them
We can fight them wherever we make the conscience decision to do that. But there is better than here.
We do though as Casey Pops suggest need to take on al-Qaida in Africa NOW.
If we are to reaffirm the historic American commitment to freedom in the world, it will certainly involve making it clear that we will do whatever we can to support people fighting for fundamental rights, even as we recognize that they must take responsibility for their own success or failure. For many reasons, democracy is seen to be on the defensive today. Authoritarian states are pushing back aggressively against groups working for greater democracy, the turmoil in the Middle East has destroyed the early promise of the Arab Spring, and China’s growing economic and military power has altered the balance of forces in the world at a time when the US and many European countries have entered a period of economic and political malaise.
ReplyDeleteAs important as it is to support people on the front lines of the struggle for freedom, such support will not be meaningful if the United States is perceived as a declining power in retreat from the world. Democracy will not be able to advance in the absence of a stable international order, and such conditions cannot exist if they are not underwritten by American leadership. This does not mean draining our resources by getting bogged down in distant wars. But it does mean backing up our diplomacy with military power and deterrence, in the absence of which we will have little leverage in negotiations with countries that do not share our commitment to peace and the rule of law. Why should they negotiate seriously if they feel they have the option of achieving their objectives by other means, including the use of force?
Committing ourselves to preserving US leadership in the world is a major challenge for US policy. This is not an expression of American arrogance or a reckless form of overreaching. Rather, it is the recognition of a fundamental geopolitical reality. “A world without US primacy,” Samuel Huntington once wrote, “will be a world with more violence and disorder and less democracy and economic growth than a world where the United States continues to have more influence than any other country in shaping global affairs.”
Continued US primacy is simply not possible unless we address the spiraling US public debt under control. The challenge we face today is as great as any in our history. Our national security and the values we cherish, in addition to the future of democracy in the world, rest on our ability to rise to this occasion.
Like it or not, agree with it or not – the fact is that the future of democracy and the new search for democracy by 3rd world countries rest squarely on the shoulders and actions of the United States.