Saturday, May 3, 2014

North Korea's Nuclear Weapons Defiance Has not Taught the West Much about Iran's Intentions

The New York Times reports that new commercial satellite imagery shows that North Korea is expanding its main rocket-launching site and testing engines of what is believed to be its first road-mobile intercontinental ballistic missile. The NYT quoted a website, 38 North, affiliated with Johns Hopkins University's US-Korea Institute, that specializes in the North. The reported activities at the Sohae Satellite Launching Station in Tongchang-ri near North Korea’s western border with China come amid concerns that North Korea may be readying another nuclear test. In recent days, more activity has been reported at an underground nuclear test site in Punggye-ri in northeastern North Korea. The North also has recently conducted engine tests for an ICBM that could potentially deliver a nuclear warhead to the United States, 38 North said on Friday, including at least one engine test for the KN-08 missile in late March or early April, according to 38 North. These tests are the latest in a series of tests for a missile believed to have a range of more than 6,000 miles. Following the engine tests, the next stage for North Korea would be a test launch of the missile, according to the 38 North report : "As this effort progresses, the next technically logical step in the missile's development would be a flight test of the entire system." Commercial satellite imagery indicates movement and removal of missile stages and fuel tanks, as well as changes in the flame trench that could indicate that North Korea has conducted one or more tests in the two-week period from March 22, the report said. South Korea's defense ministry would not confirm the specifics of the report, citing intelligence policy, but said a long-range missile launch by the North could not be ruled out, according to ministry spokesman Kim Min-seok : "It's not easy to conduct a long-range rocket launch right after an engine test but they may have had other things prepared." ~~~~~ North Korea is believed to be developing a nuclear weapon and the technology to miniaturize a warhead to mount it on a long-range missile. In December 2012, it launched a long-range rocket that successfully put an object into space orbit. In February 2013, it conducted a third nuclear test. The report on the engine tests comes a week after 38 North reported heightened activities at the North's nuclear test site at Punggye-ri, indicating it was ready to conduct a fourth nuclear test. A South Korean government official said preparations for a nuclear test at Punggye-ri appeared to be complete, including the sealing of tunnels dug into the mountain range, and all that remained was for the North's leader Kim Jong Un to order it. Since 2006, the United Nations has imposed sanctions on North Korea for its nuclear and missile tests, but the North has pushed ahead with further tests, even disregarding warnings from its sole major ally, China. ~~~~~ BBC News published an update on North Korea's nuclear program ten days ago. The update confirms that the North technically has a nuclear bomb but not yet the means to deliver it via a missile. In 2006, 2009 and 2013, North Korea announced that it had conducted successful nuclear tests - the tests all came after the North was sanctioned by the UN for launching rockets. According to the BBC, analysts believe the first two tests used plutonium as the fissile material. The North is believed to possess enough weapons-grade plutonium for at least six bombs. Whether it used plutonium or uranium for the 2013 test is unclear, but it is an important detail. The US and South Korea have said that they believe the North has additional sites linked to a uranium-enrichment program. A test based on a uranium device would mean new dangers for monitoring and proliferation because weapons-grade plutonium enrichment requires large facilities that are easier to spot. Uranium enrichment uses many, possibly small, centrifuges that can be hidden away. While North Korea has depleted its stocks of "reactor-grade" plutonium needed to make the weapons-grade variety, the country has plentiful reserves of uranium ore. North Korea claims it has "miniaturised" a nuclear device, but experts are not certain whether this is a fact or propaganda. ~~~~~ Dear readers, the details about the North Korean nuclear weapons developmenr program and the efforts of the US, Russia, China and South Korea to bring it under control are eerily like the story of the Iranian nuclear development program - but a few years down the road to having a bomb and the capability to launch it mid-and-long range. The North has pledged several times to halt operations and even destroyed cooling tower in 2008 as part of a disarmament-for-aid deal. But in March 2013, after a war of words with the US and with new UN sanctions in place for the North's third nuclear test, it vowed to restart all facilities at Yongbyon. However, in tbe case of North Korea, the US never believed it was fully disclosing all of its nuclear facilities - a suspicion bolstered when North Korea unveiled a uranium enrichment facility at Yongbyon (purportedly for electricity generation) to US scientist Siegfried Hecker in 2010. Now, consider Iran. While there is every indication that Iran is pushing ahead with enrichment at concealed sites, the US and the UN seem more willing to believe Iran. Only Israel continues to speak out with warnings to the world about Iran's real goals. One would think that America and the UN would have learned their lesson from trying to deal with North Korea's rogue nuclear bomb program. But it seems that they are making the same mistake all over again.

9 comments:

  1. When it comes to Kim Jung Un and his cohorts I think Benjamin Franklin said it best, "Believe none of what you hear, and only half of what you see."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Wishful ThinkingMay 3, 2014 at 6:57 PM

      Think about missiles that carry multiple warhead bombs, and each warhead has multiple, multiple warheads. Small but destructive. low yield nuclear warheads ... great idea isn't it

      Delete
  2. This North Korea & Iran my friends is very serious and overtly dangerous for the world as we know it today.

    The US has closed its eyes to action about North Korea since Bill Clinton allowed one of his big contributors at Singer Corp. to sell weapons guidance system to the North. The North was 25 years at best away from having the system - an act of TREASON some thought!

    ReplyDelete
  3. De Oppressor LiberMay 3, 2014 at 7:48 PM

    The world is beginning to look and sound like Poland 1939. The world seemed to be in denial about Hitler and Nazi Germany then, just as some are now about Iran & North Korea.

    Has anyone stepped back and given the slightest thought about what happen if the missiles start to be launched? What if the experts approximation of time needed for the ability to launch is wrong?

    Has anyone thought about what "Red Line in the Sand" Obama would do if he's awakened at 3AM and told we are under a missile attack? Or would Obama have our troops stand down just like what occurred at Benghazi?

    Far too many unknowns and far too many what ifs.

    ReplyDelete
  4. We are in the middle of a grave predicament that is allowing a small window of opportunity to escape from. “We The People” have made and repeated a very bad choice in electing Barrack Obama as president. He is either the most unqualified individual who has ever been president, the most unknowledgeable person as to the simplest duties of the office – or he is the most “deceptive, evil minded, Illusionist that American presidential politics has seen.

    Obama has either by a strange list of non-connected bad judgments or most likely a long list of preplanned and exculpatory actions to crash our Constitution and lay us bare in the world of evil governments that now have nuclear weapons proficient of reaching either of our shores. He has conducted foreign policy with no policy at a speed of “damn the torpedo’s full speed reverse.”

    FDR needed a war for his legacy and got us ill prepared into WW II, Clinton needed a war for his legacy and bombed an aspirin factory & allowed the prompt advance of Islamic terrorists loose, Hoover who fueled trade wars and exacerbated the Depression, Grant who presided over an outbreak of graft and corruption, but had good intentions, Pierce whose fervor for expanding the borders—thereby adding several slave states—helped set the stage for the Civil War, Buchanan who refused to challenge either the spread of slavery or the growing bloc of states that became the Confederacy. All these individuals put our country in peril, but we were determined to not falter over their mistakes.

    Obama in my opinion is an ‘evil” person. All his mistakes are not by circumstance but by planning I believe. The American people know things are terribly wrong with us from foreign policy, to our stripped military, to healthcare, to the trust in the president. What we need is for someone to step up and without political consideration tell us their plan for correction.

    ReplyDelete
  5. A Stanch ConservativeMay 4, 2014 at 9:49 AM

    "God forbid we should ever be twenty years without such a rebellion.
    The people cannot be all, and always, well informed. The part which is
    wrong will be discontented, in proportion to the importance of the facts
    they misconceive. If they remain quiet under such misconceptions,
    it is lethargy, the forerunner of death to the public liberty. ...
    And what country can preserve its liberties, if its rulers are not
    warned from time to time, that this people preserve the spirit of
    resistance? Let them take arms. The remedy is to set them right as
    to the facts, pardon and pacify them. What signify a few lives lost
    in a century or two? The tree of liberty must be refreshed from
    time to time, with the blood of patriots and tyrants.
    It is its natural manure." Thomas Jefferson, November 13, 1787

    ReplyDelete
  6. A Tool 4 FreedomMay 4, 2014 at 1:35 PM

    The question is not whether we (US) can successfully participate in a nuclear exchange – of which we certainly can with startup countries like North Korea and Iran (or whomever they give their weapons to). The functional question is do we want to risk the lives of innocent by-standers in the Middle East region and that of South Koreans, Japan (depending on the wind direction that day) and bordering Chinese.

    Or do we huddle with the bigger industrialized nations that stand to lose so much more from a shortened nuclear war and pull these “rogue” nations back into reality? And do we or any nation have the leadership tp bring such a move about?

    As it is said of a drug junkie that they must reach rock bottom before help of any sorts is beneficial to kicking their habit. So, must a rogue nation that has nothing worthwhile now and certainly nothing on the horizon be damaged more by a nuclear skirmish that they have unquestionably no chance of winning or can they be induced to sit down, talk, and take “aide” in place of trying to escape falling bombs?

    ReplyDelete
  7. De Oppressor LiberMay 4, 2014 at 2:21 PM

    What we have between North Korea and Iran is a want-a-be Axis of Evil that certainly needs some serious attention. Consider for a moment if North Korea had a nuclear warhead to place on top of one of their problematically reliable long range missiles. Their young, disturbed leader gets all upset and decides to attach the West Coast of the US. He pushes the button and lift off, except down range the missile veers of course. Ops! Perth, Australia becomes the 3rd city to suffer a nuclear attack and 50,000 are dead and dying. WHO DOES WHAT, NEXT?

    The possible scenarios are too many to go into, but you get the picture. Before there is time for cooler minds to take hold – we’re looking at a modified nuclear winter probably.

    Sounds extreme? It probably is extreme - but how extreme? Do you realize that there are military plans for just such scenarios.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Concerened CitizenMay 5, 2014 at 9:26 AM

    Right now the "West" is fragmented; they have no single person leadership/spokesperson. They have no real unity, no purpose of collective actions. The West is reactive for the most part and the defeat of the rogue nations (that have this artificial umbrella of unity) requires a strong cohesive PROACTIVE assemblage of nations.

    This emptiness of leadership in the West is due solely to the weakness of Obama as a leader, his inability to be honest and forthright with his positions and actions, and the uncertainty of who he is. The United States stance on subject has NO influence on our once close friends of Europe and Asia.

    The re-election of Obama in 2012 was an example of “not being able to see the forest for the tress mentality” … something our once trusted friends seen to have no problem with doing. The man who was swept into nation politics by George Sorros (alone) and rode gallantly on his Trojan horse into Washington DC seems to be a fraud much like his benefactor.

    ReplyDelete