Friday, May 23, 2014

America's Unhappy Truce with the Death Penalty

Controversy in the United States is again emerging over the use of lethal injection drugs, after the botched execution in Oklahoma that left the condemned man writhing on the gurney and dying of a heart attack ten minutes later. But, Tennessee has found a way around the issue: it is bringing back the electric chair -- this is not a bad political film, it is reality. Eight states authorize execution by electrocution, but only at the inmate's discretion. However, Tennessee is the first state to make the use of the electric chair mandatory when lethal injection drugs are unavailable. Tennessee Governor Bill Haslam signed the measure into law Thursday after it passed the Tennessee House, 68 to 13, and the Senate, 23 to 3. "This is unusual and might be both cruel and unusual punishment," according to Richard Dieter, president of the Death Penalty Information Center. Thirty-two states have the death penalty and all of them rely at least in part on lethal injection. Fewer than a dozen states regularly carry out executions, among them Alabama, Arizona, Florida, Georgia Mississippi, Missouri, Ohio, Oklahoma, Virginia and Texas, which accounts for 40% of those executed in the US. The federal government also uses lethal injection but rarely carries out executions. The Supreme Court has never declared a method of execution unconstitutional on the grounds that it is cruel and unusual. It upheld the firing squad in 1879, the electric chair in 1890 and lethal injection in 2008. The Court has made it clear over the years that the Eighth Amendment prohibits inflicting pain merely to torture or punish an inmate, drawing a distinction between a method like electrocution and mediaeval and renaissance European practices such as drawing and quartering. The Constitution prohibits “unnecessary and wanton infliction of pain,” the Court said in 1976. Since then, US states and the federal government have updated execution methods in their efforts to find more humane ways to put condemned criminals to death. First used by New York State in 1890, the electric chair was employed throughout the 20th century to execute hundreds and is still an option in eight states. Since 1976, 158 condemned people have been executed by electrocution. It was considered humane when it was first introduced but has resulted in many horrific executions. In 2000, Florida changed from the electric chair to injection after bungled electrocutions raised concerns that the state’s death penalty would be declared unconstitutional. ~~~~~ America is not in the majority of the world's countries when it comes to the death penalty. China executed more people than any other country last year. Although Chinese authorities treat official execution statistics as a state secret, Amnesty International estimates thousands are killed under the death penalty every year, more than the rest of the world combined. Excluding China, executions rose to at least 778 last year, up from 682 in 2012. Iran was second after China, with at least 369 put to death by the state, followed by Iraq (169), Saudi Arabia (79), and the United States (39). The United States was the only country in the Americas that carried out executions, although use of the death penalty declined last year, to 39 executions from 43 in 2012. In total, 22 countries practiced capital punishment last year, one more than in 2012. Four of those countries - Indonesia, Kuwait, Nigeria and Vietnam - resumed executions after pauses in the practice. There are now officially 23,000 people on death row somewhere in the world. ~~~~~ According to the prestigious Pew polling organization, since 1996, the margin between Americans who favor the death penalty and those who oppose it has narrowed from a 60-point gap (78% favor vs 18% oppose) to an 18-point difference in 2013 (55% favor vs 37% oppose). Among most large American religious groups, majorities support capital punishment. Roughly six-in-ten white evangelical Protestants (67%), white mainline Protestants (64%) and white Catholics (59%) support the death penalty. By contrast, black Protestants are more likely to oppose the death penalty than support it (58% vs 33%), as are Hispanic Catholics (54% vs 37%). The differences among religious groups reflect the overall racial and ethnic picture of support for capital punishment. Twice as many white Americans favor the death penalty as oppose it (63% vs 30%). Among black adults, the balance of opinion is reversed: 55% oppose capital punishment, while 36% support it. The margin is narrower among Hispanics, but more oppose the death penalty (50%) than support it (40%). ~~~~~ Dear readers, you know that I'm opposed to capital punishment. Some ask me why I support war while opposing the death penalty. My answer is that wars are fought by countries or groups with different views of how people should form and regulate their societies. The losing side will be forced into a position not unlike servitude, with their lives and social conventions uprooted. One thinks of western Europe under Nazi occupation. So killing is permitted in wars as one of the means to preserve societies. But, the death penalty is administered to someone who is already captive. They are incarcerated and without power to inflict pain or death to anyone. All that would be required is to install life sentences without possibility of parole to continue their captivity until death. Yes, it's expensive, but it saves the collective American conscience from being torn apart morally. I believe that the United States will finally abolish capital punishment and join the large and growing portion of the world that already has. The death penalty is on the wrong side of ethics, morality and religion, including American protestant Christianity. It puts America on the side of dictators and gulag-enforced totalitarianism. I do not mean that America is either a dictatorship or a totalitarian state -- it is most assuredly not. But its moral authority in the world is needlessly tarnished by state-sanctioned executions. The Italian film director who made Cinema Paradiso has recrntly made a film called Baaria - the story of three generations of Sicilians. In the film, the lead character Peppino says : "A reformist is someone who realizes that, when you bang your head on a wall, it's the head that breaks rather than the wall." That's how I usually feel about opposing capital punishment in America. But the time will come when that wall will break and my head will see the daylight on the other side of the wall.

6 comments:

  1. I think capital punishment is barbaric...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Concerned CitizenMay 23, 2014 at 6:22 PM

      It's barbaric the way those who would be in the position to receive Captial Punishment got to that position.

      Society has a right to protect its self from the mass murders, serial murders, repetitive child molesters, police killers, etc.

      Is it any more human to place an evil person in prison for the rest of his life than to follow the teaching in the Bible ..."an eye for an eye..."

      Delete
  2. De Oppressor LiberMay 24, 2014 at 7:16 AM

    If you can't do the time - Don't do the crime


    I am not pro Death Penalty. I am pro Penalty. I strongly believe that punishment should in some manner or another mimic the crime. And serving the penalty should not be a walk in the park or more comfortable conditions than the criminal had on the outside.

    There are 2 main reasons that jails/prisons are full of repeat offenders.
    1. Life is too posh for the criminal segment of society in confinement.
    2. Repeat offenders are hardened criminals that are what they are-life long criminals.

    78%of our State & Federal prison population is repeat offenders. Where does that put the theory of rehabilitation?

    There must be a better answer than death or wasting away in prison fro years upon years at taxpayers expense. But I certainly do not have the answer

    ReplyDelete
  3. This is a difficult question. I know where I stand on it, but I'm not convinced that it's the right position. You read the pros & cons of the death penalty and both sides have some validity and some fallacies connected.

    Questions that use to be so black & white any more are all shades if grey.

    It seems the time spent of discussing the subject only leads to more grey.

    Is every life precious? I don't know. How precious is the life of someone who without cause violently takes another life. Are people on Death Row really rehabilitation material?

    It's like a debate club issue. One could defend either side of the question.

    ReplyDelete
  4. The 1960s brought challenges to the fundamental legality of the death penalty. Before then, the Fifth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution were interpreted as permitting the death penalty. However, in the early 1960s, it was suggested that the death penalty was a "cruel and unusual" punishment and therefore unconstitutional under the Eighth Amendment. In 1958, the Supreme Court decided that the interpretation of the Eighth Amendment contained an "evolving standard of decency that marked the progress of a maturing society." Although not a death penalty case, opponents applied the Court's logic to executions and maintained that the United States had, in fact, progressed to a point that its "standard of decency" should no longer tolerate the death penalty.

    Maybe we need a once and final attempt to decide this question with the question being presented o the entire voting citizenry in the form of a “Constitutional Amendment”.

    But in the legal world that may only lead to more confusion and debate. Seems that “We the People” just never have the final say any more! Debate at some time must end and we have to get on down the road. If you consider the Abortion question – Roe v Wade certainly only intensified the debate didn’t it. But isn’t Capital Punishment a Constitutional question vs a state’s rights question. The answer should be what the majority of the people want. Not 50 varied ways to have or not have any form of capital punishment verses Life Without Parole (LWOP).

    ReplyDelete
  5. For most capital punishment (death penalty) is regarded as an extreme exertion of state power and is of little use in a free society; though it is of great use to a tyrannical government. But yet we still exert it in extreme cases.

    Proponents of capital punishment believe that such punishment may be justified as deterrent to particularly appalling crimes and as a means of keeping dangerous individuals permanently incapacitated from society.

    For the most part “rehabilitation” is a wish term of the social liberals. It can’t be a workable solution when 65% of Federal & State prisons inmates are repeat offenders. Prisons and their accommodations have become very acceptable to what the inhabitants have outside.

    A thought should be given to the entire sentencing and penal system. In the cases when “sentencing” is the Death Penalty- reviews and appeals should be more complete as to castoff errors.

    It certainly is a question that needs a conclusiveness to it.

    ReplyDelete