Tuesday, April 8, 2014

Ukraine and the Thin Varnish of Civilization

Ukraine's government is struggling to control its eastern regions as pro-Russian "separatists" try to hold on to positions seized in three cities. The Ukraine government recaptured its regional headquarters and detained dozens of pro-Russian protesters in Kharkiv, the country's second-largest city. In Donetsk, 250 km (155 miles) further south, protesters dug in for a third day at the 11-story regional administration headquarters they captured on Sunday and then began to declare their own parallel government. Nothing on Tuesday suggested that government forces had an immediate plan to retake the regional administration building. Donetsk has been the scene of weekly marches on government offices, but on Sunday masked men carrying batons burst through police lines to take over the building. Today, lines of car tires wrapped in razor wire were erected to deter any attempt by police to storm the building, a tactic copied from the anti-government protests in the capital, Kiev, which led to pro-Russian President Yanukovych's overthrow. And, as in Kiev, food stations have been set up inside the Donetsk building, supplied by volunteers and residents. No clear leader or agenda has emerged from Donetsk activists, but they are demanding a referendum to be held no later than May 11, on declaring Donetsk a free, independent area. While none of them have said they necessarily want the region to join Russia, they have also declined to rule out the option. Despite claims by the separatists groups to represent all of Donetsk, a region of more than 4 million people, weekend rallies outside the regional building drew crowds only in the low thousands. In addition, Kiev says unknown "separatists" with weapons and explosives are keeping 60 people hostage and threatening them inside a security service branch in the city of Luhansk. In a statement today, the Ukrainian Security Service said it is not clear who the hostages are or if they are security service employees. The building was seized Sunday by armed pro-Russian protesters. Reuters reported that the protesters occupying the building denied that they had wired the building with explosives and were holding people against their will. "There are no explosives, no hostages. We do not need hostages to get what we want," said Anton one of the protesters who described himself as a coordinator of the action, according to Reuters. ~~~~~ Although Ukraine authorities have had some success in controlling the unrest that swept across eastern provinces Sunday, discontent may threaten Kiev's plans to hold a presidential election on May 25. US Secretary of State John Kerry on Tuesday threatened Russia with tougher economic sanctions if it fails to back down from its involvement in Ukraine. "What we see from Russia is an illegal and illegitimate effort to destabilize a sovereign state and create a contrived crisis with paid operatives across an international boundary," Kerry told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. Kerry called the demonstrations in eastern Ukraine a "contrived pretext for military intervention just as we saw in Crimea." The Ukrainian parliament has voted to toughen the punishment for undermining Ukraine's national security, imposing jail terms of up to 5 years for separatism. Clearly, the seizures of buildings and calls for local votes on secession are an echo of the events that led to Russia's annexation of Ukraine's Crimean peninsula last month. After Yanukovych fled to Moscow, Russian troops took control of Crimea and the region voted to join Russia in a hastily called referendum. The White House announced today a high-level meeting among US, EU, Ukrainian and Russian diplomats to be held in the coming days to try to solve the crisis. In Moscow, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said today that the date and format of the four-way talks haven't yet been agreed. He suggested that Ukraine's presidential candidates could be invited to join the negotiations. The Kiev Post reported today that Russia also warned Ukraine to stop its military preparations in eastern Ukraine or risk civil war, quoting Russian state-owned ITAR-TASS news agency. The Kiev Post also said that Ukraine has been trying to shore up its defenses in case of a Russian attack. In other action, NATO warned Russia not to encroach further into the region, saying it would represent a "serious escalation" of the crisis : "We call on Russia to pull back the tens of thousands of troops it has massed on Ukraine's borders, engage in a genuine dialogue, and live up to its international commitments." Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov appeared to answer the US and NATO by meeting today in Moscow with Angola's foreign minister, thanking Angola for "understanding Russia's stance" in Ukraine." One is tempted to say "Birds of a feather flock together." ~~~~~ It seems useless to say yet again that the Ukraine crisis is extremely dangerous. But, a dear friend recently wrote to me about Vladimir Putin : "It must be considered that Putin is a student of Stalin and Khrushchev. He was, is, and always will be the poster child for the inhumanities that the KGB is well know for. To have women and children be a shield against advancing  forces or as a protector of his own advancing forces would not bother him at all. He is ruthless to the core. So if I were he, what would I do - exactly what he is prepared to do - win a war if that is what it comes to. Putin I think only fears personal defeat. He played the US and some of the EU in Syria and won the confrontation. He has measured the will of Obama and finds there is none there, and little in the EU except for the strength of Chancellor Merkel. I really believe that he is fully ready to risk it all to have his Motherland back in total under his control. And isn't it ironic that what stands in his way of a re-unified Russia is Merkel's strength. I'm concerned with what happens....after the US and EU decide on their next move(s). He holds the instant power via the oil and natural gas that goes to Europe....Reagan told us to beware, that Russia was not to be taken lightly or ignored. And that is what has exactly happened - 'out of sight, out of mind.'" ~~~~~ Dear readers, perhaps the enormity of the possible outcomes in Ukraine is a reminder, as Will Rogers so succinctly put it, that "We will never have true civilization until we have learned to recognize the rights of others." The trouble with this is that what is happening now in Ukraine is being caused by one player, Russian President Putin, who gives no indication that he cares about civilization, at least not in the Greco-Roman sense. Former US Secretary of State Madeleine Allbright once said that in the long term democracy is the most stable form of government, but in the short term it is very fragile. If the West has been called upon to defend democracy-based civilization by forcing Putin to stop his aggression on Ukraine and then eastern Europe, then the West's leaders must accept that the defense may require much more than they had thought necessary. Sanctions thus far have done nothing to stop Putin. What should follow the sanctions? Troop movements. Military support for Ukraine's army. A naval blockade of the Black Sea. One's instinctive reaction is to say - 'Stop. No war over Ukraine.' But, as Reinhold Neibuhr said : "There are historic situations in which refusal to defend the inheritance of a civilization however imperfect, against tyranny and aggression may result in consequences even worse than war." The consequence here is a Putin-led Russian creeping takeover of eastern Europe - until western civilization is looking across a new "wall" at the non-democratic soviet-socialist hegemony reconstructed by an unopposed Vladimir Putin. Ironically, American comedian Carrie Snow reminds us how easy it is to lose civilization and fall into a dark age of brutality led by inhuman tyrants : "Civilization is hideously fragile and there's not much between us and the horrors underneath, just about a coat of varnish."

6 comments:

  1. Former US Secretary of State Madeleine Allbright utterance - “that in the long term democracy is the most stable form of government, but in the short term it is very fragile” may well have been the most prolific, straightforward statement she ever spoke.

    Deeds not words will be the only action that will make Putin BLINK. Sanctions sometimes work with mostly lodged against third world countries that have no infrastructure and are dependent on outside sources for the basic human needs. This is not Russia. Across her (now) 9 time zones she is as self-sufficient as anyone else is.

    Being a bit of a sceptic when it concerns Obama’s trustworthiness – the school is still out for me as to what is occurring between Russia & the EU/US.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Concerened CitizenApril 8, 2014 at 7:36 PM

    “President Obama’s weak foreign policy is the real problem,” - Newt Gingrich

    Speaker Gingrich said this a few weeks ago and it as valid as any other explanation as to what is going on in the tussle between Russia, Ukraine, EU, and the United States. It’s a war of words now and could at the blink of an eye (anyone’s eye) be a war that is logistically irresponsible for the US to be in.

    Who is advising our Sec. of State on the habits of Russian leaders and KGB Officers? Has anyone “profiled” The leaders involved in this skirmish with Russia, Ukraine, Crimea – I think probably not.

    Obama is simply above his pay grade here!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Stand Up & Be CountedApril 9, 2014 at 7:34 AM

    The Ukraine is a situation that Putin keeps reviving. It's sort of has the earmarks of his "Waterloo" or his "Alps Mountains". But the disastrous possibilities just seem to be lingering in the shadows.

    For me that is the troubling part. No one wants to either push the envelope or open the mail and see whats in the envelope.

    If you don't understand the problem, then the solution is out or reach. And this current Foreign Policy group of "experts" have an dutifully earned a negative accomplishment rating in settling foreign affairs "hot spots"

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. De Oppressor LiberApril 9, 2014 at 9:11 AM

      Looking back at the brief Russian war with Georgia in 2008, I think it may be possible for relations between Russia and the EU & US to mend gradually, assuming of course Russia does not send troops into Ukraine. Substantial common interests continue.

      Delete
  4. The results of every action that our federal government eventually takes are based on the choices that YOU make. Nearly 6 years into the Obama administration George W. Bush is far removed from any blame. You lack of a job, the still sinking economy, acceptance of Obama’s lies because of formality and respect (he lies to us-not us to him), etc. It’s all a consequential result of our actions … our voting action mostly.

    He promised “meaningful change” and we went along the first time. He delivered just what he promised or at least what he calls “meaningful” change. The second election we knew, but went right ahead and turned away from Gov. Romney giving Obama a free pass to create just what we have today. We are solely responsible for what we have allowed to happen and the slippery slope edge of disaster we’re standing on.

    Obama’s idiotic actions with Benghazi, Egypt, Syria, Iran, Israel, Pakistan, Afghanistan, North Korea, Venezuela, our Southern border, CAR, Ukraine (so far), Crimea, etc. have all been nightmares in the annals of foreign policy decisions by this country.

    We have a chance to start the unraveling of this Obama nightmare with the 2014 Mid-term elections.

    “Fool me once shame on you. Fool me twice shame on me. Fool me three times and what ???”

    ReplyDelete
  5. There is an underlying trouble spot that could arise from the Russia-Ukraine-Crimea- EU-US confrontation going on. That is one of which where will Germany come down at. Germany is very unhappy with the US. We are seen by a large portion of the German population as “occupiers” since the end of WW II. The Germans have been subdued because they are militarily ill-equipped to stand up and defend her. Germany could become “nuclear” but far too late. Inside the EU France is the only nuclear “power”, and France would not sacrifice its existence for anyone.

    Germany is unquestionably the strength of the EU. But Germany has been edging more and more towards Russia rather than towards the US in its overall dealings. Germany comes close to ignoring the lesser countries in the EU and has nothing but distain for nearly all of the southern tier of the EU.

    We could be seeing more and more agreements between Germany and Russia in the coming years that will be beneficial economically to both sides. Germany has the technical knowledge and Russia has the raw materials. Russia has the taste of greed and Germany has the monies for funding. Politics has made stranger bedfellows than a German-Russian partnership. Not tomorrow, but maybe someday we’ll look back on the Ukraine and notice then what we missed today.

    The Obama administration is paying no attention to the new alliances that are forming around the world. And the Ukraine is simply another example of Obama's short sightedness.

    ReplyDelete