Tuesday, April 29, 2014

"Apartheid" - One Gaffe too Many - Mr. Obama, Get Rid of John Kerry

Secretary of State John Kerry is once again at the center of the world stage for all the wrong reasons. Kerry says he chose the wrong word in describing Israel's potential future, but only after he came under withering criticism for saying the Jewish state could become an "apartheid state" if it doesn't reach a peace deal with the Palestinians. Monday, Kerry lashed out at "partisan political" attacks against him, but acknowledged his comments last week to a closed international Trilateral Commission forum in Washington could have been misinterpreted. Here is his comment, as reported by The Daily Beast : “A two-state solution will be clearly underscored as the only real alternative. Because a unitary state winds up either being an apartheid state with second-class citizens - or it ends up being a state that destroys the capacity of Israel to be a Jewish state,” Kerry said. Now, Kerry says he may have chosen the wrong word, but he pointedly did not apologize, stressing that he was, and is, a strong supporter of Israel, which he called a "vibrant democracy." He said he does not believe Israel is, or is definitely on track to become, an "apartheid state." Kerry's prepared statement, was issued by the State Department and defended by Department spokesperson Jen Psaki, who sought to put Kerry’s comments in context Monday, noting that he remains committed to a two-state solution and was not accusing Israel of having a current policy of apartheid : “The secretary does not believe and did not state publicly or privately that Israel is an apartheid state, and there’s an important difference there. Israel is obviously a vibrant democracy with equal rights for all of its citizens,” she said. But Kerry's statement was very defensive, insisting that he would not allow his commitment to Israel to be questioned by anyone, "particularly for partisan, political purposes, so I want to be crystal clear about what I believe and what I don't believe," Kerry wrote after US lawmakers and pro-Israel groups criticized him, with some demanding his resignation or at least an apology. Kerry admitted the force of words, writing : if I could rewind the tape, I would have chosen a different word to describe my firm belief that the only way in the long term to have a Jewish state and two nations and two peoples living side by side in peace and security is through a two-state solution." In his backpeddling statement, Kerry defended his general point, noting that numerous Israeli officials, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and predecessors Ehud Barak and Ehud Olmert, have offered similar assessments in the past, but conceded that 'apartheid' is a word best left out of the debate here at home." Netanyahu's office declined comment. But Israeli Transportation Minister Yisrael Katz, a member of Netanyahu's Likud Party, wrote a scathing criticism of Kerry on his Facebook page. Kerry's "apartheid" comment was also condemned by the pro-Israel community in America and from the entire political spectrum in Congress. House GOP majority leader Eric Cantor released a statement urging Kerry to apologize to the Israeli government and people : “The use of the word apartheid has routinely been dismissed as both offensive and inaccurate, and Secretary Kerry’s use of it makes peace even harder to achieve.” Texas Republican Senator Ted Cruz called for Kerry's resignation. Cruz declared on the Senate floor : “The fact that Secretary Kerry sees nothing wrong with making such a statement on the eve of Holocaust Remembrance Day demonstrates a shocking lack of sensitivity to the incendiary and damaging nature of his rhetoric. It is my belief that Secretary Kerry has thus proven himself unsuitable for his position and that before any further harm is done to our alliance with Israel, he should offer President Obama his resignation and the President should accept it.” Florida Senator Marco Rubio described the comments as "outrageous and disappointing." At the opposite end of the congressional spectrum, liberal Democratic Senator Barbara Boxer of California also criticized Kerry's comment, saying on Twitter : "Israel is the only democracy in the Middle East and any linkage between Israel and apartheid is nonsensical and ridiculous." The influential American Israel Public Affairs Committee described Kerry's use of the term as "offensive." AIPAC’s statement read in part : “Israel is the lone stable democracy in the Middle East, and protects the rights of minorities regardless of ethnicity or religion.” Abe Foxman, president of the Anti-Defamation League, said he found it : "startling and deeply disappointing that a diplomat so knowledgeable and experienced about democratic Israel chose to use such an inaccurate and incendiary term." ~~~~~ Kerry has invested significant time and effort to bringing Israelis and Palestinians to the negotiating table, with the goal of reaching a deal in nine months. But, on today's Kerry-chosen peace accord deadline, he has achieved nothing positive, often sowing discord between Israel and America instead. Here are some of the most controversial things Secretary of State John Kerry has said about Israel since he rose to the post of America’s top diplomat last year. The list was prepared by the New Algemeiner, an American Jewish eNewspaper : 1. Israel  could become an “apartheid state” if a two- state solution doesn’t pan out. 2. Israel announced 700 new settlement units and “poof, that was sort of the moment” the peace talks were imperiled. 3. It’s a “mistake” to keep demanding that the Palestinians recognize Israel as a Jewish state. 4. The Jewish state  will face more boycotts and international isolation if peace talks fail. 5. “Not one Israeli was killed by a Palestinian from the West Bank” in 2013. (A Shin Bet report said there were five such deaths). 6. Ignore Israeli thinking when it comes to Iran sanctions. 7. Israel could face a third violent Palestinian intifada if peace talks fail. 8. The US views all Israeli settlements are “illegitimate.” 9. Amid the fall of Egyptian President Mohamed Morsi and a bloody civil war in Syria, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is the “core issue” of Middle East instability. 10. Comparing as equal the victims of the Boston Marathon bombings and the Turkish jihadist militants killed aboard the Mavi Marmara flotilla after they attacked Israeli soldiers. ~~~~~ Dear readers, even Kerry's hometown paper, the Boston Globe, called his 'apartheid' comment "the mother of all gaffes." And, Mark Whittington on Yahoo Voices made the perfect overall criticism of John Kerry : "The flap is somewhat telling of the dolorous state of Obama foreign policy. The current administration has managed to make America's enemies despise her, her friends afraid of her, and the American people outraged. It is quite a hat trick for the man who was elected to fix what he thought was George W. Bush's foreign policy mistakes. But next to him, the younger Bush is increasingly being seen as a Prince Talleyrand in comparison. With Bush, one knew where one stood. He was not in the habit of insulting allies and appeasing enemies. Sadly the current president is in the habit of doing both, much to the detriment of America's standing in the world." ~~~~~ But, if you prefer fewer words in describing Kerry, how about John Paul II's more general comment -- "Stupidity is also a gift from God, but one mustn't misuse it."

8 comments:

  1. I believe that Kerry has always had a habit of misspeaking. He and Obama both need to be gone. Aside: Love the new Casey-Popshot.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. John Kerry is an idiot, who is as uninformed to the “whys & wherefores” that Israel has to make every day for their simple continuance as a country. Our secretary of State is ignorant to struggles that Israeli citizens face every minute of every day.

      John Kerry is wise to the needs of John Kerry. He was born well, married better and lives on a hill far above the average American let alone the life torment of the average Israeli.

      For Kerry to apply the usage of the word APARTHEID to Israel demonstrates his lack of understanding of the word and his absence from the knowledge of the everyday life of Israeli citizens.

      Delete
  2. I am personally sick and tired of “apologizes” from politicians that seem to not have much a command of their native tongue. They are quick to pull the trigger to and use words they seem to not really have a command of or want to speak in “diplomatic’ese” (my word) to make us listeners marvel at how smart their speech writers are.

    Dr. Smith doesn’t come out of the operating room and instantly and says he sorry that Uncle Harry died … but it wasn’t his fault he used a chain saw vs. a fine scalpel because he thought it would be faster

    But these gaffes are as dangerous as C-6 explosives in the hands of Cub Scouts working on their Terrorism Merit Badge.

    If our esteemed Secretary of State is so stupid to botch the implication of the word APARTHEID maybe he is so far above his earned pay grade that gone he needs to be ASAP.

    These fatal mistakes all seem to surface when these want-a-be political orators are speaking without a teleprompter or a copy of the labor of their speech writers. Do we remember the days of President Reagan's extemporaneous speeches & comments – he never missed a beat, did he.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This whole administration needs to be GONE for all the reasons one would like to put on paper. From the Oval Office dweller down to bottom of his executive White House inner circle are the biggest group of over educated and under achieving bunglers ever to serve this nation. Working for the President of the United States is not an OJT position. You get one shot at getting things right.

      Delete
    2. Comments that Kerry makes to his family are private and personal. Comments that he makes as Secretary of State aren't. He was not representing Heinz ketchup at the Trilateral meeting, he was representing the US. No slack on this one. The president should recall him and demand his resignation for accusing one of our staunchest allies of a crime against humanity...but he won't.

      Delete
  3. De Oppressor LiberApril 30, 2014 at 7:39 AM

    Apology, give me a break. By making his short-sighted statement on apartheid, Kerry did exactly what he wanted and that was to once again put the emphasis on the only country that the US has any influence on and that's Israel.

    Kerry's apology is about as truthful as Hamas's recognition of Israel as Abbas’s sudden change in heart toward the Holocaust.

    When it comes to J-Street, we have the perfect example of "it's always Israel's fault". They always question Israel's decisions, while always ignoring WHY Israel has and continues to make such decisions. The mindset of those like Kerry of only seeing blame on one side does nothing but galvanize the other side. It's the same defeatist approach used with the United States. There are too many that think that if it wasn't for US policy, the world would be a better place, while at the same time ignoring everything the US has done to help others.

    What so many people quickly forget is the fact that Israel is a democracy and its people know that the only chance for survival is peace. However, it has to be a real peace. If Israeli citizens thought for one second that there was a realistic chance for peace and their leaders ignored that opportunity, the leader(s) would be voted out of office. This is why throughout their history, Israelis tended to vote for the more moderate Labor Party. The only time hardliners won in Israel is when the Israeli people faced an imminent attack.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Has John Kerry EVER looked at the history of the so called country of Palestine? The Palestinians before the 6 day war were nothing more than nomads without a country or land. They just wondered around. When Egypt in the 60's started the prolog to war claiming they owned all of Gaza and Israel. And the Sinai - they (Egyptians) promised these nomads a land if they fought with them in the war. Well Egypt and the rest got hammered and the Palestinians were left to fend for themselves, so arrives to the rescue the UN which plopped them down in Gaza and created the so called State of Palestine – which had never existed before. Palestinians have no claim for any of the land that is in discussion!

    John Kerry was inept as a US Senator, and as Secretary of State he is showing the world that very same ineptitude. Are we to believe that Kerry was the best choice to replace the poor choice of Hillary Clinton as Secretary of State? Or was he simply the logical choice as a “yes” person to carry on Obama’s foreign policies without question?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Can John Kerry be held up for ridicule over one false statement? Yes & No, but his public life is just one erroneous statement after another aimed at HIS OWN promotion of significance. Take for instance lack of truth regarding Kerry's false testimony about alleged Vietnam atrocities is as follows: "After the congressional hearings, they could find no evidence whatsoever that any of the "war crimes" Kerry claimed took place had ever happened. Indeed, they found that the sources of those stories had either never been in the military at all, were in the military but had never been in Vietnam, or had not been anywhere near where they said they had been in Vietnam. And the reason for all that is because of where the stories actually came from; the stories were concocted and disseminated by the Soviets' "disinformation" campaign of anti-war propaganda which was, as former KGB chief Andropov referred to it, "our most significant success." and, of course, John Kerry played a very important part in that Soviet propaganda victory."

    And that is further backed up by this evidence, "Ion Mihai Pacepa, a 3-star General in the secret police, and the highest-ranking Soviet intelligence officer to defect to the West, spoke out in June 2004 about the KGB intelligence operation that he believed was the basis for the assertions of war crimes and atrocities at the heart of John Kerry's 1971 testimony to the Fulbright Committee.

    "For Pacepa, the case was clear. John Kerry's 1971 accusations of war crimes in Vietnam sounded to him just 'like the disinformation line the Soviets were sowing worldwide throughout the Vietnam era.' The KGB had as a top priority the damage of American credibility in Vietnam. To this end, the KGB spent millions producing 'the very same vitriol Kerry repeated to the U.S. Congress almost word for word and planted it in leftist movements throughout Europe.

    We are entitled to a person of honor and principals as Secretary of State. John Kerry has neither – so he needs to be gone

    The truth will set us free, and lies from the likes John Kerry & Hillary Clinton may yet destroy us, especially if gullible people trust those lies because of the presumed authority they come from.

    ReplyDelete