Monday, April 28, 2014

Has Abbas Sent a Trojan Horse for Holocaust Remembrance Day?

Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas announced on Sunday through the Palestinian news agency WAFA that the Holocaust was "the most heinous crime" of modern history, a rare acknowledgment of the Jewish suffering. The recognition came as Israel began its annual Holocaust Remembrance Day, Yom HaShoah, its memorial for victims of the Nazi genocide. President Abbas' statement may have been an effort to reach out to Israeli public opinion during this deep crisis in the US-backed Israel-Palestine peace talks. Some Israelis noted that Abbas' comments may be a step in the right direction, but Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was not among them. He said the renewed attempts by Abbas to reconcile with the Islamic militant movement Hamas raised doubts about the Palestinian leader's intentions. Hamas, refusing to recognize Israel's right to exist and sworn to Israel's destruction, has questioned the Holocaust and blocked the subject from being taught in schools in the Gaza Strip. Denials and attempts to minimize the Holocaust, which saw the systematic killing of 6 million Jews by Nazi Germany in World War II, are widespread in the Arab world. Many Palestinians have the erroneous notion that recognizing the Holocaust will diminish their own claims for legitimacy based based on years of suffering, including their uprooting when Israel was created in 1948. It seems that Abbas discussed the Holocaust in a meeting in Ramallah with an American rabbi, Marc Schneier, last week. WAFA reported that he called what happened to the Jews in the Holocaust "the most heinous crime to have occurred against humanity in the modern era." Abbas expressed his "sympathy with the families of the victims and many other innocent people who were killed....Those who suffer injustice, oppression and (are) denied freedom and peace, are the first to demand to lift the injustice and racism that befell other peoples subjected to such crimes," according to WAFA's report. ~~~~~ Along with the Abbas Holocaust statement, another chapter in the Israel-Palestine history may have opened Sunday when Cabinet Minister Naftali Bennett, a powerful coalition partner who heads the nationalist Jewish Home party, told foreign journalists : "An era has ended and a new era has begun....We are not going to reach a peace agreement in the foreseeable future. I think we need to be realistic about what we can achieve." Bennett advocates giving the Palestinians "autonomy on steroids" in areas of the West Bank they already control, while annexing the remaining 60% of the West Bank that Israel rules. He said the goal now should be to make conditions as livable as possible, by giving Palestinians freedom of movement and supporting their economy, and allowing them to hold elections and run their day- to-day affairs. Full independence, however, would be impossible, he said. "I know it is not as sexy as the perfect two-state solution but this is realistic." Abbas said Saturday that any interim unity government with Hamas would be based on his political platform of seeking peace with Israel, and not that of Hamas. But Tony Blinken, the White House deputy national security advisor, appearing on CBS's "Face the Nation" Sunday, seemed to side with Israel's stance that it would not continue peace talks with a Palestinian government backed by Hamas, saying : "Any Palestinian government has to recognize Israel, it has to renounce violence, it has to accept past agreements." Blinken was not asked about the Abbas statement on the Holocaust. But, in the charged political atmosphere surrounding Israel's announcement that it would suspend further peace talks, Abbas' statement coincided with the latest US attempts trying to hold together the collapsing Israeli-Palestinian peace talks. Abbas urged Israel not to walk away : "On the incredibly sad commemoration of Holocaust Day, we call on the Israel government to seize the current opportunity to conclude a just and comprehensive peace in the region based on the two states' vision, Israel and Palestine living side by side in peace and security," Abbas said. ~~~~~ Dear readers, it is extremely difficult to take anything said by the Palestinian leadership at face value. So it is with this latest turn of events in which President Abbas has finally recognized the Holocaust. We might think of Sun Tzu, a Chinese emperor who lived in the 6th century B.C. He was a masterful military leader and wrote one of history's great books on war, The Art of War. In his book he wrote : "When envoys are sent with compliments in their mouths, it is a sign that the enemy wishes for a truce." Could it be true? Have the West Bank Palestinians finally run out of delaying tactics? Or are we looking at yet another Trojan Horse at the gates of Jerusalem.

9 comments:

  1. My money would be on the “Trojan Horse” Theory.

    Any change from real sincere positional change would (or should) have been preceded with trial balloons and positive steps by Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas - an easing into a radicle alteration of the Palestinian position on Israel.

    Words have meanings and to suddenly admit that which happened well over 70 years ago, that which ALL civilized countries and their various leaders have spoken out against was “"the most heinous crime" is a little late and a little insincere.

    Even as we speak the terrorists that are protected by Abbas in his State of Palestine are lobbing rockets into Israel killing and maiming not only Israeli citizens but at times Palestinian citizens who live and prosper in Israel. They capture, torture, and behead people they self-determine to be threats against Palestine.

    Specific words have specific meanings, and some words are only words – empty of truth and hollow of feelings.

    ReplyDelete
  2. De Oppressor LiberApril 28, 2014 at 8:44 AM

    Up until the promoters of the long and arduous daily attacks upon Israel show up at the “Peace Conference” with hat in hand admitting their faults, and asking for forgiveness, willing to accept Israel as the borders are presently drawn on the map(s). Until the duly elected/appointed heads of states say enough is enough, what is will be – Israel should consider:

    1. Overtly build huge retaining walls, mined areas, and constant monitoring of spaces where terrorists could and do sneak into Israel and conduct their murderous raids. A “No Man’s Land” approach or “Enter at You Own Risk” obstruction.
    2. When fired upon Israel should return the fire 5 fold.
    3. Israel should approach any and all Peace Conferences/Accords only when ALL their arch enemies issue a signed statement of responsibility and discontinuance of aggression towards Israel.
    4. An open agreement to recognize and cease all disruption of Israel by the Islamic terrorist that operates openly via the protection of authorized governments in the Middle East.

    Words are only words when issued by the same felons that have been issuing them for years with ABSOLUTLY no intentions of fulfilling the meanings with comparable actions.

    There could be a lasting Peace in the Middle East by months end if there were two honest and sincere participants at the conference table and a moderator with only Middle East stabilization as their goal and not their own political legacies, agendas, gains and futures in mind.

    Yep, you’re right; it looks as if peace is a long way off in the Middle East. War is easier to wage than peace for them. Old habits are hard to break.

    ReplyDelete
  3. "On the incredibly sad commemoration of Holocaust Day, we call on the Israel government to seize the current opportunity to conclude a just and comprehensive peace in the region based on the two states' vision, Israel and Palestine living side by side in peace and security," Abbas said.

    I for one would like this statement of Abbas to be true and meaningful. And it may well be. Abbas may find this to be his opportunity to be the next “Peace Maker” in the Middle East as Egypt’s Sadat was in 1979.

    "Any Palestinian government has to recognize Israel, it has to renounce violence, it has to accept past agreements." Tony Blinken. This coming from a White House upper echelon staffer is the most questionable utterance. I trust nothing that Obama’s administration says, especially when it concerns Israel. This US administration would through Israel under the bus at the drop of a hat.

    So is Palestinian perched to do what Begin and Sadat did 35 years ago last month? Hope springs eternal.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Israelis know that any peace with only one Palestinian faction would not amount to peace at all; that without elections, eight years after the last vote, Abbas has no real legitimacy; and that bringing a weakened Hamas under Egyptian suasion into a unity government (if that happens) would increase pressure on Hamas to meet international demands that it recognize Israel’s right to exist, renounce violence and accept previous signed agreements.

      Moving toward a two-state peace — the best outcome for both nations — cannot be based either on the myth that Israel’s current situation is unsustainable or on the myth that the Palestinian Authority, as currently constituted, represents the Palestinian national movement. It can only emerge when a majority on both sides believes, based on the facts, that painful compromise in the name of a better future is preferable to manageable conflict fed by the wounds of the past.

      Delete
  4. The Secretary of State John Kerry said - “that if Israel doesn’t make peace soon, it could become ‘an apartheid state,’ like the old South Africa.” Jewish leaders are fuming over the comparison and well they should be. The American people should be demanding his resignation.

    Is John Kerry trying to out embarrass the United States as his boss does so often?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. IF there is ever to be some form of peace between Israel and Palestine (PA-Fatah & Hamas) it has to be based on & grow from some sort of mutual trust and respect. Each side must police their own to keep the chattering noise level as low as possible.

      But remarks like that of Secretary of State John Kerry serve NO productive purpose except to be a wedge between the 2 sides that live side by side.

      Delete
    2. Well it’s clear now. The Obama trip to the Far East was a cover for the failure at the Kerry peace accords in the Middle East. This has been Obama’s Standard operating procedure … when policy is at the failure point get out of town and act presidential where success is guaranteed. Except that action has worn out and his trip to the 4 Asian countries was a down right failure.

      Granted the presidential trip was long planned, but it was great cover for Kerry “falling over his own tongue” routine. This administration personifies “ill-fated tenacity’s.”

      Delete
  5. As difficult as it is to believe in anything said by the Palestine Authority - isn't it just as soul searching to accept anything that comes fro the Obama Foreign Policy team as being factual.

    ReplyDelete
  6. This has got to be the most incompetent Presidential Administration in the history of our country! The President, Vice-President, Secretary of State and virtually every other cabinet officer don't seem to have a clue about foreign policy. They speak before they think and have embarrassed this country's image to a point that it will take a very long time to rebuild our credibility with our friends and allies. Michelle Obama is quoted as having said at one time that she was "ashamed to be an American." She need only to look beside her in the photo shoots to see where the real problem rests.

    It would appear that the Obama Administration assumes no one is listening. That will soon be a correct assumption if they do not consider the impact of their statements whether on or off the record.

    So many critics of the George W. Bush Administration poked fun at President Bush's grammar and his Texas drawl. President Bush is a Rogue Scholar in comparison to Obama, Biden and Kerry. Senator Reid and Rep. Pelosi are ranked closely with them in the IQ ratings.

    I yearn for the time when Americans will stand tall again with respect as a world power who had influence over Human Rights issues.

    President Reagan restored it after President Carter's abysmal failures; President Clinton brought embarrassment to the Oval Office. President Bush restored our honor. Enough said about Obama.

    And now, the best the Democrats have to offer is Hillary????

    I don't think our country can stand another self-serving incompetent president. It would be tantamount to having Obama for a third term.

    ReplyDelete