Wednesday, October 2, 2013

With al-Assad's Chemical Weapons in the Hands of the OPCW, the UN and America Should Take on Syria's Civil War and Iran

As a convoy of SUVs marked "UN" left their central Damascus hotel where the inspection team from the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons is staying, the task was to head out into the country to inspect production facilities and hold discussions on the location and size of Syria's chemicals stockpile. But first, the convoy had to pick its way through dangerous Damascus suburbs where at least 19 soldiers and pro-government militiamen have been killed in clashes in the past three days, according to the London-based Syria Observatory for Human Rights. Fighting between rebels and al-Assad forces raged on the edge of Damascus Wednesday, while rival rebel factions battled each other in northern Syria as the UN chemical weapons inspectors began to secure the sites where they will work on finding, inspecting and estimating the size of al-Assad's estimated 1,000-ton arsenal of chemical weapons. The goal, following the Security Council resolution passed last week, is to destroy Syria's capacity to manufacture chemical weapons by November 1 and to destroy its entire stockpile by mid-2014. The in-fighting in the contested Damascus Barzeh district flared up Monday when the army increased its attacks against rebel forces trying to capture the area. Districts on the edge of Damascus are important for rebels based in the capital's outer suburbs as they try to move closer to the heart of the city. There were also reports of in-fighting between al-Qaida rebels and more moderate rebel groups in the town of Azaz on the Turkish border, where militants from the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant made advances against fighters from the Western-backed Free Syrian Army, the Observatory said. There were no reports of casualties. The increasing rebel in-fighting adds a new complication to the 2½-year-old civil war, in which more than 100,000 Syrians have been killed and more than 2 million displaced. ~~~~~ Dear readers, it was relatively easy, once Russia agreed, to draft a weak UN chemical weapons inspection resolution for Syria. In reality, after Syria agreed to join the 98% of the world's nations that have agreed neither to use nor stockpile nor make Chemical Weapons of Mass Destruction, Syria fell under the regulatory regime of the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons. Indeed, the UN Security Council resolution merely mimics the OPCW regulatory program. It is now up to OPCW inspectors to deal with al-Assad and his chemicals stockpile. If they have problems, they will report to the Security Coyncil, which will meet to decide how to proceed. That is what President's sabre-rattling followed by indecision has bought - when Russian President Putin stepped into the Obama vacillation to seize control of the Syria chemical weapons agenda. While Obama has reserved the right to act unilaterally, his past performance would suggest that the Syria crisis is now completely in the hands of the OPCW and the UN Security Council. This is where the US Congress and people prefer to be on this issue. We can now ask whether President Obama and the UN will without delay turn their attention to ending the Syrian civil war, providing aid to the beleageured Syrian people and attempting to bring under control Iran's nuclear program - itself very likely a development of prohibited Nuclear Weapons of Mass Destruction - while there is still time to prevent Iran from menacing Israel and the Middle East with nuclear bombs.

4 comments:

  1. We SHOULD in a humanaterian effort to end the slaughter that is occurring daily ... But I don't think we will.

    To take action would need to be precipitated by concern and caring, neither of which do I believe exists with the Obama Administration or for that matter the UN.

    If one takes a look at the daily death and distraction that is occurring around the world via the hands of all the Islamic terrorists groups we should not expect the the arrival of the "Peacekeepers" any time soom

    ReplyDelete
  2. President Obama does not take stands. He joins in with the majority's decision. He acts on the widely popular verdicts. He climbs on the "bandwagon" never being able to be considered wrong. He stands in front of flashing cameras and accepts the gratitude that is really seldomed offered, but accepted without the slightest embarrassment.

    The man has no shame. He thinks no one sees or understands his his cowardes lack of leadership and his fragility of action.

    In perhaps one of the greatest book ever written (Man of La Mancha) about the will of mankind, the strength of his soul, the sense of duty to those unable to respond for themselves , the hero Don Quixote in the stage play adaptation has this line in a song ... " This is my quest, to follow my star, no matter how far..." Obama has never had an honorable quest for others in his life. Nor will he. His time on this planet is all about Obama

    He is a hollow shell if a leader. In fact today we are nearly leaderless of great leaders. Thank goodness for Pope Francis and the direction that leaders of the past have left us. Without these gifts we would be left to accept what is being passed off today as "LEADERSHIP."

    ReplyDelete
  3. We may not have an abundance of future philosopher and leaders to give to future history. Maybe this present self involved generation of unaware masses are the norm.

    I watched a "man in the street interview" session last evening on Fox News. Conducted on the streets of NYC 1 out if 15 knew that Obamacare and The Affordable Care Act was the same thing. But they all had a specific choice for which they'd rather have

    Maybe it's the same uninformed opinions about Syria that allows our leaders to get away with doing less than nothing. They have spoken words upon words about the "right thing we should do" while all the while, day after day, we just continue the dialog and day after day more innocent people die.

    A few words spoken many, many hundreds of years ago ... " Lead me, follow me, out let ME do my deed."

    ReplyDelete
  4. So now the OPCW is the responsible organization for the 1000 tons ( that's 2,000,000 tons of chemical bombs for the most part) . We are to believe that between now and now and Nov 1, 2013 ( some 29 days) this OPCW will be ables to safely destroy the various manufacturing facilities in Syria for these weapons, and within another 9 months or so be able to again locate, categorize, secure, and relocate all these identify able bombs/weapons to a yet determined area to be destroyed.

    A few short weeks ago an " EXPERT" from one if the Atomic Control Commissions was talking about 4 to 5 years to do this job. What happened on the way to the OPCW .


    Don't misunderstand me ... I think the OPCW may be the best organizations in this arena.

    And lastly readers... Since Obama's threat about the line in the sand ( the most recent one) and disclosure of our pending military strike at Syria has given Assad time to move a percentage of his chemical weapons toys to (possibly) Iran for his safe keeping and later use against Syrians or another rebellious Middle Eastern citizenry.

    This is all "rhetorical" and is not at all intended to be in disagreement to our dear Casey Pops ... It is not. Maybe it's all meant for food for thought. And the thought may well be is that we are being snookered again by the One World Government gang, And our dear socialists ( at best) friends at the UN.

    ReplyDelete