Thursday, September 5, 2013
Louis XIV, John Locke and Barack Obama
Louis XIV, the Sun King, was born on 5 September 1638. He died in 1715 after having ruled France for 72 years. Why should we care about a French king who died 300 years ago? He left behind him a country whose borders had been expanded to make France secure from invasion. He encouraged the arts - Moliere, Racine, Lully, Le Nôtre and many others - and founded the Academie Francaise and helped Moliere with the Comedie Francaise, the oldest national theatre. Both exist still. He quelled an early revolt of his aristocracy who opposed his ending their feudal rights - many of the revolt leaders were members of his own family, the house of Bourbon - by building the spectacular Versailles and forcing them to serve him by living there. It is the opinion of most historians that Louis XIV created the modern French state. Louis XIV has also received immense praise. The anti-Bourbon Napoleon described him not only as "a great king," but also as "the only King of France worthy of the name." Leibniz, the German Protestant philosopher, commended him as "one of the greatest kings that ever was." And Lord Acton admired him as "by far the ablest man who was born in modern times on the steps of a throne." Finally, Voltaire also dubbed his reign "an eternally memorable age," calling it " le Grand Siècle" (the "Great Century"). Louis XIV developed to its apex the theory of the divine right of kings. ~~~~~ John Locke, who was born in 1632 and died in 1704, was an almost identical contemporary of Louis XIV. Without the birthright of le Grand Louis, John Locke nevertheless made an impact on the world that was perhaps greater and more fundamental. Locke's political theory was founded on social contract theory. He believed that human nature is characterised by reason and tolerance and that human nature allowed men to be selfish. This is apparent with the introduction of currency. In a natural state all people were equal and independent, and everyone had a natural right to defend his “Life, health, Liberty, or Possessions." Most scholars trace the phrase " life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness," in the American Declaration of Independence, to Locke's theory of rights and individual liberty and responsibility. ~~~~~ It is said that Louis on his deathbed advised his heir with these words : "Do not follow the bad example which I have set you; I have often undertaken war too lightly and have sustained it for vanity. Do not imitate me, but be a peaceful prince, and may you apply yourself principally to the alleviation of the burdens of your subjects." He was right. So was John Locke. Today, Think about this, dear readers, as we watch the debacle of an American President who mouths the Constitution and clings to it as a talisman without understanding either its words or its vision of the perfectibility of mankind - or the great efforts of human minds and hearts such as Loius XIV and John Locke who moved humanity along its path to full civilization.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No one that writes a daily blog, or a magazine/newspaper column, even a radio talk show could have possible made an informative connection between Louis XIV, John Locke, and Barack Obama.Not only did you go from A to B to C ... you didn't mention Obama by name and yet he is in every line.
ReplyDeleteWe are so lucky to have the privilege to be included in your insights each day.
Clarity should be your middle name my dear
Oh! the article was excellent.
“My reading of history convinces me that most bad government results from too much government.”
ReplyDelete― Thomas Jefferson
Today that seems to be what we are suffering from all over the planet.
Democracies are being stifled by too much welfare state mentality. Autocracies are being strangled by too much of everything except the lack of human rights for the 21st century.
All governments are being collapsed under the strain of too much debt and useless spending.
The problem with governments today ... we have way too much of them in our everyday life.
We have governments that are willing to sell WMD's to governments that have neither the knowledge of facilities to produce their own in order to kill their own. meanwhile the more the manufacturing government sells it has the finances to produce and sell more.
Are we learning anything from this Merry-Go-Round ride?
You're saying Obama does not have the understanding of the Constitution that Justice Scalia does,yes???
ReplyDeleteThis read today is almost a"rhetorical" one. it certainly requires or ask for a response. Thank you for another lesson professor.
ReplyDeleteIf the reports are factual that the big bombers are being ready as we speak her in the US of A, then there is only 1 conclusion that can be drawn ... NO matter what the response is from the Congress next week, President Obama is already committed to an air & sea shelling of Syria.
Now the only remaining questions that should be asked - and hopefully explained in full and with only honest facts- is WHY AND TO WHAT END MR. PRESIDENT?
No Obama soft shoe dance around the questions, no Bill Clinton answers with another cryptic question, and no Jimmy Carter with blind quotes from the Bible. Just a or a group of some good journalists asking fair and impartial question as to where is this going and what is it all about.
We have the right to know and it is the responsibility of the president to tell us. he is not there to do as he wishes.
correction ... "it certainly DOIES NOT require, etc" Sorry
Delete