Friday, July 12, 2013

Moderate Syrian Rebel Leader Killed by Jihadist Rebels

It is not a subject often discussed in the media, but the spectre of internal moderate-islamist power struggles in the Syrian rebel camp is growing. Al-Qaida-linked gunmen killed a rebel commander aligned with western-backed militias fighting against the al-Assad regime. Thursday's casualty is the highest-profile example of growing tensions between moderate and jihadist islamist fighters among rebel forces. Loay AlMikdad, a spokesman for the Free Syrian Army, said Friday that members of the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant - a group reportedly made up of al-Qaida branches in Iraq and Syria - were behind the killing of Kamal Hamami. Hamami, known as Abu Basir, served on the Supreme Military Council of the Free Syrian Army, a group headed by a secular moderate that has the support of western powers. The Britain-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said gunmen shot Hamami Thursday after militants tried to remove a checkpoint he set up in the Jabal al-Turkoman mountain in the coastal province of Latakia. The observatory said two of his men were seriously wounded in the shooting. Hamami "was assassinated at the hands of the forces of evil and crime at one of the checkpoints." He added that the group that killed Hamami "should hand over those who carried out this act to stand trial." Reports of occasional clashes between rebel groups and Islamic militants active in rebel-held areas have surfaced, especially in the north where the opposition controls most of the region. There also has been infighting between Kurdish and Arab groups over control of territory captured from the Syrian government along the border with Turkey in the past year. These fights ended with a cease-fire agreement early this year. Hamami's killing marks the first time a commander from the Supreme Military Council of the Free Syrian Army has been targeted by rebel jihadists. His death marks a growing power struggle between moderate and extremist groups fighting in the Syrian civil war. Rami Abdul-Rahman, who heads the Britain-based observatory, said that most of the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant members are foreigners from Arab countries, as well as former Soviet republics such as Chechnya. Abdul-Rahman said members of the group also killed a local rebel commander in the village of Dana in the central province of Hama. Over the past year, the conflict has become increasingly sectarian, with mostly-Sunni rebels assisted by foreign fighters fighting mostly-Shiite government forces bolstered by fighters from the Lebanese Shiite group Hezbollah. ~~~~~ Dear readers, these incidents between moderate and islamist rebels are just one more reason that the west must secure a permanent ceasefire and political solution to the Syrian civil war. A step in this direction could be provided by the temporary ceasefire during the Moslem holy month of Ramadan being called for jointly by Turkey, which supports the rebels, and Iran, which supports al-Assad. Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu also called for all non-Syrians involved in the conflict - including Iranian-backed fighters from the Lebanese Shiite group Hezbollah - to leave Syria.

4 comments:

  1. Ceasefires seem to always aide the enemy. It's the enemy that most times request a ceasefire. It is the enemy that always break the ceasefire. It is the enemy that needs this ceasefire right now ... this time to rest, replenish, and advance stronger than ever possibly.

    With a split between moderate and the fanatical Jihadist terrorists widening with great regularity it could be wise to see where this split leads all involved parties.

    Certainly more people will die while we sit and watch for a while. But then people will die during that time no matter what we do.

    This is a plain and simple Civil War. There is NO quid pro quo. They will do nothing for us peace lovers or for the Syrian people seeking peace.

    ReplyDelete
  2. In the land of the Middle East and the world of Islam words have a very different meaning and connotation.

    Moderate to us is quiet different from that of a fundamentalist practicing Muslim. The moderate Muslin may still hold the violence and Sharia Law very close to their hearts. Moderate Muslims are not close to Western beliefs or behavior at all. Do the want "freedoms", yes probably. Do they want or are willing to throw some 3000 years of beliefs and traditions under the bus - NO, not at all.

    Do the men of this unexplored "moderate" world want to give up their supreme authority over the family, women, and children - NO WAY. At least not in the next generation of time.

    Will they or could they be negotiable on things like forced marriages, marriage of children for money, some women;s right quiet possibly after much debate and slow step forward.

    We and they are in uncharted waters here and we must be respectful (as do they) and conciliatory on many issues. Change will occur at their pace not ours. We will have to take a small bite and go back later for another bite.

    But the biggest thing is to gain their RESPECT. This is paramount in any negotiations with Muslim community on anything.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I am sure that there are some Syrians, Turks, Afgani, Egyptian, Iranian, Saudis, etc. who would set down and talk peace tomorrow. But we must be careful who we are talking to and about what. And mostly who they are.

    Are they in a position to deliver on their agreements, are they puppet stand ins for the hardliners, are they simply a divergence from the actual activity in the Middle East. And are we being "suckered in" for some obscure plan of theirs.

    We must be ever vigilant in seeing something we want it to be yet that is not real. Much like chasing Dragons that are really Windmills.

    The decision making terrorists is not going to change their spots over night. In fact it may not be in the cards to ever make peace with the likes of al-Qaida or Hezbollah, or the likes. Pick any of 24 or 30 some odd control groups in the International world of the rebel jihadists ... they simply don't want peace because they are fight a lesser army of farmers, lawyers, doctors, teachers, etc and they are the trained and equipped soldiers. Not a threat to the Jihadists at all ... a mere inconvenience. A bothersome fly sticking around.

    Don't misunderstand me ... they are dangerous theses flies, but not without help, supplies, and equipment. That's where the West enter and is helpful.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Stand Up And Be CountedJuly 13, 2013 at 6:34 AM

    So earlier today the State department (visa vie) President Obama made an urgent press demand for Morsi to be released.

    WHY? FOR WHAT PURPOSE?

    Does Washington DC - particularly 1600 Pennsylvania Ave (The White House) not understand anything a about Military Coup. Or in particular this coup. Morsi and The Muslim Brotherhood are the BAD GUYS Mr. President.

    Someplace sir in your high caliber formal education you must have been absent from the class dealing with "thugs that attempt to enslave a people". They are treated as they are - CRIMINALS.

    It would appear that Washington has now exposed what it's position in Egypt will be ... on the side of Morsi & the Brotherhood. Why would a man that repeatably say he's for the values in our constitution, and every time it comes his turn to play a "trump card" he fails to do so? Every time!

    Good luck you brave and daring souls of Egypt.

    ReplyDelete