Saturday, July 20, 2013
America Needs a Unified Strategic Middle East Policy
America's top military officers, hoping to be confirmed for second terms as members of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told a US Senate Armed Services Committee panel Thursday that the Obama administration is considering whether to use military power in Syria. The Syrian civil war is in its third year and has killed almost 100,000 people, causing an increasing demand by the Syrian rebel leadership for active US involvement. Army General Martin Dempsey, chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, declared during congressional testimony that he has provided President Obama with options for the use of force. But Dempsey declined to talk about those choices, saying : "it would be inappropriate for me to try to influence the decision with me rendering an opinion in public about what kind of force we should use." The remarks by Dempsey came after Republican Senator John McCain asked him which approach in Syria would carry a greater risk - continued limited action by Washington or more significant actions, such as the establishment of a no-fly zone and arming the rebel forces with the weapons they need to stem the advance of al-Assad's forces. "Senator, I am in favor of building a moderate opposition and supporting it," Dempsey said. "The question whether to support it with direct kinetic strikes ... is a decision for our elected officials, not for the senior military leader of the nation." The use of kinetic strikes, a military term that refers to missiles and bombs, "is under deliberation inside of our agencies of government," Dempsey said. Navy Admiral James Winnefeld, vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs, said, "There are a whole range of options that are out there....We are ready to act if we're called on to act." McCain later told a group of reporters he plans to block Dempsey's confirmation saying he was dissatisfied with the answers to the questions Dempsey was asked about Syria. Dempsey acknowledged in response to a question from GOP Senator Lindsey Graham that al-Assad's forces have the upper hand in Syria. "Currently the tide seems to have shifted in his favor," the general said. The Armed Services Committee is considering Dempsey's and Winnefeld's nominations for a second term and the Democratic-led committee is all but certain to approve the reappointments. Leading senators including Democrat Carl Levin, committee chairman, and GOP minority ranking member McCain, have been pressing Obama to take a more forceful approach to defeat al-Assad. While the administration has authorized lethal aid to rebel forces, it has so far refused to enforce a no-fly zone in which Syria's combat aircraft would be barred from flying, or to otherwise intervene militarily to halt the war. To avoid being drawn deeper into Syria's civil war, administration officials have pointed to the US-led invasion of Iraq in 2003 as an example of what can go wrong when America's military becomes involved in Middle East conflicts. "We've rushed to war in this region in the past. We're not going to do it here," Obama's chief of staff, Denis McDonough, said recently on CBS' "Face the Nation." During his exchange with McCain, Dempsey said, "situations can be made worse by the introduction of military force" without first understanding how the country would continue to govern and ensuring that government institutions don't fail. Dempsey's first term as chairman has been a turbulent one with the military drawing down from long wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. At the same time, he has dealt with billions of dollars in budget cuts that the military leadership says could threaten military readiness, as well as an epidemic of sexual assaults in the ranks, the crisis in Syria, and unrest in Egypt. ~~~~~ Dear readers, it seems certain that Dempsey and Winnefeld will be confirmed. What is less certain is whether and in what time frame and to what extent they will prevail on a reluctant President Obama who seems to have turned his attention and that of his Secretary of State to the Israel-Palestine peace process, to intervene militarily in Syria. The American military leadership should be stressing the interwoven essence of all that exists and occurs in the Middle East. Israel's and Palestine's futures are inextricably tied to the future of Syria and her neighbors - Lebanon, Jordan, Turkey and Iraq. Only a unified and coordinated American policy and tactics will have the desired long-term effect in the Middle East.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
As long as Obama is surrounded by the likes of Dempsey and Winnefeld nothing is going to change. We are where we are at in the Middle east due to the "Obama Doctrine" of fall far behind and lead from there. If either Dempsey or Winnefeld had a plan it would have seen the light of day by now.
ReplyDelete"Israel's and Palestine's futures are inextricably tied to the future of Syria and her neighbors - Lebanon, Jordan, Turkey and Iraq" as you so aptly said Casey Pops. We have no plan in either of these countries , let alone all of them. We have no plan for our dearest friend Israel.
We (the citizens of the United States of America) needs some fresh thinking in Washington. Fresh as the whole way around ... President, House of Representatives, Senate, and all that goes along with such a change.
I am sick and tired of hearing John McCain say his gibberish and Lindsay Graham immediately chirp in with full agreement.
After some3 plus years and 100,000 deaths what could the miraculous plan be, I don't believe there are any more rabbits in that hat of tricks for Obama to pull out.
ReplyDeleteIf a cat has 9 lives, Obama must have had 9 chances in the Middle East already. he is dead in the water in the Middle East.
Maybe if he drops all pretenses as to which side he really is on and stops this political camouflage of being neutral and wants only the best for all; when in fact he has NO love or concern for Israel at all... maybe then he could accomplish something for one side in the Middle East.
"If you don't understand the problem, you don't understand the solution"
I am at a loss for words. We are right up against the wall in the Middle East. One more, only one more blunder from the US (either not taking any action or coming down under the umbrella that represents the Muslim Brotherhood interests) and Game-Set-Match for Israel. We know it, the Brotherhood certainly knows it, and my dear friends in Israel mostly know it.
ReplyDeleteWe are slipping away in the wrong direction. Obama is taking us where I don’t believe the American people wish to go. But we have no strong, positive voice to present and defend our desires.
The GOP presents nothing in the aspect of leadership. The democrats are lap dog for the Progressive Socialist arm of their party. The Independents are still trying to figure out where they stand. The Libertarians are too few in numbers.
Friends I don’t see much hope and future on the horizon. I am not giving up but lovers of freedom, less government, responsibility to the people from their government. Unless some factions melt together for the good of all … we may not be by here again.
This time we are playing for all the marbles.
Casey Pops you are certainly right - the US needs a Unified Strategic Middle East Policy. What a God send that would be.
ReplyDeleteAnd while we are creating our Christmas wish list how about, a Domestic policy, a Jobs Creation Policy, an Economic Recovery Policy that is not based on the Fed's intervention,maybe an Immigration Policy, how about a policy that keeps the Federal Government out of our private affairs, a NO Spying Policy, etc.
A Return to America Standards Policy. That would simplify it.
The Middle East is a good place to start but it is far from the end of the wish list.
With all the scandals and hell-a-balu (sp) in our government - maybe the worlds democratic governments - lately (since Reagan) I think history may look at this period as either:
ReplyDelete1. When the people simply stopped being involved and laid down to the master
or
2. When the people woke up and took back control of their government and their lives.
Democracy (as it has been defined) is at a cross roads. And there are signs (no matter how faint) that people in the US are beginning to awaken and don't like what they see.
We seems to either have NO POLICY or STRANGLING POLICY there is nothing else.
Here in the US we have dividing race problems, jobs problems, immigration problems, a tax problem that is killing economic growth, a pending healthcare restructuring that shows all the sign of not being workable. And above all these local problems the citizens of the US would rally around an administration that set forth some hard and fast goal with workable policies for our helping and being involved on a positive front in foreign policy. it's not too late, but the clock is ticking away.
Maybe that was the strategy of Obama and Soros...partially break down the system and then let it crumble under all the strain and confusion. While all the while appearing to be concerned and involved.
There has to be a POLICY or PLAN in this administration someplace. or were we simply taken in by words that had no meaning and an amateur that had (still has) no vision at all.