Friday, April 8, 2016
Saturday Politics : Bernie Is Right, Hillary Is not Qualified to Be President
Saturday Politics is often about Hillary's highly questionable life. Ed Klein -- he wrote "Unlikeable," the best-selling book on Hillary Clinton -- recently told Newsmax that Hillary thinks she's not going to be indicted by the Justice Department in the email scandal, despite warnings from her husband, former President Bill Clinton, and other close advisors. Klein says : "...according to my sources, she's been warned time and time again by Bill Clinton and some of her lawyers that she's in deep trouble....Hillary keeps saying: 'Bring it on folks. Bring it on. I'm fine. I'm going to get through this. 'I've had this before, and they haven't been able to touch me and they're not going to be able to touch me this time.' That's what she thinks." ~~~~~ Donald Trump told Breitbart that Hillary is only playing nice with President Obama because she's trying to stay out of legal trouble arising from the email scandal. Trump made the remark when asked about Bill Clinton's recent speech remark calling Obama's presidency an "awful legacy." Trump's analysis? "If he said that, Hillary will be indicted. In all fairness, that's incredible, because I think she's being nice to Obama for only one reason: She wants to get protected. That's the only reason she's nice to him....If Bill Clinton made that statement, that is a disaster for Hillary's election. And it's a disaster for the relationship between Hillary and Obama." ~~~~~ The FBI last week made a significant announcement about Hillary that should be negative for her presidential campaign, except that Democrats and the mainstream media don't seem to be care about supporting a presidential candidate who's under FBI investigation. The FBI is now officially expanding its investigation into Hillary’s use of her home email server to transmit classified intelligence. Moving beyond questioning her “gross negligence” with national defense information, the FBI is investigating Hillary for violating federal law by providing “materially false” information -- US Code 18, Section 1001 -- which includes pressuring a third party to conspire in a cover-up and is punishable by a 5-year prison sentence. An unidentified intelligence source told a reporter : “The Agents involved are under a lot of pressure...” Former FBI assistant director Tom Fuentes said this means the FBI is in a criminal investigation, which is obvious from the amount of resources deployed. An investigation is also being “stepped up” on Hillary Clinton’s use of email immediately after the cover-up of the terrorist attack on America’s consulate in Benghazi that resulted in the death of four Americans. ~~~~~ Judge Andrew Napolitano says Hillary is "laughing" at the FBI when she claims it's conducting a "security review" instead of an investigation. During an interview on Fox News, Napolitano argued that Clinton does know that “she’s the target of the criminal investigation....What she’s done is for the umpteenth time in public sent a dog whistle to the FBI, a signal to the FBI....She knows it is a criminal investigation, she knows she’s the target...she knows the government has an extraordinary amount of resources investigating her, and she is laughing at them. Not a good thing to do.” ~~~~~ Dear readers, it this isn't enough to support Bernie Sanders' assertion that Hillary isn't qualified to be President, try this. In their new book, Bill & Hillary: So This is That Thing Called Love, authors Darwin Porter and Danforth Prince report interviews with Clinton insiders who claim Bill slept with so many women that Hillary repeatedly forced him to get an HIV test. The first tests were negative, the book says, but recently, HIV has been suggested by some to explain Bill's rapid aging. The Clintons have always kept their medical records secret. Clinton blames his appearance on his heart surgery and "new diet." Former Clinton advisor and analyst Dick Morris says his old boss doesn’t look good these days -- that on TV Bill is washed-out, listless, apathetic, "very slow-talking and even slower thinking." That's Saturday Politics -- not pretty.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
There is no doubt that Hillary Clinton is neither morally fit because of her abuse of the platform that being a Lawyer afford her, her insider-information sock trading,her despicable dishonest life in general or her experienced enough via her only non-participatory stint as a United States Senator from New York as her only elected/leadership role in life.
ReplyDeleteShe has somehow forced her way onto the "big stage" from being really nothing more than the Gate Keeper for husband Bill's staying out of jail for the multitudes of events of forcing women to tolerate his sexual appetite.
But then neither is Bernie Sanders qualified either. His whole professional life as has been as a verbal activist in the cause of socialism in America, his desire for total equality except for people like himself who he believes to be 'chosen' by the flock he speaks for from Vermont.
The press conversation theses days is all about how the GOP needs Paul Ryan or someone else other than Donald Trump or Ted Cruz.
Well Socialist media pundits look closely at your presenting the American voters with a treasonous gold digger or a self admitted Socialist?
The revelations from the Panama Papers—leaked documents from a secretive Panamanian law firm that helps political elites hide their money—have been hitting home across the world, exposing the widespread corruption of world leaders and their hangers-on.
ReplyDeleteThe Panama Papers have simply confirmed everything we already pretty much knew. This is just the way things work in much of the world. Clawing your way into high political office means that you have a lot special of favors to give out, contracts to distribute, land and timber and shipping deals to approve, and so on.
So you dole them out to friends, relatives, and backers—and they naturally show their gratitude by kicking some of it back to you. And if you don’t officially get rich—well, mi casa es su casa, what’s a little sharing between friends? In most of the world, this is known and more or less accepted as the way things work. But not traditionally in the US and in the developed countries of the West, where our governments have been structured, either from the beginning or over many years of civil service reforms, to prevent corruption and conflicts of interest.
A couple of other names pop up in the Panama Papers, including those of a few well-known associates of Hillary Clinton: longtime Democratic Party fixers John and Tony Podesta and Clinton sycophant Sydney Blumenthal. And why shouldn’t Hillary eventually get associated directly or as usual via friends in a money scandal? Hillary Clinton has been up to her neck in crony deals from the very beginning all the way back to 1978 and before as a junior attorney who was disgraced for lying on briefs & conclusions she wrote (as a young attorney) for the Watergate investigation panel. And not stopping as Secretary of State and the senseless murders of 4 State department staffers in Benghazi and her now famous unsecured home e-mail system which she sent highly classified documents over.
The fact is that the reason official corruption is rampant across much of the world is not just that they have insufficient civil service reforms. It’s because their governments have vast, arbitrary powers. Hillary Clinton is one of the most visible reminders of this kind of wheeling and dealing among the global elites—and she presents us with the prospect of bringing the whole sordid system back from Panama and straight into the Oval Office.
She is closer to being a wanted felon than president of the United States.
A glaring example of just how unprepared and unqualified Hillary Clinton is to be president revolves around the age old abortion question. Now this is not really a difficult question – you are either pro-abortion or anti-abortion. You either support federal funding of Planned Parenthood, or you want the organization broken up.
ReplyDeleteThis past Sunday on one of the Sunday morning news programs Hillary tried to explain her position on weather an unborn child has Constitutional Rights. Hillary answer was that “currently the unborn child doesn’t have Constitutional Rights at all.”
Clinton consciously or not (it’s unclear) referred to the baby as “an unborn person” then went onto to say, in the same breath, that such a person “does not have rights.” Either the baby is a blob with zero rights, or the baby is a person with rights. One cannot have both in any morally sound, intellectually honest universe.
It has been 4 decades sense Roe v Wade was enacted, and still Hillary is undecided and unclear with her position
In such a black and white question Hillary still tries to be unsure of what she believes or thinks. What would she do if sound intelligence was presented to her that within 24 hours North Korea was going to fire a Nuke at the United States West coast, and all she had was 20 hours to make up her mind – would she just call George Soros?
Is an imposing resume or CV any indication of the persons qualifications to be President? NO not really, in fact not at all.
ReplyDeleteJames Buchanan was a member of the Pennsylvania legislature, was elected five times to the US House of Representatives, and served as ambassador to Russia. He went back to Congress after his diplomatic tour in St. Petersburg, spending 10 years as senator from Pennsylvania — a post he resigned in 1845 to become secretary of state. He was offered a seat on the Supreme Court, which he declined, but later returned to diplomacy as America’s ambassador to Great Britain. He was elected president in 1856 and failed miserably.
Much like Hillary Clinton Buchanan was hesitant to lead, paralyzed by the secession crisis, and unwilling to hear dissenting viewpoints. Buchanan was a cynical operator who “betrayed a cavalier attitude toward ethics, both public and private, and seemed to believe that most everyone else did as well.” By the time he left office, the nation was on the brink of civil war.
Lincoln one of the most revealed and productive Presidents. He saved the Union. But on paper, in a resume he was one of our least qualified presidents.
Integrity, vision, humility, consistency of purpose, a willingness to learn — those are far more reliable indicators of excellence in a potential president. Are these or are any of these adjectives that describe Hillary Clinton? NO, none friends, none at all.
Clinton has huge vulnerabilities in her pathway to becoming a presidential nominee and if elected to function as even a poorest of the poor presidents before her. She lacks many basic political skills, and she is a hostage to fortune of unanswered legal problems—in both the usual way, as the heir to an incumbent president, and in the unusual one of being the subject of an FBI investigation, that if there is any justice in the misappropriation of public trust will end in an indictment on criminal charges being filed.
ReplyDeleteSo why does the democratic party wish to go to the ‘big dance’ with Hillary verses Senator Sanders? Because she is the poster child for all that is wrong in the Democratic Party as crusader for American values and principals. She stands for Hillary, not for America, not for freedom, not certainly for the Rule of Law. She is all about Hillary and Hillary’s gathering of power, manipulating our democratic government into a Progressive Socialists government.
She is also all about cornering as much personal wealth as she can and she sees being president as the way to facilitate that quickly via presidential favors for access to money.
Hillary Clinton is very bad for America and hopefully very disastrous for the Democratic Party on November 8, 2016.