Sunday, April 17, 2016
Both the Democrat and GOP Establishments Are Trying to Control the November Election
It's time for a new topic after four days of American immigration blogs -- maybe excessive, but without facts, dealing with America's immigration crisis is just feelings, used by Obama and Progressives to shame goodhearted Americans into making decisions against their country's best interests.. You have the facts. Use them. ~~~~~ Tuesday, New Yorkers vote on delegates to the party conventions that nominate US presidential candidates. I prefer Trump and Cruz over the Republican establishment, and that includes Kasich because, while he can cite his achievements in government, that is exactly the problem -- so can every other GOP or Democrat officeholder. They have all "achieved" America into the current near-collapse of citizen trust in its government. And, without trust, the social compact between citizens and government that is the soul of the US Constitution cannot exist. ~~~~~ What about the Democrats? New York Democratic voters prefer establishment Hillary Clinton over outsider Bernie Sanders by about 53% to 43%. While Sanders connects with young people, women and Democrats who sense he's being honest with them, Hillary has tied up the Democrat party machinery and money. Yet most Democrat voters think she is dishonest and untrustworthy. A March Quinnipiac poll found 68% of voters see Bernie Sanders as “honest and trustworthy," while 67% of voters found Hillary Clinton “not honest and trustworthy.” ~~~~~ In a February 18 CBS Evening News interview with Scott Pelley, Hillary said this about lies when Pelley said :《"You know, in '76, Jimmy Carter famously said, "I will not lie to you." CLINTON: Well, I have to tell you I have tried in every way I know how literally from my years as a young lawyer all the way through my time as secretary of state to level with the American people. PELLEY: You talk about leveling with the American people. Have you always told the truth? CLINTON: I've always tried to. Always. Always. PELLEY: Some people are gonna call that wiggle room that you just gave yourself. CLINTON: Well, no, I've always tried. PELLEY: I mean, Jimmy Carter said, "I will never lie to you." CLINTON: Well, but, you know, you're asking me to say, "Have I ever?" I don't believe I ever have. I don't believe I ever will. I'm gonna do the best I can to level with the American people."》Maybe it's quibbling over fine points, but not once did Hillary Clinton use the word "lie," choosing to say "leveling" to describe her past statements to Americans. ~~~~~ Switch to Hillary's emails. Last week, the FBI team investigating Clinton extradited to the US a man, "Guccifer," jailed in Romania for computer hacking. He hacked Clinton confidant Sid Blumenthal, to whom she sent many emails containing state secrets. We know this because Clinton-Blumenthal emails released under FOIA requests were proven by the CIA and State Department to contain secret information that they redacted before release. On April 11, Hillary gave a "Meet the Press" interview, once again saying she is willing to answer "any questions that anybody might have" about the server. When Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Senator Chuck Grassley heard this, he wrote Clinton's lawyer David Kendall, asking if Hillary knew whether her emails were hacked by "Guccifer," who was the first to reveal her use of a private server. Grassley wrote : "I hope this means you are reconsidering your refusal to answer the questions I asked you....I also hope it means you will substantively respond to this letter as well...." ~~~~~ Dear readers, Hillary always says her emails weren't marked 'Secret.' That has nothing to do with her sworn obligation to protect classified information. Either she is quibbling to cover her lies or she doesn't know the difference between lies and truth. Either way, why would a Democrat vote for her for President? Because she's being forced on them. The Democrat Party has fixed it so Superdelegates and pro-rata delegates favor Hillary. Bernie has almost no chance. At least for now, Republicans have a choice, unloved as Trump and Cruz are by the GOP establishment.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Hillary has taken a page from The William Jefferson playbook - "depends on the what the meaning of IS, IS"
ReplyDeleteWhen in doubt always lie to cover a more serious lie is her M.O.
William Jefferson Clinton ...
Delete“Now it’s just an oligarchy, with unlimited political bribery being the essence of getting the nominations for president or to elect the president. And the same thing applies to governors, and U.S. senators and congress members.” – Former President Jimmy Carter.
ReplyDeleteAs the events of this presidential primary season play out, it’s becoming clear the U.S. election — and even more so, the presidential race — is a big scam being perpetrated on the American people. Events from the 2 weeks ago have exposed the system as an illusion of choice and a farce. They have reinforced at least one study showing the U.S. is an oligarchy. Events from the last week have exposed the system as an illusion of choice and a farce. They have reinforced at least one study showing the U.S. is an oligarchy rather than a democratic republic.
The Wyoming democratic caucus took place on Saturday, purportedly to allow voters to have their voices heard in the race between Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton. Sanders lost the Wyoming caucus by winning it with a 12 percent margin. Events from the last week have exposed the system as an illusion of choice and a farce. They have reinforced at least one study showing the U.S. is an oligarchy rather than a democratic republic.
How can Sandres lose by winning 56 percent of the votes? This happens when the political process is, according to the New York Post, “rigged” by super delegates. The Post summed up this “strange” phenomenon. Under the Democratic Party’s oddball delegate system, Sanders’ winning streak ( he has won seven out of the past eight contests) counts for little. In fact, despite his win, he splits Wyoming’s 14 pledged delegates 7 to 7 under the caucus calculus.
Clinton, meanwhile, also gets the state’s four super delegates — who had already pledged their allegiance to her in January. So despite ‘losing,’ she triumphs 11-7 in the delegate tally.”
Even media pundits on liberal MSNBC openly called the process rigged.
Members of Brazil’s lower house of Congress vote overwhelmingly to impeach the country’s left-wing president, Dilma Rousseff, amid allegations that she used illegal accounting tricks to mask the true extent of the country’s deficit. The issue now goes to the country’s Senate, who will decide whether to put Rousseff on trial.
ReplyDeleteFriends even Brazil can get it right when it comes to maleficence in office - WHY CAN'T WE GET IT RIGHT ???
Hillary needs to be called to answer in a court of law for her crimes.
Has "Honesty" become something that is in the eye of the speaker. Is honesty really a factor that is one thing to one person , and quiet another to someone else?
ReplyDeleteNo it's not. Honesty is 'factored' by the speaker - it's honesty.Something is the truth or it's a lie. it's that simple.
Hillary Clinton as a "young Attorney" working as a research lawyer was the ONLY staffer on the entire staff to be fired/left-go because she was found to lie on numerous written summations she wrote.
Hillary's whole legal, and public political life has been one big lie. One lie pilled on top of another to cover the previous lie. Her dishonesty is well documented and it all comes down to the old saying ..."follow the money."
We all know what and who Hillary is and we all know she is not made of presidential material. Granted we have had other presidents and other presidential candidates that were not fit to serve or run, but friends none have reached her level of incompetence.
The breaking point for everyone with Hillary should be her 'e-mail scandal'. here she has risen to a new low for even her, here she has committed a level of treason. Purposely or accidentally treason is a very punishable action, and she needs punished for it.
She doesn't need to be rewarded and elected president.