Sunday, February 28, 2016

Ukraine, the Baltics, Europe : This Is not the Time for NATO to Collapse

Ukraine faces the same threat from corruption that caused its 2014 revolt -- a collapsing economy and widespread cronyism. The conflict in the east costs lives and money, but at stake in Ukraine’s battle with corruption is the support of EU allies and integration with the West, says Germany's ambassador to the US, Peter Wittig. Ukraine leaders are adopting economic and political change, but haven't satisfied EU donors, the IMF or reformists. There's a professional national police force, banks caught money laundering are closed, and subsidies for gas and electric service that raised prices 400% are gone, says Anders Aslund, an economics analyst at the Atlantic Council think tank. An electronic state procurement program saves 2% of economic output. Reduced regulations and a free-floating currency will minimize Ukraine’s debt service for the next four years. ~~~~~ But, Ambassador Wittig -- of Germany, the nation providing the most financial and diplomatic aid to Ukraine since 2014 -- says enforcing the cease-fire agreement with Russia and separatists is key. In eastern Ukraine, government forces are under the worst assault from Russian-backed militants since the cease-fire began. Monitors report that last Thursday hundreds of mortar, artillery and rockets were fired at government forces from territory held by Russian-backed militants. The Ukraine Chief of General Staff told USA Today active Russian military represent 20% of the 35,000 fighters in separatist strongholds. Russia supplies arms, ammunition, fuel and money daily, according to Ukraine’s Main Intelligence Directorate of the ministry of defense. Ukraine also accuses Russia of cyberattacks -- one that temporarily forced a power plant to close in December, and another on the Kiev airport intercepted in January by Ukrainian cyber security analysts. Russian President Vladimir Putin, whose government has denied any military role in eastern Ukraine, admitted in December that his military was conducting "certain tasks" there. ~~~~~ The European Parliament hosts Ukraine this week, and they'll sign an "Administrative cooperation agreement." But while the EU plods along, Latvia is asking NATO to increase security on Europe’s eastern front to counter a growing Russian menace. Alarmed by the number and intensity of nearby Russian exercises, deployment and rhetoric, Latvia is beefing up its defenses, but it needs NATO help. Foreign Minister Edgars Rinkevics says : "To deter Russia in the region, NATO needs more 'boots on the ground,'" increased bigger military exercises, deployment of military equipment and strengthened air defenses. But a Thursday Atlantic Council report says military readiness of major NATO members is so deficient that some would have difficulty fielding troops in an emergency. Rinkevics says Russia sees NATO as a strategic adversary, and Putin has begun a military buildup in Kaliningrad, the Russian enclave in the mouth of the Baltic Sea that houses the Russian Baltic fleet, including Russia’s most advanced anti-aircraft missiles and ballistic missiles capable of reaching EU capitals. Russian drills near NATO borders typically end with a simulated use of nuclear weapons. Russia seems to see nuclear weapons “not as theoretical but tactical, to prevent NATO countries from responding to fulfill their obligations under NATO treaty Article 5” that calls for mutual defense, Rinkevics says : “A clear message and response...can only be that we take those issues seriously and deploy everything necessary for NATO defense.” ~~~~~ Dear readers, Latvia membership in NATO and the EU is key to its independence and security, but the migrant crisis and UK's June referendum on leaving the EU make Rinkevics “worried.” Latvia, he says, will boost defense spending and increase border guards, and it may build a border fence. NATO, the US and EU have taken in the Baltic States. Russia's aggressive acts in Ukraine and the Baltic Sea threaten Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia, Scandinavia -- and Europe. This is not the time to let NATO collapse into unprepared obsolescence.

5 comments:

  1. We are trying to cap a volcano and if we are eventually successful the cap will be blown off in a very spectacular fashion.

    The dramatic upheaval of war after war is triggering a social disorder and revolution that is well documented. A overturning of the status-quo. Some nations survive invasions, environmental catastrophes, epidemics and inflation without disintegrating into disorder. Something about these nation’s social/ economic /political order makes them more resilient than other nations.

    Nations today when help is unpredictably needed turn to outside help recognizing that their leadership prepared for nothing except the lining of their pockets with more power and wealth.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The United States is a signatory to some 80 PLUS military agreements for various countries, regions, and organizations with wide ranging propose.

      The Obama administration has left the U.S. military shaved to the bones in man power, equipment, and readiness. A Russian strike against (and its coming) the Ukraine and/or Balkans will only worsen the ability of the US to answer it’s agreement to other nations.

      The monetary support of NATO is much lopped sided. The United Nations is burden of financial magnitude we cannot continue – again because of the debt situation that Obama has put the United States in.

      We went to Europe twice to fight Germany’s evil dictators that wanted to control the world. And we stopped them allowing the Europeans to turn inwardly to put their socialists programs into action, but never preparing for a calamity.

      Most recently various nations have blindly opened their immigration doors to unknown disasters that could bring the evil deeds of the Muslims terrorist to their government’s front doors.

      We never say no – but we need to put that word into our diplomatic handbook.

      Delete
  2. When the Soviet Union collapsed and The Warsaw Pact dissolved, the Central and Eastern Europeans raced westward. The quintessential anti-Soviet alliance no longer had/has anything to defend or defend against. Proponents of the continuation of NATO soon found a new role for NATO - such as promoting student exchanges and combating the drug trade.

    So the Western powers are now left with a NATO with no real direction. A NATO that is seriously overextended financially and strength wise. The answer to the question of the EU survival and the continuation of the Baltics in some preconceived notion lies with them and not the intervention of NATO.

    The purpose of NATO was to halt Soviet aggression. The Soviet Union no longer exists. Efforts to shift NATO's mission to other purposes has been met with minimal success. There was certainly no united NATO effort in Iraq or Libya before, during, or after.

    But NATO will not collapse - it is like the war tax that never gets repealed after the war is over.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The west needs to be positive without any doubt that rolling the dice over Latvia is the gamble that we wish to take.

    Is a confrontation in Latvia (quickly spilling over those banks into neighboring land) what we want.

    The expenditure of great sums of monies and lives need to be worth the price. Or is a quick strike accomplished with long-term peaceful occupation and society/national government building, all the while keeping guns pointed towards the aggressors.

    The quick reaction to go to war or the quick reaction to lead from far behind is history. massive debt and unanswered questions of "why" have changed or ability to do what is right.

    The once wealth and armies for such adventures is gone for the time being. resources must be allocated and spent more appropriately than before.

    ReplyDelete
  4. You can love it or hate it but a lot will have to disappear before NATO is gone. It's a deterrent just as the death penalty (is to serious crime)to the aggression of evil and terrorism is.

    We stand ready to somehow answer the call for help from country put into peril by acts of internal or external aggression.

    i for one may support the elimination of NATO and the United Nations (one being the other now) - but I would be very wrong.

    ReplyDelete