Sunday, February 21, 2016

No Scalia Replacement until Americans Have Chosen America's Future Path

Barack Obama, State of the Union Address, January 2014 : “So wherever and whenever I can take steps without legislation to expand opportunity for more American families, that’s what I’m going to do." As President, Obama had already vastly expanded the use of executive power to unilaterally defer deportation of younger illegal immigrants, delay enforcement of Obamacare and decline to defend legal challenges against the Defense of Marriage Act, a law barring federal recognition of same-sex marriages. In January 2014, he announced plans to raise the minimum wage for federal contract workers, create a new government-backed private retirement savings plan, and speed up implementation of a previously announced program to connect schools to wireless broadband. The executive orders - notably amnesty and work permits for 5 million illegal immigrants - continue to flow from the pen Obama brandished in the face of a Republican-leaning Congress in 2014. ~~~~~ Obama's refusal or inability to work across the aisle with Congress enormously increased with the GOP's taking control of the Senate in 2014. It left him toothless, leading to an even greater reliance on executive actions and regulations. Most are relatively inconsequential. Those that are serious overreaches of executive power are being challenged in the federal courts, where Obama has yet to win an executive action case. The 'plague' of Obama executive orders has had two consequences. GOP voters -- unable to understand why when voted control of Congress, GOP leaders cannot overturn unpopular laws like Obamacare or prevent more “amnesty” mischief -- have become increasingly vocal, drmanding action against Obama. Ted Cruz tapped into this anger and created an “anti-establishment” campaign, attacking the GOP leadership who, in fairness, could do little in the face of a presidential veto and a Senate Democratic minority large enough to prevent a veto override. The second outcome is that much of Obama’s executive order action has led to lawsuits and he is now at the mercy of the Supreme Court. Among the policies now under review by the Court are Obama’s amnesty orders to protect millions of illegal immigrants from deportation and his EPA regulations aimed at shutting down the US coal industry. Both circumvented Congress and both are considered by many to be an abuse of executive power. The Court’s decision to hear these cases is based on constitutional issues around balance of powers, a question that can only be resolved by the Supreme Court ~~~~~ Obama is now reaping the angry whirlwind of voters who voted for him because they expected economic recovery and brotherhood. What they got was a closet socialist determined to have his way even if it required trashing the Constitution. One facet of their anger was suddenly heightened with the untimely death of Justice Scalia, who was the leader in the battle against Obama's disregard for the rule of law. The liberal-progressive mainstream media is portraying GOP resistance to allowing Obama to choose Scalia's replacement as typical chronic GOP obstructionism. This is untrue, and Republicans need to say clearly and simply that President Obama has acted unlawfully for years, with only the Supreme Court as a brake on his unlawful and unpopular programs. If the American people want to dismantle US energy industries and raise family energy costs, or open US borders to everyone regardless of health, criminal record or terrorist intent, they can vote for Hillary Clinton or Bernie Sanders. If they want rule of law and a government that represents their views, they can vote for Trump, Cruz or Rubio. It is likely the general election choice will be between Trump and Clinton. Trump wants to return America to the rule of law and policies that put Americans first. Clinton wants to expand Obama's socialist lawlessness that will destroy the American system of government. Choosing a President is the preliminary decision America must make before Scalia's replacement is considered. Only the American people have the right to choose America's future.

3 comments:

  1. It is difficult to believe that the GOP Senate leadership will stand pat against Obama and his many lies and promises to the republican Senate leadership and not have any hearing on any nominees that Obama may happen to send to the senate to fill the Supreme Court vacancy created by the sudden passing of Justice Scalia.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The inevitable resulting clash between the Senate and the White House, made sharper in the midst of an election year, is a confrontation vital for the nation. This is more than raw politics, Democrats vs Republicans. It is about ideology and bringing clarity to what the country has become and where it is headed.

    America is extremely polarized today compared to where it was just 20 years ago. In 2014, according to Pew Research data, 92 percent of Republicans were more conservative than the median Democrat. Just 20 years earlier, in 1994, it was just 64 percent. In 2014, 94 percent of Democrats were more liberal than the median Republican. In 1994, it was 70 percent.

    This is not the case today. President Obama isn’t just a Democrat – never was he just a democrat. He is a progressive socialist liberal of the far, far left and will nominate a far left justice

    Many are pointing out that President Reagan nominated Anthony Kennedy to the Supreme Court, and he was confirmed in the last year of Reagan’s presidency. But despite Reagan being a conservative president, the whole country was far less polarized then, and Reagan himself was far more inclined to do business with the other party. Reagan sent two centrist jurists to the Supreme Court: Anthony Kennedy and Sandra Day O’Connor.

    Even in the remote chance that Obama would nominate a centrist like Kennedy; matters are too far gone in the country today to tolerate replacing Antonin Scalia with anyone less conservative, and a lesser jurists. Purity in this replacement is most important.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Policy of demeaning and snarling his political opponents has been a favorite habit of President Obama for the last eight years. Obama is perhaps the first president who believes that leading the country and playing to the beliefs of the extremists in his own party amount to the same thing. Obama fans/supporters are motivated in large degree by sheer hatred.

    Obama’s latest, silent insult — leaving a spokesman to explain he had better things to do on a Saturday than attend the funeral of a 30-year justice of the Supreme Court — isn’t surprising when you consider the mean-spirited things he says virtually every time he steps in front of a microphone.

    What Obama is all about is the absorption of as much of the private sector by the US government as possible, from the banking business, to the mortgage industry, the automobile business, to health care. I do not want the government in charge of all of these things. I don’t want this to work . . . I hope he fails.

    Obama is Gratuitous, Nasty, Petty, Spiteful, Insulting, just plain rude. When the rhetoric of a president falls to this level cooperation should not be on the table.

    ReplyDelete