Monday, January 13, 2014

Bob Gates Discusses the Need for Presidential Conviction to Support Troops in Time of War

We didn't have to wait long to get former Defense Secretary Robert Gates' first comments on his new book. Gates said on CBS News Sunday that he doesn't regret anything he wrote in his controversial book and calls the memoir "an honest account." In the Sunday interview, he offered a new and harsher criticism of President Obama's wartime leadership, saying that Obama didn't reach out to American troops and make them believe he supported their sacrifice. When asked by CBS presenter Rita Braver about his statement that President Obama never really had a passion for pursuing the war in Afghanistan, Gates answered : "It's one thing to tell the troops that you support them. It's another to work at making them believe that you believe as president that their sacrifice is worth it, that the cause is just, that what they are doing was important for the country, and that they must succeed,....President (George W.) Bush did that with the troops when I was Secretary. I did not see President Obama do that. As I write in the book, it was this absence of passion, this absence of a conviction of the importance of success that disturbed me." In "Duty: Memoirs of a Secretary of War," the former Defense Secretary not only raises questions about Obama's war leadership, he also harshly criticizes Vice President Joe Biden. Gates told CBS that people credited him with being blunt and candid while he was in the Cabinet and that "I could hardly be any less in writing a book." Gates said that the different ways people look at the book reflects the country's polarized political process. He says he didn't think that waiting until after the next presidential election to discuss important issues "made any sense." Gates remains very critical of the President, saying Obama was at skeptical of his own strategy in Afghanistan. Gates' disagreements with Vice President Joe Biden were deep, but he said, "Actually I think I am in some areas complimentary of him,..but where I had a particular problem with the vice president was in his encouragement of suspicion of the military and the senior military with the president: 'You can't trust these guys. They're gonna try and jam you. They're gonna try and box you in,' and so on. And that did disturb me a lot." But Gates said he did occasionally agree with Biden. "One time when I agreed with him on something -- often Admiral Mullen, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, and I would ride back to the Pentagon together from the White House -- and Mullen turned to me at one point [and] said, 'You know that you agreed with the vice president this morning.' And I said, 'Yeah, that's why I'm rethinking my position.'" ~~~~~ Dear readers, I watched a report on CNN today that brought home to me what Robert Gates is saying about a President needing to make his troops believe that their sacrifice is worthwhile. US veterans of the 2004 Fallujah battle talked about the hand-to-hand street-to-street nature of the battle to drive out the anti-government insurgents. They also remembered the people of Fallujah, some who had become friends, and said they wished them well in their current battle against terrorists. The veterans talked about their feelings concerning what's happening now in Iraq. They said that they had left the country with the capability to create its own future but that what is happening now seemed inevitable when the US troops left Iraq. The veterans were sombre when they recounted the friends dead and disabled in the battle for Fallujah, saying, however, that it was for the "cause of self-determination and that's always a worthy fight." They finally said that they were sure in 2004 that they were fighting and sacrificing themselves in a good cause - but now they aren't sure many still believe that. There was no mention of the pullout or of President Obama's hasty retreat from Iraq and Afghanistan, but his presence hung over the veterans' conversation and memories of battle and evaluation of sacrifice. Soldiers never make policy. They seldom create a winning atmosphere except in their local units. But, every young person sent to fight in any army anywhere in the world needs to know he is needed and that his sacrifice is valuable. It is the very least that political leaders - commanders in chief - must offer to the young men and women whom they put in harm's way. Without a profound conviction in the value and necessity of sacrifice in their souls, wartime political leaders become simple killing machines.

5 comments:

  1. I think what Bob gates was saying about the President - any president - is so very true. But it is also true right up and down the Officers ranks and senior NCO's.

    If the men (boys mostly) do not have the feeling that you are committed to the plan, the objective, the expectations from command you as the leader are deep trouble.

    I use to walk the point more often than anyone else on the team. And when i wasn't on point I was at the rear. Attitude in a war/fire zone gets a leader in lots of trouble.

    But in the larger perspective when a leader is uncommitted, that feeling begins to trickle down to the company commanders, squad leaders, etc. And pretty soon the whole organization is coming apart at the seams.

    Bob Gates was not that type of Sec Def.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Secretary of Defense Gates was always like a grandfather who taught you everything about life and how to do 100,000 things around the house. He taught you right from wrong by example. He was there every step of the way.

    He taught you that to win you had to be prepared for anything.

    If I didn’t have 2 such grandfathers … I would have chosen someone like Robert Gates

    ReplyDelete
  3. Why is there always a question mark at the end of of a statement made by a conservative individual like Robert Gates, who has spend most of his life in the service and defense o this country.

    It's perfectly fine to disagree or question his stance ... but not his honesty.

    I just watched a "former CIA analysts" she was all of maybe 25 expounding on her knowledge and how it fits into the world of foreign affairs - she has a passport I guess and can steer through customs in an outpost like Paris or Tokyo ... some real back country in the world of foreign affairs.

    Firstly how can anyone qualified be a "former" analysts at 25? Her educational background is Art History. My guess is she is "former" because she couldn't do the job, or it was too stressful, or she is not qualified at all.

    Secondly why do the national news get these people on their programs and then sit hanging on every erroneous statement they make. But then turn around and via their lack of knowledge question and/criticize a Robert Gates only because his political beliefs are in conflict with theirs?

    Robert Gates knows more about conviction and presidential support for the troops that Obama will ever.

    ReplyDelete
  4. All of this, no matter how damning, no matter how explosive,this will not mean a thing in either this year's or the 2016 elections.


    For leftists, the end result is irrelevant. It only matters that Obama tried. Incompetence is irrelevant. The left hates the military anyway, so all of this will just serve to endear Obama even more with his wacko base.



    As we already have seen time and time again, this Regime rewards incompetence with promotion. These "revelations" will only serve to strengthen Obama and Hillary's support from their base.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I cannot wait to read the book and then say, "Thank you Secretary Gates".

    ReplyDelete