Saturday, January 25, 2014
The West and Putin's Russian Vision Meet in Ukraine
Let's take a tour of Eastern Europe. According to MIKHAIL GORBACHEV, the last leader of the Soviet Union who presided over its collapse, perestroika was the "conference of development of democracy, socialist self-government, encouragement of initiative and creative endeavor, improved order and discipline, more glasnost (openness) criticism and self-criticism in all spheres of our society. It is utmost respect for the individual and consideration for personal dignity." In 1988 when Gorbachev introduced glasnost, giving the Soviet people freedoms they had never known, including greater freedom of speech, the press became far less controlled, and thousands of political prisoners and dissidents were released. Gorbachev's goal in undertaking glasnost was to pressure conservatives within the Central Committee of the Soviet Communist Party who opposed his policies of economic restructuring, and to lead the Soviet people to support his reform initiatives through openness, debate and public participation, perhaps not realizing that at the same time, he opened himself and his reforms up for more public criticism. ~~~ In his presidency and premiership, VLADIMIR PUTIN has shown that Russia has no intention of establishing a copy of the American or British political system. Putin says he is interested in a system closer to Russia's own traditions and circumstances. Putin's administration has often been described as a "sovereign democracy." According to those who agree with that description, Putin's actions and policies are designed to gain popular support within Russia itself and not internationally. And in a speech before NATO in 2007, called the Munich speech, Putin called for upholding the principle that "security for everyone is security for all," while criticizing the policies of the United States and NATO, condemning the unipolar model of international relations as flawed and lacking moral basis, condemning the "hypocrisy" of countries trying to teach democracy to Russia, condemning the domination of hard power and enforcement by the US of Western norms and laws to other countries bypassing international law and substitution of the United Nations by NATO or the EU. Putin also called for a stop to the militarization of space and questioned the plans to deploy American missile defense in Europe as threatening strategic nuclear balance and spurring a new cold war. After the Munich speech, Washington came to regard Russia as obstructionist and a spoiler because of Syria, Iran, Cuba and Venezuela. In turn, those nations began to look to Russia for protection against the US. And Europe, which needs Russian gas, but worries about Russian interference in the affairs of Eastern Europe, began to expand the EU eastward, which angered Russia. Central Asia sees Moscow as a former overlord too powerful to ignore. In Asia, India has moved from being a close ally of the Soviet Union to becoming a partner of the United States with strong nuclear and commercial ties. In East Asia, Japan and Russia remain estranged over the ownership of the Kurile islands, a dispute which has hindered cooperation for decades. And the Russia-China relationship has morphed constantly since the 1950s - from client state to antagonist to strategic resources partner. ~~~ The President of Ukraine elected during the Orange Revolution, Viktor Yushchenko, was succeeded in 2010 by VIKTOR YANUKOVICH, which led to improved relations with Russia. Yanukovich is an ethnic Belarus-Polish-Russian, whose mothertongue is Russian and who learned to speak Ukrainian later. The President of Kyrgyzstan since 2009, Almazbek Atambayev, wants a "common future" with its neighbours and Russia. Despite existing or past tensions between Russia and most of the post-Soviet states, Putin has followed the policy of Eurasian integration. Putin endorsed the idea of a Eurasian Union in 2011, (the concept was proposed by the President of Kazakhstan in 1994). Putin is quoted as saying in 2010 at a European meeting that if Ukraine attempted to join the European Union, he would consider annexing eastern Ukraine and the Crimea, althougb Putin denies having said this. In 2011, the presidents of Belarus, Kazakhstan and Russia signed an agreement setting a target of establishing the Eurasian Union by 2015. ~~~ In UKRAINE this weekend, as riots spread from Kiev to nearly half of the country, President Yanukovich promised to reshuffle his government and make other concessions - not enough for opposition leaders who say nothing short of his resignation will do. Hours after the president's comments Friday, fireballs lit the night sky over central Kiev and thick black smoke rose from burning tires at huge protester barricades. Angry demonstrators hurled firebombs, rocks and fireworks at officers as a protest leader said: "We will force the authorities to respect us,...Not they, but we will dictate the conditions of a truce." The fighting had stopped earlier this week as opposition leaders entered into face-to-face talks with Yanukovich. Vitali Klitschko, an opposition leader who is a former world heavyweight boxing champion, said the only way to end the street protests - known as the Maidan after the central Kiev square occupied by protesters - is for Yanukovich to resign. "Just a month ago, the Maidan would have gone home," Klitschko told reporters Friday night, according to the Interfax news agency. "Today, people are demanding the president's resignation." The more violent rallies broke out after Yanukovich scrapped a key treaty with the European Union in order to secure a bailout loan from Russia President Vladimir Putin, who has pressed hard to keep Ukraine in his nation's political and economic orbit, but more Ukrainians favor closer ties with the EU than any new alliance with Russia. Swedish Foreign Minister Carl Bildt, who spent several years backing the scrapped EU agreement with Ukraine, suggested that Yanukovich was losing control over the country. He posted a map of Ukraine on his Twitter account, where many regions were shown engulfed by protests : "If Kiev regime tries a military solution to this situation, it will be very bloody and it will fail." EU enlargement commissioner Stefan Fuele flew to Kiev on Friday to meet with Yanukovich and the opposition and try to broker a solution. The West has been urging Yanukovich to compromise with the protesters, while threatening sanctions against his government. ~~~~~ Dear readers, these points in modern eastern European politics are related. Putin has now, according to sources, sent Cossack troops to help Yanukovich. It seems clear that the Putin vision of a renewed Russian hegemony includes not only the southern tier breakaway nations from Georgia to China, but also Ukraine. The view that Ukraine buffers Russia from western Europe is a thousand years old. The Putin view of modern Russia as the natural socialist leader of the space from Warsaw to Mongolia can be seen in Putin's efforts to consolidate power and influence through oil and gas diplomacy that supports his instinctive opposition to western democratic societies. Gorbachev was trying to save the USSR from internal economic collapse when he undertook the politically dangerous opening up of Soviet society. The unintended consequences of his gamble have made him a 'friend' of tbe West, but it was Gorbachev who said in 1985 : "Many of you see the solution to your problems in resorting to market mechanisms in place of direct planning. Some of you look at the market as a lifesaver for your economies. But comrades, you should not think about lifesavers but about the ship, and the ship is socialism." The efforts of EU leaders going to Kiev to coax Ukraine west would be better spent in talking to Vladimir Putin about a compromise that will call his Cossacks back home and stabilize gas deliveries into the EU. Then, the EU will be able to defend the protesters, who fear a return of Soviet-era Russian overlords. Perhaps a key to success is the little-known
Viktor Medvedchuk, a Ukrainian politician, lawyer and business oligarch considered one of the most important post-Soviet Ukrainian politicians, less active now and operating out of public view. Currently Medvedchuk is chairman of the pro-Russian political organization Ukrainian Choice, and is considered 'the undisputed leader of Russia’s fifth column in Ukraine.' Putin is the godfather of Medvedchuk's daughter Darina (born in 2004). Medvedchuk and his party now have marginal popular support in Ukraine, but, with President Yanukovich's son, a feared oligarch who yields huge business power in Ukraine, he may be able to convince Putin to save their, and thus Putin's, fortunes and power by helping Ukraine find a future acceptable to Russia and the West. Not at all easy. "The country is sliding towards dictatorship and we must stop that," says a 33-year-old protester."Molotov cocktails are louder than any empty words from politicians."
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
"How do you tell a Communist? Well, it's someone who reads Marx and Lenin. And how do you tell an anti-Communist? It's someone who understands Marx and Lenin." – President Ronald Reagan
ReplyDeleteThe Ukraine protests started as a gathering of a few thousand students demanding that Ukraine sign an Association Agreement with the European Union, after the government had announced that work had been suspended on this agreement just before the Vilnius Summit of November 28–29, 2013. But when Vladimir Putin was reelected as president of Russia, in March 2012, Ukraine came into his crosshairs as a central part of his grandiose plan to create a great Eurasian Union.
These tensions were reflected in the policies of the past two presidents. Hailing from the industrial Donbas region located in Ukraine’s east, President Yanukovych rapidly turned to authoritarian rule and reversed the pro-Western policies and attitudes of his predecessor, Viktor Yushchenko, who had come to power after the Orange Revolution of late 2004.
This entire explosive problem in the Ukraine belongs to Putin and no one else.
" Opposition leader Vitali Klitschko said "to change just the ministers in not enough."
ReplyDelete"People want to change the rules because they are already tired of living without rules. Everybody is saying 'no.' You can buy any court, you can't find justice in our country. The system is totally corrupt. And that is why people right now are not happy," Klitschko said"
The above are quotes from opposition leader Kitschko in a Moscow newspaper this morning (Russian morning)
It really sums up the problem that is facing the citizens of the Ukraine. When any court is oped to be bought and sold there is NO freedoms or rights ... there is only money, who has the most, and who is willing to spend it.
The leaders of the “Opposition Movement” have (I think rightfully so) decided that they have the Russian backed Ukraine government of the run. The latest offer from Mr. Yanukovych included many, many concessions some of which were high ranking positions within HIS government. The opposition seems to be moving ahead with plans to unseat the existing government of Yanokovych.
ReplyDeleteThis is a sensible plan, and will be hailed if it succeeds, as nothing short of brilliant.
While Yanokovych and his backers in Ukraine and Moscow are hoping to drag out the negotiations as long as it takes for the opposition to grow weary and go home to their normal daily controlled lives. The real coup will transpire if or when Artseniy Yatseniuk becomes Prime Minister.
The Opposition seems to be in a controlling position at present and they are forging ahead into other northern Ukraine cities with their protests and actively taking over government buildings as they move onward.
Mr Yanukovych's recent proposals are not sincere. If they were, he seems to be prepared to nearly forfeit everything – except his presidency. The question is whether he could eventually give this up, or would he ultimately, with his back against the wall, fight back as dictators always do?
Once the link between choice and responsibility has been severed one of the major motivators for excellence has been silenced. For the greatest significance of this fundamental concept is that a feeling of responsibility for one’s own choices is its role in guiding the decisions and actions for free people. If nothing is ever your fault, if nothing is ever your achievement what does it matter what you choose or what you do? If we are to be free we must bear the responsibility of that freedom or else we will search our whole life to learn whose responsibility is it.
ReplyDeleteMake your choice(s) and then carry out plans to achieve them. never look back, never second guess, and certainly never let someone's opinion that lives elsewhere confuse the issues that you deem needed to be changed. My simple advice to the "demonstrators" in the Ukraine.
"These are the times that try men's souls" - Thomas Paine
DeleteWhatever noises Yanukovych made during the negotiations, the obvious purpose of these discussions appear to be:
ReplyDelete1. Gaining time
2. Establishing a cease-fire in Kyiv, setting up a decorative “border” of internal forces in Kyiv, who are draftees.
3. Moving all the combat-ready troops to the cities that have been mobilized, violently suppressing the local residents and taking back the administrations.
4. Continuing to have disguised cops and mafia underlings burning cars, grabbing and absconding with people to unknown destinations every night.
5. Stirring a break-up between the opposition leaders and the people, who want radical action.
6. Stirring a split between more moderate protesters and more radical ones; murdering the more radical elements during the cease-fire, while the moderates relax and slowly drift back home.
In short, a three-day “ceasefire” will cost us hundreds more abducted and crippled, dozens more killed, and a growing number trashed cars. By January 28, when the Rada is supposed to convene, these numbers will double.
To understand properly, just one thins is necessary - the statements by Lukash... not Yanukovych, but Lukash a true political “puppet,” summing up the results of the talks.
Get past all the hyperbole regarding the Ukraine and what do we have lurking in the last paragraph on the last page, what do we have … simply a fight for control of the Ukraine for the control of their natural gas that both Russia and the EU want so badly at wholesale pricing?
ReplyDeleteIs the only prosperous future for Ukraine is with the EU. When Ukraine finally joins the EU then European Democratic Norms will be embraced and followed. The Government will have to embrace the Constitution and Obey the Rule of Law. This will not happen overnight upon joining but this is the future, an end to epidemic Government Corruption. With Russia Ukraine will Spiral backwards and becomes another North Korea.