Saturday, November 16, 2013

The Collapse of Democratic Movements in Syria and Libya Is the Result of US - UN Negligence

The tragic events in the Philippines have riveted the world for the past week and I hope we are all doing whatever we can to help the 2 million Philippinos displaced by the worst typhoon ever to make landfall. But, this fully warranted media focus has masked two important stories coming out of Syria and Libya. ~~~~~ Some of us have been watching with dismay as Bashar al-Assad gradually regains control over rebel-held territory in Syria. Al-Assad forces have captured rebel strongholds in both the north and in areas around Damascus, where al-Assad has made the most of his Lebanese Hezbollah ally, capturing five towns since October 11. The latest to fall to al-Assad was Hejeira, which army troops swept through Wednesday. And in the north, al-Assad forces outside the country's largest city, Aleppo, have reinforced the regime's position. The more the government advances, the easier it is to dismiss the weak and divided opposition's demands in the critically important city of Aleppo, where rebels have fought the regime since mid-2012. Al-Assad forces have retaken a military base near the Aleppo airport, a large war prize. Momentum around Aleppo is now favoring al-Assad. His army's advances around rebel strongholds have slowed the rebel effort to retain the north. In addition, rebel infighting, with al-Qaida-linked jihadists taking over more moderate rebel brigades, has left hundreds dead on both sides of the rebel units. And both moderate rebel groups and jihadists have undertaken a brutal side conflict with Syria's Kurdish minority, which has a large presence in the northeast and Aleppo province. While rebel infighting has sidetracked their resources and undermined their effort to oust al-Assad, rebels also have been frustrated by US President Obama's decision to seek a diplomatic path to disarming Damascus of its chemical weapons. Many had harbored hopes that even limited American military intervention would arrive and help tip the scales in the rebels' favor. Supplies of weapons and gear from neighboring Turkey has also slowed to a trickle, rebels say, as Ankara has grown increasingly concerned about the increasingly prominent role of Islamic extremists in the rebel effort. ~~~~~ And in Libya, renewed fighting has broken out between rival Libyan militias around the capital, Tripoli, after at least 43 people died and 500 were wounded in Friday clashes. The latest violence is in Tajoura, the suburb where local militiamen are confronting fighters arriving from Misrata. Friday's clashes occurred when civilian protesters were fired on as they marched on the Misrata militia headquarters to demand that it leave Tripoli. Today, Prime Minister Ali Zeidan confirmed that fresh fighting had occurred in Tajoura. He urged all sides to "exercise maximum restraint,...No forces from outside Tripoli should attempt to enter the city....The coming hours and days will be decisive for the history of Libya and the success of the revolution." BBC's Rana Jawad reported from Tripoli that Tajoura is seen as the gateway to the capital and said the latest fighting was sparked when an armed convoy from Misrata entered it in an apparent attempt to make its way to the center of Tripoli. Jawad said armed groups halted the convoy, which retreated 15km (9 miles) away, but that live rounds were still being exchanged. Government-linked militias have set up checkpoints across the capital in tightened security for the funerals of many of those killed on Friday as thousands filled Tripoli streets where the coffins were being carried overhead. The Washington Post reported that the clashes serve to underscore Libya’s deteriorating security two years after Libyan dictator Moammar Qaddafi’s death, as bands of former rebels have morphed into well-armed militias which increasingly vie for power in Libya. The central government is weak and divided. Some ministers and lawmakers are suspected of having links to the militias, which control enormous stockpiles of heavy weapons and have recruited thousands of young men. Efforts to absorb the militias into a national army and police force have not succeeded. Instead, the militias threaten to use force in order to intimidate politicians, government officials and each other, even pushing through legislation. Recently, the militias shut down oil infrastructure to pressure the state into meeting their demands. More than 30 people died in the eastern city of Benghazi in June when one powerful government-sponsored militia, the Libya Shield 1, clashed with armed protesters and another state-sponsored group, the Libyan special forces. Benghazi was also the scene of the attack on the US diplomatic mission on September 11, 2012, that left four people dead, including US Ambassador Chris Stephens, and sparked the first popular mass protests against the militias. ~~~~~ Dear readers, Syria and Libya are really two sides of the same coin. In Syria, the lack of US and western support for the original rebel cause has led to its infiltration by al-Qaida linked jihadists that threaten to overwhelm the moderate rebels and give al-Assad the upper hand in any eventual Geneva negotiation, if he even sees a reason to negotiate about the future of what is beginning to feel like the latest lost cause of Syrians wanting to be free of the vicious al-Assad family dictatorship. The other side of the coin is Libya, where the US and the UN thought that in eliminating Qaddafi and allowing elections to proceed their job was done. They abandoned Libya to its fate. Only the martyred Chris Stevens was left to try to provide the longterm support that was an afterthought for everyone but him. In both Syria and Libya - we could add Iraq, Afghanistan, Yemen, Egypt, Palestine, Lebanon - democracy cannot begin to grow without a US-UN commitment to ongoing support. Killing Qaddafi and destroying chemical stockpiles is simply not enough. If the Middle East is to gain a stability based on people instead of dictators, the US and the West must stay engaged.

11 comments:

  1. Next to Obamacare/ACA the Middle East is Obama's Achilles Heel.

    Obama simply has NO Middle East policy or agenda. Without either or both there is absolutely zero possibility of "western success" in the region; which equates to an unstable political/religious atmosphere between Islamic factions that will certainly in time involve Israel into the conflict.

    No policy/agenda is a plan for disaster, millions of deaths, loss of influence for the US, unimaginable pressure on Israel, loss of shipping avenues, loss of oil supplies. No USA involved in the daily activity of the whole Middle East equals massive realignment of business worldwide.

    And we are at this crossroads due to the absolute inability of Obama to get involved and risk a loss. When in fact we are well over 50% of the way towards that loss because of our inability to act.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The brutality and illegal use if Germ Warfare that is being conducted in th Middle East presently us not in the least about the establishment of Western style "democracies". It is about century old oppression of the people under either Shite or Sunni style government with the principal guiding document Sharia Law. A quasi legal expression of authority not to governed by , but to punish,dehumanize, and oppress citizens ... Mostly women and children.


    Let's be carefull about our involvement and more so the sincerity of the side we align with.

    My concern is that at the end of the day we expect a democracy, much like our where freedoms and civil rights exist under a real legal system ... Not a "fudged" expression of servitude based upon gender, religious alignment, and wealth.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The kindest thing that can be said for Obama and his administration is that they don't know what they are doing.
    The harshest criticism that can be made of Obama and his administration is that they do know what they are doing.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Intervention will be like the intervention to "fix" the economy. In other words, it will do nothing because it will be stupidly conceived and incompetently executed.

    This Obama administration has not a single original idea as to what to do about anything. They are naive, inexperienced administrators with nothing except radical "class room" ideas.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Syria and Libya are both experiencing civil wars with the bottom line in each being religious control not the democracy. or at least not the level of democracy that we enjoy and have struggled with retaining over these last 200 years or so.

    Considering the two waging factions in Syria & Libya are both extreme views of the same dungeon that people are keep in because of the freedom crippling Sharia Law that has governed Islam for thousands of years.

    Our intervention into either or both of these conflicts will not change the outcome at all. When the fighting is over and the brutality towards the simple citizens is ended what will be left is the dictatorial control by religious zealots called Imams that get their matching orders from Sharia Law and not from their conscience (if they have one). Their actions will continue to keep the citizens of these 2 countries locked up in a 2000 year old prison of thought.

    Civil or Human rights do not exists now in either country nor will they when this period of civil war is concluded.

    Before we go rushing into something we don't understand, something that we have no comprehension about their type of expected "freedoms" or their obedience to this Sharia Law - we need to understand what our involvement will do in the long term towards the reprisal from the radical fundamentalist Islamic terrorist that want to destroy the western Christian world through a Jihad movement.

    The cost of an intervention by the USA will be high in dollars and lives. And I hate to say the rewards will be minimal in the end.

    But is this our duty, our charge to intervene in Syria & Libya (and eventually various other Middle east countries) to help those "rebels" that the press has dubbed as "freedom seekers" (theirs, not ours)? If we determine it is, let's be sure OUR present leadership-less government can muster-up.

    I for one think we need to do something other than offer empty promises that are riddled with holes of escape. And I would rather confront the radical terrorists on their ground rather than in New Jersey or Montana.

    ReplyDelete
  6. The U.S. will be hated if they do, or not do, anything.

    The U.S. should focus on Israeli. The U.S. should get involved if, and only if, these wars affect our safety, and our best allies .

    ReplyDelete
  7. A nuclear Iran, a Syria or Libya with an nuclear ally next door, an already nuclear Pakistani, an Egypt in the solid hands of the Muslin Brotherhood, an Afghanistan with the riches of it's Poppy crop ... one and all represent danger and potential elimination for Israel

    Therefore "don't ask for whom the bells toll" they toll for everyone in the world if Iran is allowed to be fully operational in producing nuclear materials & bombs for sale.

    I think we have but one "trump" card left to play in the Middle East ... MILITARY INVOLVEMENT.

    ReplyDelete
  8. The UN under it's present hard line socialists leaning is never going to be a stand up take charge force in the Middle east, or any where else for that matter. I am a strong opponent of the UN always have been. But today , there is certainly MORE that can be done with the monies that we pay this body of want-a-be leaders and a military "peace keeping force".

    President Obama has one gigantic problem ... his "mouth writes checks that his bank account can not cash". He makes promises with NO intention of living up to his word. He's not a leader, he's not about democracy, he's not about anything except Obama. Why should we or the world expect anything from him. His demonstrated past gives us no hope or valid reasoning to expect such.

    So short of the 2014 & 2016 elections producing change in Washington DC, it is sink or swim on your own out there.

    ReplyDelete
  9. So what do the people of the Middle East do for the next 3 years ... TREAD WATER?

    ReplyDelete
  10. The Obama administration and the complicit liberal media claimed the ousting of Khdaffi as a "huge foreign policy victory".

    What Policy ... certainly not Obama's he doesn't have one - anyplace.

    What Victory ... has the liberal/socialists media taken a good look inside Libya today. it will take decades (plural) to rebuild if anyone wants to and why should they.

    Ignorance by the radical Islamist may be a sign of progress and possibilities for the very small percentage of Libyans that want freedom.

    Stay tuned for the squandering destruction of the Middle East and it's history (not lately) to mankind.

    ReplyDelete