Wednesday, November 20, 2013

Mr. Obama, "You can't fool all of the people all of the time"

"If once you forfeit the confidence of your fellow-citizens, you can never regain their respect and esteem." __Abraham Lincoln. ~~~~~ One year ago President Barack Obama defeated Mitt Romney in the 2012 presidential election, but a new poll has found that a rematch today of the 2012 election would favor Romney. According to a Washington Post-ABC News poll of 1,006 adults conducted November 14-17, 49% would vote for Romney compared to 45% voting for Obama, a reverse of Romney's 4-point popular vote loss in 2012. This poll reflects just how much support the President has lost as a result of the Obamacare debacle that has undermined public confidence in both the President personally and the viability of the new healthcare law. The survey indicates that Obama's biggest loss of support comes from women, the young, the less-educated, the poor, and among liberals. In 2012, the President beat Romney among women voters by 11%, but if the election were held today, he would lead by only 1%. Young voter support for Obama has dropped from 18% to 2% since last year, while those with less than a college degree who gave him a lead of 4% have slipped to a deficit of 9%. Most surprising is that liberal support for the President has dropped to 59% from 75%, with 20% now saying they would vote for Romney if the election were held today. The Washington Post, trying to salvage something for the President, pointed out that the survey findings cannot tell the entire story because of other factors that affect the outcome of an election, such as margin of error in polling and the fact that the Electoral College - not the popular vote - elects the president. But, the last time the Electoral College overturned the pooular vote was in 1876, so we can discount this Post argunent. Thus, according to the survey analysis, an 8% swing in the popular vote toward Romney would have given him an additional 125 electoral votes, allowing him to win the race by 331 to 207, or virtually the same margin as Obama's 332 - 206 win. ~~~~~ Dear readers, President Obama is finally paying with the American public for his combination of non-existent management skills, refusal to accept expert help, and the almost complete centralization of the federal executive function in a White House that lacks the experience and political skills needed to work properly. While this amateur President and his insider friends managed to slip through the net in his first term by blaming each of their missteps on President Bush, Obamacare finally caught them up in their gross incompetence. We can only hope that American voters will remember this in 2014 and vote for Republican congress members and senators who will be able to reduce to a minimum the continuing damage being done to America by Barack Obama - from Fast and Furious to Benghazi, the Middle East and the IRS and NSA scandals. ~~~~~ As Honest Abe also said : "You can fool some of the people all of the time, and you can fool all of the people some of the time, but you can't fool all of the people all of the time."

8 comments:

  1. In a sense of fair play and a history of giving continual unmanageable respect to the Office holders of the presidency, senate, and congressmen we establish an zone where elected officials like Obama and various “leaders “in both houses of congress (that have been there way too long) can commit offenses and recover to go on and commit other felonies assaults on our Constitution and countless disregards towards the people that put them in office.

    We play the serious game of “government” much like it is a cricket match. We should be able to call a spade a spade; a duck a duck; a lying cheating politician a lying cheating politician vs. ‘My Honorable friend…, Mr. So and so …, My esteem fellow senator, etc.

    We distort the truth by distorting our feelings. We mislead the citizens on Main Street by misleading ourselves.

    If it’s yellow in color, waddles as it walks, and quakes … it’s a duck folk and sound be considered for dinner not re-election in 2014.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Can ALL THE PEOPLE really be fooled SOME OF THE TIME?
    Elections are won 51-49% of the vote, a landslide is considered above 55% of a vote to the winner, and obvious murders get off with 1 vote in their favor. Presidents that have a ruinous term gets reelected by 1% of the vote margin.
    My point is that considering the whole as 100% it’s easy to catapult forward somewhat easy to get 51%. Too many people get dissolutioned to the point where they just don’t go out and vote … thereby making the task of being re-elected to the “scandalous” politician a walk in the park.
    Maybe consideration should be given to marking elections that have less than a 65% (or so) turn out of registered voter null & void and the position simply remains empty until “MOST OF THE PEOPLE” participate.. Take the advantage from the candidates and force the participation by the electorate.
    Or a Poll Tax of $2.50 per vote and the revenue stays in the local voting district. Maybe even “LAND OWNERS ONLY” and their direct families can vote.
    And then “None of the People could be fooled” unless they wanted to be

    ReplyDelete
  3. "There's a sucker born every minute" - P. T. Barnum

    Thank goodness they don't vote very often.

    ReplyDelete
  4. As Casey Pops presented us with today … “Mr. Obama, "You can't fool all of the people all of the time"

    If you look at the most recent CBS poll numbers Casey pops is exactly right’. It appears that the electorate may be on to our leader. The polls show that:

    31% of the people now favor Obamacare/ACA vs. 43% just a week ago – down 12%
    37% of the people favor Obama vs 46% also a week ago – down 9%

    Hope springs eternal

    ReplyDelete
  5. In law a man is guilty when he violates the rights of others. In ethics he is guilty if he only thinks of doing so.
    — Immanuel Kant, Prussian geographer and philosopher (1724-1804)

    To be an honest man is to do no wrong. To be an ethical man is to never even think about doing wrong for any reason what so ever.

    Can either honesty or ethical be said in any honesty about Obama? I don't think so in all honesty.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Too bad we couldn't do a recall. And if anyone saw George W Bush on Late Night with Jay Leno last night....well, oh how I wish he was back with Dick Cheney and maybe Donald Rumsfeld.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. As Thomas Wolf said ... "YOU CAN'T GO BACK HOME AGAIN

      Delete
  7. Obama's rhetoric is much like a line from Macbeth ... "A Sound and Fury Signifying NOTHING" .

    Everything that Obama it seems has uttered since being elected and well before that has amounted to NOTHING. No honesty, no meaning, no substance.

    ReplyDelete