Saturday, August 3, 2013

America Issues Worldwide Travel Alert

Hi, dear readers. I'm back from a week on the beach with two long-time friends and their 10-year-old grandson. It is truly amazing how much energy children have. He kept all of us hopping. But, there was no WiFi or internet or TV where we were, so I had a lot of catching up to do when I got home late last night. The return trip itself was newsworthy because I travelled by train - and there were police and border agents and even a sniff dog on our train, checking passports and opening suitcases and handbags. It was only after I got home and put on my TV that I realized that the United States had issued an extraordinary global travel warning to Americans on Friday about the threat of an al-Qaida attack. America also closed down 22 embassies and consulates across the Moslem world for the weekend. The closings and warning appeared to be the determined effort of the Obama administration to prevent a second Benghazi-type attack such as occurred last September 11 in Libya. The administration's actions have received broad bipartisan support in Congress. General Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, appeared on ABC News Sunday to say that the threat is "more specific" than previous ones and the "intent is to attack Western, not just US, interests." The US State Department has advised Americans traveling overseas to take precautions, citing potential dangers involved with public transportation systems and other prime sites for tourists and noting that previous terrorist attacks have centered on subway and rail networks as well as airplanes and boats. The alert expires on August 31. The warning emphasized that possible attacks may occur on or come from the Arabian Peninsula. US officials pointed specifically to Yemen, the home of al-Qaida's most dangerous affiliate and the network blamed for several terrorist plots on the United States, including the foiled Christmas Day 2009 plan to bomb an airliner over Detroit to the explosives-laden parcels intercepted the following year aboard cargo flights. The current threat is particularly serious in areas from Yemen to northwest Africa to Afghanistan. Eliot Engel, House member from New York and the House Foreign Affairs Committee's top Democrat, who was briefed on the State Department's decision, said, "I don't know if I can say there is a particular threat...there is concern over the potentiality of violence." The "blinking red intelligence seems to be pointing toward an Al-Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula plot," said Seth Jones, counterterror expert at the Rand Corp. who taljed to AP News, referring to the branch of al-Qaida known as AQAP. Britain also took action Friday, telling British citizens in Yemen to leave and those considering such travel to delay it. Britain, which closely coordinates on intelligence matters with Washington, stopped short of releasing a US-type region-wide alert but added that some embassy staff in Yemen had been withdrawn "due to security concerns." British embassies and consulates elsewhere in the Middle East were to remain open. Germany announced the closure of its Yemen embassy on Saturday. US Representative Ed Royce, a California Republican and the House Foreign Affairs Committee chairman, said the embassy threat was linked to al-Qaida and concerned the Middle East and Central Asia. Royce said the US is doing all it can "...to better protect our personnel and, out of an abundance of caution, we should." He declined to say if the National Security Agency's much-debated surveillance program helped reveal the threat. On Friday night, the New York Times said that American officials said the US had intercepted electronic communications among senior operatives of al-Qaida. US Representative Dutch Ruppersberger of Maryland, the top Democrat on the House Intelligence panel, said the communications picked up is more serious than the usual chatter among militants and would-be terrorists on the Internet and otherwise. ~~~~~ These terrorist threats will continue, dear readers, and while they should not make us change our lives dramatically because that would mean victory for the terrorists, they should remind us that our world is a riskier place today and we should be attuned to its darker aspects. And, for me, the terrorist threat is a constant reminder that people of all religions and political persuasions should work together to build economic and cultural and social bridges that will deprive these faceless terrorists of their prey among poor, uneducated and cast-off young people worldwide.

8 comments:

  1. Glad you're back safely and all should heed the travel warnings.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think there are 2 things that can happen with this world wide warning on travel via the US government. The first is nothing happens the month simply because nothing was planned to happen.

    And secondly, some small incident will occur just to let the western world know that they can pull something off with the Superpower on alert.

    Let's all remember we had NO warning about 9/11, the USS Cole incident, the train strikes in Spain, etc.

    ReplyDelete
  3. You might not know it from the grand attempt that vocal Muslims seem to have thrown for themselves in the years since 9/11, but only one Muslim in America was killed in a vigilante "revenge" attack following the horrific slaughter of thousands in the name of Allah. That would be Waqar Hasan, a Muslim convenience store owner who was gunned down by Mark Anthony Stroman in Texas. Hardly an average American, Stroman was a white supremacist with a felony criminal record who went on to shoot two more people in the following weeks. However, he did claim to be motivated by anger after having watched the twin towers fall.More likely an excuse for hatred killing.

    For anyone keeping score: 2996 people killed on 9/11 and 1 Muslim-American killed in revenge

    Thankfully, an American jury sentenced Mark Stroman to death. The same cannot be said of many Muslim terrorists such as Lockerbie bomber, Abdelbaset Al Megrahi, who not only have sanctuary in Muslim countries, but are often treated as heroes by devout followers of Muhammad.

    Of course, 9/11 was neither the first nor the last time that Muslims have killed Americans on U.S. soil in terror attacks. In fact, since that day, Muslims have killed at least 61 people in 36 separate acts of terrorism in the United States (by the standards that Muslim-American groups set for hate crimes). Perhaps more importantly, there have been plenty of mass murder plots against Americans by Islamic terrorists that were thwarted by the FBI, law enforcement and overseas intelligence operations both before and after 9/11, as well as several that were simply botched, such as the attempt to blow up Times Square.

    By contrast, Muslim-Americans do not appear to be in any special danger from murderous (non-Muslim) religious fanatics. Identity groups, such as CAIR, whine incessantly about relatively trivial incidents while turning a blind eye to the horrible violence that is meted out daily in the name of their religion.

    For anyone wondering about the history of deadly Islamic terror on American soil since April 4, 1972 and ending with the Boston Marathon killings/injuries:

    KILLED: 3085
    INJURED:1592

    We are in this fight for survival with the world against the Islamic terrorists groups now seemly all answering in one form or another the the Muslim Brotherhood or availing themselves to the Brotherhood network of world wide finance and administrative organization.

    ReplyDelete
  4. During most wars there have been "cease-fires" for the observance of religion and religious holidays on one side or the other.

    During the 2013 "Most High Holiday of Islamic Religion - RAMADAN" one would expect all followers of Mohammad to be peaceful and reverent ... if only to their own followers and Islamic faithful.

    Think again. In the first 27 days of this years month long celebration of Ramadan there have been a total of 264 terror attacks, 27 suicide bombings, 1398 dead. and 2639 wounded around the world.

    For anyone who is interested in "number" that would work out to some 19,000 killed and 36,500 injured on a hypothetical year.

    But I am sure that along the way the terrorists could trow in a big event here and there.

    As Molon Labe just wrote we are in this fight as much as anyone else. We need to be serious about our pursuit, active against the knowledge we have (or will develop), and vigilant against this deadly enemy.

    ReplyDelete
  5. We have yet to hear (since 9/11/2001) any exasperated verbal, accusatory, demeaning rhetoric from any faction of the Islamic religion addressing their disapproval of ANY of the actions conducted by the numerous terrorists hate groups that are spraying death, destruction, and family grief around the world.

    So in this world of “political correctness” I rush to the decision that maybe, just maybe there are very few Islamic citizens that are annoyed or troubled with these terrorists, their action, or the results of said actions. It could be just fear of reprisal that is keeping some of the people silent … but them all is doubtful.

    From July 5, 2013 until August 3, 2013 there have been 296 certifiable terrorists’ attacks around the world. But in all honesty some 92% have occurred within the Middle East region.

    My point is simply this … Are we fighting an enemy that is much larger, much more entrenched in their own societal fabric than we acknowledge, and much more determined than we seem to be in taking the conflict to the “enemy” .

    “He who reaches the battlefield first, is likely to win the battle” an old Asian proverb from someone

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. A good argument that you present. But could the fault lie at the feet of the citizens of the US and not a staleward effort by the Muslim's that have fear and disruption of life on their side and not a whole lot more.

      I'm not so sure that the will to engage another enemy so soon after the "POLITICAL LOSS" we suffered in Vietnam is there and Iraq and Afghanistan.

      This enemy could be eliminated quickly except for the public reprisals and bad press coverage for the current administration

      Delete
  6. CASEY POPS IT'S GOOD TO HAVE YOU BACK SAFE AND SOUND AND EXCITING OUR MINDS WITH THOUGHT PROVOKING ARTICLES. YOU PICKED A GOOD WEEK TO RESUME. THE WORLD SEEMS TO BE SO CONFUSED RIGHT NOW.

    ReplyDelete
  7. If the Muslim extremist have or had (sine many hours have now passed since the Washington DC warnings) an attack planned, the big question is ... WHERE WAS THE POINT OF ATTACK?

    If the government had solid, verifiable information as to a forth coming attack the best way to dissolve the plan of attack would have been to NAME THE LOCATION.

    We need to discern the real from the maybe's in this war on terrorism.Broadcasting 25% of the possibility of an attack is wholly useless. If say the attack information pin pointed "UN in NYC" for instant ... if people knew that they would have stayed away from NYC/Lower Manhattan area.

    Let's be honest this administration has a "honesty gap" from jobs to unemployment, Obamacare, taxes,etc. Just about everything now that I think about it.

    Don't cry wolf on a Friday afternoon in DC and not follow it up without a mere word from the President.

    ReplyDelete