The Caravan, Open Borders, ObamaCare, Mad Maxine in Charge of Financial Services, Doing "Something" about White Men -- There's No Reason to Vote for Any Democrat, and every Reason to Vote for All Republicans

IF ANYBODY STILL NEEDS A REASON TO VOTE REPUBLICAN -- try this. The TeaParty.org website posted an article on Thursday that ought to strike fear into the heart of every American. In the article, Gateway Pundit reported that Maxine Waters -- the future chairperson of the Financial Services Committee IF Democrats win the mid-term elections -- told supporters if Democrats succeed in taking back the House in the midterm elections -- It’s going to be payback time. The video shows Mad Maxine at her shouting, yelling worst as she warned top US financial institutions, “I’m going to do to you what you did to us.” : “I will be the first African-American, the first woman to chair the powerful Financial Services Committee. That’s all of Wall Street. That’s all the insurance companies, that’s all the banks. And so, of course, the CEOs of the banks now are saying, ‘What can we do to stop Maxine Waters because if she gets in she’s going to give us a bad time?’ I have not forgotten you foreclosed on our houses. I have not forgotten that you undermined our communities. I have not forgotten that you sold us those exotic products, had us sign on the dotted line for junk, and for mess that we could not afford. I have people who are homeless who have never gotten back into a home. What am I going to do to you? What I am going to do to you is fair. I’m going to do to you what you did to us,” she vowed. You can watch the video -- “I’m Going To Do To You, What You Did To Us” -- at < https://youtu.be/AzppOBJzvuo >. • Max Maxine is straight out of a Halloween horror film. We have been warned. • There are other reasons to vote Republican in the mid-terms -- lots of reasons. Here are some of them. • • • THE CARAVAN ROLLS ON BUT SHIFTS DIRECTION. But, American Thinker suggested on Friday that the migrant caravan's tactics may be changing. American Thinker notes that : "Donald Trump has reacted to the surge in migration toward our southern border in a truly unexpected fashion, at least as unexpected as it can be from an activist Progressive press that still doesn't understand him. Watch for indications that the planners of the migrant 'caravan' are adjusting their plan from invasion to a purposeful large-scale humanitarian crisis acted out before the compliant press. If these hordes cannot be used to invade, then they can still be used for a propaganda blitz." • The reason American Thinker sees a change in tactics is found in a Thursday article in the Yucatan Times, which reported the following : "The caravan of thousands of Central American migrants has signaled its intended border crossing, turning toward Texas rather than staying on the route toward California. The group, estimated around 4,000, set off before dawn Thursday from the city of Juchitan de Zaragoza, where they had spent a rest day on Wednesday October 31. Instead of continuing up the Pacific coast, they turned north, toward the state of Veracruz and the Gulf Coast. That route suggests they're heading for the crossing from Reynosa to McAllen, Texas." • American Thinker says that if the caravan had continued toward California, "there was a chance that they would be able to storm their way into the sanctuary state and deprive the Progressives of a golden humanitarian crisis. Now that the migrants have been directed toward the most expedient, and unwelcoming, of locations, look for the stage to be set at the border for a crisis that can dominate the news cycle for weeks." • And, there was a final warning for voters : "Don't be surprised if the UN and other Soros- funded groups have the media tents pitched and ready to go before the first migrant arrives." • That ought to help the GOP everywhere -- Americans do not want Open Borders -- as one astute observer said, open borders means no borders. • • • CARAVAN MIGRANTS HAVE SUED THE UNITED STATES !! They are arguing that the US has violated their "constitutional rights" -- could we make this up??? Fox News reporter Edmund DeMarche wrote : "A dozen migrants traveling by foot from Honduras to the US to seek asylum filed a class-action lawsuit Thursday against President Trump, the Department of Homeland Security and others, claiming a violation of their due process under the Fifth Amendment. The Fifth Amendment states that, 'no person...shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.' " • DeMarche explains : "Twelve Honduran nationals, including six children, are listed as plaintiffs in the lawsuit. The suit, which was filed Thursday in the US District Court in Washington, DC, said it is widely known that Guatemala, Honduras and El Salvador are 'undergoing a well-documented human rights crisis.' The lawsuit also claims that the plaintiffs’ right to the Administrative Procedures Act and the Declaratory Judgment Act were being infringed upon. The lawsuit points to Trump's claim that he will prevent the caravan from entering the US. It claims that the President cannot stop asylum-seekers by employing the military -- when they have a fair claim. The suit criticized the President's alleged attempt at stoking 'fear and hysteria' by claiming that criminals and gang members have joined the caravan. The suit cited a Trump interview with Fox News’ Laura Ingraham, where the President laid out plans to build tent cities to house migrants. The suit questioned the functionality of such a project, and asked if these living quarters would qualify under the Flores Agreement of 1997. The agreement protects asylum-seekers’ rights and limits how long minors can be held. Earlier this summer, a federal judge in California rejected a request by the administration to modify Flores to allow for longer family detention. Administration officials say they have the authority to terminate the agreement, but that is likely to be tested in court. The White House, Department of Justice and the Department of Homeland Security -- which were all named as defendants -- did not immediately respond to Fox News' request for comment." • No comment?? They were probably speechless !!! • President Trump announced in a speech at the White House on Thursday afternoon that in response to what he called the "crisis at our southern border" and a surge of fraudulent asylum claims in recent years, his administration will soon require asylum-seekers to "lawfully present themselves" at a port of entry. DeMarche says : "Asylum claims made by migrants caught crossing the border illegally would seemingly be summarily denied under Trump's proposal. The asylum clause of the Immigration and Nationality Act says that anyone who arrives to the US may apply for asylum based on a well-founded fear of persecution, and Trump's decision was expected to prompt immediate federal court challenges." • AND, while mainstream media presents these caravan marchers as "poor migrants" and "frightened women and children" seeking safety from gangs, we now know that they have lawyers -- Nexus Services Inc. is funding the lawsuits through a civil rights law firm called Nexus Derechos Humanos (Human Rights) Attorneys Inc. Mike Donovan, president of Nexus Services, issued a statement : "Federal law enables migrants to apply for asylum in the United States. President Trump and his administration have used ‘increased enforcement,’ like separating families and lengthening detention to violate migrant rights." The lawsuit also raises another legal issue, stating that the US cannot send troops into Mexico to cut off the caravan from crossing the border. The lawsuit says that even with the National Guard at the border, once an immigrant indicates an intention to apply for asylum, the suit maintained the process has begun. Immigrants who are seeking asylum must be referred for a “credible fear interview,” during which an asylum officer would determine if the immigrant has a “credible fear of persecution,” the lawsuit said. If the officer makes that determination, then there is a significant chance for the asylum-seeker to be granted asylum, according to the suit. • FOUR caravans of thousands of border-busting foreigners from El Salvador, Guatemala, and Honduras are now headed for the United States, says Front Page Mag : "Many are violent or reportedly are suffering from communicable diseases. The first is currently near Matias Romero in the Mexican state of Oaxaca. The second is around Huixtla in the Mexican state of Chiapas. The third and fourth caravans are near Escuintla, Guatemala, and Ahuachapan, El Salvador, respectively. BUT, President Trump is standing firm. “Migrants seeking asylum will have to present themselves lawfully at a port of entry,” President Trump said on Thursday at the White House, according to The Epoch Times. “Those who choose to break our laws and enter illegally will no longer be able to use meritless claims to gain automatic admission into our country....These migrants are not legitimate asylum seekers,” he said. “They're not looking for protection because if they were, they'd be able to get it from Mexico.” • President Trump is absolutely right about that. Legitimate refugees fleeing persecution in their homelands are obligated under international law to seek the protection of the first country they enter, not the country they like the most. Refugee claimants who ignore this rule risk having their claims rejected and being deported. Even in the 2015 surge of illegal immigrants into Europe, the EU made the illegals stay in the first EU country they entered and apply for political asylum there. Some caravan marchers have reportedly been offered asylum in Mexico but have rejected it. On Wednesday, President Trump said up to 15,000 troops could be deployed to the border. “We’ll go up to anywhere between 10 and 15,000 military personnel -- on top of Border Patrol, ICE and everybody else at the border....These illegal caravans will not be allowed into the United States and they should turn back now. We are stopping people at the border. This is an invasion.” • Some of the Central American migrant caravan marchers have either become exhausted with marching or have decided to heed President Trump's warning -- the size of the main caravan is now estimated to be approximately 4,000 people, down from a high of 7,200. • As for the lawsuit -- listen for one word from the DC Circuit Court -- STANDING. These caravan members do not have standing. If they were granted standing to sue, every person anywhere in the world who wants to migrate to the US could avoid American immigration laws and erase America's borders by simply declaring himself a political refugee seeking asylum in the US and boarding a plane bound for America. I DON'T THINK SO. • • • ATTACKING WHITE MEN FOR FUN AND CNN . Townhall, and almost every other online site, has noted what CNN's Don Lemon said about white men. Townhall's Michael Brown wrote : "What if Sean Hannity had said on Fox News that “the biggest terror threat in this country is black men, most of them radicalized to the left, and we have to start doing something about them”? The uproar would be immediate, unrelenting, and intense. And it would continue until Fox handed over Hannity’s head on a platter. Of course, Hannity said no such thing. But CNN’s Don Lemon said this : “We have to stop demonizing people and realize that the biggest terror threat in this country is white men, most of them radicalized to the right, and we have to start doing something about them.” • No uproar, except from conservative online sites. Does that mean ProgDems, or the Democrat Party, agrees with Don Lemon? My guess is 'Yes,' because white men tend to vote for Trump and anyone Trump likes. That is -- white men are the antithesis of the Progressive Fake news about America -- Progs are wrong, America is not racist, extreme, or misognyist -- something gay Don might well be. • CNN took Don's racist -- that is exactly what it was -- attack on white men as a closed subject. A CNN spokeswoman said Wednesday neither "Lemon nor the network would speak more about it.” No big deal for CNN. No Anderson Cooper spending two hours dissecting it. No controversy. The same can be said of GQ’s Julia Ioffe, who told CNN that “this President has radicalized so many more people than ISIS ever did.” REALLY, Julia??? Get serious. Even CNN’s David Urban responded immediately, saying, “That’s just...it’s unconscionable for you to say that.” Jake Tapper, however, offered little resistance. The Fake news and ProgDem double standards continue. • And for all those who attack President Trump’s immigration policy, here's a quote : “We simply cannot allow people to pour into the US, undetected, undocumented, unchecked and circumventing the line of people who are waiting patiently, diligently, lawfully to become immigrants in this country.” Senator Barack Obama, 2005. OR, what about this : “But there are some areas that the federal government should not leave and should address and address strongly. One of these areas is the problem of illegal immigration. After years of neglect, this administration has taken a strong stand to stiffen the protection of our borders. We are increasing border controls by 50 percent. We are increasing inspections to prevent the hiring of illegal immigrants. And tonight, I announce I will sign an executive order to deny federal contracts to businesses that hire illegal immigrants. Let me be very clear about this: We are still a nation of immigrants; we should be proud of it. We should honor every legal immigrant here, working hard to become a new citizen. But we are also a nation of laws.” President Bill Clinton, 1996. • DOUBLE STANDARDS. You need a tank to cut through them. President Trump wrote in a tweet Thursday morning : “A very big part of the Anger we see today in our society is caused by the purposely false and inaccurate reporting of the Mainstream Media that I refer to as Fake News. It has gotten so bad and hateful that it is beyond description. Mainstream Media must clean up its act, FAST!” • • • DO THE DEMOCRATS STAND FOR ANYTHING AMERICAN? American Thinker's William Sullivan wrote on October 22 : "With just over two weeks until the November midterm elections, Democrats have found themselves championing two specific issues in the run-up to the elections -- amnesty for illegal aliens and federal regulation of health care. This all has prompted me to wonder...does anyone remember that these were precisely the two central issues of the 2014 midterm elections? Border security took center stage in the summer of 2014, as tens of thousands of unaccompanied minors were sent northward from Central America. Democrats were emboldened, then, by the perceived rightward shift of the Republican Party, as House majority leader Eric Cantor was ousted in the Virginia primary for his pro-amnesty position. Even Brit Hume was prompted to observe that 'Republicans will go forward into the 2016 election without their name associated with immigration reform which will make it very difficult for any Republican to become president.' That observation hasn't aged well, given that Donald Trump, now sitting in the Oval Office, largely centered his campaign on border security and against any form of blanket amnesty. Ann Coulter wrote an entire book about it." • And, says Sullivan : "Obamacare was also the hot topic of the day in 2014, if you'll remember, as Democrats rallied the troops around thwarting a potential Republican Congress, which would destroy Barack Obama's landmark achievement. The problem was that Obamacare was wildly unpopular, as Obama's promise that 'you could keep your doctor' contrasted poorly with Americans' experience. By the millions, they lost their health insurance plans, only to be left with the costly (and incredibly limited) Obamacare health insurance plans. Those who 'kept' their policies and their doctors faced skyrocketing premiums, and none was too happy about it." • How did that 2014 strategy work out for Democrats -- Republicans won the "largest number of legislative seats since before the Great Depression," a time so long ago and so averse to modern thought that Democrats could rely on the "Solid South" for a firm base of Democrat support. • In 2018, Democrats are not touting the preservation of Obamacare They want, more firmly than ever, says Sullivan, "a socialistic, government-funded and administrated 'single-payer' healthcare overhaul -- 'Medicare for all,' they're calling it today." BUT, for America's often income-strapped senior citizens, the prospect of a "death panel," or the denial of life-saving treatment in favor of "taking a painkiller," as Barack Obama once framed it, is a real and looming threat on the horizon. Sullivan notes : "Add to this that Americans in this elder age demographic constitute a larger number of voters than ever before, and are growing at a faster rate than ever before. This does not bode well at the polls, irrespective of how well it polls for media advocates of single-payer health care in America in 2018." • And, about those Honduran and Guatemalan "refugees" -- they seek, says Sullivan "the promised land of American welfare programs funded by American taxpayers....Democrats have embraced this as a humanitarian crisis, as they did in 2014, when more than 68,000 unaccompanied children were taken into custody by federal law enforcement. But what Democrats' seem to not understand is that this particular issue has a congealing effect, which serves to align the historic Democrat voting bloc, particularly of the blue wall, and free-market Republicans like me. For example, I am not against a policy of robust immigration. Immigration can serve to reinforce competition in labor markets. It tightens labor markets that have become loose and uncompetitive, and this generally fosters an environment of economic growth, particularly in an increasingly global marketplace. The result is that the scarcity of goods and services that Americans desire is reduced, thereby making those things more affordable, and the quality of our lives is vastly improved in the process. What I firmly oppose is our massive, taxpayer-subsidized welfare state, which makes the playing field unlevel for millions of Americans by providing government-subsidized benefits to people who are not American citizens, who have broken our laws to even be here, and should not be afforded a dime of the benefits which are financed by American citizens and the economic largesse of our freer markets. The average Democrat in the blue wall might see it a little differently. He might see the labor market as competing for a finite pool of wages, and the thousands of immigrants seeking to enter this country illegally as a threat to job security. A tight labor market, he might argue, is driving down American workers' wages while also extracting taxpayer-subsidized benefits." • There is no doubt -- we get it every day on TV's mainstream ProgDem lapdog media -- that the Democrat Party's stance on both Obamacare and immigration does not sit well with Americans. AND, the Democrat 'Russia collusion( allegations have died aborning, while Trump and the GOP's tax cuts have yielded a thriving economy and the lowest unemployment rate in almost 50 years. Added to this, the attempted Kavanaugh derailment has heavily backfired against Democrats. DESPERATION. That is the sound you hear when any Democrat steps up to a microphone. Desperation born of their unspoken realization that November 6 will be a victory for Republicans. • We can add one more pro-Trump pro-Republican item to our ledger. LifeZette reported las week that : "In compelling news for those who value the dignity of human life at every stage, a majority of Americans -- 52% -- now believe abortion is a sin, a new survey released Monday revealed. The 2018 State of Theology survey reported that the figure rose from 49% in 2016, noted The Daily Caller....Since 1973 [the Roe v Wade decision], about 60 million unborn babies have died as a result of abortion, LifeSiteNews reported -- nearly 90 times the number of US soldiers who lost their lives in every war since 1775, the American Family Association pointed out. LifeWay Research conducted the new survey; it’s a company that “assists and equips church leaders with insight and advice that will lead to greater levels of church health and effectiveness,” according to its website. The new study was sponsored by Ligonier Ministries. Online interviews of 3,002 “demographically balanced” American adults were undertaken to obtain the results; the survey was conducted last spring, with a margin of error of less than or equal to 1.9%. Seventy-six percent of Americans also want significant abortion restrictions, including making abortion illegal after the first trimester, a January Marist poll revealed, as The Daily Caller noted. Only 12% of Americans think abortion should be available to a woman at any time during her nine months of pregnancy, that poll said. Forty-nine percent of 18- to 34-year-old Americans would support a ban on abortions after 20 weeks of pregnancy if the policy were enacted in their state, a 2017 Quinnipiac poll revealed, said The Daily Caller. Interestingly, the new LifeWay survey revealed that 69% of Americans agree “God is a perfect being and cannot make a mistake.” That’s higher than both the 2016 (65% and 2014 (63%) surveys revealed. Fifty-seven percent of Americans also agree with the statement “Jesus is the only person who never sinned.” A majority -- 54% -- of Americans agree, “Hell is a real place where certain people will be punished forever,” the new survey also found. NOW we know why abortion has not been a hot ProgDem topic going into the mid-terms. • AND, add a few more polling results -- Rasmussen Reports published a poll that should make everyone in the media think twice about his job : the new Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey finds that 45% of all Likely US Voters think that when most reporters write about a congressional race, they are trying to help the Democratic candidate. Just 11% think they’re trying to help the Republican instead. Only 35% think most reporters are just trying to report the news in an unbiased manner. • • • OBAMA SURFACES FROM THE SWAMP. TheHill reported on Friday that : "Former President Obama is back on the campaign trail, aiming to boost Democratic candidates -- and protect his own legacy. Obama will be in Florida and Georgia Friday. He’s campaigning with incumbent Senator Bill Nelson (D-Fla.) and gubernatorial candidate Andrew Gillum in Miami, and with Stacey Abrams, who hopes to become America’s first black female governor, in Atlanta. The reemergence of the most towering figure in the Democratic Party has excited activists who still hanker after a President whose style, as well as politics, is diametrically opposed to President Trump’s." WELL -- if drawing 1,300 people to a Las Vegas arena that would hold 3,800 is going to boost the Democrat chances on November 6, perhaps we should ask Obama to hit the campaign trail every day. TV images of fake walls behind the small crowds Obama now attracts cannot help but bolster Trump supporters. As for that Fake news hyperbole -- "the most towering figure in the Democratic Party" -- we let it rest in peace. The Obama epoch is flat-out dead. • BUT, a Democrat majority in at least one chamber of Congress would clearly put a brake on Trump’s agenda. We must not forget that. At a recent rally in Milwaukee, Obama complained about politicians who he claimed were just “blatantly, repeatedly, baldly, shamelessly lying. Making stuff up,” implicitly mocking Trump and his 2016 campaign pledge to “drain the Swamp” in Washington. How much of a difference will Obama make. NOT MUCH, is my feeling. • • • DEAR READERS, on the eve of the mid-terms, the ProgDems believe that public shrieking spectacles showcasing feminist, immigrant, and identity issues will beat the booming economy created by President Trump and might galvanize independents and fence-sitters to vote for liberal candidates. Yet the caravan, the Kavanaugh hearings, and the Warren DNA fiasco, and Mad Maxine Waters' threat to punish all of America's financial services sector if she becomes the chairperson of the Financial Services Committee, remind voters of the very opposite. Every country requires a border and the rule of law. Due process cannot be thrown out of the Constitution. There can be no Senate debate and decisionmaking without safety and calm inside its chamber. Americans know that. Progressive activists don’t. • And, true to his word, President Trump knows it. CNBC announced on Friday that US payrolls smashed estimates with a gain of 250,000, and wage gains that passed 3% for first time since the Obama stagflation and recession. CNBC stated that average hourly earnings increased by 5 cents an hour for the month and 83 cents year-over-year, representing a 3.1% gain, the best pace since 2009. The unemployment rate stayed at 3.7%, the lowest since December, 1969. • There is no reason to vote for any Democrat. There is every reason to vote for all Republicans. They are doing President Trump's good and great work for America. Don't let it fall apart on November 6. Vote Republican.