The Democrats Are in Trouble -- Uranium One, Hillary, the Foundation, Mueller, Comey

THE REAL NEWS TODAY IS THAT SPECIAL COUNSEL MUELLER MAY BECOME A CONGRESSIONAL TARGET. The online media on Monday and Tuesday was full of reports that Robert Mueller has in several ways done things that, if true, should require his removal as Special Counsel investigating the Trump-Russia 'collusion' allegations -- or even perhaps making Mueller a possible subject of investigation himself. • • • THE URANIUM ONE DEAL AND COVER-UP. Breitbart's Kristina Wong reported on Sunday that the Senate Judiciary Committee is looking into the 2010 sale of US uranium to Russia under then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to determine "whether then-FBI Director Robert Mueller alerted the Obama administration about the FBI investigation into Russians involved in the deal, according to Newsweek." The FBI investigation began in 2009 into corruption and extortion by senior officials of Tenex, a subsidiary of Russian nuclear company Rosatom, TheHill revealed last week. This validated reporting by Breitbart News editor-at-large Peter Schweizer, who first wrote about the uranium deal in his book Clinton Cash. Wong says court filings show that Rosatom was aware of the bribery scheme by Tenex head Vadim Mikerin, who pleaded guilty in 2014 to orchestrating more than $2 million in bribe payments, through accounts in Cyprus, Latvia, and Switzerland. But, despite the existence of the FBI investigation into Rosatom subsidiary Tenex, the Obama administration allowed the sale of Uranium One, a Canadian-based company with US uranium assets, to Rosatom. Hillary Clinton and then-Attorney General Eric Holder presided over the US Committee on Foreign Investment (CFIUS) that approved the deal that began in 2009 and ended in 2013, transferring American uranium deposits in Kazakhstan -- that is, 20% of American reserves transferred into Russian hands. • Recent news is that Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley sent an October 12 letter to various agencies involved in the deal that said, “in 2009, when the validity of the mining licenses was at issue, the Chairman of Uranium One, Mr. Ian Telfer, donated $1 million to the Clinton Foundation via his family charity called the Fernwood Foundation.” The letter noted that Telfer was also a major investor in the company UrAsia, and between 2008 and 2010, Uranium One and former UrAsia investors donated $8.65 million to the Clinton Foundation -- donations made while the Uranium One sale was being hammered out. The FBI told Newsweek it had no comment as to whether Mueller had alerted senior Obama administration officials, including Clinton, about the ongoing FBI investigation before they brokered the deal. In true Swamp style, Mueller is now leading a special counsel investigation -- Fake? -- into whether Russia meddled in the 2016 election and whether there was any collusion by the Trump campaign. • • • MUELLER'S FINANCIAL ENTANGLEMENTS. Blabber Buzz and Offended America's Jacob Wohl reported on Monday that : "Robert Mueller’s complex financial entanglements include investments linked to George Soros and Russia. During Mueller’s tenure at the FBI, high profile cases of financial wrongdoing within hedge funds that he invested in were ignored by federal law enforcement. An Offended America investigation has revealed that Mueller’s holdings in a fund of funds expose him to Russian investments and to hedge funds tied to George Soros. Mueller’s exclusive hedge funds were not open to the general public, but rather wealthy private accredited investors. The minimum investment in several of the funds is $10 Million." • Mueller also has been an investor in Mellon Optima L/S Strategy Fund, LLC for many years, according to his financial disclosures. That fund consists of holdings of other hedge funds in a structure commonly referred to as a “fund of funds,” says Wohl : "According to 2017 SEC Filings, one of the funds held by the Mellon Optima L/S Strategy Fund is the OCCO Eastern European Fund, run by Charlemagne Capital. The fund released a performance overview on August 31st that said in part : 'August was a relatively quiet month for markets and a strong one for the portfolio....Russia was again the main driver with supportive contributions from other markets.'....The OCCO Eastern European Fund also stated in late August 2017 that 'Our single largest position at ten percent total gross exposure is the 5% long position in Novatek paired with a cash neutral short position in Gazprom.'....According to Charlemagne Capital, the OCCO Eastern European Fund is based in the Cayman Islands and has a net-long position in the Russian markets. This means that Robert Mueller gains financially if the Russian market does well....The fund’s prime brokers are Goldman Sachs and Credit Suisse." Wohl says that Mueller isn’t the only person investigating Russia with financial interests in Russia : "California Democratic Representative Adam Schiff, the ranking member of the House Intelligence Committee, reported owning at least $16,000 of Russia-linked investments on his most recent financial disclosure." • The point of this revelation is that Mueller’s investments in Russia could present a conflict of interest in how he carries out his investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election. • Jacob Wohl also revealed in his Offended America report that : "Mueller benefited from Ponzi Schemes. Another hedge fund that Robert Mueller disclosed owning was Defenders Multi-Strategy Hedge Fund, LLC. This hedge fund was run by William P. Sauer, who has been sued by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for running two separate Ponzi Schemes. Sauer ultimately settled the lawsuits for $5 million. This hedge fund did business under 4 different names during its 9 years of existence, and "fed clients into...Bernie Madoff’s Ponzi Scheme and eventually paid $200 million to settle complaints associated with alleged misconduct surrounding this investment. The FBI never investigated any of the people or entities associated with the Defenders Multistrategy hedge fund or other funds that Mueller has invested in. The hedge fund at the center of these allegations of wrongdoing never faced investigations from the FBI, and produced profits for Robert Mueller, who headed up the FBI when the allegations were made, prompting the SEC to begin their investigation." According to Wohl : "The US Department of Justice launched wide- ranging investigations into many of the 'feeder funds' that put client money with Bernie Madoff. [But] BNY Mellon’s Madoff feeder funds in which Robert Mueller had a financial interest remained completely untouched by the FBI and DOJ. These facts spark suspicions that Mueller intentionally turned a blind eye to wrongdoing at the BNY Mellon fund, in order to protect his financial interest in the fund." • As if that is not enough, Wohl also reveals Mueller's Soros ties : "In 2013, Mueller was invested with a fund of funds called Mellon Optima. Mellon Optima invested a portion its funds in Karsch Capital a fund managed by Michael Karsh, who worked for Soros Fund Management before leaving the firm in 2000, according to Reuters. Stanley Druckenmiller, the trader who infamously broke the Bank of England, netting over $1 billion in a single day when he worked alongside George Soros, personally provided seed capital to Karsch Capital. SEC disclosures reveal that the fund of funds that Mueller holds, Mellon Optima, also invested in Highbridge Long/Short Equity Fund. Alec McAree, who is the Managing Director of Highbridge, previously worked as a Managing Director for Soros Fund Management according to a Highbridge press release. Alex Soros, son of hedge fund billionaire and anti-Trump money-man George Soros, revealed his close relationship with New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman in an Instagram post. Politico previously reported that Mueller has teamed up with New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman’s office. Sources told Politico that Schneiderman is currently working together with Mueller in an investigation regarding the financial dealings of President Trump and members of the 2016 Trump campaign. Many are questioning how Schneiderman could possibly carry out or assist with an impartial investigation in regards to President Trump, given his clear ties to George Soros and well-documented tendency towards partisanship." • Not enough about Robert Mueller?? Try this. Jacob Wohl also touches on Uranium One : "In 2006 the Department of Energy, which oversees the United States’ nuclear technology, confiscated highly enriched uranium from a smuggling operation involving one Russian firm and several Georgian companies. In August 2009, Wikileaks released a classified State Department cable which showed the details of this transfer of highly enriched uranium. TheHill recently reported that as soon as Hillary Clinton became Obama’s Secretary of State, FBI counterintelligence agents observed Russian operatives successfully attempting to gain influence with Bill and Hillary Clinton’s inner circle. The activity that took place appeared to be criminal in nature, according to FBI counterintelligence agents familiar with the matter. Russia requested a ten-gram sample of a batch of highly enriched uranium (HEU) seized in early 2006 in Georgia during a nuclear smuggling sting operation involving one Russian national and several Georgian co-conspirators. The seized uranium was transferred to US custody and was being held at a secure Department of Energy facility. In response to the Russian request, the Georgian government authorized the United States to share a sample of the material with the Russians for forensic analysis. Wikileaks showed as early as 2009 that Hillary Clinton’s State Department began facilitating the transport of samples of high enriched uranium to members of the Russia’s intelligence service, the FSB. The person tasked to transport the highly enriched uranium to the FSB was none other than Robert Mueller. Wikileaks’ release of classified State Department wires showed in part : 'Director Mueller previously planned to deliver the sample in April (Ref A), but due to a scheduling conflict the trip was canceled. Embassy Moscow LegAtt informed the FSB prior to Mueller’s intended April delivery and received confirmation that the FSB would take custody of the sample after the Director’s plane landed. FSB Moscow also informed Rosatom of the planned transfer and that the US placed a high priority on completing this transfer (Ref B). Once the LegAtt told FSB counterparts the April trip had been canceled, Ambassador Beyrle informed Igor Neverov (Ref C), who said that he understood but was disappointed the trip was postponed. The September 21 visit provides again an opportunity to deliver the requested ten-gram sample from the seized HEU in order to obtain cooperation from the GOR on this nuclear smuggling case and to eventually establish a more productive mechanism of US-Russian cooperation on nuclear forensics.' " Mueller’s role in dealing with the Russian government in uranium transfers, which have been investigated and may currently be under investigation by the FBI, says Wohl : "raises questions over his ability to serve as the Special Prosecutor tasked with investigating Russia. Mueller’s involvement in transporting highly enriched uranium to Russia as head of the FBI, as well as his current investments in Russia and co-investments with anti-Trump financier George Soros raise serious doubts over whether he can conduct an impartial investigation. Like Jim Comey, Mueller is quickly losing the confidence of the public. The loss of confidence in Mueller’s investigation seems to extend to within his ranks. Peter Strzok, a veteran counterintelligence investigator, resigned from Mueller’s team in mid-August and transferred to the FBI’s human resources department. This move into human resources has been described as unprecedented by several former and current FBI counterintelligence agents, including Asha Rangappa, who said 'I have seen instances where if some issue comes up, the agent might be moved to another investigation or to the operations center, where you essentially field calls all day, but why he would be moved to HR is just bizarre.' Mueller’s many conflicts of interest creating a serious crisis of credibility in his expansive investigation. One question remains: how can Mueller investigate Russia while having so many vested interests in Russia?" • • • THE HOUSE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE JOINS SENATOR GRASSLEY. Fox News reported on Monday that the House Oversight Committee has started looking into the "Obama-era deal in which a Russian-backed company bought a uranium firm with mines in the US." Fox cites Representative Ron DeSantis, who told Fox News on Sunday that he’s spoken with the federal government’s “confidential informant” on the Uranium One matter. The uranium agreement was reached while Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State, and some investors in the Russian-backed company, Uranium One, had relationships with former President Bill Clinton and donated to the Clinton Foundation. DeSantis told Fox : "I’ve spoken with the confidential informant that helped the FBI uncover this bribery scheme. Clearly, it’s in the public’s interest that this individual be able to tell his story to Congress.” When asked by Fox News if a criminal investigation would be coming, DeSantis responded: “It could be criminal.” He cited statutes of limitations that may limit prosecutions of any crimes that may arise from the 2010 deal. • The Senate Judiciary Committee last week said it started an investigation into the matter, including whether federal agencies knew the FBI was looking into possible corruption before the deal was approved. In addition, Iowa GOP Senator Charles Grassley, the Judiciary Committee chairman, has requested the Justice Department lift a non-disclosure agreement (NDA) that the former FBI confidential informant said prevents him from speaking to Congress about the handling of a criminal probe linked to the deal. Grassley said the Justice Department had threatened to prosecute the informant if he disclosed details of his involvement in the investigation. DeSantis said Sunday the informant to whom he spoke signed his original NDA with Obama administration Attorney General Eric Holder and was “threatened with reprisal” by the Justice Department under Attorney General Loretta Lynch when he tried to “come forward” in 2016. DeSantis also said he has spoken with the informant’s attorney, but it’s unclear whether the informant is the same one to whom Grassley has referred. • The House Oversight Committee doesn’t appear to have announced officially that it has opened a probe or a more formal investigation. Fox couldn't reach Committee Chairman Trey Gowdy on Sunday for comment, but DeSantis said : “I have spoken with Chairman Gowdy. He believes that this is an important issue and he has indicated to me that he is supportive of what we are doing. So, I think you are going to see action." • President Trump said last week that media outlets have failed to cover the purchase of American uranium mines by the Russian-backed company adequately. During the 2016 campaign, Trump cited the deal for the uranium, which is used in nuclear reactors, and has returned to the issue at rallies recently. Trump says the 'real Russia story' is not about allegations of collusion during the 2016 presidential election, but about how Russia acquired control of 20% of US uranium mining capacity. Clinton's State Department was one of nine US government agencies that had to approve the deal. But Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign and former State Department officials have insisted she was not involved in the approval process by the CFIUS. • The mainstream media refuses to cover this Uranium One story, and it now appears that the fallback argument of the principal players will be to deny their participation in the deal or to say that they bowed out of the uranium deal before it was approved. Note that while Republicans have pointed to some of the investors in the deal and their ties to the former President -- Canadian financier Frank Giustra, a top Clinton Foundation donor, sold his company, UrAsia Energy, to Uranium One, which was chaired by Ian Telfer, also a Clinton Foundation donor. That is participation, but Giustra has said he "sold his stake in the deal in 2007," while Clinton and Barack Obama were vying for the Democratic presidential nomination. That ignores the ongoing intertwined financial transactions that are reported to have involved Giustra in the Clinton Foundation after the Uranium One deal was completed. The New York Times reported that Giustra "flew to Kazakhstan with Bill Clinton to meet the Central Asian nation’s president. Shortly thereafter, Giustra secured a lucrative concession to mine Kazakh uranium, despite his company’s lack of experience with uranium ore. As Bill Clinton opened doors for Giustra, the financier gave generously to the Clinton Foundation." The NYTimes also reported that the Giustra-Clinton dealings gave Clinton donor Giustra control of a significant portion of the world’s uranium supply, and according to the NYT report : "Just months after the Kazakh pact was finalized, Mr. Clinton’s charitable foundation received its own windfall : a $31.3 million donation from Mr. Giustra that had remained a secret until he acknowledged it [much later]. The gift, combined with Mr. Giustra’s [later] public pledge to give the William J. Clinton Foundation an additional $100 million, secured Mr. Giustra a place in Mr. Clinton’s inner circle, an exclusive club of wealthy entrepreneurs in which friendship with the former President has its privileges." • While other media, such as the left-leaning PolitiFact fact-checker that "found" that most of the donations from individuals related to Uranium One and UrAsia Energy were made before and during Clinton's 2008 presidential campaign -- before she became Secretary of State -- Don't Be Misled. These smoke screens are the Progressives gearing up to once more protect Hillary and Bill Clinton even as they pursue Trump with outrageously inaccurate accusations. • • • THE ALLEGATIONS, IF TRUE, ARE CRIMES. The corrupt Uranium One scheme is said to have been financed by the Russians through bribes, kickbacks, extortion and money laundering. The FBI and the Department of Justice reportedly had the evidence in their possession before the uranium sale, but kept the matter secret and never notified Congress which would have stopped the transfer of uranium to Russia. The entire corrupt affair remained hidden for seven years. But, now that Congress is waking up to the scope of the alleged curruption, the ProgDems are gearing up to counterattack. The thing to remember is that it is a crime to use a public office to confer a benefit to a foreign government in exchange for money. Referred to as “pay-to-play,” such actions can be prosecuted under anti-corruption laws passed by Congress, including the federal bribery statute, the federal gratuity statute, the mail fraud statute, the wire fraud statute, the program bribery statute, and the Travel Act. Fox News legal expert Gregg Jarrett says : "The FBI evidence, if true, would seem to show that one or more of these illegal 'pay-to-play' laws were broken. The government would have to prove that Hillary and Bill got paid, while the Russians got to play. And prosecutors are required to show a 'quid pro quo' or 'nexus' between the payments and the benefit provided. But it appears that the FBI already possesses all the evidence it needs to make a compelling case. If Hillary leveraged her public office as Secretary of State for personal enrichment, but also used her charity as a receptacle or conduit for money obtained illegally, that would also constitute racketeering, as I first argued in a column almost a year ago. Racketeering is the use of a business for a corrupt and illegal enterprise. The “Mafia” and other organized crime syndicates are often prosecuted under the “Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act” or “RICO” (18 USC 1961-1968). Frequently, they devise a dual purpose company -- one which operates lawfully from the front door, but unlawfully out the back door. There is little doubt the Clinton Foundation operated as a charity. But if the FBI documents demonstrate that there was a secondary, hidden purpose devoted to self-dealing and personal enrichment, then prosecution could be pursued against Clinton for racketeering. According to the Associated Press, more than half the people outside the government who met with Hillary Clinton while she served as Secretary of State donated money to her Foundation. If Clinton was peddling access, was she also peddling influence? Again, the reported FBI documents seem to answer that question." Jarrett asks the key question : "But why has there been no prosecution of Clinton? Why did the FBI and the Department of Justice during the Obama administration keep the evidence secret? Was it concealed to prevent a scandal that would poison Barack Obama’s presidency? Was Hillary Clinton being protected in her quest to succeed him? The answer may lie with the people who were in charge of the investigation and who knew of its explosive impact....Holder, Mueller, Comey & Rosenstein....If the evidence is as compelling as reported, a second special prosecutor should be appointed to determine whether Hillary Clinton and others should be indicted for crimes of corruption and racketeering." • Fox News journalist Dan Gainor wrote on Monday : "It’s been nearly a year since President Trump was elected and the media have been trying to tie him to Russia for most of it. Finally, after 11 months, there’s strong evidence linking Russia to a 2016 presidential candidate. But the candidate is Hillary Clinton. According to TheHill, the FBI, 'obtained an eyewitness account -- backed by documents -- indicating Russian nuclear officials had routed millions of dollars to the US designed to benefit former President Bill Clinton’s charitable Foundation.' Even worse, that was 'during the time Secretary of State Hillary Clinton served on a government body that provided a favorable decision to Moscow, sources told The Hill.' Our guardians of press freedom ran from that story like it was the radioactive uranium itself, diving for cover under desks as kids did during 1950s nuclear bomb drills. Forget tough questions. It’s duck and cover. No wonder Americans 'believe the news media fabricate news stories about President Donald Trump and his administration, according to a new POLITICO/Morning Consult poll.' It’s not just making up the stories -- it’s hiding stories....The broadcast networks have suppressed the scandal....This is the latest example of how the media downplay the disaster that is the Clinton Foundation, giving scandals at the operation almost no attention in more than two years." • • • AND THE CLINTON FOUNDATION MAY BE IN REAL TROUBLE. InfoWars' Jerome Corsi wrote last Thursday an article titled "The Clinton Foundation Did Not Report Russian Uranium One Payments, Wall Street Analyst Argues." Wall Street analyst Charles Ortel, in a detailed analysis of Clinton Foundation financial accounting reports, reveals what he believes is a systematic pattern of fraud designed to hide payments the Clinton Foundation reportedly received related to the Uranium One deal. To stress the gravity of the Clinton Foundation’s Russian Uranium One scandal, Ortel told Infowars that he believes Clinton Foundation financial reports are criminally fraudulent in failing to report payments received in relation to the Russian Uranium One scandal -- a criminal omission Ortel believes could cause the Clintons their fortune and leave them no option but to face jail time. Current reports, says Ortel, suggest as much as $145 million may have flowed to the Clinton Foundation from the Russian Uranium One deal, but the money cannot be found anywhere in the Clinton Foundation financial reporting : "The truth is that use of the Clinton Foundation as an unregulated conduit through which cash likely was traded for influence is a story that began at that entity’s birth on 23 October 1997 and continues to present -- no part of the Clinton Foundation and none of the Clinton Foundation’s many ‘affiliates’ has ever been properly overseen by trustees, audited by accountants, or even validly organized by its lawyers for 20 years,” Ortel explained to Infowars in an exclusive interview. Ortel stressed no outsider actually knows what happened to all sums that may have been sent towards the Clinton family. However, he acknowledged, it is possible to discern, through digging, that significant portions of these supposed donations “leaked” (were diverted) along the way....Ortel’s examination of the Clinton Foundation, now extending into its fourth year, has driven Ortel to search for and acquire detailed financial reports for the Clinton Foundation, stretching back to the foundation’s inception, including all audited financial statements, as well as all available state and federal regulatory filings, including required annual IRS tax filings. Ortel pointed out that the "available Clinton Foundation regulatory filings are riddled with what appear to be intentional ommissions.” Ortel argues : “The Clinton Foundation was originally organized as a ‘Presidential Library’ to be a repository for ‘Presidential Records,’ but it has never validly altered its controlling ‘Articles of Organization’ to engage in any other tax-exempt purpose. Yet, it and people claiming to work with it have roamed worldwide soliciting more than $2 billion in cumulative declared donations.” Ortel’s point is that "ever since 23 October 1997, the Clinton Foundation, its trustees, its executives, and its agents seems to have been using the mails, telephones, and the internet to solicit massive donations while false and materially misleading filings circulated in the public domain....This ongoing, criminal solicitation is a massive scandal hidden in plain sight that certainly is illegal. Just ask former US Congresswoman Corrine Brown who awaits sentencing on numerous federal counts for illegally operating a much smaller slush fund.” • • • DEAR READERS, Ed Timperlake of American Thinker wrote last week that the Russians have a "long history of trying to bribe Clinton, Inc." Timperlake says he knows this because he is : "an original source on Russian bribes, having been part of a 60 Minutes story with the late Mike Wallace in 1998. As a congressional investigator for the House Committee on Rules, we had the "impeachment inquiry," and I was tasked to investigate successful attempts by the Chinese to buy in to the Clinton 1996 presidential campaign and also any and all Russian Mafia attempts at bribery. In investigating Russian Mafia attempts at bribing President Clinton, I teamed up with Mike Wallace and his 60 Minutes team. We jointly interviewed Dr. Gregori Loutchansky, an alleged leader of a global criminal smuggling syndicate. We all met in a suite in the Hotel Maurice in Paris. Dr. Loutchansky really impressed me as a very smart man. He had been implicated in a bribery scheme through a NYC "straw donor" to then-president Clinton. Mike Wallace and his able producers for the 60 Minutes segment pointed out how dangerous Dr. Loutchansky was in smuggling "bad things to bad people," mostly weapons and nuclear components for the development of weapons. During the interview, Mr. Wallace, whom I have the utmost respect for, asked him directly : 'Dr. Loutchansky, did you try to bribe President Bill Clinton?' Answer: 'Of course I did. It was not a crime for me.' Now we find out that in 2010, Russian criminal elements were finally successful in bribing Clinton, Inc. This time, the corruption was a criminal gambit to capture 20% of our uranium mining activity. Nancy Soderberg, a real Clinton operative spin-master, tried to filibuster Tucker Carlson on his Fox show. Tucker Carlson made a brilliant point that even if the successful bribery occurred years ago, the infamous Clinton spin machine -- 'old news, distant past, nothing to see, flush down the memory hole,' -- was not going to work, because Tucker simply pointed out that it is still happening." • Hillary Clinton, if she collected donations for the Clinton Foundation, far overstepped her legal role as Secretary of State. Uranium is now in the hands of Russia, and perhaps of operational criminal syndicates -- uranium-mining is part of the continuum of reactor operations leading to "bomb material," but that didn't seem to worry Secretary Hillary. So, thanks to the Clintons' often-cited greed and corruption, 20% of American uranium is now in the hands of totally corrupt people -- one estimate quoted by Timperlake is that about 64,000 tons of uranium ore will be refined, a lot of very toxic dirty bomb material. • From Whitewater to Travelgate to Bill's sexual predations to the well-documented financial corruption of the Clinton Foundation from Hillary's pay-to-play as Secretary of State. People have gone to prison for such crimes. The real tragedy is that the Left with its ProgDems and complicit mainstream media still reveres Bill and Hillary. Where is the Progressive conscience, code of ethics, or any sense of morality. And yet they lecture the rest of us and call us Deplorable racists and white supremacists. Hillary's book tour rolls on in an embarrassment of monumental proportions as she blames others for her electoral loss. Has she ever truly examined her own actions? One thing is sure -- ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, MSNBC, NYT, WaPo will not do it for her. Their own lack of values and contempt for anything traditionally American prevent self-examination. And make no mistake : Obama was as corrupt as Hillary, either by complicity or by turning a blind eye and refusing to investigate. Americans, normal Americans, the ones who elected Donald Trump, now see the great damage done to the Republic. They want it punished and stopped. But, the establishment elites of both parties are doing their best to Stop Trump. He is hanging in there and making progress, but he needs America's help to defeat this bunch of shameless, corrupt Swamp Creatures.