Thursday, January 21, 2016

Are Obama and Khamenei Best Friends Forever?

Reuters reported this week that three US citizens of Iraqi origin who vanished last week in Baghdad were kidnapped and are now held by an Iranian-backed shiite militia. Reuters' information came from Iraqi intelligence and US government sources. Iraqi officials said gunmen seized the three Friday from an apartment in Baghdad's Dora district. A police colonel told the Washington Post the Dora area is controlled by shiite militias, including Iran-backed Asaib Ahl al-Haq - League of the Righteous. The colonel said the three had been invited to their Iraqi interpreter's home. But a resident of the apartment building where they were seized said they were taken from an apartment he described as a well-known brothel. The police agreed. The resident said the apartment is frequently raided by Asaib Ahl ­al-Haq, although usually the men found inside are simply told to leave. Baghdad Operations Command described the apartment as “suspicious.” An Iraqi lawmaker told the Post : “They went to an inappropriate place. Iraqi security forces are working very hard now to locate them.” ~~~~~ US sources told Reuters that America has no reason to believe Iran was involved in the kidnapping and does not believe the trio are being held in Iran, which borders Iraq. Reuters says the Iraqi government is trying to control shiite militias that fought the US military during the Iraq War and have been accused of killing and abducting US nationals. Baghdad-based analyst Hisham al-Hashemi told Reuters : "The militias are resentful of the success of the army in Ramadi which was achieved with the support of the US-led coalition and without their involvement." Asked about the kidnapping at a State Department news briefing on Tuesday, spokesman John Kirby declined to say whether Secretary of State John Kerry had contacted Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif about the three. ~~~~~ It may only be a coincidence that on Saturday, the US lifted sanctions on Iran after the UN's IAEA certified Iran had fulfilled its end of the nuclear deal. That same day, five Americans were released from Iranian custody in a prisoner swap. Then, on Sunday, the US paid $1.7 billion to Iran to settle an old claim -- the return of Iran’s $400 million military equipment trust fund frozen in 1979, plus what President Obama called “appropriate interest” of $1.3 billion. Tuesday, the White House rejected claims the payment and swap were tied. White House press secretary Josh Earnest said critics are wrong to call it a "ransom" for the American prisoners. ~~~~~ It may also be coincidental that Iran Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei on Wednesday thanked the Revolutionary Guards for "arresting" US sailors last week : "I didn't have the opportunity to thank the young soldiers in the Revolutionary Guards. What they did in the Persian Gulf was right. The politicians should do the same and stop the enemies with full power if they cross the line anywhere." On Tuesday, Khamenei welcomed the implementation of the nuclear deal and lifting of sanctions, but warned that Teheran should remain wary of its old enemy the United States and its "deceit and treachery." ~~~~~ Dear readers, Patrick Buchanan wrote a piece for the American Conservative this week that slams those who think Iran is lying about its nuclear intentions, arguing that Iran is only seeking economic development : "Iran’s regime seems to have concluded that the path to power and permanence of the regime lies not in conflict with the United States, but in avoiding conflict and taking the China road." But there's a flaw in Buchanan's argument. China's move to a more open economy hasn't made it stop aggressively infringing on its Asian neighbors, harassing Hong Kong, terrorizing domestic dissenters, or using profits to agitate world trouble spots. Nor will an open-market Iran stop its use of Hamas, Hezbollah and Houthi to terrrorize the Middle East, make nuclear bombs, or try to destroy Israel. We know, and Obama knows, it won't keep Iran from taking more US hostages to use in manipulating America, "the Great Satan." Ransom or payment ??

6 comments:

  1. We know as little about our own president, Obama, as we do about the Middle East, Putin, and certainly the Muslim thought process.

    That is a very scary thought. Think of it - everything Obama does is in conflict with what the majority of Americans believe in. And for a political leader who has absolutely no agenda, no cohesive connections with Anerica, and no established goals.

    He has wasted 7 years going on 8 years of America's energies and determination. In the past 7 years American has at best quietly slipped backwards into a tragic state of mediocrity at best.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The Obama administration has released one of al Qaeda’s most skilled explosives experts, a man personally praised by Osama bin Laden and who created the shoe-bomb design that was used unsuccessfully to bring down an airliner in 2001.

      The Pentagon said Thursday that Egyptian Tariq Mahmoud Ahmed al Sawah, who may have known of the original Sept. 11 plot, was transferred to the government of Bosnia.

      Does it really matter if Obama and Khamenei specifically are friends? It seems that Obama is Best Friends Forever (BFF) with everyone that hates American, are terrorists, and moistly radicle terrorists.

      Don’t be shock friends we have had blinders on for too long with Obama – now let’s address him as he is and always was.

      Delete
  2. We have leaned or are learning the very hard way that Russia will always be Russia. there may well be times that Russia is a somewhat 'sleeping nemesis' to democracy and individual rights.

    And as long as the EU is a functioning conglomeration countries that are at the heart of the matter much to liberal/socialists Europe will always be Europe.

    Therefore friends it is logical (as Mr. Spook would say) to deal with China and the Middle East based on what we KNOW them to be. Not as Obama has dealt with them in his wildest dreams of friends and 'can't we just all get together'.

    And we need to 'fess up' to our own mistakes in trying to be something we are not - such as the twice elected likes of Obama as president.

    As unique as American is and always will be we need to understand this uniqueness and be what we are. Since Super Bowl Sunday is on the horizon we could steal a saying we could steal a phrase from the early 1970's run on winning championships that the Pittsburgh Steelers had ... "DANCE WITH THE ONE WHO GOT YOU THERE."

    Well friends America and all that agree with us in our rule of law, human rights, etc needs to one and not spend energies on trying to make others what they are not.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. B R A V O Freedom Speaks 1776, BRAVO.

      Part of winning is knowing who and what you are. We know who and what Obama is and always was. Mistake made, lets get back to being America. Milk toast is floppy and malleable and in the end is still just undesirable milk toast.

      Delete
  3. We should not be rewarding any form of or from anyone any example of “ROGUE BEHAVIOR."

    We are all happy the captives in Iran were released and home safely. But the actions of the Obama administration and his White House Inner Circle to genuflect to the Ayatollah Khamenei and pays what amounts to nothing more than ransom in the form of 7 convicted Iranians, expunged international arrest warrants against another 14 individuals, plus released upwards to $200 Billion in previous sanctions, and signed a very bad nuclear deal with Tehran.

    The United States was held hostage by this nuclear deal.

    There was a better option that never saw the table top … refusing to compensate Iran or Obama’s quests for his legacy via such outward appearing rouge conduct.

    ReplyDelete
  4. The entire Obama administration and the congressional supporters of the hostage exchange and the nuclear agreement from a few months ago ought to look at the recent disqualification by Iran's Guardian Council of all 'moderate' parliamentary candidates for the upcoming elections.

    They might consider the possibility that their policy of engagement has produced inside Iranian quiet the opposite results of their intentions.

    The more Obama and his 'friends' express their hopes that the nuclear deal can and would bring a better rapport between the Islamic republic and the West - the more Khamenei and his revolutionary Guards withdraw from any outreach and crack down harder inside Iran on all dissenters who want closer ties with the West, or they simply want more commence and investments from the West to build up President Rouhani camp of Iranian Islamist power which is regarded Rouhani power base.

    ReplyDelete