Wednesday, September 16, 2015

Iran and Obama -- the Deal Gets Ever More Sordid

Are we surprised that Iran has discovered a new big reserve of uranium and will soon begin extracting it at the mine in Yazd province. The head of Iran's Atomic Energy Organization reported this on Saturday. The news contradicts prior evaluations by western analysts who said Iran would need to import uranium for use in its nuclear program. Some western analysts had said that Iran was close to exhausting its raw uranium supply and that mining it domestically was not cost-efficient. A 2013 report by the US Carnegie Endowment and the Federation of American Scientists said the scarcity and low quality of Iran's uranium resources forced it "to rely on external sources of natural and processed uranium...Despite the Iranian leaders' assertions to the contrary, Iran's estimated uranium endowments are nowhere near sufficient to supply its planned nuclear program." Now, the idea that Iran could become self-sufficient will gnaw at world powers that signed the nuclear deal with Iran -- a deal opposed by a large majority of Americans but approved by the US by means of a Democratic filibuster preventing a Senate vote earlier this month. ~~~~~ Iranian nuclear chief Ali Akbar Salehi told state news agency IRNA : "I cannot announce (the level of) Iran's uranium mine reserves. The important thing is that before aerial prospecting for uranium ores, we were not too optimistic, but the new discoveries have made us confident about our reserves." Salehi said aerial uranium exploration had covered two-thirds of Iran and would be complete before 2020. Uranium can be used for energy production and scientific purposes, but is also essential for nuclear weapons. US State Department spokesman John Kirby said any new Iranian reserves of uranium will be under the same monitoring as existing mines under the nuclear agreement : "Any violation of that commitment would be met with the appropriate response." Sanctions on companies in Iran's uranium mining industry will be lifted when the nuclear deal is fully implemented. ~~~~~ One group of US experts would not be surprised that Iran hid its new uranium deposits from the US-led P1+5 negotiators and UN/IAEA scientists. A Defense One survey recently found deep skepticism among US active-duty military and civilian national security employees when they were asked to evaluate the statement, “The Iran nuclear deal is a good deal for the United States” --- 66% of responders disagreed — and two-thirds of that group “strongly disagreed.” When asked what the US should do about it, 62% said the US would be better off rejecting the deal and keeping current sanctions in place. Half said the US should compensate for the deal by increasing arms sales to countries in the Middle East. ~~~~And, dear readers, now we learn that President Obama knew about a link between the terrorist group that attacked the World Trade Center towers on 9/11 and Iran, but he has not yet told Americans. Documents captured by SEAL Team 6 after they killed Osama bin Laden reportedly show that al-Qaida was welcome in Iran. Around 2006, al-Qaida wanted to set up an Iran office, but it was too expensive. Before the Iran nuclear deal was signed, the Wall Street Journal wrote : “[E]arlier this summer the State Department’s latest country report on terrorism said Iran had ‘previously’ allowed al-Qaida ‘to operate a core facilitation pipeline through Iran,’ implying this was over. Less than a month later, President Obama announced the Iran nuclear deal." While he hid the information from Americans prior to the unpopular Iran deal, Obama could now release bin Laden files related to Iran. The WSJ said : "[I]f the President doesn’t release the documents, Congress ought to demand them." Before Obama gives Iran $150 billion and a nuclear capability, Congress and America deserve to see these documents, as well as the Iran deal secret side agreements. But it will take House legal action by Speaker Boehner and the GOP caucus to pry them loose from Obama.The fate of the dangerous Obama Iran deal is far from decided but we could ask, who lies more - Iran or Obama?

3 comments:

  1. Iv this is a surprise to anyone, I wonder why. Lying, fabricating "truths" to support his desired situational outcome, withholding truths about Obamacare, falsifying Intelligence reports, lies to cover lies, half truths and no truths at all.

    The signature of the Obama administration is lies.

    But unlike all the others lies, this whole series of lies covering the Iranian Nuclear treaty has DEADLY consequences for every individual, town, country region, and the planet in its entirety.

    All bets on all previous votes concerning this treaty should be null and void. The whole Congressional investigative process should begin anew. Votes were conducted on nothing but false information purposely released to President Obama's friends - closer friends, better friends, and more trusted friends than any of us Americans who trusted him twice.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Within a 2 party democracy (that is unlike any other on the face of this planet) like the United States there is bestowed on elected officials a very high level of trust. Trust to do what is best for the people, trust to fulfill their campaign promises, trust to uphold their Oath of Office, trust to support the Constitution, and trust right-v-wrong not their own narrow vision of what is right to get re-elected.

    This trust is broken at times and the process takes care of those ‘caught’ officials. But those really shady officials that have neither trust, the good will of the country, or honor in their own souls incessantly find the loop holes that allows then an escape hole.

    We are currently surrounded by these “shady” individual both elected and appointed. And maybe there is nothing we can do about them until Election Day November 2016.

    With so many of these ‘strangers ‘ in our government today it has brought forth a shortcoming within our political system – short of treason there seems to be no recourse to reverse the passage of bad law or bad treaties with other governments when passage or rejection was based on nothing but lies intended to have adverse effects. Passage requires 1 vote more that half the voting assembly for the most part. Reversing that vote requires 75% voting for reversal if the vote ever get to the floor of the assembly.

    Our procedural laws are for trustworthy elected officials – a miniscule quantity that exists today in Washington DC.

    ReplyDelete
  3. This is not just a deal, or some trade treaty, an agreement that will sell more ‘widgets’ to a country that will abide by nothing it signs and will stop at nothing until they get their nuclear capabilities. And sell and/or distribute them to their radicle friends in North Korea and other various Middle East outlaws.

    Don’t blink friends because you may miss the finish of civilization as we know it today.

    Why does Obama continue to lies about what he perceives to be the peaceful nation of Iran? Unequivocally, it’s because he is with them oh so much more than he is with his own.

    President Obama knows all about the workings in Iran and he agrees with them.

    Treason by any other name is still treason friends. This time it may kill us all.

    ReplyDelete