Monday, March 16, 2015

Israel Votes...Their Destiny Is with Netanyahu and Post-Obama America

"Any terms that world powers grant Iran under a nuclear deal will be sought by Saudi Arabia and other countries, risking wider proliferation of atomic technology." ~~~~~ Are these the words of Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netahyahu, trying to stir up voters before tomorrow's parliamentary elections in Israel? NO. They are the words of a senior Saudi prince, warning the world in a BBC interview today. Prince Turki al-Faisal, who has previously served as head of Saudi intelligence and as Riyadh's ambassador to Washington and London said : "I've always said whatever comes out of these talks, we will want the same." Saudi Arabia sees Iran as its regional rival and fears that an atomic deal would permit Teheran to gain a nuclear weapon and ease political pressure on Iran, giving it more space to back Arab proxies opposed by the Kingdom. ~~~~~ Iran and the international community seem headed toward a nuclear deal that Netanyahu fears could destroy Israel. He also sees a resolution to the Palestinian issue as distant as ever because Palestinian Authority leader Mahoud Abbas demands that Israel withdraw to the pre-1967 war borders before talks begin -- a demand impossible for Israel because it would divide Jerusalem and expose the country to close range attack from Syria, which would thereby control the Golan Heights. Because US President Obama agrees with Abbas, the world mindlessly turns more and more against Israel's reasonable position. Netanyahu's focus on Israel's many security challenges -- he has long called for zero tolerance of terrorism and supported Jewish settlements in the occupied West Bank, which the opposition and the outside world detest -- stem from his desire to provide defensible borders for Israel in any peace accord. Netanyahu said in his speech to the US Congress earlier this month : "We are no longer scattered among the nations, powerless to defend ourselves." His stern rhetorical style, often compared to Churchill, fell on very receptive ears in Congress. The style has served him well during a three-decade career that has included time at the Israeli Embassy in Washington, as ambassador to the United Nations, a series of senior Cabinet posts and a stint as opposition leader. He has spent a total of nine years as prime minister since 1996. ~~~~~ But, after enjoying a surge of popularity following last summer's war against Hamas in the Gaza Strip, Netanyahu is struggling. Despite his speech to Congress, his efforts to halt the Iranian nuclear program - which he describes as the mission of his lifetime - appear to be stumbling, since the US seems determined to make a deal with Iran at any cost to its or the world's future safety. The speech, delivered over White House objections, has worsened an already troubled relationship with President Obama, a relationship not likely to change in the final two years of Obama's term, no matter who is elected. While he is seen by the Israeli public as the candidate more suitable to be prime minister, based on his image as the "responsible adult" running the country, the gap between him and his main rival, Isaac Herzog, is closing, according to the last pre-election opinion polls. Israelis vote for parties not individual candidates, so Herzog could be given the first chance to put together a majority coalition in the 120-member parliament. A poor finish for Likud could set the stage for an internal party coup. Yoaz Hendel, Netanyahu's chief spokesman from 2011 to 2012, said his former boss can point to key accomplishments : he built a fence along the Egyptian border that has halted an influx of African migrants, he helped guide Israel through the aftermath of the 2008 world financial crisis, his warnings about Iran's nuclear program - and threats to attack it - pushed the issue on the international stage. But Hendel believes that if Netanyahu leaves office, he would not be satisfied with the outcome of the two most pressing issues : Iran's nuclear program and the lack of resolution with the Palestinians. When asked about his legacy, Netanyahu answered, "You are being judged on your record." ~~~~~ Netanyahu has attacked what he calls funding "from abroad" of an activist group which has pushed for Netanyahu's ouster. The activist group OneVoice, which says none of its US State Department grants are being used in Israel. OneVoice is working with V15, a grassroots anti-Netanyahu Israeli activist group, in building online lists, voter registration and get-out-the-vote drives. OneVoice's president is Jeremy Bird, President Obama's former national field director in the 2012 reelection campaign effort, raising serious questions about the reality of Barack Obama's official veil of neutrality in the Israeli election. ~~~~~ At his last large conservative rally in Tel Aviv, Netanyahu warned : "This is a fateful struggle, a close struggle. We must close this gap. We can close this gap," which met with roaring applause from his supporters. "We will preserve Jerusalem's unity in all its parts. We will continue to build and fortify Jerusalem so that its division won't be possible and it will stay united forever," Netanyahu said : "Likud's victory is the only thing that can ensure the continuation of a national leadership and will prevent the establishment of a left-wing government." Netanyahu, who emphasized his support for east Jerusalem settlement construction, called the potential for a government led by Zionist Union leaders Isaac Herzog and Tzipi Livni "a real danger." Meanwhile, Herzog has been rising in the polls on a campaign that promises to repair ties with the Palestinians and the international community and also bring relief to the country's struggling middle class. Herzog talks about a "crucial" vote for the country. ~~~~~ Dear readers, I cannot recall a foreign election that is so important both for its own citizens and for the United States. And its three themes are critical worldwide -- the US-Israel relationship that is the linchpin of democratic and pro-West alliances in the Middle East; the US-led P5+1 negotiations with Iran over its nuclear weapons capability, in an atmosphere of Iranian aggression toward its sunni Arab neighbors and Israel; and peace between Israel and Palestine, whose success is key for Middle East stability. US Secretary of State John Kerry's recent comment that he hopes whoever wins the Israeli elections, it will lead to the revival of the peace process shows that he remains oblivious - or indifferent - to the reality in the Middle East, particularly concerning the Palestinians, who are today divided into two camps -- one, Hamas, that wants to destroy Israel through terrorism and jihad, and the other, the Abbas Palestinian Authority, whose international program aims to delegitimize and isolate Israel, forcing it to its knees. As Kerry was talking about the revival of the peace process, Hamas announced that it has completed preparations for the next confrontation with Israel, including rebuilding its tunnels near the Israel border. And we now see an influential Saudi prince, the brother of the Kingdom's Foreign Minister, support Netanyahu's position that the Obama nuclear deal with Iran will lead to a Middle East nuclear arms race. In addition, war-weary Israelis seem to be following the left's siren song -- just negotiate a peace with Palestine and all will be well. Nothing could be more wrongheaded. Now is the time for Israel to stand tough, to turn away from fairytale promises that say if one side wants peace, it will come. War weary America did that in electing Obama and it has brought the US to its knees. But, America has understood. It is facing down Obama and his dangerous Iranian and Middle East policies. The re-election of Likud and Netanyahu will help America, even as it protects Israel from the existential threats lurking behind the election campaign ideas of leftist Israeli politicians. We have only 18 months to wait for our liberation from Barack Obama's foolhardy policies. Stay the course with America and with your own destiny.

5 comments:

  1. As much as the Obama Administration has NO idea about what to do or what they are doing in the Middle East – so the Liberal U.S. media has NO idea about the facts in the Israeli elections.

    There are numerous questioning the legacy of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu if he loses this election. Friends PM Netanyahu legacy is well established in Israel history. He as served twice as Prime Minister, held nearly every high level cabinet position.

    The name Netanyahu is and always will be a name of honor and duty to Israel.

    Tomorrow election is important to Israel, the United States, the free world, but legacy is not in this picture.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This election in Israel may be decided by voters’ block of “a country within a country” - a block of some 21% of the eligible voters – approx. 1,750,000 million Arabs who have the right to vote in elections.

      They are internally referred to as Arab Israelis. They live in Israel; their second language is Modern Hebrew, and they have STRONG family and political ties to Palestine.

      Delete
  2. De Oppressor LiberMarch 17, 2015 at 8:25 AM

    The 2015 elections have been driven not by debate over the Israeli-Palestinian peace process or even a nuclear Iran, but by domestic issues, like the cost of living. Yet these elections are evading Israel’s greatest long-term domestic crisis: the de facto exclusion from the mainstream of the country’s two fastest-growing populations, ultra-Orthodox Jews and Israeli Arabs. Together, they form more than 30 percent of Israel’s population.

    After the results of today’s elections in Israel there will be 3 scenarios possible.

    The first is a narrow right-wing coalition. In that scenario, Israel will likely continue to take tough positions to curb Iran’s nuclear ambitions, including threatening to use military force.

    The specific steps this government would consider will depend on the results of negotiations between the P5+1 and Iran. Israel would probably perceive any agreement they might conclude as bad. It would not have the backing of major powers to initiate unilateral military action, but it might try to press the U.S. Congress to foil the agreement. It would also invest intelligence resources in monitoring Iran for violations of the agreement. If the Iran negotiations fail, Israel would resume its public threats to take unilateral military action.

    This coalition would take a negative attitude toward arms control initiatives. It would perceive them as instruments to weaken Israel rather than curb proliferation. Israel would show no flexibility in its conditions for the WMD-Free Zone (WMDFZ) conference, and probably prevent it from taking place for fear the forum would single out Israel for its perceived nuclear capabilities.

    The second is a narrow center-Left government, which would be more willing to play along with an Iranian nuclear agreement and aim to resume close dialogue and cooperation with Washington. It would be more open to certain arms control initiatives, including the WMDFZ conference, trusting its Finnish facilitator to prevent the forum from singling out Israel and being ready to discuss various subjects in parallel. That might enable a Middle East arms control and regional security process.

    The third possible scenario is a broad national unity government. Its positions would fall somewhere in between these other two scenarios, but probably closer to the right-wing one. The differences will probably lie more in its language than the content of its policies.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I have been quiet taken back by the ’lack of front page above the fold’ reporting here in the United States on the nearly completed Israeli elections.

    Tonight’s TV news will be loaded with stories loaded with “as I reported weeks ago” and “the results tonight were to be expected”, etc. But reality is that neither the White House nor the major news outlets have had one original thought as to what was going on in the Jewish political campaign or the impact in the Middle East or on the World’s stage of a Netanyahu loss will mean.

    But that only enforces that the present administration or their controlled left wing press has any idea what occurs daily within the boundaries of the Middle East region. For the past 6 years the foreign policy creativities have all been failures, which has lead Israel to today’s elections.

    And when the votes are all counted and certified the losers could well be the United States and Europe.

    ReplyDelete
  4. US Senate Investigatory committee has launched a probe into an American nonprofit’s funding of efforts to oust Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu after the State Department of US President Barack Obama gave the nonprofit taxpayer-funded grants.

    the probe is looking into “funding” by the OneVoice Movement – a Washington-based group that has received $350,000 in recent State Department . OneVoice defines itself as an “international grassroots movement that amplifies the voice of mainstream Israelis and Palestinians, empowering them to propel their elected representatives toward the two-state solution.”

    Interesting in light of the complaints about Netanyahu speech to the U.S. Congress.

    ReplyDelete