Saturday, January 3, 2015

The Jeb Bush Education Policy and Common Core

In a speech last November before the Foundation for Excellence in Education created by him, Jeb Bush once again defended part of the Common Core, which has become a rallying cry for conservatives who see the standards as federal overreach into state education. This could prove to be Jeb's greatest liability if he runs for President. But Bush delivered a talk in November that was typical of his Foundation’s work. School choice, flexibility for states, higher standards, digital learning -- that’s what America needs, he said, not more bureaucracy and stronger politicized monopoly unions : “Education should be a national priority, not turned into a federal program. Most of the time, it will require a political fight. Monopolies don’t go quietly into the night. The federal government has to stop tying every dollar to rules written in Washington. And more federal programs..." ~~~~~ Jeb Bush's Foundation is a strong supporter of school choice. And as Florida Governor, Bush signed into law the Florida Tax Credit Scholarship Program, which current Florida Republican Governor Rick Scott is working to expand while fighting lawsuits filed by teachers unions and school boards. Bush defends Common Core standards in math and English language arts, which were developed not by the Obama administration but by state education chiefs and governors across the country. He said Common Core needs to be "the minimum standard for excellence and rigor. If states are looking to adopt something else, then they need to aim even higher." When Jeb Bush announced his support for Common Core back in 2010, it wasn't a controversial position to take. Dozens of governors from both parties endorsed the Common Core, along with business leaders, teachers unions and the Obama administration. All that has changed. So if Bush runs for President as the “education governor,” his Republican rivals will be happy to hang what has become a divisive label around his neck. For years, Bush’s stature as a leading voice for education reform, and his successful education program as Florida Governor, were seen as a tremendous asset to his national ambitions. But his opponents now have good reason to hope it could become an albatross, as many of the policies he is championing are now being attacked by conservative activists and suburban parents. ~~~~~ As Florida Governor, Bush pushed hard to expand charter schools, which are publicly funded but privately managed. Bush also promoted a voucher program to subsidize tuition at private and religious schools that was struck down by the state Supreme Court as unconstitutional, but Bush worked with the legislature to enact other subsidies for private school tuition. “Jeb Bush had a stellar education reform record as governor of Florida,” said Michael Petrilli, president of the Thomas B. Fordham Institute, a conservative think tank : "What made it so compelling and so effective was how comprehensive it was. No state in the country showed larger gains for poor and minority children than the Sunshine State under Bush’s tenure.” It is a matter of public record that Jeb Bush was vowing to create a public school system in Florida “to ensure that no child is left behind” before that became the inspiration for federal legislation under his brother, President George W. Bush. In addition, Jeb Bush has long been on record as believing that the most effective place for school reform is the states, not the federal government. In 2011, Jeb Bush told a group at Harvard : “By federalizing education policy you create resistance at the classroom, school, school district -- and even the state level. I think you’re getting more dynamic results by having the states play the policy role and holding local school districts accountable for actual learning.” This is what Jeb Bush did in Florida, with positive results. It didn’t happen in a day, and the difficulty in sustaining the gains made in lower grades through high school in Florida show how difficult it is to sustain excellence in education. Yet, the Jeb Bush voucher program and other elements supporting school choice are much like those of his fellow governors, such as Jindal and Walker, who tout their own successes at expanding voucher programs and charter schools. In Congress, Rubio, Paul and Cruz have all been passionate advocates for school choice. And Bush joins most of his fellow Republicans in calling for more federal education funding to be turned into block grants that states can use for their own priorities, rather than following rules dictated by Washington bureaucrats. Bush was also an early promoter of online education, talking often about the power of technology to transform schools and help every child reach his highest potential. ~~~~~ Dear readers, US childhood education is badly in need of both reform and a strong voice to lead the reform. Jeb Bush is urging state action, not federal mandates tied to funding. Conservative Republicans should support his effort to take back from Obama the education agenda and put it where it belongs - in each state. If the federal mandates and tied funding are deforming the original goals, open a debate and change or eliminate them. If required tests are using too much of the time available for subject-based studies, review and adopt new test requirements. If states have varying goals for the content of their education programs, every state should be free to adjust curricula. But, to refuse to improve the education of American children because it has become tarred with the political words "Common Core" is to be penny wise and pound foolish. Toss out the two divisive words and their federal mandates and funding mechanisms that Americans find objectionable. But, keep working to improve American childhood education. And don't reject Jeb Bush's expertise simply because he uses the phrase 'Commom Core.' Listen to his ideas and review what he has actually done. That is the only basis for judging Jeb Bush's proposed education policies.

8 comments:

  1. I guess Jeb Bush is just not going to go away with his liberal leaning ideas on education and immigration reform.he did do a great job in Flordia in both areas. But the massive over 60 population and the very large immigrant population made his advancements and improvements in both cases a "special interest" driven administration, as successful as his 8 years as governor was - it was not a all encountering administration of life improvements.

    I like the Bush dynasty ... Jeb least of all. When he falls on a side of a issue it is well last the middle of the political spectrum for my liking.

    But if he is the nominee I will give 110% to elect him.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Education is not a Federal Government mandate. Not now, never was,and we need to guard against it ever being. Once one red cent of Federal money enters the picture there are accompanying it regulation after regulations.

    Education is at its very uncontrollable a state issue. At very best it manifest it's best inside each and every classroom.

    We have do not have an immigration problem, but rather a policy of 'don't ask-don't tell' -don't verify that an individual is legal or not and they won't tell
    you!

    Our politicians use to fight and stand strong not for what they saw possibly as coming problems, but for what was behind the nation that was good and proven.

    A well planned battle plan only needs to be "tweeted" as the battle moves on - not trashed and a new plan put in place. That is a plan for disaster

    ReplyDelete
  3. Jeb Bush did what he said he would in Florida and that means education would go back to the states if he's elected.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What he said and did as a governor is not what he will do or want to do, or be able to do as President. And if Jeb Bush thinks that he needs to only think of what his father thought he could do ... "Read my lips, NO new taxes."

      In Washington DC the power is not necessarily embodied with the occupant of the White House.

      Delete
    2. Casey Pops that is a great new Casey- PopShots

      Delete
  4. All of us Reaganits keep judging all potential republican candidates for president the whole way down to Dog Catcher for Loma Linda, California by what we remember of the great man.

    Well do we recall that Reagan was a realist and understood that getting everything on every issue that he wanted was impossible. President arrays would compromise on any issue that had wiggle room to compromise and still preserve the value of the issue in discussion. He felt he had won if after compromising he came out of negoations with 50-75% of what he wanted.

    My point is that we 'conservative Reaganits' need to do as the he did compromise. Get a pound of meat is pray and be able to come back tomorrow and try for more.

    In our own party it's the same. We conservatives could stand our ground and get a headline conservative candidate. Or if need be for party unity we could compromise and select a candidate who stands firm on the major issue for a conservative victory and compromise with support that is viable to our fellow republicans in return for our important issues.

    Jeb Bush could get the nomination and lose if we conservative take our votes, our campaign donations, our energies and stay home on Election Day November 2016.

    I won't do that, will you?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Tax reform, meaningful jobs, immigration, and defense, I believe those are the pressing issues that any and all candidates for the GOP nomination need to be discussing right now.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I could live with Jeb as well he GOP nominee. May have to swallow hard every once in a while. But on the big issues I think he'd work out.

    But it's January 2015 - the convention isn't up for another 20 months. In American politics that is one long time away.

    The issues will change, major issues will come forward, various candidates will fall by the wayside, new faces will R merge and be on top for a while, the world's picture will change, etc.

    But 2 republicans that we will still be talking about in 20 months will be Jeb Bush and Mitt Rommey if they elect to be part of the process. And if that is the way the picture is painted come July 2016 I think Mitt is the better choice and Jeb in the administration someplace.

    But again we may not even be mentioning the eventual nominee right now - remember Gov Pence of Indiana.

    ReplyDelete