Tuesday, December 2, 2014

Senator Schumer and Democrat Lies about Being the Party of the Middle Class

President Obama's Obamacare and illegal immigrant amnesty orders sometimes take on a life of their own, and sometimes, they even overlap. ~~~~~ At least one disadvantage wasn't anticipated by either legal immigrants or President Obama when he granted deportation amnesty to 5 million illegal immigrants under questionably illegal executive orders. Legal immigrants who are eligible for Obamacare are having problems when they try to sign up for health coverage because of safeguards that were put in place to keep out illegal immigrants, the Wall Street Journal reported recently. People born outside of the United States who are trying to sign up on HealthCare.gov are having difficulty proving they are the identities they present and also struggle in trying to submit documents that demonstrate they are in the country legally. As a result, some are being redirected to Medicaid even though they don't qualify, while others struggle to navigate an online system with a range of glitches, including a failure to verify people without an extensive credit history. Verification is an essential step in creating an account. "A lot of advocates are frustrated," Angel Padilla, health policy analyst at the National Immigration Law Center, told the WSJ. Hispanics have the highest rate of uninsured of all racial or ethnic groups, with roughly 25% without coverage, so the messed-up enrollment process is undermining the Obama administration's target of enrolling more Hispanics, who had a poor showing during the first year of the program. Aaron Albright, a spokesman for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), told the WSJ that CMS officials said they were not aware of some of the problems alleged by the immigrants rights groups. We have to wonder if this Obamacare problem - added to Hispanic disappointment with President Obama's inaction on his promise of immigration reform until six years into his presidency - may help explain the noticeable Hispanic voter switch to Republican candidates at all levels in the November midterm elections. ~~~~~ But, glitches or not, at least one Democrat, third-ranking US Senate Democrat Charles Schumer, said last week that Democrats made a mistake by passing President Obama’s healthcare law in 2010 : “We took [the American people's] mandate and put all our focus on the wrong problem -- health care reform.” He said, although this is not easily confirmed, that he opposed the timing of the healthcare vote and was overruled by other party members. “The plight of uninsured Americans and the hardships created by unfair insurance company practices certainly needed to be addressed,” the New York Senator said. “But it wasn’t the change we were hired to make” in the 2008 election. The vast majority of Americans were relatively happy with their employer-provided health insurance in 2009, and the healthcare overhaul's message was aimed at about 5% of the electorate: those who lacked insurance and who voted. The Democrats blew the opportunity the American people gave them. We took their mandate and put all of our focus on the wrong problem - healthcare reform." In fact, Senator Schumer is not the first Democrat to try to put space between himself and the hugely unpopular Obamacare, but he is the first Democrat to say he rejected it before he voted for it. Perhaps Schumer's recent revelation has something to do with Washington rumors that he would like to replace Harry Reid as Democrat Senate leader. ~~~~~ Moneynews commented on Senator Schumer's statement about Obamacare, noting that Schumer added that President Obama and Democratic majorities in Congress were elected in 2008 to get the economy working for middle class families, not to pass Obamacare. Moneynews concludes that the 2008 Democrat agenda had nothing to do with the middle class, because most middle class families had private healthcare insurance they liked. Rather, according to Moneynews, Obamacare was really part of the Democrat agenda to "assist the working poor - raising the minimum wage, expanding Medicaid, food stamps, the earned-income tax credit and higher education grants - while cozying up to big business to finance Democratic campaigns....Schumer still embraces Obamacare as sound policy, even though it made healthcare more expensive for many middle-class families and it enriches Democratic contributors who are among the top executives and shareholders in the healthcare industry....Cozying up to big business - while championing the poor and offering lip service to the middle class - is what Democrats have done best lately." That, added Moneynews, is the kind of special treatment that Obama blames on Republican lawmakers. ~~~~~ Dear readers, what is so boldly wrong and disingenuous about Schumer's position is that he pretends that he and the Democrat Party support "the middle class," while in reality just the opposite is true. Democrats take hard-earned money from the middle class to pay for the entitlement programs meant to bind together the Democrat voter coalition of Blacks, Hispanics, young people, women and poor whites. The American middle class is the cash cow that pays and pays -- and receives little in return -- when Democrats are in control of the federal government. But, the American middle class - White, Black, Hispanic - woke up in November 2014. They remembered that Americans prosper when private business, fair play and competition are in play. They saw that monopolies -- especially the Obamacare government monopoly for healthcare -- is an abuse of the public's trust in government to keep their best interests and desires at the heart of the governing process. As Moneynews put it : "Somewhere along the way Washington, and in particular Democrats, forgot that private businesses, not government, are the nation's principal jobs creator and that monopolies stifle progress." It is clear that Democrats believe that government does not answer to the electorate -- it tells them what is best for them. Recent examples include not only Obamacare but also blocked petroleum exploration off the Atlantic, Pacific and Eastern Gulf coasts and the Keystone XL project. These limit US oil supplies, enrich big multinational oil companies and keep OPEC and Russian oil producers in business. What these Democrat-Obama policies do is deny Americans decent jobs. They also send US Dollars from gasoline and other petroleum product sales in the US to the Middle East and Russia, where they finance anti-American policies and terrorism. The new GOP Congress will work hard to turn Washington around. But each step of the way, Senator Schumer and other Democrats will be wringing their fat-cat hands while they falsely accuse Republicans of being in bed with big business. Don't be fooled. Join in the GOP-led fight to put the federal government back into its proper place as the servant of the American people.

7 comments:

  1. Maybe Senator Schumer shouldn't have listen to then Speake Pelosi ... we need to pass Obamacare/ACA in order to find out what's in it"

    He should have read the bill first before voting "AYE"

    ReplyDelete
  2. The walls of of lies and deceit are built by the willingness of people to have them built

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Lying is all this administration can do or has done. The Inner Staff daily orders are to lie when confronted - buy time for a more plausible lie.

      Delete
  3. There is really something strange going on in Washington DC. It has been 1 month since the democratic took a real shellacking in the mid-Term elections. I mean they got trounced in National, State , and Local elections. But yet they are acting like they are still the power.

    And more interesting the republicans seem to very content to allow it.

    During Bill Clinton's first mid-term election he took the same who whipping from republicans. And the republicans squandered it away because the didn't know how to handle the authority after not being in power for some 45 years, give or take.

    Is the GOP going to re-do another belly-flopper> A big splash and its over in30 seconds?

    ReplyDelete
  4. A major reason Americans have been losing confidence in their government in recent decades is that our government has grown so unwieldy, ineffective, and unaccountable. The federal government has taken on more and more responsibilities, inserting itself into every nook and cranny of American life, yet it seems incapable of performing even the most basic tasks competently. Corporations face multiple regulators. Presidents revise laws without bothering to consult Congress. Federal
    agencies wield massive authority while facing little in the way of accountability.
    The limited but effective government envisioned by the Founders bears almost no resemblance to the chaos that now reigns. Restoring something like constitutional government is a task that will take generations, and it will have to be undertaken by citizens and legislators as well as by courts. The rise of the Tea Party movement has helped remind Americans that the work of constitutional government must be done by all Americans, and not just federal judges. Conservatism should be home to everyone who takes seriously the task of strengthening the constitutional structure. Conservatives must draw out the constitutional dimension of everyday policy disputes, and make clear the ways in
    which their policy initiatives reflect our constitutional ideals.

    ReplyDelete
  5. We are so consumed to better this, to equalize that, bigger government, less government, redistribution of wealth, cradle to grave public assistance, so on and so forth - Dreams of grandeur of government doing everything for everyone.

    Do we need more government or would less (maybe much less) be better? When the government shut down for 17 (?) days we were told that life would end. Nothing happened.

    Do we need any strong, self-renewing form of government? You’re asking yourself now what kind of nut is this person, right. Well here’s something to munch on …

    “Italy is living proof that a country can do very well without a functioning government.” They have had some 75 different governments since the end of WW II. Establish-dissolve, establish-dissolve, and on and on. There’s no time superfluous, life altering government intervention here.

    Leave the Middle Class alone.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Congress passed the Veterans Access, Choice and Accountability Act with bipartisan fanfare. The bill’s backers, including Sanders, promised it would allow the VA secretary to hold corrupt senior executives accountable. That was a lie from Day One, but since few members of Congress read that bill before voting on it, how would they know?

    The truth came to light on November 13 during a heated interrogation of VA Deputy Director Sloan Gibson by the House Committee on Veterans Affairs.

    Committee Chair Jeff Miller, R-Fla., said he was “perplexed and disappointed” at the lack of change in VA personnel. Rep. Ann Kirkpatrick, D-Ariz., called it “outrageous that Sharon Helman is still collecting her salary of $170,000 after being put on administrative leave in May.” Kirkpatrick said she wanted Helman fired immediately.

    That’s when Gibson broke the bad news that the new law doesn’t make it easier to fire corrupt executives. “Any removal must still meet stringent evidentiary standards and provide due process.” Otherwise, cautioned Gibson, the U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board (which protects lack of merit in every federal department) will overturn the firing, reinstate the employee and award back pay and legal fees.

    This is one reason why the people rebelled in the November elections. This is what the “cronyism” of the Obama administration has gotten us.

    Just yesterday a lady who is a BIG time fund raiser for the Democratic party and a producers of a soap opera was appointed the new Ambassador to Hungry. She has no experience in foreign affairs, never been to Hungry, doesn’t speak their language, knows nothing (self-admittance) about the politics there – pure cronyism by Obama. A thank you for raising money for him to stay in the oval office

    ReplyDelete