Wednesday, November 19, 2014

Obama Abandons Constitution with Immigration Order

President Obama announced today on his Facebook page that he will talk to America at 8 p.m. EST Thursday about his plan to shelter up to 5 million illegal immigrants from deportation, bypassing Congress and acting by executive order. Those covered will be able to get work permits but not federal benefits such as tax credits for Obamacare coverage. ~~~~~ Republicans are furious with the President about his threat to act on immigration by executive order. Some Republicans in Congress have threatened to shut down the government if the President issues such an executive order. Other Republicans have raised the possibility of refusing to pass a continuing resolution funding the government after mid-December as a means of making Obama withdraw such an action. But on Sunday, Represenrative Tom Cole, the Republican House deputy whip, warned his colleagues that shutting down the government is exactly what President Obama wants them to do : “I think the President wants a fight...I think he is trying to bait us into doing some of these extreme things that have been suggested.” The Washington Post said staffers for Senate Majority Leader-elect Mitch McConnell late last week distributed a memo to the more conservative members of the GOP, arguing that the last government shutdown had badly hurt the party. On Fox News Sunday, the network senior political analyst Brit Hume said : "It is an iron rule in Washington, exemplified many times, that if the government shuts down, the Republicans get the blame. Not some of the blame. Not most of the blame. All of the blame.” On Sunday, Republican lawmakers appeared on talk shows and said they weren’t interested in shutting down the government because of an immigration fight. Senator John Thune told Fox : “Republicans are looking at different options of how best to respond. Shutting the government down doesn’t solve the problem.” Even Senator Mike Lee, one of Obama’s most vocal detractors and a strong Tea Party conservative, dismissed shutdown rumors : “We’re not heading into a government shutdown. Congress is going to stand up to the President. Exactly what we do may depend on what he does and how he does it.” ~~~~~ The illegal immigrant issue has several key components. First and most important, one out of every six adult males aged 25 to 54 do not have jobs. Many of these men could be employed if Obama simply enforced the immigration laws already on the books and pushed the states to cooperate by requiring proof of citizenship to possess driver's licenses, enroll children in schools and access social services. This would put unemployed Americans in the preferred position when job-hunting. Second, GOP congressional leaders recognize rhat winning back the White House in 2016 will be more difficult if they ignore the sentiment of Hispanic voters, who have called on the President and Congress to ignore US immigration laws and thereby end deportations. Third, President Obama's continuing relaxed enforcement of US immigration laws has encouraged Central and South Americans and Mexicans to try to slip across US southern borders, knowing that once across the border, they will have a good chance of remaining in America. This has the effect of allowing into the country not only unskilled workers who drive down wages for Americans but also criminals who deal in drugs and human trafficking, and those with undetected serious communicable diseases ~~~~~ It is possible to enact a bipartisan compromise immigration law that finally *seals the border, *limits the legalization of undocumented workers to truly worthy cases, *provides for the entry of immigrants with skills needed by the US, and *establishes a rational and effective deportation policy. Instead, President Obama is now going to grant legal status to millions of illegal workers through an executive order that even Obama has said is questionable under the Constitution and circumvents prior laws enacted by Congress. ~~~~~ In addition, an NBC/ Wall Street Journal poll taken last weekend shows that half of Americans oppose President Obama’s plan to take executive action this week to allow millions of undocumented immigrants to legally remain in the country, even though Americans support attempts to help undocumented immigrants obtain citizenship. Obama's plan to take action without congressional consent is opposed by 48%, while 38% expressed support for the immigration plan, and 14% were undecided or had no opinion. Despite opposition to Obama’s proposed executive action, 57% of those surveyed were in favor of efforts to facilitate citizenship for undocumented immigrants and 75% of Americans would support the efforts if undocumented applicants were submitted to background checks and potential fines. Of 100 Latinos who responded to the survey, 43% favored Obama’s immigration plan, compared to 37% who were opposed. Nearly 65% of Democrats support executive action, compared to just 11% of Republicans. ~~~~~ Dear readers, these poll results have been replicated often over the past several months, making it meaningful for Republican leaders in the new Congress to forcefully oppose the President. However, the results will also encourage the President and his supporters to paint the GOP as anti-Hispanic, even though the GOP has fielded Hispanic candidates elected as Senators, Representatives, Governors and state and local officeholders. So, while Democrats may think that acting to loosen even more the Obama immigration enforcement policies by executive order might help some Democrats in 2016, it will do so by trashing the rule of law, selling out millions of unemployed Americans and reducing the incomes of working families. And, considering the November 4 midterm election results, the Democratic Party should be cautious. Republicans won 54 Senate seats, extended their House majority to an historic high, now hold 32 governorships, and a large majority of state legislatures and local offices - more than at any time since 1920. We may conclude that ignoring what Americans believe to be government's role may prevail for long periods, especially when the enforced policies seem to be socially "good" - as Bill Clinton liked to say, " the right thing to do." But, that tolerance for Democrat liberal socialism finally failed in America. Socialist policies long ago failed in Europe where unemployment stands at more than 12% on average, with a high of 25%, and where Europe cannot find the money it needs to continue to pay for the cradle-to-grave benefits Europeans are now addicted to. But he US midterms reflect a re-awakening of Americans to their conservative roots -- and yes, that includes immigrants, if they enter legally and join America in its goals of individual freedom and responsibility, with the government providing security and infrastructure, and appropriate safety nets. Legal immigration - yes. Nanny state benefits for illegal immigrants - no.

6 comments:

  1. Obama most likely abandoned the Constitution when he took his first oath of office. He must have had his fingers crossed behind his back on the podium.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The “i-word” is beginning to be talked about seriously in some circles of Washington and around the country. Now, constitutional lawyer Michael Connelly has drawn up articles of impeachment for President Obama – and they’re damning.

      The articles, while obviously tentative and unlikely to be adopted, make an exhaustive case that our current president has so abused his position that any other politician would have been convicted and hauled off long ago.

      Posted on a website ‘Red Flag News’, the three articles of impeachment each cite numerous high crimes and misdemeanors that illustrate just how thoroughly Obama has wiped his derriere with the Constitution.

      The first article argues that Obama has violated his oath to “faithfully execute the office of President of the United States and, to the best of his ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”

      Delete
  2. Obama wants to start fixing our broken immigration. You know what's broken about the immigration system is that we're not enforcing it. There's nothing broken about the law. The law is perfectly fine. We're just not enforcing it and that is being used as an excuse for the president to say … "I patiently waited six years for the Republicans to join me, but they don't care about Hispanic people. So I have to do this on my own.

    If he can now legally do this on his own, he could have 6 years ago. If this was not all about driving the Hispanic vote away from the Republican, Obama could have salvaged this past election for his party by “doing this on his own” this past June 2014.

    All this is nothing more than “street trash talk” aimed at making the republicans cave in

    ReplyDelete
  3. The only problems posed by migration ones unique to the illegal variety, such as an uncontrolled entry into our country that can allow diseases, terrorists and WMDs to cross our borders?

    The real problem -- the only one that really matters over the long term -- is that we are importing socialist-oriented voters with mindsets contrary to Western ideals. This is because of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 (INA65), which created a situation wherein 85 percent of our new immigrants hail from the Third World and Asia. Moreover, the legislation has led to an increase in overall immigration from a historic average of 250,000 a year to approximately 1,000,000.

    If you’re Obama and his fellow travelers and believe in “fundamentally” changing America, you love this because, upon being naturalized, approximately 80 percent of these newcomers will vote for you. You know Republicans get 90 percent of their votes from whites, so the formula for ideological conquest is simple: reduce the percentage of whites in America as much and as fast as possible. And INA65 certainly fits that bill. Non-Hispanic whites were close to 90 percent of the population in 1965. Now they’re just under 63 percent.

    I do not believe the US will survive long in its present form. And when chroniclers finally write The Rise and Fall of the American Republic, they may record that the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 was the most destructive legislation in her history, a turning point from which there was no turning back.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Obama is in over his head and depressed. Gawker reported in 2011, “There are people at the[New York] Times who, based on the paper’s reporting, believe Obama is depressed – the kind of depression where, if he weren’t the president of the United States, he wouldn’t be getting out of bed in the morning.” Although multiple media outlets wrote at the time that the Times was coming out with an article about Obama’s depression, nothing ever materialized, fueling speculation that the White House put pressure on the Gray Lady to kill it.

    ReplyDelete
  5. A country is a nation of laws not simply because the people comply with the dictates of the government. The rule of law depends on the government obeying the law—including the Constitution. Simply allowing government to decide for itself what the law is isn’t likely to keep government power limited.

    If checks and balances, federalism, and the Supreme Court all fail, doesn’t that mean the people must have some recourse? They invariably point out that the republic was born of revolution.

    George Will irritated many Ron Paul supporters when he wrote that Paul “believes, with more stubbornness than evidence, that the federal government is a government of strictly enumerated powers.” Will continued, “Even before the Founders’ generation passed from the scene, the government was slipping off the leash that Madison said and Paul says the Constitution puts on it.”

    If meant as an objective observation about the growth of government and not a value judgment in favor of virtually unlimited federal power, is Will really that far off? As another more constitutionally-minded columnist once put it, “The U.S. Constitution poses no serious threat to our form of government.”

    From high school civics to national political debates, we repeat the phrase “government of laws, not men.” Is this still true or have we in fact become a government of men and women rather than laws?

    ReplyDelete