Friday, May 3, 2013

Al-Qaida Related Security at US Benghazi Mission?

Senator Lindsey Graham is performing a vital service in leading the Senate challenge to President Barack Obama's increasingly embarrassing effort to control the Benghazi Affair, again calling on the President to allow survivors of the deadly attack to talk with congressional investigators without fear of being fired. Graham told Fox News Wednesday : “Benghazi is eight months old, nobody has been arrested, and the survivors have never been allowed to be talked to by the Congress. This administration is investigating itself.” Earlier this week, attorney Victoria Toensing said she had a client who wanted to share classified information with congressional investigators, but is being blocked by the State Department. At least four career State Department and CIA officials are seeking legal representation and are complaining that administration officials are trying to intimidate them as they prepare to cooperate with congressional investigators, according to a Fox News report. The President, during his Tuesday news conference, said he was unaware of the issue, and White House spokesman Jay Carney on Wednesday called it was a non-issue. “Let’s be clear,” Carney said, “Benghazi happened a long time ago. We are unaware of any agency blocking an employee who would like to appear before Congress to provide information related to Benghazi.” ~~~~~ Dear readers, the importance of Senator Graham's work was emphasized today by a Newsmax report indicating that the security group hired by the US State Department to protect its endangered Benghaei diplomatic mission had clear al-Qaida sympathies, and had prominently displayed the al-Qaida flag on a Facebook page for some months before the deadly attack. The organization calling itself the February 17th Martyrs Brigade was paid by the US government to provide security, but there is no indication the Martyrs Brigade fulfilled its commitment to defend the mission on 11 September 2012, when it came under attack, claiming the lives of Ambassador Chris Stevens, information officer Sean Smith, and former Navy Seals Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty. Several entries on the militia’s Facebook page openly profess sympathy for Ansar al-Sharia, the hardline Islamist extremist group widely blamed for the deadly attack on the mission. According to Newsmax, the State Department did not respond to its request for an explanation as to why the February 17th Martyrs Brigade was hired to protect the mission. On April 23, House Republicans released an interim progress report on their investigation into the Benghazi killings, citing “numerous reports” that “the Brigade had extremist connections, and it had been implicated in the kidnapping of American citizens as well as in the threats against US military assets.” The report also stated that just a few days before Stevens arrived in Benghazi, the Martyrs Brigade informed State Department officials they no longer would provide security as members of the mission, including Stevens, traveled through the city. From June 2011 to July 2012, Eric Nordstrom, who was then the regional security officer for Libya, documented more than 200 security threats and violent incidents involving US personnel in Libya. Fifty of those incidents occurred in Benghazi. Yet despite those threats, repeated requests for additional security from the mission went unheeded by the State Department, for reasons that remain unclear. The biggest question is why the State Department would hire a group that openly displayed its admiration for al-Qaida, and ask it to participate in the defense of its diplomatic mission. The banner, or “cover photo” of one of the group’s Facebook pages, shows an Islamic fighter with a portable rocket launcher resting on his shoulder. The distinctive black flag of al-Qaida can be seen fluttering to the man’s left, attached to the vehicle in which he is riding. He wears a headband based on the design of the al-Qaida flag. The flag in question features the shahada, or Islamic declaration of faith, and a white circle that is sometimes described as the“seal of Mohammed.” The flag was made famous by the late Abu Musab al-Zarqawi’s Iraqi al-Qaida affiliate, commonly known as “al-Qaida in Iraq.” The cover photo showing the al-Qaida flag was posted by the site administrator on June 10, 2012., and was the first activity on the Facebook page. Furthermore, the group has repudiated neither al-Qaida nor its violent ideology. According to Newsmax, a document recovered from the mission two days after the attack indicated the State Department had arranged for the Martyrs Brigade to act as a “Quick Reaction Force” to protect the mission. The Memorandum of Agreement states that “in the event of an attack on the U.S. mission, QRF will request additional support from the 17th February Martyrs Brigade.” Throughout the summer leading up to the attack, embassy officials repeatedly asked the State Department for additional security. But the State Department actually reduced security, removing a military detachment responsible for defending diplomats in Libya. Newsmax suggests that one reason the requests for additional security may have been denied is that they did not fit into the administration narrative that al-Qaida elements no longer posed a threat to US interests. One diplomatic cable to the mission indicated that the US-based deputy assistant secretary for diplomatic security was “reluctant to ask for [additional security] apparently out of concern that it would be embarrassing to the [State Department to continue to have to rely on [Defense Department] assets to protect our mission.” When the mission’s regional safety officer in July 2012 wanted to ask State Department official to permit the military security team to continue to protect the mission, Charlene Lamb, deputy assistant secretary in charge of diplomatic security, sent an e-mail that responded: “NO, I do not [I repeat] not want them to ask for the [military security] team to stay!" ~~~~~ One has to wonder if this is just one more security threat and bungled response that neither Secretary of State Hillary Clinton nor President Obama knew anything about.

6 comments:

  1. ~~~~~ One has to wonder if this is just one more security threat and bungled response that neither Secretary of State Hillary Clinton nor President Obama knew anything about .. let's do a short quick review.

    We are talking about 2 lifelong politician. One that was raised and the feet of Chicago Mobsters. and the other who protect Bill Clinton his entire political life. And there is the possibility that these two didn't know what was going on.

    THESE ARE TWO CONTROL FREAKS. No they knew and they knew early on ... maybe days before the incident in Benghazi occurred.

    I believe in giving the praise and credit where it is due ... and in this case it's ill praise and fault instead.

    Premeditated - NO. Planned - NO. Occurred on their watch - YES. Are they responsible and guilty of malfeasance of office - YES. Are they guilty of Ambassador Stevens and his 3 body guards death - YES, as much as any anyone can be marked as responsible.

    we had the time to rescue. It was one of those decisions that had to be made spontaneously. neither Obama or Clinton wanted to risk the responsibility of doing so .. election time you know.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The Libyan militia group that the State Department hired to defend its embattled diplomatic mission in Benghazi had clear al-Qaida sympathies, and had prominently displayed the al-Qaida flag on a Facebook page some months before the deadly attack . This is a known fact

    That organization, the February 17th Martyrs Brigade, was paid by the U.S. government to provide security at the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya. But there is no indication the Martyrs Brigade fulfilled its commitment to defend the mission on Sept. 11, when it came under attack. The Fox was watching the chicken coop door. the fox that Mrs. Clinton State Department hired

    The assault claimed the lives of four Americans: Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens, information officer Sean Smith, and former Navy Seals Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty. Stevens was the first U.S. ambassador killed in the line of duty since 1979.

    Several entries on the militia’s Facebook page openly profess sympathy for Ansar al-Sharia, the hardline Islamist extremist group widely blamed for the deadly attack on the mission.

    It is a hard pill to swallow that we have/had such incompetent people in both the Oval Office and at the State Department. But as another lady once said toi so many millions ... "A Spoon Full of Sugar Makes the Medicine Go Down".

    The facts are in front of us. Are we really going to allow these two to escape with nothing more than a blemish mark on their other wise perfect honorable public service - SELF PROCLAIMED IMAGE. Just ask them they'll tell you how smart and righteous they are.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I hope dear, persistent Senator Graham does NOT give up or relent until all the ugly facts are public and that the former Sec'y of State is held liable.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. De Oppressor LiberMay 4, 2013 at 8:11 AM

      We all I think hope that the dear senator from South Carolina stays the course on this.

      But there is enough blame and underhandedness to go around. This whole thing if it sees the light of day will read like a Shakespeare novel .. akin to King Lear or Macbeth.

      "Toll and trouble" lurks for someone.

      Delete
  4. A Tool 4 FreedomMay 4, 2013 at 8:22 AM

    Why do the great governments of Europe (past and present) survive the early ouster of elected and appointed public servants ... and we in the US feel obligated to allow "scoundrels" to continue on their rein of lies and incompetence until their term is completed.

    What we have in Benghazi is at best "malfeasance of office" and maybe the case could be made by some constitutional lawyers of treason.

    Good public servants died because of the inaction of this administration and specifically the State Department. All with knowledge of what was happening. And with some assistance from State with the choice of a local "indignant security force"

    Here's a big question for this incident ... WAS THIS A SITUATION GONE WRONG WITH BAD MANAGEMENT or WAS THIS A WELL PLANNED EXECUTION OF SORT?

    ReplyDelete
  5. We excuse and tolerate far to much from our elected officials and appointed public officials. they need to be held accountable to the wishes of the citizens not social issues that the deem necessary or massive changes in our life styles, or spending money foolishly where we wouldn't think of going ... all in the name of being seen a s active, aware, and also getting re-elected.

    but Benghazi is the bottom of the so called barrel. American citizens, American diplomats, brave men that knew what dangers lie in Benghazi all had the same expectations when they commenced their adventures that day and evening on 9/11/2012 .. if trouble came so would the US government come to their rescue or at the very least make a full fledged attempt at recuse with the strength of the US military.

    Put aside the bad or lack of any judgement and action by Obama and Mrs. Clinton ... imagine if you can - because I have been there and I know how they felt- how these people felt waiting for help to arrive and finally knowing it wasn't on the way. That final realization that their death was sealed and just outside the walls.

    Obama helps everyone from terrorists to illegal immigrants. yet he turns his back on diplomats and various government employees in a land far, far away. Breaking his so often spoke promise ..."We Have Your Backs"

    ReplyDelete