Tuesday, October 23, 2012

Mr Romney-what about Europe, Syria, Benghazi, Afghanistan, Pakistan, the Arab Spring?

Last night's third and final US presidential debate was one too many. At least for me. The topic was foreign affairs but the two candidates turned the questions around to the domestic US economy as often as possible. And since we had already listened to three hours of economic debate, it was boring to hear it all again - repartee laden with statistics but more often an effort of President Obama to turn Governor Rommey's economic experience and savvy into a simplistic summary of reducing taxes for high income Americans. Boring. Perhaps we should have known that Romney would be conservative, displaying a calm reason that would assure Americans that he can handle the foreign affairs dossier without becoming a frightening warmonger. But, given Romney's character - steady, unflappable, reasonable, kindness itself - we knew all along that his goal in becoming President had nothing to do with getting his trigger finger on the red button. President Obama, on the other hand, painted a wildly inaccurate picture of a President who has majestically ruled the world for the past four years. One only needed to ask why there is no universal Pax Americana to show for it. But Mitt Romney never asked that one crucial, Obama-demolishing question. Just as he never asked why Obama still thinks that words, no matter how eloquent, can ever replace action in aid of the Syrian people. Just as he agreed with a failed Obama Afghanistan-Pakistan policy that has left American troops on the ground hostage to Taliban infiltrators. Just as he never mentioned the slain American Ambassador, Chris Stevens, whose tragically predictable assassination is the very embodiment of the failed Obama policy in Arab Spring nations. Just as he never pointed out that America has abandoned its European leadership role, leaving a valiant France alone to articulate and defend the West's values against an al-Qaida resurgent because of Barak Obama's failure to follow through on the Bush era pro-active attack. What were you thinking, Governor Romney? We know that your economic policy will be robust, that it will bring America back from the edge of the abyss that Obama has led us to. But, we also need a robust foreign policy, one clearly founded on an America economically strong, but one based on leadership, not the silent absentee non-leadership of the world that Barak Obama's foreign policy has become. In the days that remain, Governor Romney, please reassure America and the world that you understand this critical concept and will follow through on it.

3 comments:

  1. Casey;
    You have hit the nail on the head. My husband was saying many of the questions you asked. Why weren't they brought to the forefront at least last night but in other debate settings also. When "Mitt", mentioned the apology tour, why didn't the bowing to the King of Saudi, fall right in line when "O", said it wasn't an apology tour. That's what it looked like to all the Americans. Yes we need education, but that was not the point for the debate last night and "O", couldn't answer a thought put forth without going to education. It was as you said in many ways a boring, we've heard it all before debate. At least it wasn't just a Q & A.
    Thanks for your thoughtful input.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I don't think debates influence one vote...

    ReplyDelete
  3. Gov. Romney showed last night many characteristics of a president and of a foreign policy expert. he was cool, calm and collected. he took the hits and continued down the path that he had set for the evening. he was not drawn into a debate that his election didn't need to have last night.

    The American people don't really give a "hoot" about specifics of our foreign policy. What they care about is that the "MAN" in charge is capable of conducting business with foreign governments, that he knows the needs of the USA and will represent those needs without hesitation.

    President Obama needed to have a debate about Libya, he needed to talk about the value of his Arab Spring venture, he needed a chance to misrepresent one more tome why Amb. Stevens and 3 bodyguards are dead at the hands of jihad terrorists. he needed the face time to explain why the State dept has messed up, how the CIA isn't doing their job, why the navy is very short handed and it won't matter with his plans. He needed to get Romney to go someplace that Romney didn't need to go to win on Nov. 6th. And Mitt Romney didn't give him any chance at all.

    This was a very dull debate. The questions were pathetically bad and uninspiring. But even that served Romney and not Obama.

    In a few days I believe that the pundents will begin to discover hat Romney cleaned Obama's clock last night.

    Obama lost the military last night. he lost N. Carolina last night, he somewhat lost the Jewish vote last night. He lost a huge percentage of the "undecided voters" last.

    And I believe that he unofficially lost the election last night. there are 2 weeks left. That is not enough time for the fires in the Obama express to be lite again.

    And now the momentum of Romney/Ryan is spilling over to house and senate races. And control of the Senate is within his grasp.

    Romney was playing chess last night and Obama was playing Chinese checkers at best.

    ReplyDelete