Thursday, October 25, 2012

Lance Armstrong and the Tour de France

Dear readers, I've put off writing about the scandal surrounding Lance Armstrong because - frankly - I don't know I feel.about it. When the UCI accepted sanctions imposed by the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency and did not appeal them to the Court of Arbitration for Sport, it was clear that Armstrong would be stripped of his 7 Tour de France titles and be disgraced and cast out of the cycling world. Even his 2000 Olympic bronze medal came into question. But reality forced itself onto the scene when the head of the UCI announced: "For us, very clearly, the titles [Armstrong's 7 Tour titles,1999-2005] should remain blank. Effectively, we wish for these years to remain without winners [because doping was so rampant]." This is the cycling dilemma...drugs are everywhere and no one has found the key to eliminating them. Now, I knew nothing about cycling until I met my husband, a great fan. He patiently taught me the details I needed to become a fan, too. And part of his experience related to the history of the use of drugs. He said that before EPO there were steroids and before that amphetamines and before that alcohol. It was an open secret. The problem is, especially for the grueling Tour de France, cyclists are expected to perform superhuman feats for 3500-4000 kilometers in 21 days with 3 days rest. How? Depends on the epoch you're talking about. I don't condone drug use in sports, but perhaps it is as inevitable as wet suits for swimmers and Big Bertha golf clubs. And in Europe, where cycling is a major sport, families actually take vacation time, load the family into a camper and follow the Tour for a week. The TV (at least 3-4 hours a day with special review programs every evening) coverage and following is enormous...because it isn't only watching the men climb mountains on bikes, it is the aerial panoramas of the beautiful countryside and mountain tops and quaint villages nestled in out of the way places that the Tour visits - with a different route selected and announced soon after the last Tour ends...to give people a chance to arrange their vacations and find hotel rooms. So the Tour de France is a major event by any measure...the European equivalent of the Super Bowl...but one played every day for three weeks. So, I suppose my position would be -- clean up the sport, do it efficiently but quietly, do not let heros become ogres after the fact because it serves no real purpose, and try to find a way to help professional cyclists survive physically the demands if the Tour without destroying their health and bodies and without expecting them to be masculine Mother Teresas.

2 comments:

  1. Well Casey Pops I know where I stand on this subject - I believe that Lance Armstrong was singled out to be the poster child of all that is bad and reprehensible in the world of cycling by the NO AUTHORITY (a presidential panel) to order Pizza's for a local cycling club. If they had any authority at all - other than razing a ruckus - Lance Armstrong's Olympic medal would be gone also. They have no standing in the international sports world.

    The United Sates Anti-Doping Agency for some unknown reason - other than he is a white male of conservative political beliefs, who voiced them when he saw it fit to do - and they did so by continuously accusing Armstrong of some UNPROVEN DOPING.

    Lance Armstrong submitted and passed some 150 straight urine/blood test. All at various, impromptu times - NO NOTICE.

    Given we don't really have much cycling in the USA. But the days of the Tour was something to look forward to. Now it is simply another sport that is not worth watching. Much like b-ball with it's gangster members and golf for it's one dimensional approach to police PGA members that are delinquent and harmful to the image of the "Gentleman's Game of Golf".

    I think the loser here is the cycling sports world.

    "Don't cry for lance Armstrong" - to paraphrase a line from a song in Avita.

    ReplyDelete