Deep State ProgDems, #NeverTrumpers and RINOs Are Trying to Destroy President Trump But America Stands with Him

AS 2018 COMES TO A CLOSE, THE PROGDEMS ARE STILL SABOTAGING AMERICA. And, sometimes the #NeverTrump brigade of RINOs lends a hand to the sabotage. • • • GIULIANI TELLS MUELLER TO "STUFF IT." TheHill reported on Thursday that Rudy Giuliani "has an unmistakable New Year’s message for special counsel Robert Mueller : It is time for the chief investigator in the Russia case to be investigated in 2019." Giuliani gave a long interview to Hill.TV on Wednesday and Thursday, and President Trump’s personal defense lawyer pointedly accused Mueller’s office of destroying evidence by allowing text messages from now-fired FBI official Peter Strzok and his FBI lover, Lisa Page, to be erased in the Russia probe. Giuliani said : “Mueller should be investigated for destruction of evidence for allowing those text messages from Strzok to be erased, messages that would show the state of mind and tactics of his lead anti-Trump FBI agent at the start of his probe.” • Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz reported earlier in December that there are large gaps in the preservation of official government text messages between Strzok and Page, the two top FBI agents who helped to start the Russia probe in 2016, who were having an affair at the time, and who expressed disdain for Trump. The IG report said a "technical glitch" was to blame for the FBI’s failure to save those text messages but the IG was able to recover more than 19,000 from the early part of the Russia probe before Mueller was named special prosecutor. What is particularly suspect is that the IG said it was unable to recover messages from the time Strzok and Page worked for Mueller’s office in spring and summer 2017 because the memories of both FBI officials’ government phones were wiped clean by technicians. That ERASURE occurred AFTER Strzok and Page left Mueller’s team over revelations they exchanged anti-Trump text messages, including one string in which they talked about stopping Trump from becoming President. Giuliani told Hill.TV : “That should be investigated, damn it, that should be investigated fully. You want a special counsel, get one for that....It’s actually worse than Rose Mary Woods. She erased less than 19 minutes of conversation, but the FBI got rid of more than 19,000 messages." MESSAGES, we point out, that are from the time Strzok and Page worked for Mueller and are now lost forever. • Rudy Giuliani also said the Russia probe investigators should be investigated for using the Christopher Steele Dossier, which he called a “piece of garbage,” to justify a search warrant on a Trump advisor without telling the court it was paid for by Hillary Clinton’s campaign and the Democrat Party : “Do I think that is improper? Yeah, that borders on, that sounds to me a lot more like a false statement than some of the ones they charged.” • Former New York City mayor and Republican presidential candidate Giuliani sharply criticized Mueller’s team for allowing what he said were false statements by former Trump attorney Michael Cohen at Cohen’s sentencing a few weeks ago : “He just lied the other day. He told the judge, ‘I was fiercely loyal to Donald Trump.’ No, he wasn’t. He taped him surreptitiously while he was 'fiercely' loyal. He hid it. And he disclosed it.” Giuliani called the Mueller prosecutors’ failure to stand up during the sentencing and correct Cohen’s statement “unethical in and of itself. Making a false statement to a court, even a lawyer, you’ve to correct it." Giuliani said he is disturbed that the one Cohen tape that has surfaced -- in which Cohen and Trump discussed making payments to two women accusers during the 2016 campaign -- was inexplicably cut off midway through the conversation. Giuliani believes the missing sections of the conversation include “exculpatory” statements that would prove the President was innocent. • Giuliani expressed hope that the Mueller investigation would end soon, now that Trump has submitted written answers to prosecutors’ questions. He remains confident there was no evidence the President colluded with Russia to hijack the 2016 presidential election. • As for another round of written answers by President Trump for Mueller, Giuliani : “They have everything they need unless they just want to set a perjury trap.” • Noting that Mueller’s current focus is on whether Trump friends such as Roger Stone were communicating with WikiLeaks outside the campaign about hacked Hillary Clinton emails shows just how far astray the probe had gone, Giuliani said : “We’re now four degrees of separation from the original mandate of the investigation, which was collusion which did not occur.” • Giuliani also pointed to the FBI, saying it still needs to rehabilitate itself from the damage done by missteps in the Russia probe. Giuliani said he believed that “99 percent of the FBI agents” were doing a great job but that a small group of “FBI politicians” had improperly hijacked the Russia probe during fired director James Comey’s tenure. • Giuliani made it clear that he intends to fight back on every remaining move special counsel Mueller makes. The Trump defense team already has drafted a robust document to counter any information Mueller sends to the Justice Department in his final report. For example, Giuliani said it is ironic that, after investigating Trump for possible obstruction because Trump once suggested the FBI consider going easy on former national security advisor Mike Flynn, Mueller himself asked a federal judge to go easy on Flynn by awarding no prison time. So far, Mueller's team has indicted or reached plea deals with three companies and 33 people, but those with any connection to President Trump are onetime Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort, former national security advisor Michael Flynn and Trump's former longtime personal lawyer, Michael Cohen. None of the three have been indicted or entered pleas on any matter related to President Trump or the Trump campaign or "Russian collusion." • • • NEW LIGHT ON THE ALABAMA SENATE ELECTION. BizPac Review reported on December 20 that according to a new report in the New York Times, the head of the cyber security firm which wrote a report for the Senate on Russian disinformation in the 2016 election also engaged in similar strategies to affect the hotly contested Alabama race between Republican Roy Moore and the eventual winner, Democrat Senator Doug Jones. The Alabama project “experimented with many of the tactics now understood to have influenced the 2016 elections,” according to an internal report obtained by the New York Times. • Here is how the Fake news worked -- According to the new New York Times report, the head of the cyber security firm that wrote a report was Jonathon Morgan, chief executive of the research firm New Knowledge, which participated in the effort that included setting up a Facebook page made up of supposedly conservative voters in Alabama who did not support Moore. The group attempted to divide Republican voters, working along with an effort on Twitter which attempted to link Moore to more than a thousand Russian-language Twitter accounts that popped up and followed the GOP candidate’s account. Democrat operatives told the NYT : “We orchestrated an elaborate ‘false flag’ operation that planted the idea that the Moore campaign was amplified on social media by a Russian botnet.” • So, Moore was right all along! A billionaire Democrat donor did fund a ‘Russian bot’ scheme in the Alabama Senate race, and media bought the Fake information and ran with it. The project was funded by liberal billionaire Reid Hoffman who gave the operatives $100,000 to undertake the experiment in a race that Federal Election Commission records revealed cost approximately $51 million, the NYT reported. • So, Moore was right! A billionaire Democrat donor did fund a ‘Russian bot’ scheme in the Alabama Senate race, and media bought the Fake information and ran with it. CAN YOU BELIEVE that Morgan claimed the tactics used were not intended to affect the outcome of the race which eventually saw Democrat Doug Jones beat out Moore in the deep-red state. Morgan said : “The research project was intended to help us understand how these kind of campaigns operated. We thought it was useful to work in the context of a real election but design it to have almost no impact.” GET SERIOUS !! Of course it was meant to affect the election outcome -- and it did !! News outlets around the nation fell for the ruse during the race, helping spread the narrative in multiple reports as Moore blamed Democratic operatives for the stunt, for which he was widely criticized and mocked. • “Some will do whatever it takes to win,” GOP consultant Dan Bayens told the New York Times, “You’ve got Russia, which showed folks how to do it, you’ve got consultants willing to engage in this type of behavior and political leaders who apparently find it futile to stop it." • The big danger is that ProgDem or #NeverTrump operatives use the dark arts of bots and social networks in the 2020 presidential election campaign, AND it works.” • • • REPUBLICANS IN NAME ONLY SIDE WITH DEMOCRATS ON OPEN BORDERS. BizPac Review and the Daily Caller reported the week before Christmas that : "A coalition of former Republican politicians and executive branch officials filed an amicus -- or a 'friend-of-the-court' -- brief at the Supreme Court, arguing that President Donald Trump’s asylum rules are unlawful. 'The Attorney General’s regulation is inconsistent with the plain text and meaning of [federal law],' the brief reads. 'That should be the end of the matter.' " • The Trump administration issued new rules governing asylum claims in November as a migrant caravan coalesced in Tijuana, Mexico, near the border with the United States. The rules operate in two parts : the DOJ and Homeland Security issued a regulation on November 9 denying asylum eligibility to any alien subject to a presidential proclamation regulating immigration at the southern border. That same day, Trump issued an order suspending the entry of all aliens along the Mexican border, except those who arrive through designated points of entry. The former GOP officials’ brief says the government is essentially arguing that the attorney general has a “a free hand to suspend asylum categorically for any reason for any duration....Even if the attorney general only acted wisely, and only in response to a crisis, in issuing a suspension, that would be no substitute for a statutory limit, which is what separation of powers requires.” • The brief twice cites Justice Neil Gorsuch’s opinions on immigration issues -- Gorsuch is probably the most likely of the conservatives to join with the liberal bloc on this matter. For example, the brief cites Gorsuch’s separate opinion from an April case called Sessions v. Dimaya, in which Gorsuch and the four liberal justices voted to strike down a deportation statute as unconstitutionally vague. A federal judge issued an injunction barring enforcement of the new rules on November 20. The 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals upheld that decision on December 8, prompting the federal government’s appeal to the Supreme Court. At this stage, the Justice Department is only asking the Supreme Court to lift the injunction and allow the rules to take effect while legal challenges work their way through the courts. The case is Trump v. East Bay Sanctuary Covenant. • Signatories to the brief include William Webster, a Republican appointee to the 8th US Circuit Court of Appeals named CIA Director by President Ronald Reagan; Peter Keisler, a senior Justice Department lawyer former President George W. Bush nominated for the US Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit; Stuart Gerson, a former acting attorney general; and John Bellinger III who held several top legal posts in the Bush administration, among others. • Just before Christmas, President Trump issued an order revising the November order that permits asylum seekers to enter the US and file petitions for asylum, but who must then return to Mexico or their home country to await the review and asylum hearing. This later order has not yet been challenged. • • • DID JOHN MCCAIN'S ASSOCIATE LEAK THE RUSSIA DOSSIER TO BUZZFEED? BizPac Review's Vivek Saxena wrote on December 20 that : "Roughly a month and a half after the 2016 presidential election, a close associate of the late Senator John McCain funneled a fraudulent and thoroughly debunked Dossier on then-President-elect Donald Trump to various members of the media, including Ken Bensinger of BuzzFeed News. This and other revelations were unveiled at a court hearing this week involving a suit filed last year against BuzzFeed by Cyprus resident Aleksej Gubarev and his company XBT Holding alleging that the BuzzFeed’s decision to publish the Dossier in January 2017 defamed them. • BizPAc says that although US District Judge Ursula Ungaro ultimately ruled against Gubarev, arguing that BuzzFeed is protected by the fair reporting privilege, the proceedings did allow for the uncovering of new information regarding how the publisher got a hold of the Dossier in the first place. Variety reported that : "BuzzFeed’s Ken Bensinger obtained the Dossier from David Kramer, a former Deputy Assistant Secretary of State responsible for Russia, Ukraine, Belarus, and Moldova," citing court documents from the hearing, “They met at the McCain Institute on December 29, 2016.” Their meeting at the McCain Institute was not incidental. It was McCain who had dispatched Kramer, a member of the institute, to obtain copies of the Dossier roughly a month before the meeting. Previous reports revealed that sometime in late 2016, former British diplomat Andrew Wood -- a friend of British spy Christopher Steele, the man who compiled the Dossier for the firm Fusion GPS -- met with the Arizona Senator to inform him of the contents of the since-discredited document. Following the meeting, McCain reportedly dispatched Kramer to obtain the Dossier directly from Fusion GPS. It’s what happened afterward that remains a bit murky." • The Daily Caller noted that : “Kramer met November 30, 2016, with McCain and McCain’s chief of staff, Christopher Brose, to review Steele’s reports. Kramer advised McCain to share the reports with the FBI and the CIA.” The Senator did exactly that, acknowledging early in 2017 that he gave the Trump Dossier to the FBI late in 2016 : “Late last year, I received sensitive information that has since been made public. Upon examination of the contents, and unable to make a judgment about their accuracy, I delivered the information to the Director of the FBI.” BUT, Kramer reportedly took action as well, choosing to arrange a meeting with BuzzFeed. During that meeting, the Dossier wound up in the hands of Bensinger. Judge Ungaro wrote in her ruling : "Kramer testified that Bensinger took photos of the Dossier when Kramer was out of the room, even though he asked Bensinger not to," adding that “in a later declaration, Kramer stated that he had no objection to Bensinger taking a hard copy and had provided hard copies to other journalists.” • Thus we now know that not only did John McCain meet a former British diplomat to discuss the Steele Dossier and then send his associate to London to retrieve a copy of the Dossier -- McCain's associate later met with journalists at the McCain Institute and gave them copies of the Dossier. Whether Kramer carried out these actions voluntarily or under the direction of the Arizona Senator remains unclear. We also do not know why Senator McCain had been so focused on the Dossier in any case. BizPac Review says that an anonymous former national security official who spoke with the New Yorker earlier this year claimed the plan had been for McCain to confront Trump with the Dossier and demand his resignation. All of this once more shows just how viciously #NeverTrump John McCain was, willing to do anything to harm the President. • • • STEELE NOW ADMITS HE WAS HIRED BY HILLARY'S LAW FIRM TO PREPARE A DOSSIER. It was to be used to challenge the 2016 election of Donald Trump. The Washington Times reported in mid-December that : "British ex-spy Christopher Steele, who wrote the Democrat-financed anti-Trump Dossier, said in a court case that he was hired by a Democratic law firm in preparation for Hillary Clinton challenging the results of the 2016 presidential election. He said the law firm Perkins Coie wanted to be in a position to contest the results based on evidence he unearthed on the Trump campaign conspiring with Moscow on election interference. His scenario is contained in a sealed August 2 declaration in a defamation law suit brought by three Russian bankers in London. The trio’s American attorneys filed his answers Tuesday in a libel lawsuit in Washington against the investigative firm Fusion GPS, which handled the former British intelligence officer. In an answer to interrogatories, Mr. Steele wrote : 'Fusion’s immediate client was law firm Perkins Coie. It engaged Fusion to obtain information necessary for Perkins Coie LLP to provide legal advice on the potential impact of Russian involvement on the legal validity of the outcome of the 2016 US Presidential election. Based on that advice, parties such as the Democratic National Committee and HFACC Inc. (also known as ‘Hillary for America’) could consider steps they would be legally entitled to take to challenge the validity of the outcome of that election.' The Democrats never filed a challenge, but Mr. Steele’s answer suggested that was one option inside the Clinton camp, which funded Mr. Steele’s research along with the Democratic National Committee." • The Obama-era US intelligence community concluded that Moscow interfered in the election by hacking Democratic Party computers and stealing emails that it released via WikiLeaks. BUT, NO Trump associate has been charged with collusion. • In a previous court filing in a second case in April-May 2017, Steele said his job was to find links between Trump associates and Moscow. Hired by Fusion in June 2016, he wrote a 17-memo Dossier alleging a “extensive conspiracy” between the two, which two years later hasn’t been proven publicly by special counsel Robert Mueller or Congress. In his most recent London court filing, BizPac says : "Steele is defending against a libel lawsuit by citing a discredited story about a computer server, Trump Tower and a Russian bank. The suit was brought by three Russian oligarchs who control Moscow’s Alfa Bank. Mr. Steele, under the Dossier heading of election interference, accused them of paying cash bribes to Russian President Vladimir Putin. The bankers -- Mikhail Fridman, Petr Aven and German Khan -- also sued Fusion GPS. The case was dismissed by a DC Superior Court judge. Lawyers filed an appeal in US District Court and attached Mr. Steele’s August declarations given in the London court. 'Internet traffic data suggested that a computer server of an entity in which the Claimants have an interest, Alfa Bank, had been communicating with a computer server linked to the Trump Organization,' Mr. Steele stated. His goal was to show that his unverified Dossier was correct when he wrote of an 'extensive conspiracy." BUT, the server story has fallen into the “fake news” category according to BizPac Review, which states : "When it began appearing on social media in 2016, some online sleuths looked at the server’s IP address and other data. They traced the server to a location outside Philadelphia that spewed marketing spam. A Trump Organization official told The Washington Times last year that some of the spam went to Alfa Bank employees who perhaps stayed in Trump hotels. That’s how Alfa turned up in some emails. The New York Times investigated and said the FBI basically came to the same conclusion." • When former FBI Director James Comey was questioned by Representative Trey Gowdy in an early December joint House Judiciary and Oversight Committee hearing, he claimed “I don’t know” or “I don’t remember” in response to dozens of questions concerning key details in the Russia probe. Comey was also fuzzy on the eventual Democratic funding of the research that went into the controversial and unverified anti-Trump Dossier. Asked by Gowdy when he learned that the firm behind the Dossier, Fusion GPS, was hired by law firm Perkins Coie -- and when he learned that law firm was hired by the Democratic National Committee -- Comey said “I never learned that” while Director. Comey also claimed not to know key details surrounding the involvement of Christopher Steele, the former British spy who authored the Dossier. Asked when Steele was “terminated” as an FBI source, Comey said he didn’t know. Asked about Steele’s subsequent contact with Justice Department official Bruce Ohr, Comey said, “I don’t know anything about that.” • • • CLINTON WHISTLEBLOWERS REFUSE TO GIVE DOCUMENTS TO CONGRESS. TeaParty.org reported in mid-December that Mark Meadows, the Chairman of the House Subcommittee on Government Operations, led a hearing on the Clinton Foundation whistleblowers : "Special prosecutor John Huber was a NO-SHOW. Congressman Meadows became angry with the two Clinton Foundation witnesses, Mr. Doyle and Mr. Moynihan, after they refused to hand over to the Committee the over 6,000 pages of evidence they gathered on the corrupt foundation. Lawrence Doyle of DM Income Advisors and John Moynihan of JFM Associates told Meadows that they handed over the thousands of pages of evidence to the IRS and FBI but refused to give the Oversight Subcommittee the documents. Moynihan and Doyle argued that according to their research, the Clinton Foundation was acting as a foreign agent, not a 501c3 non-profit organization yet never registered under FARA. The witnesses also told the committee today they had to send their evidence to the Huber investigation THREE TIMES because they kept losing it. Meadows lost his patience and became furious after Mr. Doyle and Mr. Moynihan refused to give him their documents : 'If you’re not going to share your information with this Committee, my patience is running out.' " After consulting with their lawyers, they still refused, with Moynihan saying : "We will not be providing those materials.” Meadows answered : “We will compel you to bring all those documents to this Committee then…let me just tell you, this is a hearing to get to the truth and what you’re saying is that you’re all about the truth, Mr. Moynihan..if you’re all about the truth then why aren’t you willing to give us the documents?” • Why did these two witnesses testify today if they weren’t going to give Meadows the 6,000 documents supporting their testimony? The Tea Party thinks that they amy be holding out for a hefty financial reward. And, they know that the IRS and FBI can be trusted to take no action and that Huber has already proven to be ineffective. BUT, are they perhaps turning around and now supporting the Deep State and the Clintons? Have they been scared off? We just do not know. • Clinton Foundation filings show that the Clinton Foundation received $26.6 million in 2017 -- down a staggering 58% from the $62.9 million it took in the previous year. Tom Fitton, president of Judicial Watch, notes that Clinton Foundation had received “staggering sums” of money from Saudi benefactors, estimated between $18 million and $50 million, when she was Secretary of State : “While Mrs. Clinton was Secretary of State, Bill Clinton gave two speeches in Saudi Arabia earning a total of $600,000. There is enough evidence to warrant serious investigations of the Clinton Foundation.” Investigative journalist Sara Carter told Fox News host Sean Hannity that whistle-blowers John Moynihan and Lawrence W. Doyle said the FBI is investigating the Clinton Foundation. "They basically admitted that the FBI is actually investigating the Clinton Foundation, and it’s been ongoing. It’s huge.” Attorney Gregg Jarrett noted that there’s enough evidence to nail Hillary and her crooked Foundation : The evidence is there. There’s an internal auditor about her Foundation how there were quid-pro-quo benefits, the Doug Band e-mails which demonstrate that Bill Clinton didn’t just cross the line of impropriety -- he demolished it. [Bill Clinton used] the Foundation as his own personal piggy bank as his wife put a ‘for sale’ sign on the door of her office as Secretary of State. It’s good that there is an FBI investigation. There should also be a grand jury to look at it.” BUT, Mueller ignored the unethical relationship between former SOS Hilary Clinton, the Clinton Foundation and the Russian company Rosatum that bought Uranium One. • In addition, TheHill reported that a whistleblower submission filed with the FBI and IRS in August 2017 included internal legal reviews that the Clinton Foundation conducted between 2008 and 2011. Those reviews raised concerns about legal compliance and improper mingling of personal and charity business. According to TheHill report, MDA investigators met with Clinton Foundation CFO Andrew Kessel in late November 2016. During the meeting, Kessel said that “one of the biggest problems was [former President Bill] Clinton’s commingling and use of business and donated funds and his personal expenses.” A separate interview memo stated that Bill Clinton “mixes and matches his personal business with that of the Foundation. Many people within the Foundation have tried to caution him about this but he does not listen, and there really is no talking to him.” • American Thinker's Thomas Lifson wrote on December 7 : "Having the chief financial officer of the Clinton Foundation turn informant is a nightmare for the Clintons. The CFO has to process all the cash, and because that person usually is on the hook for any criminal violations, there is ample incentive to turn state's evidence. That evidence was assembled by a private firm called MDA Analytics LLC, run by accomplished ex-federal criminal investigators, who alleged the Clinton Foundation engaged in illegal activities and may be liable for millions of dollars in delinquent taxes and penalties. In addition to the IRS, the firm's partners have had contact with prosecutors in the main Justice Department in Washington and FBI agents in Little Rock, Ark. MDA Analytics claims to be motivated by the prospect of reaping a substantial bounty from the IRS, as the agency pays informants a portion of the taxes it is able to recover. The fact that they are not politically motivated is a huge plus, because they have invested their own resources in the investigation in the expectation of a financial return. These experienced pros believe they have a strong enough case to yield many millions to the IRS and a portion of those millions for themselves." • BUT, we now know the these whistleblowers are not going to share their 6,000 pages with the House Oversight Subcommittee. • Lifson says : " The hysteria ginned up by the Mueller investigation can be harnessed to focus on the Clintons, using the same techniques that the Left has embraced when used against Trump." • • • DEAR READERS, the Deep State, Democrats and Republicans alike, are in lock step trying to remove Trump from office. If only they were in similar agreement on securing the border, cutting regulations, or growing the economy than they are against Trump. Represnetative Maxine Waters says : “President Donald Trump is a ‘criminal’ who should be impeached.” It never ends. President Trump, a billionaire businessman with a successful reality television show, had it all -- money, influence, and popularity. He gave that up try to make a difference for America and the world. For his efforts, he is ridiculed and maligned not only by his political opponents but by many in his own GOP. The #NeverTrumpers in Congress and the media who would be ecstatic if a President Bush, Kasich, or Rubio were implementing everything Trump is doing, yet Trump’s conservative accomplishments mean nothing because he is not one of them, not a member of their elite establishment club. So, rather than support the outsider Trump, #NeverTrumpers and RINOs have chosen to embrace radically Leftist Democrat policies. Who cares about fair trade deals, lower taxes and regulations, border enforcement, economic growth, and conservative judges. Not the GOP Establishment !! No sir. Kill the GOP. Kill the recovery. Kill the Republic, if that is what it takes to get rid of Donald Trump. • As Brian Joondeph wrote in American Thinker : "The more Trump does, the more the opposition grows. To the point that he has few friends in Washington, DC. Especially in his own party. Special Counsel Robert Mueller will undoubtedly cook up something for House Democrats to use for impeachment. For every line that Trump may have crossed, Obama, Clinton, and their minions crossed a parking lot full of lines, all without consequence. It’s not simply two standards of justice, it’s no justice at all. It’s Stalinesque justice where the deep state makes up the rules as they go along, favoring themselves with kangaroo courts for their opponents. Conventional wisdom is that Senate Republicans would never vote to remove an impeached President Trump from office. Oh really? How many will see obstruction of justice in Trump firing James Comey, after his deputy attorney general recommended, and his attorney general agreed, that he should do just that? Or his perfectly legitimate nondisclosure agreements with payment....The fact that Trump is still upbeat and optimistic, accomplishing more in a day than his predecessors did in a week, is beyond amazing. But at some point, the human spirit breaks. How many slings and arrows will Trump take before he’s had enough? How long do political and media hacks pursue trivial matters while danger lurks in all corners of the globe? What kind of example is America, as the world’s lone superpower, setting for the rest of the world with American politicians re-enacting 'Mean Girls' against the duly elected President? When does Donald Trump say, “Enough is enough!”? • Apparently, not just yet. Because even Fake News CNN can't seem to get its polls to agree that President Trump should be impeached. The American public has become increasingly less interested in a potential Trump impeachment, and that’s according to CNN’s own polls. Setting aside CNN's compulsion to constantly ask this question, the network can’t be thrilled with the way the nation is swaying in regards to a Trump impeachment. CNN was forced to admit, “support for impeachment has dipped.” According to the December CNN poll, 50% of respondents don’t feel that Trump should be impeached, compared to 43% who still feel he should be impeached. In September, 47% of those polled felt that Trump should be impeached, so the recent polls represents a 4% dip in support for impeachment. And, it is not just Republicans who move the poll roward non-impeachment. In September, political independents were split almost evenly in the polls, with 48% for impeachment and 47% against. In December, that split has skewed heavily against impeachment, with the recent polls showing 36% favor impeachment and a whopping 55% are against it. CNN also cites impeachment calls dying down among young adults as well as racial and ethnic minorities. Young adults, classified by CNN as younger than 45, went from 53% pro-impeachment to 45%. And in a stunning rebuke of the leftist’s favorite narrative that Trump is racist, racial and ethnic minorities went from 66% favoring impeachment to 50%. The poll shows that calls for impeachment have all but fizzled down to a vocal subset of far leftists. Everyday Americans are growing more and more disinterested in the prospect. • The message is loud and clear as we leave 2018 -- it resonates from all corners of America and even reaches as far as the US military base in Baghdad -- America loves President Trump and his lovely First Lady and we want them to stay with us. We need the President's courage, skills, and determination in the face of the ProgDems, #NeverTrumpers, and RINOS. Make America Great Again. That is President Trump's goal, and it is our goal.