Progressive Psychos with Bludgeons and Axes Will not Cave-in to Conservative Tea and Sympathy

A MODERN FABLE. A 6-ft 5-in psychopath hulk sneaks up behind a professional heavyweight boxer dancing around his punching bag and cracks him on the head with a steel pipe bludgeon. The boxer finally wakes up and realizes he is lying on the floor with one arm taped behind his back. He looks up and sees the psycho looming over him. The Psycho gets the boxer to his feet and then says : "Now we'll see who is the best," waving his axe in one hand and his steel bludgeon in the other. The boxer looks down at his free hand -- it is empty. The psycho makes one swing to the body with the bludgeon, follows with the axe to the head, and the boxer falls, dead. Moral : If you are in a game with psychos, keep your back against a wall, and load and use both arms. • • • THE ATTACK ON FOX NEWS. It is an attack not just on Fox but on every conservative journalist who speaks in support of President Trump. The goal is to destroy every conservative voice and network. The attack is led by the Progressive Democrat Left. • THE COWARDLY ADVERTISERS. Business Insider reported this list of advertisers that left O'Reilly or Fox as of April 4 : Mercedes-Benz, BMW, Mitsubishi, Hyundai, Lexus, Subaru, T. Rowe Price, Ainsworth Pet Nurition (Nutrish dog-food), GlaxoSmithKline, Bayer, Sanofi, The Wonderful Company, Credit Karma, Orkin, Esurance, UNTUCKit, Coldwell Banker, the Society for Human Resource Management, TrueCar, Wayfair, Ancestry, LegalZoom, H&R Block, Invisalign, Vision Works, Pacific Life, Old Dominion Freight Line, Advil, Touchnote, Carfax, Reddi Wip, Progressive, Stanley Steemer, Liberty Mutual, BambooHR, Jenny Craig, and Quincy Bioscience (Prevagen). • SEAN HANNITY. In his opening monologue Monday night, Fox News’s Sean Hannity addressed the “well-orchestrated effort by the intolerant left in this country” that is trying to “silence every conservative voice,” including his. Following the ouster of Fox New’s Bill O’Reilly, Hannity appears to be the next target at Fox News. He said he has hired lawyers and will challenge his “serial harasser” -- an individual he did not name -- in court. • TruthRevolt named the "serial harasser" -- Debbie Schlussel, a columnist, attorney and former Fox contributor, who has harassed Sarah Palin, Steven Crowder, Free Republic, Melanie Morgan, and Sean Hannity over and over again. Schlussel recently appeared as a guest on a Tulsa Radio program and accused Hannity, of sexual misconduct. Schlussel accused Hannity of the same type of behavior that lead to Bill O’Reilly leaving the beleaguered Fox News last week. Among the allegations -- Schlussel claimed that while at an appearance in Detroit which they both attended, Hannity invited her back to his hotel room. Schlussel said that after she turned down his advances, she was not invited back on his program. Schlussel said : “This kind of stuff is all over the place at Fox News and anything that has to do with Sean Hannity." Liberals reacted with glee over the supposed shortcomings of Hannity. For example, the Daily Beast's headline shouted, "Sean Hannity Accused of Inviting Fox News Guest to His Hotel Room." • WELL, NO. It wasn't that at all. After Hannity said he would hire lawyers and go after the "serial harasser," Schlussel changed her story. She told Lawnewz that she doesn't believe what happened between the two amounted to sexual harassment. She said she was never 'sexually harassed' by Hannity, that he invited her back to his hotel, not his hotel room, but that she thought Hannity "weird" and "creepy." In a letter sent to the Huffington Post, Hannity said Schlussel’s claims were “100 % false and a complete fabrication," and called her a “serial harasser who has been lying about me for well over a decade.” • Prominent conservatives have been ousted from their positions recently over sexual issues. Roger Ailes, the head of the most powerful cable news network, is gone from Fox News, and Bill O’Reilly, the highest-rated cable news personality, is also gone. In light of this trend, Hannity accused Schlussel of being just one part of a larger “coordinated effort afoot to now silence those with conservative views.” • The truth has a way of emerging. • • • HANNITY IS BOTH RIGHT AND WRONG ABOUT HOW TO REACT. On Monday, Hannity said : “In this fiercely divided and vindictive political climate, I will no longer allow slander and lies about me to go unchallenged, as I see this now to be a coordinated effort afoot to now silence those with conservative views. I will fight every single lie about me by any and all legal means available to me as an American.” THAT is right and it seems to have worked with Schlussel. • But Hannity also said this isn’t just about him : “I’m speaking out tonight so that you, our audience, will understand what is really happening and what is really at stake when it comes to freedom of speech in this country....there have always been efforts and attempts to smear and slander and besmirch me and other conservatives, but it has never been as intense and completely insane as it is right now....If we don't stop it right now, there won't be any conservative voices on radio or television left. Now I'm not the only one that these liberal fascists routinely target. Like me, conservatives are monitored on radio and TV, every word they say. Liberal fascism is alive and well in America today. Their goal is simple. They want to shut up and shut down, completely silence all conservative voices by any means necessary." • BUT, then Hannity showed that he may not understand the war he is in. He said : "Here’s the difference. Unlike the left, I don't have any problem with what the other side says. If you want to listen to liberals on radio or TV, read their articles, follow them on social media, go for it. Now, I’ll call them out for their bias. I’ll explain why they’re wrong. I’ll debate them but I’ll never, ever say they should be silenced. And I won't support boycotts to attack their advertisers, a roundabout way of silencing them. So let me be clear tonight. Everyone who publicly supported President Trump is a target. This is very political. We have seen repeatedly that the left knows no limits in these efforts. They have gone after and attacked the first lady; they have attacked members of the President's family, every White House advisor. They've even attacked his daughter and his 10-year-old son. Now ultimately, their goal is to cause as much collateral damage as they can to anybody who supports the president. They have tried to undermine the outcome of this election since November 9th....If we don't take a stand now, if we allow this to happen now, I'm telling you, America as we know it -- freedom of speech as we know it -- is over. Let's stop the boycotts – let’s stop silencing opposition voices. Let all Americans make their own decisions." • • • NO, HANNITY, THAT WON'T WORK. The one weapon the liberal media have left is personal character assassination -- and like the psycho hulk, they are using that weapon to pin one arm behind every conservative back so that they can then bludgeon and axe every conservative until there are no more conservatives left. Conservatives must fight the war that the Progressive Left is bringing to them, a war that will not by won by being soft and tolerant. Stand up and fight back with every tool legally available. • As David Horowitz put it : "Bill O'Reilly was just murdered in cold blood by the liberal media." His crime? Horowitz says it's simple : O'Reilly was the most powerful voice in cable television and he treated Trump fairly and criticized the dishonesty of the anti-Trump media....Even before he took the oath of office, the press, working with Barack Obama's most loyal aides, decided they were going to do whatever it would take to stop President Trump, and sabotage his administration. • Horowitz noted that after Trump won Obama even made a cryptic comment, saying Fox News played a key role in defeating Hillary. But, Horowitz writes that the GOP and Trump must recognize that they are not just fighting policy ideas, but an ideology -- a Progressive one with a radical agenda to stop Trump in an effort to reduce America's power and greatness. • • • WHERE WAS BARACK? He spent a month in isolation in the South Pacific, 'unwinding and beginning his memoirs.' But, Barack Obama also used the time to agree to a $400,000 fee for speaking to a prominent Wall Street firm, according to Charlie Gasparino of Fox Business Network, who stated that Obama will speak to a health care conference sponsored by Cantor Fitzgerald in September. Gasparino tweeted : "The huge fee puts Obama at the top of the list of speaking fees for former government officials." Hillary Clinton received over $200,000 apiece for each of her speaking engagements at Goldman Sachs. Those payments later were used against her by political rivals, who argued they were evidence that the former Secretary of State was too close to Wall Street. Obama has joined her on Wall street and I do not hear one MSM voice critical of his anti-Progressive decision or fee. • Could Obama have been lying low while his lackeys did the dirty work of "murdering" Bill O'Reilly and going after Hannity?? We will probably never know because no Progressive MSM outlet would investigate that angle. • • • THE IRAN DEAL BITES OBAMA AGAIN. But, we do know that new information by Politico suggests that the details of the prisoner swap that the Obama administration released were lies. As part of the Iran deal, the United States agreed to release some of its Iranian prisoners in exchange for some of Iran's American prisoners. At the time, the Obama administration called the Iranians being released “civilians” and described them as individuals who would be on trial for “sanctions-related offenses, violations of the trade embargo.” But, Politico recently discovered that the Department of Justice accused some of the released men of being national security risks. Politico's Josh Meyer writes : "Three allegedly were part of an illegal procurement network supplying Iran with US-made microelectronics with applications in surface-to-air and cruise missiles like the kind Teheran test-fired recently, prompting a still-escalating exchange of threats with the Trump administration." It has also been reported that the DOJ dropped charges against over a dozen fugitives in an effort to aid the White House in making a deal with the Iranians -- the Obama administration did not release the names or details of these men at the time, but it has now been uncovered that three of them were attempting to lease a Boeing aircraft for a Hezbollah-supported airline, and another was accused of conspiracy to buy thousands of US-made assault rifles and smuggle them into Iran. The “biggest fish” that got away, according to Politico, is Seyed Abolfazl Shahab Jamili, who was charged with conspiring to acquire parts “with nuclear application for Iran via China” for close to seven years. (2005-2012). Politico alleges that most of the dealing going on internationally was done without many DOJ officials knowing. Some DOJ individuals had spent decades attempting to infiltrate the networks where these types of individuals operate, and when federal prosecutors and agents learned the true extent of Obama's releases, many were shocked and angry. The new Politico report cites experts claiming that it appears the Obama administration made decisions regarding the Iran deal for political “shrewd calculations” and that the moves elevated our national security risk. Politico writes : “The former [senior Obama administration] official also acknowledged the complaints by agents and prosecutors about cases being derailed but said they were unavoidable, and for the greater good.” • Will the Trump DOJ and State Department go after the new public information released about Obama? • • • BRENNAN'S CIA COLLUDED WITH FOREIGN SPIES TO TRAP TRUMP. And, if the Iran news isn't enough, the DailyWire reported a headline, from The American Spectator : "Confirmed: John Brennan Colluded With Foreign Spies to Defeat Trump." The American Spectator stated : "Seeking to retain his position as CIA director under Hillary, Brennan teamed up with British spies and Estonian spies to cripple Trump’s candidacy. He used their phony intelligence as a pretext for a multi-agency investigation into Trump, which led the FBI to probe a computer server connected to Trump Tower and gave cover to Susan Rice, among other Hillary supporters, to spy on Trump and his people. John Brennan’s CIA operated like a branch office of the Hillary campaign, leaking out mentions of this bogus investigation to the press in the hopes of inflicting maximum political damage on Trump. An official in the intelligence community told the American Spectator that Brennan’s retinue of political radicals didn’t even bother to hide their activism, decorating offices with 'Hillary for president cups' and other campaign paraphernalia." Over the next six months, until summer 2016, a number of western agencies shared further information on contacts between Trump’s inner circle and Russians, sources told the Guardian. The European countries that passed on electronic intelligence -- known as "sigint" -- included Germany, Estonia and Poland. Australia, a member of the “Five Eyes” spying alliance that also includes the US, UK, Canada and New Zealand. But, the American Spectator hit the point succinctly : "Were the media not so completely in the tank for Obama and Hillary, all of this political mischief would make for a compelling 2016 version of All the President’s Men. Instead, the public gets a steady stream of Orwellian propaganda about the sudden propriety of political espionage. The headline writers at Pravda couldn’t improve on the official lie, tweeted out by Maggie Habermans: “Susan Rice Did Nothing Wrong, Say Both Dem and Republican House Aides.” • The American Spectator's special report did not mince words : "A supporter of the American Communist Party at the height of the Cold War, Brennan brought into the CIA a raft of subversives and gave them plum positions from which to gather and leak political espionage on Trump. He bastardized standards so that these left-wing activists could burrow in and take career positions. Under the patina of that phony professionalism, they could then present their politicized judgments as “non-partisan.” All of this took place at the moment when Brennan was auditioning for Hillary. The American Spectator says : "He desperately wanted to keep his job and despised Trump for his alleged “Moslem ban,” a matter near and dear to Brennan’s heart. Not only was he an apologist for the Moslem Brotherhood, but Brennan’s Islamophilia dated to his days in college, when he spent a year in Cairo learning Arabic and taking courses in Middle Eastern studies. He later got a graduate degree with an emphasis in Middle Eastern studies. In 1996, his ties to the Islamic world tightened after he became the CIA’s station chief in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. He once recalled that “during a 25-year career in government, I was privileged to serve in positions across the Middle East -- as a political officer with the State Department and as a CIA station chief in Saudi Arabia. In Saudi Arabia, I saw how our Saudi partners fulfilled their duty as custodians of the two holy mosques of Mecca and Medina. I marveled at the majesty of the Hajj and the devotion of those who fulfilled their duty as Moslems by making that privilege -- that pilgrimage.” So, is Brennan a Moslem?? And was he working for another Moslem?? We don't know. But, the American Spectator says : "Out of this Islamophilia came a special dislike of Michael Flynn, who had planned to rip up the Obama-era 'reset' with Moslem countries. Furious with Flynn for his apostasy from political correctness, Brennan and other Obama aides couldn’t resist the temptation to take him out after rifling through transcripts of his calls with the Russian ambassador. They caught him in a lie to Mike Pence and made sure the press knew about it." • The rest, as they say, is history, and we are left with the reality that the Obama administration flagrantly betrayed the public trust by using the intelligence agencies as a political weapon. Whether this was done with the knowledge and approval of President Obama, we do not yet know. But, we already know that people like Brennan and former National Security Advisor Susan Rice were in on the game. We don’t know who was snookered and who was intentionally deceptive. Estonia and Britain, named in the Brennan scam, are US allies. But, says the American Spectator, their motivations are obvious. Trump terrified them with his threat to withdraw from NATO. These countries are also desperate to stop the populist momentum that led to Brexit and may also lead to the election of Marine Le Pen in France. They watched how Trump talked about Vladimir Putin and they panicked. Their panic has now turned into fear -- the fear of being found out in their deception. • • • DEAR READERS, can we expect that the Trump DOJ led by Jeff Sessions, who is agressively on the job now -- and dare we hope the FBI led by that most unpredictable of Directors, Jim Comey -- will address all these questions frontally and bring to justice all the perpetrators who have so badly sullied America's values and reputation. To know that the machine of American justice is turning would satisfy all Americans who are conservative supporters of the Constitution and President Trump. • BUT, a big BUT -- there is the other war being fought. The Hannity, O'Reilly, conservative media war that is really a war against all conservatives. And, although the Progressive Democrat media will not tell you, conservatives are winning with many Americans on many issues. • On April 21, Blabber Buzz and Breitbart reported that Californians favor private school vouchers. It turns out that even liberal Californians want taxpayer-funded vouchers for private and religious schools, according to a poll released Wednesday by the Public Policy Institute of California (PPIC). The eye-popping poll states that 60% of adults favor “providing parents with tax-funded vouchers to send their children to any public, private, or parochial school they choose.” Among registered voters, 55% favor vouchers, and, among likely voters, 50% favor vouchers. Among adults, 73% of African Americans!!, 69% of Latinos!!, 56% of Asian Americans, and 51% of White Americans favor school vouchers. This news could not be much worse for ProgDems or much better for President Trump, and his pro-school choice as Secretary of Education, Betsy DeVos. • And, on Good Friday, Patriot Post reported that with Progressive sweetheart Pope Francis leading the so-called dangerously outdated Catholic Church, many Progressives, both Christian and atheist, anticipate the Catholic Church finally will ordain women, welcome homosexual priests, and hand out condoms at the rectory. Pope Françis' famous “Who am I to judge?” is Progressive proof that he’s a champion for some obscure, long-awaited rise of Catholic "tolerance." Yet while the world gushes over the reformist moves of Francis, many conservative Catholics feel stranded and are searching for a new home. Francis has begun the process of overturning the traditional Catholic teaching that divorced and remarried Catholics cannot receive Holy Communion. Immediately, Maltese bishops began allowing openly homosexual Catholics to receive Communion, too. Francis also protected a member of the Knights of Malta, Albrecht von Boeselager, when a scandal erupted accusing Boeselager of distributing condoms to the poor through a Catholic charity despite the Church’s forbidding the use of artificial birth control. The Chancellor of the Knights, confronted by Francis' support for distributing condoms and not wanting to be compliant in the violation of Church teaching, resigned shortly thereafter and surrendered control of the Order to Francis -- ceding the oldest, most powerful independently governed entity in the Catholic Church to its new Progressive Pope. American Cardinal Raymond Burke, one of the most prominent bishops in the Catholic Church, warns that there is “a very serious division in the Church which has to be mended” or it “could develop into a formal schism.” For some Catholics, the schism has already happened. Even the Washington Post admitts that Progressive churches are “dying” at the rate of a million members a year, while conservative churches, both Catholic and Protestant, are “thriving.” Patriot Post calls Francis the first pope of modern times to undermine some of the Catholic Church’s core teachings. When read under the guidance of its tradition, Catholics believe that the Bible leaves very little room for alternate interpretations that allow for accommodations of modern “morality.” It is solely because of its steadfast teachings that the Catholic Church has not joined Progressive Christendom in its watered-down spirituality. The modern distorted view depicts the “Buddy Jesus” who not only doesn’t call sin what it is but approves of whoever (or whatever) you marry or whatever gender you decide to adopt. While many Protestant denominations continue to split over whether to allow homosexual pastors or other “progressive” social issues, the Catholic Church has stood firm for centuries. Francis’ ambiguity on the Church’s core teachings is alarming to many Catholics, who fear a slide even further into the mire of leftist 'tolerance.' The rumblings of an 'underground Church' are already beginning. It’s entirely possible that #notmypope may become the most tweeted hashtag of the year among Catholics who are tired of burying their heads in the sand. • And, President Trump has struck a blow to the Progressive media lapdogs of the Washington press. Trump announced last Saturday that he will be holding a rally that happens to be the same night as the White House Correspondents’ Dinner : “Next Saturday night I will be holding a BIG rally in Pennsylvania. Look forward to it!” The rally will be held April 29 in Harrisburg, the day that Trump marks the 100th day of his presidency, Politico reported. No White House staff will attend the dinner either as a show of solidarity with Trump, and outlets such as Vanity Fair, TIME, People, Bloomberg, and the New Yorker have canceled their parties. • So, to close the loop -- the Progressive hulk psychos are attacking conservatives with bludgeons and axes. Why should conservatives simply lie down and take the beating? What is wrong with boycotts? Why would any conservative want to buy a product from one of those companies that boycotted Fox News and O'Reilly? Why would conservatives watch the Correspondents Dinner on TV? Why would any conservative watch anything on CNN, NBC, CBS or ABC. When I watch Fox or read conservative internet news, I learn what these MSM lapdogs said without having to look at their smug Progressive faces. • And, why oh why are the GOP congressional committees not exposing the Progressive Obama and Hillary lackeys for the elitist, intolerant, entitled and closed-minded criminals some of them are. Could GOPers in Congress be in bed with the Progressives? • And in BREAKING NEWS, why would the US spend its money to fund the International Monetary Fund or help German Chancellor Merkel save her bacon by protecting Germany from unwanted and dangerous Middle East refugees when Ivanka Trump was booed in Berlin on Tuesday for saying her father is a "tremendous champion of supporting families and enabling them to thrive." The moderator had to move the discussion on amid a chorus of boos. These are not friends and allies worth spending and dying for. They are Progressive globalist ideologues who detest conservatives and especially President Trump's walloping of Hillary Clinton last November. • Americans, indeed the majority in the West, support the conservative fight. When you are at war with Progressive hulk psychos, don't let your values tie one arm behind your back. Don't be afraid of a little down-home truth. Don't intellectualize. Act !!!