Tuesday, October 14, 2014
Give Up Your Weak Airstrike Strategy, Mr. Obama, and Let the US Military Do Its Job
AP reported today that Turkish warplanes have struck Kurdish rebel positions in southeastern Turkey, in the first major airstrikes against the rebel group since peace talks and a truce began two years ago to end a 30-year insurgency. Turkish F-16 and F-4 warplanes bombed Kurdish PKK (Kurdistan Workers' Party) rebel targets near the Iraqi border, in the town of Daglica, in response to PKK shelling of a military outpost, the Turkish armed forces said, although Kurd media say that Turkey started the shelling some days ago. The private Dogan news agency said the Turkish jets hit PKK targets in response to intense "harassing fire" by PKK rebels on a military outpost. The air raids caused "heavy casualties," according to the Hurriyet Daily. The strikes followed a three-day PKK assault on a military outpost with heavy machine guns and rocket launchers, it said. Clashes were also reported between the PKK and troops in the Tuncel area of east-central Turkey on Monday, far from the border. Last week Kurdish protests gripped Turkey's Kurdish-majority southeastern provinces. At least 31 people died in widespread street clashes, as Kurds expressed anger at Turkey's passive policy over Kobani. The army imposed a curfew in some areas. But some of the fighting was reported to be between PKK supporters and Islamist Kurds sympathetic to ISIS. Turkish Prime Minister Davutoglu accused Kurds of using the peace process as a means to "blackmail" Turkey into taking action to defend Kobani, but said his government is determined to press ahead with efforts to bring about a Turkish-PKK peace. The Kurds are furious because Turkey has done nothing to halt the ISIS attack on Kobani. PKK fighters have been helping Kurdish YPG militia in Kobani but Turkey has refused to help supply the PKK, its long-standing enemy, with weapons or allow Kurdish fighters in Turkey to enter Syria. Two PKK commanders wounded in the Kobani fighting were arrested by Turkish authorities when they arrived for treatment at a hospital in southeastern Turkey, according to the Anatolia news agency. Separately, some 260 YPG militia were arrested when they crossed into Turkey last week, although 60 of them were allowed to go back, Turkish media reported. Turkey treats the PKK as a "terrorist" organisation and its leader Abdullah Ocalan is in jail. But he has been Turkey's main point of contact in peace negotiations since he was incarcerated in 2012. The PKK is also labelled "terrorist" by western governments. The insurgency has killed more than 40,000 people. ~~~~~ On Tuesday, the US-led coalition launched 22 airstrikes on ISIS positions in Syria, with all but one targeting positions in and around Kobani, the US Defense Department said. Idriss Nassan, deputy head of Kobani's foreign relations committee, said : "Over the past night there have been very intense airstrikes by the coalition that targeted several Daesh [ISIS] positions in and near Kobani." He added that Kurdish fighters later captured a major Kobani hill and brought down the black ISIS flag. The extremist group still controls more than a third of the predominantly Kurdish town. Kurdish leaders, including jailed PKK chief Abdullah Ocalan, have warned that the fall of Kobani would end the Turkey-PKK peace process. Meanwhile, PKK commander Cemal Bayik has been quoted in Turkish media as saying that some PKK fighters who had withdrawn from Turkish territory as part of the peace efforts have now returned to Turkey, causing another rift in the truce. The Kurdish PKK is an important force on the ground in both Iraq and Syria fighting ISIS. ~~~~~ Dear readers, the return of violence between Turkey and the PKK, which began in 1984, is only part of the complications Turkey faces as it negotiates its role with the US and NATO allies fighting ISIS extremists. Turkey is using its strategic position - geographically and militarily - to achieve several goals. First, it wants the moderate Free Syrian Army armed and supported. Second, it wants the US-led coalition to attack Bashir al-Asszad and his Syrian regime, including a no-fly zone and a free zone for refugees on the Syrian side of the Turkey-Syria border. So far, President Obama has been unwilling to agree to any of these demands and so Turkey has refused to partcipate in the coalition it joined or do anything to help save Kobani. If this impasse continues long enough, Turkey will probably achieve its unspoken third goal - let Kobani fall to ISIS and thereby separate the Kurds into at least two smaller groups that would be less dangerous to Turkey domestically. It is impossible to believe that the US military is not aware of all this. We might hope that during today's coalition meeting at Andrews Air Base near Washington, the American and other coalition military leaders in attendance will finally be able to make President Obama see his current airstrike strategy for what it is - a failure unless it is accompanied by US Special Forces leadership on the ground to direct strategy and give tactical input to both the Iraqi and Free Syrian Army ground troops, as well as to provide airstrike targeting information. It is this weak Obama strategy that gives Turkey leverage, not the correctness of Turkey's position. The US is reportedly spending $10 million each day on its airstrike strategy - with close to "0" payback, and it is pointing to the likelihood of losing the entire Anbar province in Iraq and with it, the Baghdad Airport - a catastrophe that could lead to an evacuation of Americans from the Baghdad Green Zone that would be reminiscent of the US helicopters leaving Saigon. Cannot Mr. Obama try to break out of his politically-driven position - which, incidentally, is so unpopular that it will cost him the Senate majority on November 4 - and accept the truth that wars are fought by the US military, not by a White House Harvard think tank. Give it up, Mr. President, before the entire Middle East goes up in ISIS flames.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I'm sure Gen. Dempsey agrees wholeheartedly with you...
ReplyDelete“On September 25, 2014, the Pentagon announced a bold expansion of current policies to create new opportunities for young illegal immigrants to enlist in the U.S. military. This policy change also will allow the young soldiers to receive preferential treatment in obtaining citizenship. A new Department of Defense initiative will broaden an existing program that allows military recruiters to seek foreign nationals with narrow skills, mostly those with foreign-language expertise or certain health-care training. Until now, these enlistees were legal noncitizen residents. The Obama administration now has altered the program, known as Military Accessions Vital to the National Interest (MAVNI), to absorb so-called Dreamers. These are illegal immigrants who came to the U.S. with their parents before age 16, and who were afforded de facto amnesty by the Obama administration under its policy known as Deferred Action for Child Arrivals (DACA). MAVNI soldiers receive educational aid in addition to pay and benefits and expedited citizenship. For now, at least, the program has a cap of 1,500 recruits per year.”
DeleteUnchecked moves like this is where the anger and action against Obama should be directed. Obama’s air war is a joke was never intended to be effective I believe. And the reappearing photos from a different perspective from one announced bombing run to another days bombing run brings into questions the validity of Obama’s air strike war.
Pentagon brass seems to be in accordance here?
My faith in my government has been dwindling now for the longest time. But illogically I thought that some of the governments of Europe were stable enough to hold the sphere together.
ReplyDeleteToday I don't really believe a thing that any regime says. Governments don't understand or comprehend the problems they are continuously creating and exasperating old ones.
Lies upon lies upon lies. Lies to cover lies. Lies to cover their individual short comings. And it the end when no other reason to lie they use 'national security." The truth (or something close to it) is never it seems to be contemplated.
We need to as a friend once told me ... "All me needis to put God back in the Town Square."
Let’s suppose that the “entire Middle East” does goes up in flames visa vie Obama’s stupid plans of engagement with ISIS. Just suppose that for one minute – what then in this worst case scenario is the plan of the delinquent Obama government in Washington DC for the citizens of Israel?
ReplyDeleteSoon as possible this is the end game of ISIS – to reach the promise land and start the slaughter of all Israeli’s if that is even humanly possible?
This trek of ISIS across the Middle East is not simply about one vicious faction of Islam against a wee bit less vicious faction of Islam. No, this is about the control of the collective citizens of Islam via fear - control to have a ‘lock stepping’ force of 200 million invaders march into of Israel. And Obama’s air war (and nothing more) is window dressing.
A little noticed move by Obama 4 years ago probably carried out likely late on a Friday afternoon when the news was on a back burner:
ReplyDeleteIn October 2014, the first patient on American soil infected with the Ebola virus sits in isolation in a Texas hospital, prompting calls for travel restrictions between the United States and Ebola-stricken countries. Meanwhile, four years ago, the administration of President Barack Obama moved with virtually no fanfare to abandon a comprehensive set of regulations which the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) had called essential to preventing international travelers from spreading deadly diseases inside the United States. The CDC had proposed the regulations in 2005 under the administration of George W. Bush, reported USA Today in 2010. The original impetus for the regulations was fear that avian flu would spread unchecked.
A U.S. outbreak would lead to “severe disruption” in America’s economy and society nearly crippling the United States. A war without any “boots on the ground”, only a few dead illegal immigrants who carried the virus.
The administration is so eager to boast about its “broad coalition” against ISIS that it is announcing contributions before they have been secured. If the U.S. can’t persuade other states to make more significant contributions against ISIS, that is probably because they don’t perceive the threat to be that great or because they take for granted that the U.S. will bear almost all of the burden and foot almost all of the bill. Talking about what our “partners” are contributing is a weak attempt to distract Americans from that reality – an attempt that the American voting public will see right through on November 4, 2014.
ReplyDelete