Monday, August 18, 2014

The Perry Case : In America It's People, not Courts, Who Vote on Election Day

On Friday, the District Attorney’s office in Travis County, Texas, filed an indictment against Republican Governor Perry, charging he misused his powers by threatening to veto and then vetoing $7.5 million in funding for the office’s Public Integrity Unit after District Attorney Rosemary Lehmberg refused to step down after her conviction for drunken driving. In a Saturday news conference, Perry said he stands by his veto, and called the indictment against him outrageous : “We don’t settle political differences with indictments in this country. It is nothing more than an abuse of power - and I cannot and will not allow that to happen.” ~~~~~ It's one of the occasions when all Americans - left and right, Democrat and Republican - agree. Senator Ted Cruz, also a Texan Republican, quickly backed Rick Perry, saying he was "proud to stand with the Texas governor in the wake of his indictment Friday. In a Facebook post Saturday morning, Cruz said Perry is "a friend, he's a man of integrity." But, perhaps the voice that carries the most weight is that of Alan Dershowitz, Harvard law professor and constitutional and criminal law scholar, who excoriated the indictment. Dershowitz told Newsmax he is “outraged” over the Perry’s indictment, saying the charges are politically motivated and an example of a “dangerous” trend of courts being used to affect the ballot box and politics. “Everybody, liberal or conservative, should stand against this indictment,” Dershowitz said. “If you don’t like how Rick Perry uses his office, don’t vote for him. This is another example of the criminalization of party differences....This idea of an indictment is an extremely dangerous trend in America. Dershowitz said such indictments are "something that’s done in totalitarian countries and should not be done in the United States." In such countries, “if you don’t like them, you indict,” Dershowitz said. “In America, you vote against them…this should be up to the voters. There is no room in America for abuse of office charges, and this has to stop once and for all." Dershowitz also told Newsmax Perry was well within his rights when he vetoed the money for Lehmberg’s office, as he “saw a drunk serving as DA” who “shouldn’t be enforcing criminal law.” Dershowitz said that he believes Perry will be acquitted, and the indictment will become an embarrassment to those involved. ~~~~~ In his interview, Dershowitz said he would never vote for Perry, but he’s not alone among liberals questioning the indictment. Democratic pollster and analyst Doug Schoen told Newsmax : "I've never seen anything like this in politics. It looked to me like what Perry was doing was right, reasonable and responsible." Schoen cautioned that the Democrats need to be very careful of using the indictment to dash Perry's chances should he choose to run for the White House in 2016 : "It is one of the worst things that the Democrats could do: to try to go after a partisan Republican with a partisan criminal indictment. It is a further sign of really the destruction of our nonpartisan - seemingly nonpartisan - criminal justice system. It is very depressing, sad and just plain wrong." Liberals opposed to the indictment include former Obama campaign strategist and insider advisor David Axelrod, Clinton and Obama administration alumnus Jonathan Prince, Vox’s Matt Yglesias, and New York Magazine’s Jonathan Chait - all tweeting that they do not agree with the DA’s decision to indict Perry. Axelrod called the indictment “sketchy.” Prince tweeted that the indictment “seems nuts.” ThinkProgress, a liberal-oriented news site, questioned the indictment, saying : "Though the state legislature probably could limit this veto power in extreme cases - if a state governor literally sold his veto to wealthy interest groups, for example, the legislature could almost certainly make that a crime - a law that cuts too deep into the governor’s veto power raises serious separation of powers concerns.” ~~~~~ What are the facts behind the indictment? Special Prosecutor Michael McCrum, based in San Antonio, spent months presenting evidence and calling witness while investigating whether Perry broke the law when he publicly promised to deny $7.5 million over two years to the public integrity unit of the office of Travis County Democratic District Attorney Rosemary Lehmberg. Why did Governor Perry act? Because Lehmberg pleaded guilty to drunken driving in April 2013 - with a blood alcohol content of nearly three times the legal limit for driving - but refused Perry's calls to resign. She served about half of a 45-day jail term while remaining in office. Perry contended that Lehmberg's behavior was inappropriate. A video recording made at the jail showed her shouting at staffers to call the sheriff, kicking the door of her cell, and sticking her tongue out. Democrat pollster Schoen said : "The Travis County District Attorney appears to me to be way out of line, especially given her own conviction for drunken driving." Other top Republicans also called for Lehmberg to resign. The unit she oversees spearheaded the politically motivated investigation against former GOP House Majority Leader Tom DeLay. Several top Perry aides appeared before grand jurors in Austin, including his deputy chief of staff, legislative director and general counsel. The governor did not testify because he was not subpoenaed to appear, something rather unusual that was explained away by McCrum, who said : "That's prosecutorial discretion that I had." ~~~~~ Perry's indictment is just another of the many "witch hunts" by the county district attorney's office, according to former Houston-area broadcaster and GOP philanthropist Fran Fawcett, who told Newsmax : "The Travis County District Attorney's Office has long been trying to ensnare Republican officeholders." Fawcett cited Ronnie Earle, Lehmberg's Democratic predecessor who brought charges against DeLay. He also sought indictments against former GOP US Senator Kay Bailey Hutchinson when she was state treasurer, as well as singling out other Republicans. Earle first elected in 1976, was replaced in January 2009 by Lehmberg. Fawcett said that Earle was "unrelenting in using extreme tactics of personal destruction to try and smear Republicans. That his successors would indict the governor for exercising his legitimate power is simply more of the same. The real crime here is the amount of taxpayer dollars the Travis County D.A.'s office uses in its witch hunts," she said. ~~~~ Perry can legally veto measures approved by the Texas Legislature, including part or all of the state budget. But Texans for Public Justice, a liberal government watchdog group that filed the ethics complaint leading to the inquiry, accused Perry of coercion because he threatened to use his veto before actually doing so, and thereby was trying to pressure Lehmberg to quit. TPJ executive director Craig McDonald said of the indictment : "We're pleased that the grand jury determined that the governor's bullying crossed the line into illegal behavior. The complaint had merit, serious laws were potentially broken." In responses echoing what Schoen told Newsmax, other strategists warned that Perry's indictment could very likely bolster any presidential bid. "GOP state-level activists love nothing more right now than a leader with the guts to stand up against a system they believe is failing the people and protecting the elites," Republican strategist Bruce Haynes of Purple Strategies told Politico. He urged Democrats eyeing the indictment as a weapon against the hard-driving Republican Rick Perry to "beware." "Ultimately, this may not be a threat to Perry as much as it is a gift," Haynes said. Some Texas Democrats, meanwhile, called on Perry to quit. "For the sake of Texas, Governor Perry should resign following his indictment on two criminal felony counts involving abuse of office," said Representative Joaquin Castro, the Austin American-Statesman reports. Texas Democratic Party Chairman Gilberto Hinojosa told the newspaper, "Governor Rick Perry has brought dishonor to his office, his family and the state of Texas." ~~~~~ Dear readers, dishonor? It is on the head of Texans for Public Justice and its executive director, Craig McDonald, for twisting the common sense of the law deliberately in order to gerry-rig a complaint against Governor Perry. Dishonor? It also rests on the head of Special Prosecutor Michael McCrum for taking rhe TPJ complaint seriously and pursuing it with a grand jury. In the United States, political arguments are settled at the ballot box. Courts are not political decisionmakers. Americans make political decisions by voting, but their decisions are being erased by ballot box losers. This unconstitutional use of the courts to "get" political opponents will bring down the American political system if it is not halted. Rick Perry's case may finally highlight and end this insidious attack on America's Constitution.

11 comments:

  1. I thought that the Tom Delay case was insane, now followed up by this travesty of justice. If this stands, if this gets any further down the road to an actual trial the Rule of Law will be forever blemished.

    When people make decisions to travel certain roads and not travel others, sometimes the errors cannot ever be mended. There are defining moments in the history of all nations and societies that guide them for hundreds of years. And when the mistake is fixed, the people are too far off course to ever return to where they once were.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The Democratic Party is nothing more than an organized crime syndicate, and the media is largely nothing more than their “hit” men.

      If it were not for the fact that politicians routinely either officially or practically exempt themselves from the laws and regulations they impose on the rest of us the daily conduct of the Democratic Party and their media enablers and apologists are precisely what the RICO (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) statutes are intended to address.

      The descent into tyranny progresses unimpeded.

      Delete
    2. To borrow the phrase from the time of the Kennedy clan - Gov. Rick Perry’s decision to take the steps he did was a true “profile in courage.” We don’t see much doing the right things coming from politicians today.

      Delete
  2. Be a nice Bi-Partisan move for Professor Alan Dershowitz to offer his services if this goes to trail. Could you see that on the evening news updates.

    ReplyDelete
  3. "Reputation is what men and women think of us; character is what God and angels know of us."
    Thomas Paine

    ReplyDelete
  4. This is a great opportunity for Perry to overcome the national image of being incompetent that he cast upon himself at the GOP Primaries in 2012.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If the Texas Legislature had voted to defund the Public Integrity Unit, would all those who had voted "Yea" be liable to criminal charges of abuse of power?
      This is absurd. But it’s that absurdity that is getting the attention isn’t it. The Below Average Thinkers (BAT’s) just love this simplistic, ignorant action by their hero’s in DC

      Delete
  5. The legality of this action against Perry is far beyond my commenting past the point of agreeing with Professor (did I say I agree with the legal beagle of the left) Alan Dershowitiz … “If you don’t like Rick Perry just don’t vote for him”. But this legal action seems to be so far removed from having any bearing on the matter at all.

    Let’s take a second and all look at the nearly 12 years Rick Perry has been governor of Texas and what an outstanding job he has done for ALL Texans – The Good, The Bad, The Ugly, and The Ones who never voted for him! Rick Perry has been an outstanding administrator – period. The economy of Texas is one to make Obama efforts at job creation, stabilizing unemployment, attacking relocating and start-up business to the Texas landscape.

    He talks the talk and walks the walk. Do his words and actions sometimes rile others – certainly? But that’s Rick Perry’s style I guess. And at the end of the day he is successful for Texas & would be for the nation (in some capacity) and that is why he’s been elected & re-elected 3 times.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Lanny Davis, yet another extreme leftists “big time” democratic operative said this morning to Newsmax:
    “Yet we see the shameful indictment of Texas Gov. Rick Perry by the Travis County (Austin) district attorney because Perry vetoed funding of the public corruption unit. He did so after the district attorney leading that unit had pleaded guilty to drunken driving.

    Whether or not Perry was right or wrong in vetoing that funding, motivated by good reasons or bad reasons, is not relevant. The voters get to decide that issue. But it is a perversion of the criminal justice system, a classic case of prosecutorial abuse, to indict Perry as a way of deciding the wisdom of his veto. Voters should decide that, not a prosecutor.

    It is even more outrageous to anyone who cares about due process and civil liberties to read the comments from local and state Democrats in the state Texas Democratic Party about the Perry indictment. Most of the comments I read used language of guilt or a presumption of wrongdoing because of the fact of the indictment.”

    If the democrats in Travis County, Texas don’t but a stop to this they will succeed in creating a most positive Soap Box for republicans to preach to the voters both informed and misinformed. This action in Travis County is so much bigger than they (democrat’s) wish it to be.

    ReplyDelete
  7. The problem that Gov. Rick Perry faces in Travis County, Texas with an overzealous, vengeful, inebriated District Attorney (Rosemary Lehmberg) is not about the withholding of $7.5 million dollars in budgeted funds for her office operation - not at all.

    It is about the misuse of judicial authority. It’s about righting some election result that occurred 3 times in 12 years that the DA of Travis County disagreed with all 3 times. It’s about her stupidity to comprehend her State of Texas Constitutional defined job. It is about power, and anger, and dead brain cells from too much alcohol over the years. It’s not about professional ability, but more about inability to understand that the people make election decisions at the ballot box on election day and not at the foot of some DA and Judge who need to be considered for a recall vote.

    This is akin to the happenings in Berlin, Germany years ago, or Stalingrad/St. Petersburg, Russia, N. Korea today, anywhere in the Middle East right now via the Islamic Jihad groups of thugs, and yes in Ferguson, Missouri as recent as last night.

    We don’t worry about the knock on the door – is it storm troopers coming to haul us away for some trumped up charges because the real violation was being an annoyance to an elected DA that has been elected to that position way too long.

    When your grandchildren look at you some day and ask …”Where were you on the August 15th, 2014 when elections became a legal action?”

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. WHAT WILL YOU SAY (sorry the last line didn't print

      Delete