Tuesday, December 17, 2013

Republicans Should Be Taking Aim at Democrats, Not Squabbling Among Themselves

According to an AP analysis, Republican leaders and several right wing groups are displaying "the classic signs of a political divorce." The conservative groups attack mainstream Republicans, causing the mainstreamers to question the motivation of those organizations. The groups accuse House Speaker John Boehner of having a hidden motive, thinking that he may want to move past their budget issues so he can tackle immigration legislation early next year, before the first round of 2014 primaries. The Senate Conservative lFund and Club for Growth often threaten to challenge mainstream Republicans in the primaries with conservative purists, often tea partiers who are already lining up primary opposition to GOP senior congressional leaders whose roles are often key in opposing left-leaning Democrat legislation and finding compromises that are more conservative. So, this is an extremely bad time for a "philosophical" fight inside the GOP family because there are several major federal issues that clearly favor Republicans in the lead-up to the 2014 elections. Instead of infighting over the nuances of Republicanism, all Republicans should be working together to preserve and increase their House majority and to take over the Senate. What are the major issues? ~~~~~ (1). All Republicans and conservatives must rejoice in the constitutional victory provided by US District Court Judge Richard Leon, a G. W. Bush appointee, who ruled yesterday that the NSA meta-sweep collection of internet traffic data is a violation of the Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable searches. Judge Leon stayed his order pending appeals. Leon concluded that the government didn't cite a single instance in which the program "actually stopped an imminent terrorist attack." He said : "I have serious doubts about the efficacy of the metadata collection program as a means of conducting time-sensitive investigations in cases involving imminent threats of terrorism." His order bars the government from collecting "any telephony metadata associated with their personal Verizon [the plaintiffs have Verison accounts] accounts" and requiring the government to "destroy any such metadata in its possession." Leon reasoned : "The Fourth Amendment typically requires 'a neutral and detached authority be interposed between the police and the public,' and it is offended by 'general warrants' and laws that allow searches to be conducted 'indiscriminately and without regard to their connections with a crime....I cannot imagine a more indiscriminate' and 'arbitrary invasion' than this systematic and high-tech collection and retention of personal data on virtually every single citizen for purposes of querying and analyzing it without prior judicial approval. Surely such a program infringes on 'that degree of privacy that the founders enshrined in the Fourth Amendment. Indeed I have little doubt that the author of our Constitution, James Madison, who cautioned us to beware 'the abridgement of freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachments by those in power, would be aghast." Leon went on to call the program "almost-Orwellian technology." The Obama administration has defended the program as a crucial tool against terrorism. ~~~~~ (2). Meanwhile, the Republican Party has a gigantic workhorse of an issue for the 2014 elections -- Americans who already have health insurance, that is 85% of Americans, blame President Obama's health care overhaul for their rising premiums and deductibles. And, a huge 75% say the rollout of coverage for the uninsured has gone poorly. This 85% of Americans, who were happy with their health insurance prior to Obamacare and who had their coverage disturbed by Obama's law, see their coverage being reduced while costs and deductibles are rising, and they say Obamacare is to blame. Nearly 4 in 5 (77%) blame the changes on Obamacare. Sixty-nine percent say their premiums will be going up, and 59% say annual deductibles or copayments are increasing. Fourteen percent said coverage for spouses is being restricted or eliminated, and 11% said their plan is being discontinued. Most Americans with employer-provided insurance looking at next year are really worried about what is going to happen," Robert Blendon told AP. Blendon is a professor at the Harvard School of Public Health, who tracks public opinion on health care issues. Predictably, political leanings somewhat affect perceptions of eroding coverage, with larger majorities of Republicans and independents saying their coverage will be affected, but even a majority of these Democrats see Obamacare as a threat to their health care costs and options. Also, the dysfunctional website has become a talisman for Republicans, allowing the GOP to attack Obama's infamous promise : "you can keep the coverage you have if you like it." Disapproval of Obama's handling of health care topped 60% in the poll. Only about one-fourth ofl who tried the website have managed to enroll. Half said they were not able to buy insurance, and the remaining quarter said they weren't sure what happened when they used the website. ~~~~~ Dear readers, Republicans are in an excellent position to come out on top in the 2014 congressional elections. Democrats are already having to defend themselves against GOP TV ad attacks showing them voting for and defending Obamacare. And the NSA appeals are going to put President Obama in the negative position of defending an obviously unconstitutional search of hundreds of millions of Americans who are simply using their personal phones and email. The last thing the Republican Party should do now is succumb to internal pressures and media baiting that will lead to the infighting that the media will then use to portray the GOP as being in disarray. That must not happen. The 2014 elections will save Ametica from Obama's leftist policies and no internal GOP squabbles should be allowed to interfere with this critically important goal for America.

5 comments:

  1. I agree wholeheartedly but you're talking about the REPUBLICAN PARTY and they don't know how to behave and stop in-fighting. They are masters at cutting their nose off to spite their face. They have no idea how to turn the other cheek. And finally, they don't want to kiss and make up because they love to stab their fellow GOPer in the back. And remember I'm a Republican.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think that this "disagreement" goes a bit further than just republican in-fighting. It's about core values and ability to stay the course, hold onto principals, and lastly realizing that the continued backpedaling of the GOP for years with the democrats in power in DC has lead the GOP to just where they are today ... confused and bewildered with no knowledge of what to do with all the ammunition that Obama has handed them. And NO leadership in either House that will lead them to victory and/or continued dominance in 2014.

    It's not the democrats that should be the target - they have virtually defeated themselves. It is our own worn and tired leaders that are going to give a breath of fresh air to the opponents in their pursuit of victory based on defeated, compromised, and just generally worn out ideas on bi-partisanship and confrontation.

    "We (GOP) have meet the enemy ... and he is us"

    ReplyDelete
  3. I am admittedly a political animal. I eat breath, and live politics. I have 1000’s of times been asked why I am a republican, and my quick and honest response is …” I find more true conservatism in the GOP than with the democratic party.”

    But today the winds of times are changing American politics. With the long accepted fact that the voting American public is split 40% republican, 40% democratic, and 20% not really being sure what they believe from one election to the next – the under informed percentage, the what’s in it for me crowd.If you break down that 20% crowd you’ll find approximately 7.5% will lean towards the republicans with a little issue education because of economics and foreign policy issues. While 7.5% will also float towards the democratic based on social and righting the world of injustices issues, responsibility vs. feel good issues.

    So to be honest many elections are unknowingly controlled by a mere 5% of the electorate. With that 5% make up being under informed voters that vote solely for “what’s in it for me today” issues. These are the people that are driven to the polls, paid to vote, receive the bulk of entitlement program dollars (ie tax payer’s contributions) get paid for having children they can’t afford, and not working while getting one unemployment extension after another.

    Now then MY definition of a “true conservative” party would be one that is grounded on the teachings of Jefferson, Locke, Burke, deTocqueville, William F. Buckley, Goldwater, Pres. Reagan, George Will, Dr. Krauthammer, Thomas Sowell, etc. Political philosophy based upon helping fellow human beings out of their immediate needs and giving them tools so they move on with and in control of their lives.

    Today though we are told in the GOP we need to diversify, to widen our base. This all means we need to more like the other party – the Democratic Party in order to give more control to that 5% that do little other than vote how they are told by community organizers. What we need to do is to strengthen the GOP party internally, get leadership, and stay true to our core values.

    I never thought I’d welcome a new Conservative party … but maybe it’s time to rethink the direction of the GOP. A split off Conservative Party would quickly be more appealing to voters who share their conservative core values.

    ReplyDelete
  4. The Republican Party does not need to take the ill advice of the various democratic pundits who know how to “strengthen” the GOP. We simply need to do something that everyone should do to their home computer every month … D E F R A G M E N T I T !

    That’s right we need to reorganize our attitudes, direction, leadership (or lack of). We need a tow truck to latch onto our bumper, pull us out of this ditch, and get us headed down the road again. This will not happen with unrecognizable names of leadership at the Republican National Committee (RNC).

    We need to clean out the mish mash of ideas, activities, selection of candidate’s procedures, and otherwise junky stuff that RNC sends our way disguised as “New Ideas”. New is not always better. The tried and proven sometimes is good for years and years.

    “Let me lie down and bleed awhile … and I shall rise to fight again” Well the GOP has laid down; we bleed, now it’s time to rise and do our job… “If not us who – If not now when” Pres. Reagan

    ReplyDelete
  5. If you have always believed that everyone should play by the same rules and be judged by the same standards, that would have gotten you labeled a radical 60 years ago, a liberal 30 years ago and a racist today.

    Thomas Sowell

    ReplyDelete